logo
I have a 2000 Apple iMac DV with original packaging - will it grow in value if I keep it? DAN HATFIELD replies

I have a 2000 Apple iMac DV with original packaging - will it grow in value if I keep it? DAN HATFIELD replies

Daily Mail​03-05-2025

I have an Apple iMac computer that I bought in 2000. It also comes with a printer. It's all in working order.
Is it worth much - and would it be better to hold onto it as a future collectible? Mike, via email.
Dan Hatfield, This is Money resident expert valuer, replies: Launched in an optimistic decade - the time of Britney Spears, TV show Big Brother, and collective relief that the world didn't end with a Millennium bug - it's a piece of modern-day nostalgia.
In the decade previous, technology leapt - and it gave us some iconic pieces of tech, including the first version of your computer, the iMac G3 in 1998.
It had me thinking about how staggeringly far we've come since the turn of the millennium, with modern computers now being around 1,000 times more powerful than yours - and that's no exaggeration.
It's quite amazing, really, we often think of the year 2000 as 'not that long ago', and yet a quarter of a century has passed so in tech terms it's been light years.
For most of human history, progress moved at a snail's pace, measured in lifetimes, not years.
Stone tools lasted millennia, the wheel took centuries to catch on, and writing systems evolved over generations. Advancement was historically, glacial.
Then came the 20th century, a time of electricity, flight, nuclear energy, and the birth of computing.
We didn't just pick up speed, we hit warp drive.
We are living through a technological revolution so vast it makes the Industrial Revolution look quaint.
Computers are now shaping how we live, think, communicate and even what it means to be human. And machines like your iMac? They're part of that story. Small in size, maybe but part of a seismic societal shift.
Now, let's talk about the brand who created your item, Apple. Founded in 1976 in a California garage by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne, the company had its ups and downs.
By the mid 90s, Apple was struggling. They had unfocused product lines and a dwindling market share.
Then in 1997, Steve Jobs returned to the company he'd been ousted from 12 years earlier. His comeback was nothing short of legendary.
He cut the clutter, refocused the brand, and in 1998 launched the iMac G3, a computer that threw out the beige box and ushered in a new age of cool, colourful, consumer-friendly tech.
This wasn't just about performance it was about personality. Technology was no longer just practical, it was aspirational.
Apple wasn't just making computers but was reshaping our relationship with them.
Your model, although from the year 2000, is part of that very lineage.
The iMac DV (short for Digital Video) was launched at the very dawn of the new millennium, arriving in late 1999.
It built on the success of the earlier iMac G3 but added FireWire ports and better performance for users wanting to dive into digital video editing, something previously reserved for professionals. This machine helped to put creativity into the hands of the everyday user.
Now, I'm not going to get too technical, the history of tech is about as far as a self-proclaimed luddite can stretch.
But what I do know is that the iMac DV was a huge success, paving the way for Apple's meteoric rise - and when I say meteoric, I mean it.
As of 2025, Apple is one of the most valuable companies on the planet, with a market capitalisation of over £3trillion.
Now, I might be rubbish with tech, but I'm decent with money, and even I can't wrap my head around how many zeroes that involves!
Today, nostalgia for the iMac is strong. It's the grandparent of over 2billion Apple devices currently in use.
Apple isn't just a tech company but moreover a cultural phenomenon and early machines like yours, from its comeback years, are increasingly collectable.
The original Bondi Blue iMac G3s are especially sought after, fetching £300 to £500, depending on colour and condition.
You're quid's in If you've got the original box and accessories as this all adds to the value.
While yours isn't the first iMac, it's the DV version that soon followed which is still a lovely bit of Apple history.
Most people through the packaging and manuals as soon as the computer hits their desk, so it's great that you still have these as this further adds value.
What could also add value is the colour of yours as the sage green model is particularly desirable within the collector community.
Given its excellent condition, I'd expect you to fetch around £300. If you were to sell it online, you'd likely see offers beginning around £200 but don't be tempted to bite too early, definitely hold out for an offer that starts with a 3, not a 2.
Given how many of these machines were mass produced, I think the price is pretty impressive.
But, as technology continues to evolve at breakneck speed and nostalgia for the early days of computing becomes more historic, I wouldn't be surprised if these iMacs start fetching close to £1,000 in the next 15 to 20 years.
So, there you have it, a little machine with a big legacy. A computer that once whirred to life in Y2K, and now sits as a cherished time capsule of a simpler digital age.
And if that doesn't make you want to dance to a bit of NSYNC and fire up MSN Messenger, I don't know what will.
Send in your Modern Treasures
Dan Hatfield is This Morning's money-making expert and resident pawnbroker. He is an international specialist in antiques, jewellery, diamonds and collectibles.
Dan's first non-fiction book, Money Maker: Unlock Your Money Making Potential (£16.99, published by Hodder Catalyst) is available now.
This is Money's Modern Treasures column is after your items and collections for valuations.
Please send in as much information as possible, including photographs, to: editor@thisismoney.co.uk with the email subject line: Modern Treasures
We're after post-War items only please and we may contact you for further information.
Dan will do his best to reply to your message in his bi-weekly column, but he won't be able to answer everyone or correspond privately with readers.
Nothing in his replies constitutes regulated financial advice. Published questions are sometimes edited for brevity or other reasons.
As with anything, if you are looking to sell items and collections, it is wise to get a second and third opinion - not just rely on Dan's suggestions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity
How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity

The Guardian

time8 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

How AI pales in the face of human intelligence and ingenuity

Gary Marcus is right to point out – as many of us have for years – that just scaling up compute size is not going to solve the problems of generative artificial intelligence (When billion-dollar AIs break down over puzzles a child can do, it's time to rethink the hype, 10 June). But he doesn't address the real reason why a child of seven can solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle that broke the computers: we're embodied animals and we live in the world. All living things are born to explore, and we do so with all our senses, from birth. That gives us a model of the world and everything in it. We can infer general truths from a few instances, which no computer can do. A simple example: to teach a large language model 'cat', you have to show it tens of thousands of individual images of cats – being the way they are, they may be up a tree, in a box, or hiding in a roll of carpet. And even then, if it comes upon a cat playing with a bath plug, it may fail to recognise it as a cat. A human child can be shown two or three cats, and from interacting with them, it will recognise any cat as a cat, for life. Apart from anything else, this embodied, evolved intelligence makes us incredibly energy-efficient compared with a computer. The computers that drive an autonomous car use anything upwards of a kilowatt of energy, while a human driver runs on twentysomething watts of renewable power – and we don't need an extra bacon sandwich to remember a new route. At a time of climate emergency, the vast energy demands of this industry might perhaps lead us to recognise, and value, the extraordinary economy, versatility, plasticity, ingenuity and creativity of human intelligence – qualities that we all have simply by virtue of being HaymanAdvisory board member, Minderoo Centre for Technology & Democracy, Cambridge University It comes as no surprise to me that Apple researchers have found 'fundamental limitations' in cutting-edge artificial intelligence models (Advanced AI suffers 'complete accuracy collapse' in face of complex problems, study finds, 9 June). AI in the form of large reasoning models or large language models (LLMs) are far from being able to 'reason'. This can be simply tested by asking ChatGPT or similar: 'If 9 plus 10 is 18 what is 18 less 10?' The response today was 8. Other times, I've found that it provided no definitive answer. This highlights that AI does not reason – currently, it is a combination of brute force and logic routines to essentially reduce the brute force approach. A term that should be given more publicity is ANI – artificial narrow intelligence, which describes systems like ChatGPT that are excellent at summarising pertinent information and rewording sentences, but are far from being able to reason. But note, the more times that LLMs are asked similar questions, the more likely it will provide a more reasonable response. Again, though, this is not reasoning, it is model TaylorMona Vale, New South Wales, Australia Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Apple wins appeal to overturn $300 mln US patent verdict
Apple wins appeal to overturn $300 mln US patent verdict

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Apple wins appeal to overturn $300 mln US patent verdict

June 17 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab has convinced a U.S. appeals court to throw out a $300 million verdict by a jury that found it infringed wireless standard-essential patents owned by IP management company Optis Wireless Technology. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Monday sent Optis' case back, opens new tab to Texas for a new trial after determining that the jury instructions in the previous trial were flawed. The decision marks the second time that a nine-figure U.S. patent verdict for Optis has been overturned in the case. Attorneys and spokespeople for Optis and Apple did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment on the Federal Circuit ruling. Plano, Texas-based Optis and its affiliates sued Apple in 2019 in Marshall, Texas federal court, arguing that the tech giant's iPhones and other products violated their patent rights in technology related to the LTE wireless standard. A jury found in 2020 that Apple owed $506 million for infringing Optis' patents. U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap ordered a new trial on damages in 2021 after finding the award may not have been in line with Optis' responsibility to license the standard-essential patents on fair and reasonable terms. A new jury awarded Optis $300 million in damages after the retrial later that year. The Federal Circuit on Monday overturned the award and remanded the case for a new trial on both infringement and damages. A three-judge panel said Gilstrap improperly worded the jury verdict form by combining all of the patents at issue into a single infringement question. "The problem with the district court's single infringement question is that it deprived Apple of its right to a unanimous verdict on each legal claim against it," the appeals court said. A UK court separately ruled last month that Apple owes Optis $502 million for infringing Optis' UK wireless patents. Apple has said that it plans to appeal the ruling. The case is Optis Cellular Technology LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 22-1925. For Optis: Willy Jay of Goodwin Procter For Apple: Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr Read more: Apple socked with $506 million patent verdict in East Texas Apple wins new damages trial in $506 million patent loss Apple hit with $300 million patent verdict after new Optis trial

'I shopped in a mystery tech bundle that rivals Wowcher and got £99 earphones for less'
'I shopped in a mystery tech bundle that rivals Wowcher and got £99 earphones for less'

Daily Record

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Record

'I shopped in a mystery tech bundle that rivals Wowcher and got £99 earphones for less'

Mystery bundles are popular with tech shoppers looking to bag high-end devices for as little as a tenner - here's how From a speedy Ninja airfryer to make cooking less of a hassle, a Nintendo Switch console, to a 65-inch TV, these are just some of the products shoppers could get from as little as £9.99 in the latest Tech Mystery deal from Wowcher, for those unfamiliar with it it's notoriously a pot-luck sale. While it's not guaranteed what items shoppers will walk away with, the raffle-style tickets see some shoppers get huge items for less than a tenner. This deal is divided into two categories - Standard and Premium both of which offer shoppers different options for their money. In the cheapest bundle items on the list include the Amazon Echo Show 5, Apple Watch Series 6, while one of the most offered items is a laptop sleeve. On the more expensive £19.99 bundle, items like a Nintendo Switch and Apple MacBook Air 7th Gen are up for grabs. The retailer has become a go-to for shoppers looking to take their chances at bagging a multi-hundred-pound device for less than £20, but it's not the only retailer. Another standout deal is the Discount Experts Ultimate Mystery Electronic Deal, which includes very similar items to Wowcher. Starting from a similar £9.99 entry rate and products like Beats headphones, LG TV, an Amazon Echo and De'Longhi Coffee Machines. Like Wowcher, it also reserves the bigger ticket items for its £19.99 package - prices which many will spot are the same price as the fellow money-saving deals site. This is where the 55-inch LG TV is up for grabs, but in contrast to Wowcher, Discount Experts highlight how many shoppers will win each product, which is just one shopper for the TV whereas 750 customers will get a Veho Bluetooth speaker. While I've not taken part in Wowcher's Mystery tech sale before, I can speak for what the Discount Experts mystery tech bundles are like, as I've done one before - I only paid £21.99 at the time, much higher than the current £19.99 Gold price, and got headphones - a pair which at the time I said rivalled Apple. Covering my experience for The Manchester Evening News I said: "Having seen the growing interest surrounding the mystery boxes I decided to test it out, pushed by my inquisitiveness I wanted to see if shoppers really were getting a 'bargain of the century' or simply paying an extortionate price for a bit of tech you could get in the pound store. "About a week later I got a thin parcel envelope through my letterbox with my mystery Black Friday product inside, it wasn't an iPad but an Apple dupe I was perfectly happy with. Inside the mystery envelope (NOT BOX) was a pair of Candi London i16 Wireless Earphones, which, according to Discount Experts cost £99. "One downside of the process was the questionable emails after purchasing the tier - instead of emailing to say 'your item is on the way' or 'thank you for your order', each email update had lots of misleading deals." It's worth noting that if you spot an item in the Wowcher Mystery Sale and really want it, many are featured in other sales - although this obviously means paying considerably more for them with the assurance you'll actually receive it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store