
Hackers using aliases from TV show claim UK retailers are on their 'Blacklist' after cyber-attacks on M&S and Co-op
The hackers responsible for the devastating cyber attacks on M&S and Co-op have allegedly placed all UK retailers on the 'Blacklist' in a nod to the popular television series.
Claiming to be behind the attacks that saw supermarket shelves cleared and mass disruption nationwide, the alleged hackers have now provided evidence which proves that substantial amounts of private customer and employee information has been stolen.
In Telegram messages reportedly exchanged for five hours between the alleged cyber crooks and the BBC 's cyber correspondent, they expressed frustration that the Co-op had not given in to their ransom demands, while also failing to confirm the Bitcoin figure demanded in exchange for not revealing or selling off the stolen data.
And, while keeping their identity and location unknown, the hackers even highlighted their unwavering bid for fame and notoriety, claiming that they eventually wanted to be known as 'Raymond Reddington' and 'Dembe Zuma', two characters from the hit US crime thriller show The Blacklist.
In a message to the BBC, they boastfully proclaimed: 'We're putting UK retailers on the Blacklist.'
Released in 2013, the 10 series drama centers around a notorious international criminal and wanted fugitive cooperates with the FBI in the hunt for other criminals on his 'Blacklist'.
The BBC said that the 'English speakers' behind the anonymous Telegram account were eventually able to prove their intimate involvement in the cyber attacks through several messages.
In Telegram messages reportedly exchanged for five hours between the alleged cyber crooks and the BBC 's cyber correspondent, they expressed frustration that the Co-op had not given in to their ransom demands (file image)
The communication, alongside other information provided, eventually led the cyber correspondent to eventually conclude that the hackers were associated with the DragonForce hacking group.
DragonForce's ransomware operation uses malicious software, which when triggered can prevent the target from accessing their own devices and data.
Criminals then use stolen data as leverage to extort huge sums of money, a process known as 'ransomware-as-a-service'.
While unknown who ultimately used the service to attack the two popular British retailers, several security experts believe that the tactics used emulate the loosely coordinated group of hackers dubbed 'Scattered Spider' or 'Octo Tempest '.
Having reviewed the amalgamation of evidence provided by the hackers, the BBC said that they contacted the Co-op's press team for comment. It was only then, they allege, that the popular retailer, who had initially downplayed the hack's implications, eventually admitted to the widespread data breach.
Co-op had previously claimed that the cyberattack had only a 'small impact' on its operations and insisted there was 'no evidence that customer data was compromised'.
However, a Co-op spokesman later said the hackers ' accessed data relating to a significant number of our current and past members '.
Following this, in an angry letter he later received by the alleged hackers, it was also revealed that the UK store had 'narrowly dodged a more severe hack' having intervened shortly after its computer systems were initially infiltrated.
Quick-thinking bosses had apparently 'yanked the plug' on their systems having spotted M&S' systems, also targeted by the hackers, being seriously compromised.
The hackers told the BBC: 'Co-op's network never ever suffered ransomware. They yanked their own plug - tanking sales, burning logistics, and torching shareholder value.'
They added that they had successfully infiltrated Co-op's systems and stole customer data, and had been in the process of uploading the malicious data when they were caught.
The hackers had moved to limit the impact of the attack by shutting down some IT systems, including parts of its supply chain and logistics operations, resulting in disruption to deliveries.
Turning off computers prevent hackers from doing further damage, meaning companies are able to isolate their systems and assess what has been tampered with.
It means that while M&S are still scrabbling to get systems such as online shopping back into working order, Co-op has been able to recover more quickly.
Co-op said there would be improved availability in its food shops and online from this weekend, while its stock ordering system is now fully online again.
It was also now able to accept all forms of payment, including contactless and chip-and-pin.
On May 14, a Co-op spokesperson said: 'Following the malicious third-party cyber attack, we took early and decisive action to restrict access to our systems in order to protect our Co-op.
'We are now in the recovery phase and are taking steps to bring our systems gradually back online in a safe and controlled manner.'
Meanwhile, M&S customers were left reeling following the devastating hack more than three weeks ago which forced it to halt online sales for five days - with its share prices plummeting by more than £500m and the company shedding £1billion worth of value on the stock exchange.
Following the attack, some M&S stores were left with empty shelves as the beleaguered retailer continues to battle with fallout of a crippling hack.
Shoppers were also left furious after some outlets were left 'completely empty', with items including bananas, fruit and vegetables, fish and Colin the Caterpillar cakes out of stock.
As the crisis continues to plague the British High Street staple, staff have reportedly been forced to work for up to 24 hours a day while enduring 'sleepless nights' to fix it, insiders have revealed.
The hackers went undetected in M&S' systems for up to 52 hours before the devastating cyber attack was finally uncovered. Crisis teams then battled tirelessly to protect the beloved British store, frequented by up to 9.4million active customers, throughout the five-day 'attack phase'.
Alan Woodward, University of Surrey cyber security professor, told The Times that he believed the fact the store has still failed to reinstate their online sales, with customers having been unable to take any orders through the website or app since April 25, 'suggests they were a little less prepared than maybe they should have been'.
Following the devastating attacks, retailers are on red alert for similar attacks, as DragonForce said it was poised to launch more.
In an interview with Bloomberg, its anonymous creators threatened to release data if it does not receive payment from the retailers, saying it typically expects millions of pounds for ransom payments.
The group operates similarly to a criminal cartel and sells its software to other hackers, such as the Scattered Spider gang.
'Our job is not to destroy, we just take some money and walk away,' it said, also warning that the recent attacks were 'just a start'. DragonForce hackers claimed more than 90 victims last year and targeted companies across various industries.
On May 2, the Information Commissioner's Office said it was also looking into the attack, as well as a similar major incident involving M&S' competitor, the Co-op.
M&S and Co-op customers have also been urged to use strong passwords and different ones across multiple platforms.
The National Crime Agency said: 'We are working closely with our law enforcement partners to investigate. We are considering the incidents individually. However, we are mindful they may be linked and therefore this will remain under review.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Dominic Cummings may have just blown the grooming gangs scandal wide open
All progressives solemnly honour LGBTQIA+ Pride Month. And Islamophobia Awareness Month. And Black History Month. Plus many other such events. This is because they're passionately committed to 'raising awareness' of social injustice. So why not the grooming gangs scandal? For some reason, this is one example of social injustice which has failed to grip progressives' attention. To rectify this, I suggest we introduce Grooming Gangs Awareness Month. Fly an official Grooming Gangs Scandal flag from all public buildings. Get civil servants to wear Grooming Gangs Scandal lanyards. Then perhaps these people might finally take an interest. Then again, we may be wasting our time. In all likelihood, progressives have never lacked 'awareness' of the grooming gangs. They just didn't want anyone else to be aware of them. Which brings me to the explosive allegations made on Thursday by Dominic Cummings. In an interview with GB News, he claimed that, when he was working at the Department for Education in the early 2010s, there were 'mass cover-ups of the whole thing in Whitehall'. Are Mr Cummings's allegations true? I don't know. But then, that's why we need the full national inquiry that Labour continues to deny us. A handful of mere 'local inquiries' won't do – not least because it wouldn't be within their scope to investigate Mr Cummings's claims about what went on in Whitehall. Yesterday, incidentally, seven members of yet another grooming gang were found guilty of raping two teenage girls in Rochdale. Labour may not like Mr Cummings. But this time I think it should listen to him. And, for that matter, to the increasingly furious public. Talking Bull Personally, I was somewhat taken aback when, on Tuesday, the new chairman of Nigel Farage's Reform UK told voters that 'immigration is the lifeblood of this country, and it always has been'. I was even more surprised when, on Wednesday, he told Richard Madeley on ITV's Good Morning Britain that he was once strangled by an evil spirit masquerading as the ghost of his late grandmother. To my mind, though, Dr David Bull's most intriguing comment of the week was this. Asked whether he supports calls to ban the burqa in this country, he replied: 'I'm very anxious about the rise in people that think it is OK to hide their faces. We had a conversation yesterday about whether that was the burqa, crash helmets, scarves or whatever.' Hang on. Crash helmets? I for one have always admired Reform's bracingly no-nonsense attitude towards health-and-safety-gone-mad. But a ban on crash helmets, I feel, might be taking it a touch too far. In any case, I'm not convinced that there's a huge public clamour for such a ban. There are plenty of people who want to ban the burqa, and they have strong arguments for doing so. But I've never heard a voter say: 'I'm sorry, but I'm sick of seeing all these women walking around the streets in crash helmets. It's not as if it's their choice, either. Their husbands force them to do it. The crash helmet is a disgusting symbol of misogyny and patriarchal oppression. 'Also, crash helmets make normal human interaction impossible. When a motorcyclist zooms past me at 70mph, I expect to be able to see his face. 'Anyway, it's just not British. If motorcyclists want to wear crash helmets, they can go and do it in their own country.' Remarks like those, I would guess, aren't heard all that often in focus groups. So why Dr Bull raised the idea, entirely unprompted, in reply to a question about banning the burqa, I don't know. Still, I'm not complaining. Far from it. When I stepped down as this newspaper's parliamentary sketch writer in 2021, after 10 years, I felt that politics was in danger of becoming dull. The previous decade had teemed with the most glorious eccentrics, on Left and Right alike. Increasingly, however, they seemed to be fading from view, to be replaced by robotic regiments of Starmers and Sunaks. How wonderful it is to see a new generation coming through. Violence: a Left-wing guide I don't know whether you ever read Left-wing news outlets. But if you do, this week you'll probably have noticed something peculiar. In such outlets, the violence in Ballymena is always described as 'rioting' – yet the violence in LA is always described as 'protests'. You may well have wondered why this is. After all, both Ballymena and LA have seen cars set on fire, missiles thrown, and police officers injured. These are all very bad things. So why don't Left-wing news outlets refer to both as 'rioting'? The answer is simple. The violence in Ballymena is being perpetrated by people who are against mass immigration. The violence in LA, in contrast, is being perpetrated by people who are in favour not only of mass immigration, but of 'irregular' (i.e., illegal) immigration. And, just as importantly, they hate Donald Trump. Therefore, their actions must be made to sound understandable and legitimate. In other words: sometimes setting people's cars on fire is nasty and frightening. And sometimes it's noble and compassionate. Please update your records accordingly.


BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Holiday park caravan owners say industry needs regulation
When the Reverend Vic Ready bought his first static caravan he was looking for a holiday home on the Norfolk coast that his whole family could Mr Ready, of Sheringham, Norfolk, said his experience of caravan ownership soured as a result of what he claimed was an "unregulated" industry that has left many people "suffering".The caravan park involved rejected any "allegation of wrongdoing" and said it had had a "proud record of extremely satisfied customers".Mr Ready is one of hundreds of caravan owners who have contacted the BBC in the wake of its investigation into the holiday park Ready bought his first caravan in 2013 at Beeston Regis Holiday Park for £26,000 before trading it in, and paying an extra £25,000, for a "nicer caravan in a better position" seven years Ready said he then saw his original caravan on sale for £29,000 - a figure that surprised him. Three years later, faced with what he claims were ever-rising ground rents of up to £6,000 per year, the family decided to sell said he was initially offered £8,250 by the park for his caravan.A week later the park agreed to up its offer to £15,000, a sum Mr Ready a couple of days later, Mr Ready said he was sent an advert showing the caravan listed for sale by the park at £47,950."Until you eventually want to sell and leave the site, you don't appreciate how much it's going to cost you and how much you've actually lost," Mr Ready said."This is a corrupt, unregulated business and it needs to stop," he said. "So many people are suffering." A spokesperson for Beeston Regis Holiday Park said Mr Ready had been a "valued customer" and claimed he was "happy with the deal" when he sold company said the caravan - a Pemberton Abingdon model - eventually sold for £35,000, which included a new 10-year site licence."Our business, like any other, is subject to constant cost increases, and our pitch fees have to rise to cover these costs," the spokesperson said, adding it strove to "minimise" such rises."In all businesses which rely on buying and selling, there has to be a profit margin, and – when we buy a caravan, we have to estimate the likely selling price and commit to a purchase price ahead of that," the company added Mr Ready had acquired his second caravan £8,000 below the asking price and said despite having "no obligation to buy the caravan from him" it had done so in "good faith" and had offered "than double the book value". In 2021, Ipswich-based Paul Burke bought a caravan at the Suffolk Sands site in Felixstowe for £75, caravan was his wife's "happy place", Mr Burke said. But when site fees reached about £7,000 a year, the couple decided to sell first, he tried to sell privately and spoke to an estate agent."He told me he'd been in the business for 20 years," Mr Burke said. "In that time he'd not sold a single caravan.""Part of the process is the purchasers need to be interviewed by the caravan park," said Mr Burke. "During that process they are persuaded to buy an alternative caravan directly from the park, probably with incentives such as a free year's site fees, or a better location or a slight upgrade." Mr Burke said he felt he had no choice but to sell the caravan directly back to the park for £25,000."That is a lot of depreciation in three years," he said. "There is pretty much zero protection. This really does need some industry-wide protection."Park Holidays, which owns Suffolk Sands, said it provided buyers with a licence agreement intended to help people make "informed purchasing" said the £75,000 purchase price included two years of pitch fees and said those fees were reviewed yearly and "broadly" mirrored the consumer price company said owners can sell privately as long as the prospective buyer passed its "vetting" procedures. It also said while it would seek to "assist" private sales, the park could offer "buying incentives such as favourable finance and free pitch fees" which private sellers could not.A government spokesperson said it was "aware of the difficulties some holiday home owners have experienced and we have strengthened consumer law".


BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Universal gets ready to recruit for UK theme park near Bedford
Universal has started the recruitment process for its first theme park in Europe, which could be built in the has estimated 28,000 jobs could be created by 2031 if the proposed attraction at a site which includes the former Kempston Hardwick brickworks, near Bedford, gets planning the website of Universal Destinations and Experiences. the US company's theme park arm, there is now a form for people to register interest in "future job opportunities"."We're committed to advertising these jobs to local people and will engage with the community at the appropriate time," it said. The company has claimed the development, which could open in six years, "will have a transformative impact on Bedford and the UK economy".It has said 80% of the theme park's employees would be from Bedford, central Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton online form asks people where they live and what sort of job they would be interested areas listed include admin, construction, entertainment, HR and park and resort form states "it may be some time before these opportunities become available".Anyone job seekers who have already been in contact are thanked, but are urged to submit the form to ensure records are up to a theme park, the attraction could include a 500-room hotel and a retail complex. Universal, which has made films including Minions and Wicked, has theme parks in Orlando and Los Angeles in the US, as well as in Japan, Singapore and China. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.