Iowa rallies will push back on Trump's parade
Why it matters: The widespread movement will run counter to Trump's multimillion-dollar military parade in Washington, D.C.
"No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance," organizers wrote. "From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism."
By the numbers: More than 100 pro-democracy advocacy groups are partnering to organize the No Kings events.
Millions of people are expected to protest in more than 1,500 cities across all 50 states and commonwealths, organizers said.
Zoom in: The DSM protest is scheduled from noon-2pm at the Capitol, according to a social media post by Polk County Democrats.
More than two dozen others are planned across the state.
State of play: Trump on Tuesday vowed that protests to the parade in D.C. will be met with "very big force."
"I haven't even heard about a protest," he said during an Oval Office press conference, "but ... this is people that hate our country."
What they're saying: Des Moines police have a team in place to respond Saturday if needed, Sgt. Paul Parizek tells Axios.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
What is Trump's approval rating? See states where he is most, least popular
President Donald Trump's approval ratings nationally are in the red, but for about half of the states, more people approve of his job peformance. State legislatures could determine Trump's political future. Texas' push to redraw its Congressional map to add more Republican seats has dragged the states into a bit of a standoff, as heavy hitter Democratic states threaten to do the same if Texas moves forward. That's because Democrats are looking to take back control of the U.S. House in the midterm elections, and doing so would subvert Trump's efforts for his last two years in office. While Trump's approval rating nationally remains historcially low, a look at state-by-state survey results show a more complicated picture. Here is what we know: More: Did Trump remove the Rose Garden? He has pushed these White House renovations Trump has positive approval rating in 27 states Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states. That is according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states is unchanged from July's update. Trump is most popular by Morning Consult in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of his job performance. But his approval is net negative in two states with gubernatorial races this fall: New Jersey and Virginia, according to Morning Consult. In Texas, 53% of voters approve of Trump's performance while 44% disapprove. In California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to counter changes in Texas' redistricting, 41% approve of Trump's job peformance while 56% disapprove. California is Trump's seventh worst rating among the states, according to Morning Consult. What is Trump's approval overall? RealClearPolitics Poll Average shows Trump's approval rating was becoming more negative throughout the first few weeks of July before buoying toward the end of the month. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show a similar trend. As of Jan. 27, Trump received a +6.2 percentage point approval rating, but as of March 13, it flipped to slightly negative, the RealClearPolitics graphics show. The approval rating reached its most negative on April 29 at -7.2 percentage points, which fell around Trump's 100-day mark. It came close to that low again on July 22 and 23 at -7.1 percentage points, as the controversy over Epstein carried into its third week. His average approval rating margin as of Aug. 12, according to RealClearPolitics, is -5.4 percentage points. The approval margin according to the New York Times aggregator on Aug. 12 is -8 percentage points. How does Trump's approval rating compare to previous presidents? A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in July of his first years in office − both as the 45th and 47th presidents − are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. In a Gallup poll conducted from July 7-21, 37% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in July of their first year of their term, according to Gallup: Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump deploys National Guard for D.C. crime but called Jan. 6 rioters ‘very special'
On Jan. 6, 2021, a pro-Trump mob committed a month's worth of crime in the span of about three hours. The FBI has estimated that around 2,000 people took part in criminal acts that day, and more than 600 people were charged with assaulting, resisting or interfering with the police. (Citywide, Washington currently averages about 70 crimes a day.) But President Donald Trump's handling of the most lawless day in recent Washington history stands in sharp contrast to his announcement Monday that he needed to use the full force of the federal government to crack down on 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals' in the nation's capital. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up After a prominent member of the Department of Government Efficiency, known by his online pseudonym, 'Big Balls,' was assaulted this month, the president took federal control of Washington's police force and mobilized National Guard troops. His team passed out a packet of mug shots, and Trump described 'roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' Advertisement President Trump speaks at a rally near the White House in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, before some supporters marched to riot at the US Capitol. KENNY HOLSTON/NYT That was nothing like the message he delivered to the mob of his supporters on Jan. 6, when he told them, as tear gas filled the hallways of the Capitol: 'We love you. You're very special.' 'If we want to look at marauding mobs, look at Jan. 6,' said Mary McCord, the director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law and a former federal prosecutor. 'If you want to look at criminal mobs, we had a criminal mob and he called them peaceful protesters.' Advertisement In one of his first actions upon retaking the presidency, Trump issued a sweeping grant of clemency to all of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the Capitol attack. The president issued pardons to most of the defendants and commuted the sentences of 14 members of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia, most of whom were convicted of seditious conspiracy. He has sought to rewrite the history of the riot and called those arrested 'hostages.' He has selected a passionate defender of Jan. 6 rioters to run the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, and his administration even hired a former FBI agent who was charged with encouraging the mob to kill police officers. The agent, Jared L. Wise, has been named as an adviser to the Justice Department task force established to seek retribution against Trump's political enemies. 'He is showing one-sided support for violence that supports his political agenda,' said Robert A. Pape, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago who has studied the Jan. 6 defendants for more than four years. Pape said the hiring of Wise only underscored the message sent by the pardoning of the rioters. 'What he is doing, of course,' Pape said, 'is sending the signal to everybody that you will not just be pardoned, he will not just give you moral support, but he will reward you with high-level positions and opportunities.' Advertisement Trump has also shifted his position on police officers who used deadly force, based on the circumstances involved. Casting himself as a champion of the police, Trump issued full and unconditional pardons this year to two D.C. police officers who were convicted after a chase that killed a young Black man in 2020. But Trump took the opposite view of the use of deadly force during the Capitol riot, condemning the police officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt and calling the officer, who is Black, a 'thug.' The president's crackdown on Washington was put in motion by an assault against 19-year-old Edward Coristine, who was part of Elon Musk's job-slashing effort. Trump shared a photograph that appeared to show Coristine sitting in the street around 3 a.m., bleeding and shirtless. Two teenagers have been arrested in the case. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City,' Trump said. Crime in Washington is declining, a point many Democrats have made as they railed against Trump's actions as federal overreach. Last year, violent crime hit a 30-year low. 'Donald Trump delayed deploying the National Guard on January 6th when our Capitol was under violent attack and lives were at stake,' Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, wrote on the social platform X. 'Now, he's activating the DC Guard to distract from his incompetent mishandling of tariffs, health care, education and immigration — just to name a few blunders.' Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that Trump's takeover of Washington's police force was unjustified. 'As you listen to an unhinged Trump try to justify deploying the National Guard in DC, here's reality: Violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low,' she wrote on social media. Advertisement Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, hit back at critics of the president's crackdown. 'I think it's despicable that Democrats cannot agree that we need more law and order in a city that has been ravaged by violence, crime, murders, property theft,' Leavitt said. Pape said that while Coristine's injuries were troubling, they were similar to those suffered by police officers on Jan. 6. The indictments against Jan. 6 defendants, Pape said, were full of photos of 'cops getting beaten up unbelievably with metal poles and all kinds of things, and they're being beaten pretty severely.' McCord said she believed Trump's takeover of the Washington police would most likely be 'performative' and not make a lot of difference functionally on crime. 'This feels like very much a way to send a message: I have control. I can use it, and I will use it,' she said. But the move also reeks of hypocrisy, McCord said. 'It's the hypocrisy of saying essentially that he supports our police, our law enforcement across the country, and wants to enact policies that support the police,' she said, 'yet that didn't apply when it came to all of the law enforcement officers on Jan. 6.' This article originally appeared in .
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Arizona school funding ruled unconstitutional by state judge
Arizona's system for funding K-12 facilities violates the state constitution because it doesn't provide for some school districts' minimum needs, a judge said Wednesday in what could be a landmark ruling. Why it matters: If the ruling withstands a planned appeal, the Arizona Legislature will have to provide substantial new funding for school facilities and other capital needs at some point in the future. The big picture: Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Dewain Fox ruled in a major lawsuit that the funding system violates the Arizona Constitution's requirement that the state establish "a general and uniform public school system." Yes, but: The ruling isn't likely to be the final word. Senate President Warren Petersen, who intervened as a defendant, will appeal, a Senate spokesperson told Axios. Attorney Danny Adelman of the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, who led the case for the plaintiffs, said it'll likely be several years before the matter is fully resolved. Flashback: In 1994, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled in Roosevelt vs. Bishop that Arizona's system for funding capital needs — including buildings, buses, technology and books — violated the state constitution's requirement that there be a "general and uniform" school system. Because districts relied on taxes based on property value, the system left districts in less wealthy areas short on funding. To comply with that ruling, the Legislature created the Students FIRST program, which added building renewal grants and funding for new school construction and for districts that exhausted other resources. A group of school districts and education organizations sued the state in 2017, arguing that it hadn't met its obligations from the Roosevelt vs. Bishop ruling. The case finally went to trial in May 2024. Zoom in: On paper, Students FIRST rectified the funding disparities, Fox wrote in his ruling. But in reality, the state hasn't provided sufficient funding for school facilities. Districts can obtain additional funding through bonds and budget overrides, but those are at voters' whims. As a result, many schools are forced to operate with deficient facilities for months or years while they await funding. Adelman told Axios that districts have lost between $6 billion and $7 billion over the past 25 years or so. Between the lines: While disparities in districts' ability to raise money through voter-approved bonds and overrides aren't unconstitutional, inadequate funding leaves some unable to meet their needs without them. "In short, Arizona has returned to a system that forces districts to rely largely on local property taxation to fund their capital needs, and as such, property value is crucial to a district's ability to fund its schools," Fox wrote, comparing it to the system that the Arizona Supreme Court struck down in the original Roosevelt case.
