State must pay R26. 6m to motorist left a paraplegic after accident caused by pothole
Image: File
A pothole in the North West Province will cost the MEC of the Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport more than R26.6 million after a motorist was involved in an accident when she drove through the pothole, which left her a paraplegic.
The North West High Court, sitting in Mahikeng, ordered the department about three months ago to pay this amount to the plaintiff, only identified as Beauty. However, the department has to date not yet paid up.
Her attorney, Righardt Bezuidenhout, said the department promised that it would pay by Wednesday. However, by the time of publication, she has not yet been paid. When the department failed to pay her prior to now.
Bezuidenhout had obtained an order to attach the assets of the provincial department, to sell at auction in a bid to receive payment. The department, in the meantime, promised to make the payment in a bid to avoid its assets being sold at public auction.
Bezuidenhout earlier managed to secure an order against the provincial department after proving that the pothole was the cause of the accident, in which Beauty was left a paraplegic. She lost control of her car in 2014 when she hit the massive pothole on a public road, and her vehicle overturned.
The provincial department was held responsible as it was proved to have been negligent for not fixing the pothole earlier. The court was told that the pothole had been there for some time and that it was fixed a few days after the accident.
The provincial department was held 100% liable for the damages she could prove she had suffered as a result of the accident. Beauty was a highly functional nurse prior to the accident, but she is now left helpless and needs around-the-clock assistance.
During the second leg of the court case earlier this year, a host of experts were called in a bid to determine how much compensation Beauty should receive. The damages claimed by her were for past medical expenses, future medical expenses, loss of earnings, and general damages.
In determining her damages, Deputy Judge President Tebogo Djaje considered the fact that Beauty was employed as a professional nurse at the time of the accident. She had been in service for approximately 25 years.
Since the accident, she has not been employed and was medically boarded in 2016. She will not be able to return to work as she presents with a physical impairment of 77%, according to the orthopaedic surgeon.
Apart from being wheelchair-bound, she uses an indwelling catheter as well as nappies and is completely dependent on her daughter for assistance. The only physical activity that she can do is gardening to a limited degree.
According to the experts, the plaintiff will require extensive future treatment. Apart from spinal injuries, she also suffered a hip fracture, as well as shoulder and rib fractures. Her injuries further left her with several scars, and she lost four of her front teeth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
‘Inclusive' housing a start but we need deeper affordability in Cape Town
The City of Cape Town has announced housing development that is 'moving towards inclusion' – but inclusion for whom? Photo: File Sometime during July, I was scrolling through a property site, perusing accommodation options while trying to plan my future. I found a flat — two bedroom, bathroom, 115m² in Cape Town. 'That could work,' I think — until I see the price. R35 000 a month. I scroll further. Nothing under R19 000. I know I'm not the only Western Cape local who has had that gut-punch moment while trying to find a place to live. So, when the province's infrastructure MEC Tertuis Simmers announced on 25 July that new 'affordable' and 'social' housing development plans would soon be made available in Cape Town's inner city, I was intrigued. Sceptical, yes, but curious to hear the full story. But after reading The new developments — including the Leeuloop Precinct, the Founders Garden and the Prestwich Precinct — promise about 1 766 social housing units, 120 affordable housing units, and a total of 1 892 residential units. But these homes won't be offered on a first come, first served basis. Access depends on eligibility, which raises key questions about who qualifies and which income brackets will be prioritised. Simmers frames these developments as part of a broader effort to 'redress past spatial injustices'. But they also arrive in the shadow of the protracted The case centred on the province's 2015 decision to sell the Tafelberg property in Sea Point — one of the last well-located pieces of public land on the Atlantic Seaboard — to a private school, rather than using it for affordable housing. Activists argued that the sale entrenched apartheid-era spatial exclusion and that the city had also failed to use its powers to make inner-city land available for lower-income residents. Although the initial In his letter, Simmers draws a distinction between social housing and what used to be called RDP (Reconstruction and Development Programme) housing (now Breaking New Ground or BNG). Social housing refers to state-subsidised rental units for households earning R1 850 to R22 000 a month, regulated under the Social Housing Act and managed by accredited institutions. These units are exclusively to be rented and cannot be sold. In contrast, affordable housing, as defined by the Western Cape government, targets households earning R3 500 to R30 000 a month. This can include both rental and ownership options, often supported through indirect subsidies like cross-subsidisation (where market-rate units fund affordable ones) or discounted public land. Unlike social housing, affordable housing does not require oversight by the To fund all of this, the Western Cape government is pioneering alternative and blended finance approaches — combining public grants, private investment and land value strategies. One such strategy involves selling high-end units to subsidise affordable ones, as seen in Leeuloop and Founders Garden. This cross-subsidisation model is clever, but it carries risks, especially when 'public good' is tied to private market success. Who gets included? So, what exactly counts as 'affordable'? The income bracket defined — R3 500 to R30 000 a month (with 'primary targeting' of R3 500 to R27 200) — is both broad and politically charged. At the lower end are precariously employed workers, informal traders and grant-reliant households. For them, 'affordable' can only mean deep subsidies and permanent rent caps — the kind Simmers promises will be delivered. At the upper end are upwardly mobile professionals earning R25 000 or more, many of whom already have access to credit and housing finance. Yet they too fall under the 'affordable' banner, allowing developers to meet policy thresholds while catering to a far less precarious demographic. This raises some hard questions — will developments cater more to the R25 000+ income band than the R3 500 one? Will rent controls or purchase subsidies reflect this disparity or flatten it? And if they flatten it, who benefits most from this? By flattening such a wide spectrum into a single category, the policy risks hiding the very inequalities it claims to address. Developers can technically 'tick the box' for affordability while still targeting higher-income tenants who pose less financial risk. This matters. Back home, Johannesburg's inclusionary zoning policy — while progressive on paper — has struggled with To avoid repeating these failures, Cape Town's inclusionary housing policy needs more than ambition, it needs enforceable protections. At minimum, the city ??? must: Mandate permanent affordability clauses in all publicly subsidized housing contracts; Ringfence units for lower-income households (for example, R3 500 to R7 500 a month), with clear rent ceilings and oversight; and Publicly disclose allocations and affordability terms, to ensure transparency and accountability. Without these safeguards, affordability risks becoming a short-lived marketing tool, especially when it depends on market-rate units to cross-subsidise the rest. Proximity to wealth tends to redefine affordability over time, reshaping who belongs in a neighbourhood and who gets priced out. What inclusion should look like What bothered me most about Simmers' letter was both his opening — which I've referenced in this piece — and his end. I start with his opening in full: 'These projects are not just about building homes, they are about redressing spatial injustice, unlocking economic potential, and creating inclusive, dignified communities in the heart of Cape Town.' It's a powerful promise. And, to be clear, these projects aren't nothing. They mark a step up from elite-only development and signal an overdue acknowledgement of spatial exclusion. But it also risks becoming a symbolic gesture if we don't ask what meaningful inclusion actually looks like, beyond performance metrics and market-friendly strategies. Inclusionary housing is a promising start, but it cannot be the end goal of urban housing policy. A truly 'inclusive' housing policy would admit that the crisis isn't just about housing shortages. It's about land ownership, racialised inequality, labour precarity and historical exclusion. If inclusion is the goal, then it must be systemic, not symbolic. We need more than mixed-income buildings. We need a city that treats housing not as an asset class, but as a right. True inclusion means long-term affordability that doesn't depend on market success. While Simmers emphasised rental caps, what happens 10 or 20 years from now when land speculation returns? Who gets to stay then? We need models that prioritise stability over profit: community land trusts, cooperative housing and public land reserved for non-profit development. And we need those models to be protected from financialisation and resale. A few 'affordable' units scattered among luxury towers won't undo a century of exclusion. Inclusion must mean redistributing access to land, to services and to opportunity. That means building deep affordability in central areas, not just moderate affordability for professionals priced out of the suburbs. Simmers ends his letter by saying: 'Social and affordable housing in the inner city is no longer a dream …' and I wonder whether he realises what's actually keeping that dream out of reach — and for whom. The truth is, we can debate 'inclusion' until our faces turn blue. But unless we challenge the structural drivers of exclusion — runaway private rentals, the spread of Airbnb, the encroachment of 'digital nomad urbanism' — the dream of inner-city housing will remain just that: a dream. Even the most well-intentioned affordable housing projects will be drowned out by speculative forces unless they're accompanied by serious rental control, strong protections against commodification and a commitment to housing as a public good. To make this vision real, the city must legislate deep affordability, enforce it and ensure that inclusion means lasting access — not just temporary proximity. Nicola van der Westhuizen is a PhD candidate in social anthropology in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University.
Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Here's how South Africa can avoid the economic dependency path
Reindustrialisation, as well as diversified trade partners and dismantled apartheid spatial patterns, will get South Africa out of its socioeconomic mess. Photo: File South Africa's racialised capitalist system has been anchored on the minerals-energy-complex (MEC) since the 19th century. This economic structure is organised around fossil-fuel energy, segregated spatial development, market sector concentration and cheap black African migrant labour. The mining, energy, agricultural and upstream sectors linked with mining constituted the core sector drivers of the MEC. The structural composition of the MEC has been altered slightly since the country's democratic transition in the early 1990s because of macro-economic policy shifts and full reintegration in the global political economy. The most significant change is financialisation and the central role played by financial markets in South Africa's economy. Several literature sources analysing the post-1994 economy draw attention to positive and negative policy outcomes associated with this trend. Additionally, the growing introduction of digital and low-carbon technologies in all sectors aims to disrupt the traditional MEC economic logic. Our country is classified as a middle-income nation in various global indexes. But it still exhibits the structural socio-economic fault lines associated with economic path dependencies of lower income countries — deindustrialisation, low productivity, systemic inequality and uneven spatial development. South Africa should speedily implement strategic policy steps to avoid the negative socio-economic consequences produced by the path of dependency. First, place rebuilding the industrial base of the country at the centre of macro-economic policy planning and implementation. Fiscal, monetary and trade policy strategies should complement this objective in several ways. This requires improved policy coordination and political will to place reindustrialisation socio-economic indicators such as manufacturing growth and domestic value chain linkages at the apex of development outcome assessments. A narrow focus on GDP growth without disaggregating overall sector drivers underpinning economic growth should be avoided. Second, South Africa requires a growth path that emphasises creating demand in the economy. This is essential for two reasons: a demand-led economic development trajectory reduces inequality and addresses free market failures. A good starting point is connecting our social wage expenditure on housing, education, health and public infrastructure with clearly defined industrial policy targets. These linkages will create employment, support localisation, enhance skills development and drive aggregate economic demand. An additional lever for raising demand is addressing South Africa's astronomical wage disparities. Several labour market analyses point to race and gendered pay income gaps that impede economic growth and development. Interventions such as the minimum wage, sectoral determinisations, Companies Act and Employment Equity Act amendments are useful policy options for addressing wage inequalities. Third, our country needs to diversify trade partnerships and deepen its connection with African regional trade networks. The shift towards economic nationalism globally puts countries that are overly dependent on one or two export markers at greater risk. Thus, it is imperative to adapt to changing international political economy trends so that South Africa's national development goals can be achieved. There are several opportunities for trade diversification that should be explored by policymakers. These include the African Continental Free Trade Area and Brics trade strategies, which present opportunities for technology transfer, integration into global value chains, investment attraction and employment creation. But South African trade policy negotiators must avoid the narrow East versus West trade partner categorisation that misses the political economy nuances in trade treaties or agreements. For example, several actors assume that trading with partners in the Global South will automatically produce positive socio-economic returns. The empirical evidence on these trade relationships counters this assertion. Last, it is important to dismantle colonial and apartheid spatial development patterns. The transition to democracy has not addressed this matter adequately and it needs urgent attention. Recent debates on redesigning rural and township economies are useful because they shift the dominant paradigm, which reduces governance in these areas to service delivery and maintaining the law. We need to rethink and broaden conceptions of development in municipalities so that they are based on industrial diversification, local value chain creation, increasing access to public goods and protecting global commons. This requires local economic development planning that is not solely dependent on household rates and taxes. Municipalities should diversify revenue sources and create economic development planning around sectors that produce the following socio-economic outcomes: enhanced job creation, skill development opportunities, technological upgrading and increased local manufacturing. Dr Khwezi Mabasa is a lecturer at the REAL centre: University of Witwatersrand.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Women unite to mark 69 years since iconic march
The Gauteng Provincial Government, in partnership with the Tshwane metro, hosted the annual Women's Day celebration at the Union Buildings on Saturday. Marking the 69th anniversary of the historic 1956 Women's March, the event was held under the theme 'Building Resilient Economies for All'. The day began with a powerful re-enactment of the march, as the women in the safety and security cluster led a 2.2km procession from Tshwane House, located on the corner of Lillian Ngoyi and Madiba streets, to the Union Buildings. Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi and other government officials joined the march, paying tribute to the courage of the women who fought for freedom. Addressing the crowd at the Union Buildings, Premier Lesufi highlighted the importance of unity and economic empowerment for women. The celebration continued with a music festival featuring an all-female line-up. MEC for Sport, Arts, Culture and Recreation, Matome Chiloane, said the province had made significant strides in creating an enabling environment for women to thrive. 'Over the years, Gauteng has created an enabling environment for women to thrive both in their personal and professional lives. 'Investing in women and girls in areas such as sport, education, healthcare, and economic opportunities will remain one of the province's priorities,' he said. He said they salute the achievements of women over the years, including their pivotal role in transforming the nation, and their contributions to socio-economic development. 'We will continue to honour women from different spheres of life for their remarkable achievements and overcoming challenges and societal barriers.' An on-site government and business expo brought services closer to residents, with organisations such as SARS, Home Affairs, SASSA, the Department of Health and economic development agencies offering assistance and information to attendees. ALSO READ: New training aims to empower communities to tackle rising child kidnappings Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
