Germany's Merz faces pressure to toughen stance on Israel
Merz, who leads Germany's center-right CDU, has been increasingly critical of Israel. But Germany was notably absent from the joint statement issued on Monday by the EU and 28 Western countries including Britain and France, which called on Israel to immediately end the war.
The countries condemned what they called the 'drip feeding of aid' to Palestinians in Gaza and said it was 'horrifying' that more than 800 civilians had been killed while seeking aid.
Reem Alabali Radovan, international development minister in Merz's cabinet and a member of the center-left SPD junior coalition partners, said on Tuesday she was unhappy with Germany's decision not to sign it.
'The demands in the letter from the 29 partners to the Israeli government are understandable to me. I would have wished for Germany to join the signal sent by the 29 partners,' she said.
Merz's office says Germany's criticism of Israel is similar to that of other allies. Merz said on Tuesday he had told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'very clearly and very explicitly that we do not share the Israeli government's policy on Gaza.'
'Above all we see the great suffering of the civilian population there. That is why I would like to once again renew my call to truly provide the necessary humanitarian aid to the civilian population in the Gaza Strip. The way the Israeli army is operating there is not acceptable,' he said.
Government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said that although Germany did not sign the joint declaration, Merz and his foreign minister 'expressed very critical views of Israel's actions in the Gaza Strip yesterday – and in terms of substance and significance, said the same thing.'
'Their statements are in no way inferior to the joint declaration,' Kornelius said.
But the decision to withhold Germany's signature from the declaration follows many months in which Germany has taken particular care in public to restrain its criticism of Israeli actions.
German officials say their approach to Israel is governed by a special responsibility, known as the Staatsraeson, arising from the legacy of the Nazi Holocaust. They believe they can achieve more through diplomatic back channels than public statements.
German statements on Gaza typically include a demand for the immediate release of hostages held by Hamas. The joint statement that Merz declined to sign to this week stopped short of such a demand, although it noted that the hostages were suffering under worsening conditions.
Merz is one of the few European leaders who has publicly offered to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, without arresting him on a warrant for suspected war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
Israel rejects the charges against Netanyahu and says they are political motivated. The ICC says all signatories of the court's founding statute, which include all 27 EU members, are obliged to arrest Netanyahu if he enters their territory.
Critics of Merz's approach, including within the SPD coalition partners, say the legacy of the Holocaust cannot be an excuse for ignoring Israeli crimes, and, on the contrary, the post-Holocaust motto of 'never again' should apply to Gaza now.
'The situation in Gaza is catastrophic and represents a humanitarian abyss,' said a joint statement by two senior SPD lawmakers - foreign policy spokesperson Adis Ahmetovic and rapporteur for the Middle East Rolf Mützenich - who called for Berlin to join the joint declaration.
There should be 'clear and immediate consequences' for Israel, including the suspension of a pact governing EU-Israeli relations and a halt to the export of weapons to Israel that are used in violation of international law, they said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
42 minutes ago
- Leaders
Brazil to Join South Africa's ICJ Genocide Case against Israel
The Brazilian Foreign Ministry revealed on Wednesday that the country is currently finalizing its submission to join South Africa's genocide case against Israel's war in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, according to Reuters. Brazil also accused the Israeli government of violating the international law by annexing the territories 'by force.' Meanwhile, Israel denies deliberately targeting Palestinian civilians, stressing that its objective is to eliminate Hamas. Lawyers for Israel have also labeled South Africa's case as an abuse of the genocide convention. 'The breaking of Brazil's long-standing friendship and partnership with Israel is a misguided move that proves the extremism of our foreign policy,' Brazil's National Israeli association CONIB said in a statement. Strong Condemnation In June, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva condemned Israeli war on Gaza and called it a 'premeditated genocide,' during his visit to Paris. 'This is not a war. It is genocide. A genocide being carried out by a highly trained army, against women and children' Lula said at a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris. '[It is] a premeditated genocide from a far-right government that is waging a war, including against the interests of its own people,' he said. This was not the first time for Lulu to use the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's actions in Gaza. Genocide Case South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians, following Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023. It submitted various evidence claiming, 'acts and omissions' by Israel 'are genocidal, aimed at bringing about' the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group'. South Africa accused the Israeli occupation of carrying out air strikes and killing thousands of Palestinians, mentioning comments from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as evidence of 'genocidal intent'. Since the beginning of Hamas-Israel War in Gaza in 2023, the Israeli strikes have killed more than 57,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 137,000, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Countries Joining Genocide Case Other countries such as Spain, Turkey, and Colombia have also sought to join the case against Israel. Turkey joined the case as a response to Israel's violations during the war on Gaza after it has already taken serious steps against Israel, such as the restrictions on some exports. Moreover, Nicaragua's application was submitted under Article 62 of the ICJ Statute, requesting intervention in South Africa's case against Israel. Columbia supported South Africa's case and requested a different type of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute to assist the Court in interpreting the provisions of the Convention in this case. Israel's Response Israel fiercely dismissed the case and accused South Africa of presenting 'grossly distorted' allegations of genocide. Israel insists that its bloody war in Gaza is 'self-defense,' and it targets Hamas, not the Palestinians, and that its leaders have shown no genocidal intent, reported CNN. In addition, it asked the UN court to dismiss the case on the grounds that the evidence is 'unfounded.' The ICJ also ordered Israel to stop its Rafah military assault in Gaza in response to a complaint from South Africa. It also ruled Israel must keep Rafah crossing open for 'unhindered' humanitarian aid. The ICJ also ordered Israel to submit a report to the court within one month containing all measures taken to comply with the order. In April 2024, the court set deadlines for the parties to submit their evidence and counter-memorials, which will be October 28, 2024, and July 28, 2025, respectively. Related Topics: ICJ Rejects Israel's Bid to Dismiss Genocide Case Cuba to Join South Africa's Genocide Case against Israel at ICJ The Hague Group: More Nations Join Legal Efforts Against Israel Short link : Post Views: 20


Leaders
44 minutes ago
- Leaders
Knesset Passes ‘Symbolic' Motion to Annex West Bank
Over 70 Israeli lawmakers passed a motion in the Knesset on Wednesday, calling on the government to annex the West Bank amid mounting violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians, according to AFP. Symbolic Motion Members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing coalition and some opposition lawmakers have supported this non-binding vote in the Knesset. However, this symbolic move has nothing to do with the Palestinian territory's legal status. Moreover, fifteen Israeli Cabinet Ministers from Netanyahu's Likud party have recently pushed him to immediately annex the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The lawmakers have signed a petition requesting the administration 'to apply sovereignty over Judea and Samaria (West Bank) before the end of the Knesset summer session,' which ends on July 27. They also implied that the current moment is appropriate for the annexation thanks to strong US-Israeli relations and the recent military gains. On Wednesday, lawmakers stressed that annexing the West Bank 'will strengthen the state of Israel, its security and prevent any questioning of the fundamental right of the Jewish people to peace and security in their homeland.' They justified this move by stating that the West Bank was an integral part of the realization of Zionism and the national vision of the Jewish people. Palestinian Rejection In a response to this move, Hussein Al-Sheikh, Deputy to Palestinian Authority President Mahmud Abbas, described the motion as 'a direct assault on the rights of the Palestinian people.' Al-Sheikh also noted that it undermines the prospects for peace, stability and the two-state solution. 'These unilateral Israeli actions blatantly violate international law and the ongoing international consensus regarding the status of the Palestinian territories, including the West Bank,' he wrote on X. Mounting Settler Violence The UN Human Rights Office said that violence against Palestinians in the West Bank is growing with increasing number of killings and attacks by settlers and security forces, according to Reuters. Approximately 1 million Israeli settlers live in illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in violation of international law. OHCHR noted that settlers have launched 757 attacks on Palestinians or their properties since January 2025. Building Jewish State In May, Defense Minister Israel Katz said that Israel planned to build a 'Jewish Israeli state' in the occupied West Bank, according to Al-Arabiya. Katz's remarks followed Israel's announcement of the creation of 22 new settlements in the West Bank. He also noted that the new settlements would be a clear message to French President Emmanuel Macron and his associates: they will recognize a Palestinian state on paper – but Israel will build the Jewish Israeli state here on the ground. Related Topics: Time for Decisive Action: Over 100 Aid Agencies Warn of Mass Starvation in Gaza Palestinians Protest against Settler Outpost at West Bank Israel Kills American Citizens in West Bank, Anger Turns toward US Short link : Post Views: 33

Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Europeans to test Iran's appetite for nuclear compromise as sanctions loom
France, Britain and Germany will hold face-to-face talks with Iran on Friday for the first time since US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in June, aiming to gauge Tehran's appetite for a compromise to avert sanctions, diplomats say. The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to a 2015 deal – from which the US withdrew in 2018 – that lifted sanctions on Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear program. Friday's talks between senior diplomats from the so-called E3 group and Iran's negotiating team will be held in Istanbul. The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which US President Donald Trump said had 'obliterated' a program that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at acquiring a nuclear bomb. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon. European and Iranian diplomats say there is no prospect of Iran re-engaging with the US at the negotiating table for now. But the Europeans say negotiations must be revived due to a halt in inspections of nuclear facilities by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and as an October 18 deadline for the expiration of the 2015 deal draws closer. They also want answers over the location of 400 kg (880 pounds) of near-weapons grade highly enriched uranium, whose whereabouts have not been known since last month's strikes. 'We are determined to do everything to reach a diplomatic solution,' German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told a press conference in Paris on July 18. Snapback or extension? Under the terms of the UN Security Council resolution enshrining the 2015 deal, UN sanctions could be reimposed before the agreement expires – a process that would take about 30 days. The E3, who do not want to lose leverage by letting the deal expire, have warned that unless there is a new nuclear accord they will launch the 'snapback mechanism,' which would restore all previous UN sanctions on Iran, including on the oil, banking and defense sectors. With Russia – an ally of Iran – taking over the Security Council presidency in October, the three European countries have signaled that the latest window to reactivate the sanctions would be the end of August. Three European, one regional and an Iranian diplomat said the meeting in Istanbul would focus primarily on the issue of the snapback mechanism. They said the E3 would float the possibility to Iran of extending the snapback mechanism by up to six months. In return, Iran would need to make commitments on key issues, including eventual talks with Washington, full cooperation with the IAEA, and accounting for its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Speaking to reporters at the UN on Wednesday, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who will be in Istanbul, said Tehran had agreed to allow a technical team from the IAEA to visit in the coming weeks. He warned that a triggering of the snapback mechanism would be met with a strong response from Tehran. It has previously threatened to leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) over the issue. Gharibabadi added that he had heard about the possibility of an extension. 'That's very premature now to discuss the issue of the extension. We have almost about three months actually, till the deadline of 18th of October,' he said. A Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the US was 'coordinated' with the E3 when asked whether Washington was discussing the reimposition of sanctions with them, but declined to elaborate. Israel's Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer was in Paris on Thursday and due to meet French officials for talks on various subjects, including Iran, four sources said. Israel launched the attacks on Iran saying it wanted to remove any chance of its arch-foe developing nuclear weapons.