Ecuador: 8 people killed in shooting outside nightclub – DW – 08/11/2025
Eight people were killed and two others were injured in a shooting outside a nightclub in southwestern Ecuador, police said Sunday.
Police Colonel Javier Chango told a press conference that seven people died at the scene, and another died in the hospital.
The attack took place in Santa Lucia, a town with a population of 38,000 in the Guayas — one of the four provinces under a two-month state of emergency decreed earlier this week by President Daniel Noboa to combat gang violence.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Chango explained that the gunmen arrived in two pickup trucks and opened fire on the crowd drinking outside the Napoles nightclub at 1:15 am local time (0615 GMT).
After the attack, they fled along an "unknown route," Chango said. Police also found 800 cartridge cases at the scene.
Among the dead was the nightclub owner Jorge Urquizo, the brother of Santa Lucia's mayor.
The police have not determined a motive for the shooting.
"We are open to all hypotheses; we can't rule any out yet," said Chango.
Ecuador closed the first half of 2025 with 4,619 homicides — a 47% increase compared to the same period last year.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a day ago
- DW
Sweden: man shot dead outside mosque – DW – 08/15/2025
One man was killed and another injured after shots were fired outside a mosque in the Swedish city of Orebro. Police suspect the incident is related to organized crime rather than the mosque itself. A 25-year-old man was shot dead after leaving a mosque in the Swedish city of Orebro on Friday, local police confirmed. "We are speaking to eye witnesses," a police spokesman told the AFP news agency, adding that officers were looking for the "culprit or culprits." Another man, also reportedly in his 20s, was also injured in the incident which is believed to linked to organized crime. "I want to stress that currently, we don't see any connection to the mosque," said the police spokesman. "On the other hand, we do see a connection to criminal groups." Police have launched investigations into murder, attempted murder and aggravated weapons offenses. Swedish authorities have been battling against armed criminal gangs for several years now. Criminal gangs often recruit teenagers in socially disadvantaged immigrant neighborhoods to carry out hits. Local broadcaster TV4 reported recent tensions between two rival Orebro gangs. Orebro, located around 200 kilometers (124 miles) west of the capital, Stockholm, made headlines earlier this year when a 35-year-old forced his way into an adult education center and shot dead ten people before turning his weapon on himself. The incident was the deadliest firearms incident in Swedish history. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
a day ago
- DW
Washington legal chief sues Trump over police takeover – DW – 08/15/2025
The nation's capital has been challenging the president's move to seize control of its police force. City leaders have called it the gravest threat to autonomy from federal power in decades. Washington, DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb on Friday filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block US President Donald Trump's takeover of the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). The legal challenge came hours after US Attorney General Pam Bondi named Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as the department's emergency commissioner. Schwalb said the lawsuit asks the court to rule that Trump's action is illegal. "The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home," he said. "This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it." Bondi's directive, issued Thursday night, gives Cole authority over the powers and duties of the police chief. She ordered that the MPD must receive Cole's approval before issuing any directives. Mayor Muriel Bowser wrote that "there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official." It remains unclear how the move affects Police Chief Pamela Smith, who works for the mayor. Neither Bondi's office nor the White House responded immediately to requests for comment. Bondi rescinded several MPD policies, including a recent directive from Smith allowing limited cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Justice Department said Bondi opposed the chief's order because it still allowed so-called "sanctuary policies" that restrict local law enforcement's ability to assist in immigration enforcement. Smith had instructed Metropolitan Police Department officers to share information with immigration agencies about people not in custody, such as those stopped at traffic checks. However, she said other MPD policies remain in place, restricting inquiries into immigration status and prohibiting arrests based solely on federal immigration warrants. Schwalb told Smith in a memo that "members of MPD must continue to follow your orders and not the orders of any official not appointed by the Mayor.' Trump said Monday he was deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city's police department to address what he called a crime emergency. Federal law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and Customs and Border Protection have been patrolling streets and making arrests. Residents have reported a heavy federal presence, with Humvee vehicles positioned at Union Station and National Guard troops at major landmarks.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Could Trump repeat his DC intervention in other cities? – DW – 08/15/2025
US President Donald Trump has sent the National Guard into Washington, D.C. and may well have other major cities in his sights. The arrival of 800 US National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. at the direction of President Donald Trump has been framed as an "authoritarian push" by the mayor of the nation's capital. Trump has also named other cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Baltimore, as possible future targets if they don't address their own local crime issues. But it's not clear that Trump could replicate his capital intervention across state lines, and a court case in California, where he also deployed Guardsmen and Marines in June, could narrow his scope further. Trump cast his decision to involve the National Guard in Washington as a crime crackdown, calling it "Liberation Day" and claiming the city needed rescuing from "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." The police will now sit under the supervision of US Attorney General Pam Bondi who has appointed Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as "emergency police commissioner." But federal data contradicts Trump's claim, with statistics showing that DC's violent crime is at a 30-year low. Critics say that based on this, there is no emergency that requires a military presence in the capital. "The numbers simply do not justify this measure," said Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser. So if crime has been going down in Washington, why the intervention? "It does look, if you look at the data, [like] crime is going down," said Laura Dickinson, a law professor at George Washington University, US. "City officials have not asked for help [from the president] so it really does seem at best questionable." "This is really problematic and contrary to our tradition in the United States, where we've been very cautious about using the military to do law enforcement functions," Dickinson added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In part, because he can. Washington, D.C. (which stands for District of Columbia) is not part of any US state and largely falls under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Under the 1973 Home Rule Act, presidents can take control of the DC police during emergencies for 30 days without congressional approval. And because it's a federal enclave, the president also commands the city's National Guard. Some US commentators have observed the move could be a political attempt to distract from ongoing controversy related to the Epstein Files and the release of jobs figures that showed a rise in unemployment. Trump's popularity in his flagship policy areas — in particular immigration — has also recently declined. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While Trump and his allies have pointed to city crime as justification for the move, his opponents inside and outside of congress say the action is designed to exact control over cities that do not support Congressional Black Caucus, which currently has no Republican members, also said the cities named by Trump as potential targets all have the common thread of being led by Black mayors, labelling the move a "blatantly racist and despicable power grab." The presidency has fewer powers outside of the nation's capital. The governors of the 50 US states preside over the National Guard within their own borders. It's a key distinction that William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, US, said would make it far more difficult for Trump to follow through on threats to extend interventions beyond the federal enclave of Washington, D.C. "It would be unwise, I think to generalize this example and apply it to other places in the United States," Banks told DW. "He can't go to Chicago or Philadelphia or New York City or Los Angeles and do the same thing. He simply doesn't have the authority." But what about in June, when he deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles? Banks said there are provisions for limited interventions to protect federal property and personnel, but Trump "was walking on very thin ice." "His argument was that they were needed to ensure that the protesters didn't destroy federal property or harm ICE and other immigration personnel who are on the ground there doing their job." While they can protect federal assets, military personnel are banned from being actively used in domestic policing by the Posse Comitatus Act. In California, a three-day trial investigating whether the deployment of the National Guard was in breach of this law, and potentially unconstitutional, has recently wrapped up, with a decision pending. While the decision would only apply in California, it could give clarity on the outcome of future litigation if the president took a similar course in other states. "Obviously, it would be quite relevant how the court decides," Dickinson told DW. But Dickinson believes there's a wider question confronting the armed forces — using them to patrol American cities could impact how these institutions are perceived by the public. "It could damage the credibility and respect that Americans have for the military and the National Guard," Dickinson said. "These are some of the few institutions in the United States that enjoy very broad bipartisan support." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Federal command of the DC police ends after 30 days, unless the Republican-controlled Congress approves an extension. The National Guard can remain active indefinitely. Despite alarms being raised by Trump's opponents, who are calling the move an authoritarian flex, Banks expects a return to the status quo is more likely, particularly when it comes to threats to other states. He said the United States' foundational history overthrowing the British military, and the norm that law enforcement should be maintained by civilian police, are crucial in understanding what Americans will accept in their communities. "Our situation is somewhat unique in the United States in not having any expectation of military involvement in law enforcement," Banks told DW. "We don't like military uniforms on our streets, we don't like men and women with guns patrolling our streets, it just rubs against the grain. "Posse Comitatus codifies that principle, but I think the norm is even more important and more fundamental."
