Chinese PC maker Lenovo says US-China tariff pause a positive sign
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
China's Lenovo said on Thursday the tariff pause between Washington and Beijing was positive and growth in China's AI infrastructure remained strong despite U.S.-China tech tensions."The truce is a positive situation," said Lenovo's CEO Yang Yuanqing in an interview with Reuters after the world's largest maker of personal computers released its fiscal first-quarter results."We feel better than the previous quarter - it brings us more certainty rather than uncertainty."The U.S. and China have extended a tariff pause for another 90 days to November, averting triple-digit duties on each other's goods and offering temporary relief to businesses on both sides.Lenovo's overall revenue for the three months ended June 30 climbed 22% year-on-year to $18.8 billion, exceeding analysts' expectations of $17.4 billion, according to LSEG data.Yang attributed the performance to strong AI demand in its three major business segments, each scoring double-digit growth in the first quarter.Chinese exports to the U.S., including PCs, currently face a 30% levy, despite the tariff truce. Yang said the U.S. accounted for less than 20% of Lenovo's total revenue, and that the tariffs on Chinese goods had not had much impact on its business so far due to its global manufacturing footprint.Net profit attributable to shareholders more than doubled year-on-year to $505 million, well above the consensus estimate of $307.7 million.AI PC accounted for more than 30% of all Lenovo PC shipments in the first quarter, according to Yang. Lenovo's AI server business grew 150% in the first quarter on strong local demand."We see strong pipeline in AI servers," Yang said.China has recently advised major internet firms to exercise caution when purchasing Nvidia H20 chips and to consider domestic alternatives, after Trump approved the resumption of H20 chip sales to China.Yang said China AI infrastructure had grown faster than the rest of the world and Lenovo, a Nvidia partner in China, has invested to diversify its supply-chain options amid the US-China dispute over semiconductors."Not only can we sell global products, we have invested a lot to develop the best local component products to meet customers' different requirements," Yang said.Lenovo's shares fell more than 3% in early trading on Thursday, against a 0.4% rise in the Hang Seng Index. However, the stock has climbed 15% over the past three months, outpacing gains in the benchmark.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘Trust but verify' holds the key for improving ties with China
The thaw in India-China ties, strained by the 2020 border clash, is a welcome development. The recent visit of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to New Delhi has resulted in several tangible outcomes, including the decision to resume direct flight connectivity and strengthen trade and investment flows. There are also unconfirmed reports that Beijing is willing to address India's concerns regarding fertilisers, rare earths, and tunnel boring machines. However, our policy and decision makers must not go overboard about the thaw. The two governments have decided to facilitate visas for tourists, business professionals, media personnel, and other visitors, aiming to improve people-to-people and commercial exchanges. In a symbolic move to enhance cultural and religious linkages, they will resume the Indian pilgrimage to Mount Kailash (Gang Renpoche) and Lake Manasarovar (Mapam Yun Tso) in Tibet from next year. Additionally, border trade will reopen through three designated points-Lipulekh Pass, Shipki La Pass, and Nathu La Pass. These arrangements underscore efforts to gradually normalise border-related interactions and build confidence. On the sensitive boundary question, the two sides agreed to establish at least three new mechanisms dedicated to managing disputes. Both countries reaffirmed their commitment to using existing diplomatic and military channels for border management and to advance discussions on de-escalation. The Ministry of External Affairs highlighted that these steps were aimed at preventing misunderstandings and ensuring stability along the Line of Actual Control. Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Wang at his residence following a round of high-level talks with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. In a post on X, the Prime Minister noted that 'stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity.' Modi is scheduled to visit Tianjin for the SCO Summit on August 31 and September 1, a trip that adds significance to the renewed dialogue. According to China's foreign ministry, Wang conveyed to Doval that maintaining stable relations serves the core interests of both nations. He called for building trust through dialogue, broadening cooperation, and working toward consensus on sensitive issues, particularly boundary management. Doval emphasized that the special representatives' talks hold 'very special importance' considering Modi's upcoming visit. All these are nice expressions, but the Indian side should never forget the fact that the Chinese are adept at interpreting the otherwise unexceptional phraseology as it suits them—often in a most disingenuous manner. This diplomatic engagement has come against the backdrop of growing sourness in New Delhi's relations with Washington. US President Donald Trump's decision to raise tariffs on Indian exports—doubling them to 50 per cent, including an additional 25 per cent levy—over India's purchase of Russian crude has created new challenges for India. Against this shifting geopolitical landscape, India's balancing act with China acquires added urgency. Still, enthusiasm must be balanced by prudence. New Delhi must assess every assurance by Beijing carefully. The current rapprochement should not obscure the reality of unresolved border disputes (primarily because of China's stubbornness), deep mistrust, and divergent strategic goals. Rebuilding ties with China may indeed open new avenues for cooperation, but it must proceed with vigilance and verification at every step. India should follow the adage 'trust but verify.'
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Export panels, import panels - How Adani makes the best use of US solar tariffs
The US clampdown on Chinese solar panels has landed the Adani Group in a win-win situation—The restriction has opened up the American solar market for one Adani group firm making cells and panels, while another Adani firm building the world's largest solar park in India buys panels from third parties, including Chinese and domestic firms. The US has spared Indian solar panels from the stiff tariffs it has imposed on a range of Indian goods, benefitting several Indian firms including Mundra Solar PV Ltd (MSPVL), a step-down subsidiary of Adani Enterprises Ltd making such panels at Mundra in Gujarat. Just three hours away by road, Adani Green Energy Ltd is building the world's largest solar park of 30GW at Khavda, with China's JinkoSolar and LONGi as its top solar panel suppliers. Exporting panels from one company and importing them for the other helps the Adani Group make the most of the volatile global tariff scenario, as each business prioritizes what's best for its shareholders. While lucrative, this arbitrage is likely to be short-lived with India already clamping down on imported solar panels. Adani's strategy contrasts with other players like Tata Power and Waaree Energy, which utilize in-house panels for constructing their own solar power plants. A key notable difference is that the solar panel manufacturing business and the solar power plant business are housed within the same company in the case of Tata Power. Waaree's captive solar power plants are not as expansive as Tata and Adani, as its key business is manufacturing panels. High margin Credit rating agency India Ratings upgraded MSPVL's rating by a notch to Ind A+ in April. 'Export sales have been yielding higher margins on account of robust demand, specifically from the US, which has disincentivized imports from China. As a result, India has become a key exporter of solar modules to the US," a credit note from the rating agency said on 2 April. India's solar module exports to the US were priced about a fifth more than exports to other countries, S&P Platts noted on 1 July. About 80% of all solar exports from India head to the US. Meanwhile, companies in China's Xinjiang region are the largest and most cost-effective solar cell producers in the world, according to S&P Platts. MSPVL, which makes 2GW of TOPCon solar cells and modules a year - enough to power 2.5 million Indian homes - ships more than half of its production to the US. TOPCon stands for Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact, which is the most popular solar cell technology today. Powered by the high-margin exports, the company doubled its revenue in FY25 to ₹6,353 crore, while profit jumped over fivefold to ₹1,085 crore, as per its regulatory filings. Its Ebitda margin improved from 13.8% in FY24 to 27.3% in the first nine months of FY25, as per India Ratings. Cheaper in China The Adani Group has an end-to-end supply chain for solar across the two listed group companies. Two Adani Enterprises units manufacture solar cells and modules and Adani Green sets up large solar plants with such modules to generate electricity. The trade between Adani Enterprises and Adani Green, or its absence, is in line with governance practices followed by other bluechip peers, where they do not give any preferential treatment to a fellow group company. Instead, maximum returns for the shareholders and diversification of the supply chain or customer base is prioritized. 'Transactions between Group companies are treated with the same rigour as those involving independent suppliers, ensuring transparent and fair dealings for all parties," a spokesperson for Adani Green Energy said over email. 'Further, our procurement processes are aligned with good governance practices, and all transactions, whether within the group or third-party entities, are conducted on an arm's length basis and with established price-competitive bid mechanisms." Several factors influence procurement decisions, the spokesperson further said, including project schedule, requirements, delivery timelines and availability. Besides its large-scale projects, Adani's in-house manufactured panels are also used for government initiatives such as the KUSUM (Kisan Urja Suraksha Evam Utthaan Mahabhiyan) and Surya Ghar scheme, which promote rooftop solar installations in households, the spokesperson pointed out. Jinko, LONGi Among Adani Green's solar module suppliers for Khavda are at least six manufacturers other than fellow group company MSPVL. Jinko Solar is the largest supplier, accounting for almost 2.4 GW out of the existing 5.6 GW of installed capacity in Khavda, as per disclosures made by the two companies. China's LONGi has supplied another 1.4 GW of modules. Other suppliers include China's JA Solar and Astronergy, as well as domestic players Grew Solar and Goldi Solar. However, the opportunity for the two companies is likely to be short-lived. On one hand, demand and prices of solar modules sold in the US may cool over the medium term as projects currently under construction become operational, Care Ratings noted in February. On the other, India has indirectly restricted the import of China-made solar modules by making it mandatory to use solar panels made by local companies for all government-linked projects - which form the bulk of solar demand in India. Only manufacturers part of the Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (ALMM) can supply solar panels to projects like Khavda, which would be supplying electricity to the national grid. The restrictions are effective from April 2021, but were kept in abeyance in FY24 to address a shortage of domestic solar panels. Projects approved before April 2021 or during FY24 can utilize solar modules of any make, including Chinese. The government is also working on a second ALMM list for solar cells, which is expected to be effective from June 2026, which will make it mandatory for companies to use only domestically produced solar cells. 'Our solar module procurement adheres to and is fully compliant to the guidelines of the Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (ALMM). ALMM applies to projects for bids which were finalized after April 2021," the Adani Green Energy spokesperson said. The company's module sourcing includes a mix of both domestic and international players including Adani New Industries Limited and is fully compliant with the prevailing Indian regulations, tender requirements, and the policy framework, the spokesperson said. 'We remain committed to transparency, regulatory compliance, and best governance practices in all aspects of our project execution and operations." We remain committed to transparency, regulatory compliance, and best governance practices in all aspects of our project execution and operations. Demand outlook Due to this, the domestic demand for solar modules in India continues to rise, and several manufacturers are now prioritizing local sales over exports, S&P Platts noted on 1 July. Considering this, MSPVL is likely to supply more to Adani Green and other Indian solar companies in the future. A high-purity silicon block called ingot is the basic raw material for solar panels. This ingot is cut into thin strips called wafers, which are then processed into solar cells, which can convert sunlight into electricity. The wafers are then assembled into a solar module, also called a solar panel. Interestingly, both MSPVL and Adani Green's leading supplier JinkoSolar are battling First Solar of the US in an alleged patent-infringement lawsuit in a Delaware court.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Pushed by the US, India may return to the world's largest trading bloc
New Delhi: Pushed by escalating trade tensions with Washington and with its relations with Beijing on the mend, New Delhi is warming up to a deeper embrace of the East by signalling a potential return to an eastern trade bloc that it had walked out of nearly five years ago. According to two senior government officials aware of the matter, India is weighing the possibility of rejoining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a trade group of 15 countries. India had left the group in November 2019 just before the pact was signed, citing concerns over market access, widening trade deficits, and risks to farmers, domestic manufacturing, and small businesses. According to one of the officials cited above, internal discussions have begun in the Indian government on reassessing the costs and benefits of RCEP membership in light of global supply chain realignments, tariff wars, and the urgency of diversifying export markets. The second official cited above said, 'The fresh rethink is being explored as part of a broader strategy to deepen India's trade engagement with neighbouring countries, especially after strained trade talks with the US." Both officials spoke to Mint on condition of not being named. In the latest development, China has lifted export curbs on rare earth magnets, fertilizers, and tunnel-boring machines for India following a meeting between Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi and India's external affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on Tuesday, a move seen as a thaw in India-China trade relations amid the current US tariff regime. On its part, India is weighing easier rules for Chinese investments in select sectors as part of another step to improve ties ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the eastern neighbour to participate in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, as reported byMint on 18 August. The Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS), an autonomous body under the ministry of external affairs, has been tasked with conducting an impact assessment of India becoming a member of RCEP, particularly as the Trump tariffs are expected to remain in place for a long period, the second official said. 'India is pushing for written assurances from China and ASEAN nations to ensure greater market access for Indian products in order to make the pact a more balanced agreement," said the first person. 'The idea at this point of time is largely in terms of the opportunities that an FTA can create, and India has also brought in some changes," said Sachin Chaturvedi, director-general of RIS. 'If you look at trade compatibility and scope, the ambit within which we had earlier thought of two- or three-tier tariff structures, and the new momentum we are seeing in India-China trade relations, both would have to be factored in. Then some framework for assessment should come up." Queries sent to the spokespersons of the Prime Minister's Office, Chinese Embassy in New Delhi, and the ministries of commerce, external affairs remained unanswered till press time. The RCEP is the world's largest free trade agreement. As per World Economics, a UK-based data and analysis platform, the RCEP group accounted for 32.6% of Global GDP in 2025 and is home to over 2.35 billion people. The trade bloc comprises 15 member countries, including all the ASEAN member states — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam — plus China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. Notably, Japan and Singapore had included a special provision allowing India to return to the bloc at any time. Pushed by the US Experts said punitive US tariffs are pushing eastern economies to make RCEP a more compelling platform. 'The US under President Donald Trump has imposed tariffs of 15-20% on several ASEAN economies, with higher duties of 40% on Laos and 19% on Cambodia," said Srikanth Kondapalli, professor of China Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). 'Such tariff barriers have made exports uneconomical, pushing these countries to reconsider their trade options within the RCEP framework." Trump, meanwhile, imposed the highest 50% tariffs on India, including a 25% penalty for buying Russian oil. The first set of duties came into effect on 7 August, while another 25% is scheduled to come into force on 27 August. 'Since both China and India are among the largest markets in the region, it is essential that they work out a more workable arrangement to make effective use of the RCEP platform," said Dattesh Parulekar, assistant professor of International Relations at Goa University. 'Without mutual understanding between the two, the benefits of such a mega trade pact will remain underutilised." Why India left RCEP in 2019 India's earlier opposition was shaped by key concerns such as an unfavourable trade balance with China, fears that Chinese goods would flood Indian markets through third countries, and New Zealand's plan to supply milk and milk products to India that would hurt India's small farmers and dairy cooperatives, experts said. 'China had been using Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, and other ASEAN nations as platforms to reroute exports into India under existing free trade arrangements, leading to charges of unfair trade practices," said Kondapalli. 'Out of nearly 14,000 tariff lines offered to China under its trade pact with India, Beijing increasingly exploited indirect channels, which became a major sticking point for New Delhi." In the present setup, India's strongest export sectors, such as pharmaceuticals and IT services, face heavy restrictions in China and do not have market access there. Recalibrate China trade strategy Amidst the thaw in India-China relations, a new study by Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (Icrier) has called for a recalibration of India's trade strategy with Beijing, noting that the trade deficit touched a record $99.2 billion in FY25. According to data from the ministry of commerce & industry, India's imports from China increased from $94.57 billion in FY22 to $113.45 billion in FY25. In contrast, exports to China declined from $21.26 billion in FY22 to $14.25 billion in FY25. In the current fiscal, inbound shipments from China during April-July stood at $40.66 billion, up 13.1% from a year earlier. Exports to China, too, jumped 20% to $5.76 billion during the same period. While India's FDI (foreign direct investment) inflows from China have been negligible at $886 million over the past decade, the Icrier study led by professor Nisha Taneja highlighted that India's untapped export potential to China is as high as $161 billion —nearly 10 times the current exports. Strikingly, 74% of this potential lies in medium and high-technology sectors, compared to the present export basket that is dominated by primary and resource-based goods, the report noted. The study highlighted that the realisation of large additional export potential with China has been constrained by several tariff and non-tariff barriers (NTBs). To address market access barriers, it recommended that India and China set up a joint task force to resolve NTBs, and improve transparency through fair testing and WTO-compliant communication. It further suggested diversifying the export base towards high-value products such as telephone sets, aircraft, turbojets, motor vehicle parts, and photo-semiconductor devices. On the import side, the report underscored that complete decoupling from China is unrealistic given its role in global value chains. Instead, India should cut uncompetitive imports worth nearly $30 billion—mainly machinery, electronics, and chemicals—by sourcing from more competitive suppliers such as Vietnam, South Korea, and the UAE.
