
A Rare Interstellar Object Is Zipping Through Our Solar System. This Brand-New Telescope Saw It First
In an act of cosmic serendipity, astronomers pointed the Rubin Observatory toward the patch of sky where the interstellar object appeared during its commissioning phase. Images captured by the observatory, perched atop a mountain in the Chilean Andes, later revealed the comet in its full glory. Rubin's observations of 3I/ATLAS were recorded on June 21, around 10 days before its official discovery, according to a recent paper available on the preprint website arXiv.
The Rubin Observatory, overseen by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy (DOE), boasts the largest digital camera ever built for astronomy. Its car-sized, 3.2-gigapixel camera is designed to capture ultra-high-definition images and videos of the cosmos. The observatory unveiled its first images to the public on June 23, observing millions of galaxies and stars in the Milky Way over a period of just 10 hours. The images were not only beautiful—they also revealed supernovas and distant galaxies that could help astronomers study the universe's expansion.
With its revolutionary precision, it's no wonder then that the Rubin Observatory captured the recently discovered comet before any other telescope. 3I/ATLAS was first spotted in data collected by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) between June 25 and 29, and again on July 1. By July 2, the Deep Random Survey remote telescope in Rio Hurtado, Chile, had seen it too. The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center confirmed that this comet came from outside our solar system on July 2, marking the third discovery of an interstellar object.
Since then, astronomers have been rushing to gather as much data as they can on the mysterious object. The Gemini North telescope on Maunakea, Hawaii, recently snapped a close-up view of 3I/ATLAS, capturing the comet's coma in extreme detail. Initial observations of 3I/ATLAS suggest it's the oldest comet ever found, around 2 billion years older than our solar system. Compared to the two previously discovered interstellar objects, 'Oumuamua and Comet 2I/Borisov, 3I/ATLAS is not only older, but it's also faster. A recent study, which has yet to undergo peer review, found that 3I/ATLAS has a hyperbolic velocity of about 37 miles per second (60 kilometers per second).
Rubin's early observations of 3I/ATLAS are important considering they are the earliest images captured of the comet by a high-precision telescope. The new paper includes 49 images in total, although some were excluded because they were captured during Rubin's alignment sequence and were out of focus. Nineteen of the images were captured during intentional operations and confirm that 3I/ATLAS does in fact behave like a comet, with a cloud of gas and dust surrounding its icy nucleus, according to the paper.
Just as it was the first to spot the comet, Rubin will also be the first to lose sight of it. On August 22, 3I/ATLAS will shift out of the area in the sky currently being watched by the observatory. Until then, the astronomers behind the paper will keep an eye out for the interstellar visitor in Rubin's images.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Perseid Meteor Shower Begins Next Week — When To Get The Best View
The year's most prolific display of 'shooting stars,' the Perseid meteor shower, will peak next week, but conditions will not be ideal. With a bright moon bringing significant natural light pollution to the sky, only a handful of the 50-75 meteors per hour are expected to be visible overnight on Aug. 12-13. Despite that, this peak night will be the best night of the year to see the Perseid meteor shower. A Perseid meteor streaks across the sky above Inspiration Point early on August 12, 2016 in Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. (Photo by) Getty Images Under a moonless dark sky away from light pollution, the Perseids can produce up to 75 meteors per hour on the peak night — more than one meteor per minute. This year, an 84%-lit moon will rise shortly after it gets dark on Aug.12 and remain in the night sky all night. The moonlight will significantly reduce the number of meteors visible, though the moon will remain rather low on the southern horizon. Although rates are likely to be vastly reduced, the Perseids do produce some bright 'fireballs' that ought to still be visible, if skies are clear. There will be a short window of opportunity in the evening of Aug. 15 to watch for Perseids in moonless night skies, though since the Perseids have a steep peak and trough, don't expect to see more than a handful of shooting stars. Perseid meteors move very fast, striking Earth's upper atmosphere at around 133,000 mph. That can sometimes cause a bright flash and a long trail that's visible for a split second. The Perseids are caused by dust particles from comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle, which last visited the inner solar system in 1992. It takes 133 years to orbit the sun. Seeing a 'shooting star' requires patience — and for the Persieds in 2025, perhaps even more than usual. The best way to watch a meteor shower is to get out of the city, away from urban light pollution, according to NASA, such as a Dark Sky Place or somewhere found by using a light pollution map. Once in-situ, allow at least 20-30 minutes for your eyes to adjust before you start to wonder where the meteors are. Never look at your smartphone, whose bright light will instantly remove your night vision. Don't Miss The Conjunction Of Venus And Jupiter Tuesday, Aug. 12, is marked in the calendars of skywatchers for something other than the peak of the Perseid meteor shower this year. Rise an hour before sunrise and look to the east-northeast to see Venus and Jupiter less than a degree apart — the width of a finger held at arm's length against the sky. The Perseids are the most popular meteor shower of the year in the Northern Hemisphere because they peak during August, when camping trips are popular and practical. However, the strongest meteor shower of the year is December's Gemini meteor shower. Running from Dec. 7 through Dec. 17 and peaking overnight on Dec. 13-14 this year, the Geminids can produce up to 120 meteors per hour at their peak. This year, that peak will occur in a moonless night sky, with only a slim waning crescent moon rising in the early hours of Dec. 14. It's also the only annual meteor shower known to be produced by a meteor, called 3200 Phaethon. Further Reading


Medscape
9 hours ago
- Medscape
How Ancestral Plant Knowledge Could Shape Modern Medicine
"My registered name is Hemerson Dantas dos Santos, but you can add 'Pataxó Hãhãhãi' at the end, which is the Indigenous people I belong to." This is how the interview began, conducted by Medscape's Portuguese edition , with the researcher behind a study that catalogued 175 medicinal plants used by the Pataxó Hãhãhãi people from southern Bahia, Brazil. Of these plants, 43 are specifically used to treat the three most common health issues at the community's health center: diabetes, hypertension, and intestinal worms. Published in the Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine , the study bridges traditional knowledge with contemporary scientific evidence. Notably, the work was led entirely by an Indigenous ethnobotanist — from planning to data collection in the field — with the goal of recovering and documenting his people's medicinal knowledge. Pataxó Hãhãhãi is a doctoral candidate at the Institute of Environmental, Chemical, and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), under the supervision of Eliane Rodrigues, professor at the institute's Center for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies. He holds a degree in chemistry from the State University of Santa Cruz and a master's degree in organic chemistry from the Federal University of Bahia. The grandson of a tribal chief, Pataxó Hãhãhãi had only left the village a few times before enrolling at university; one such occasion was when he broke his arm and had to seek medical care. His university experience, combined with his daily life in the village, proved to be an invaluable asset in his research. The study follows the principles of "participatory ethnobotany," an approach that centers the population being studied in the scientific process. This method promotes the active involvement of traditional peoples in knowledge production. In this sense, Pataxó Hãhãhãi moves between two worlds — the forest and academia — with a firm footing in both. During his research, he explored his own family history and the historical violence faced by the Pataxó Hãhãhãi people. Expelled from their land in 1948, they only returned in 1982, which hindered the transmission of knowledge about medicinal plants and led to the loss of native species. Much of the land was turned into pasture, and Indigenous people began using nonnative plants in their practices. The traditional language was also lost. Today, the Pataxó Hãhãhãi people number around 3600 individuals across 10 villages. According to Pataxó Hãhãhãi, one of the key insights of the research was understanding the profound cultural and environmental losses experienced by the community. The introduction of diseases like diabetes and hypertension, conditions previously unknown in traditional Indigenous medicine before contact with non-Indigenous populations, presents further challenges. The low involvement of younger generations in traditional practices exacerbates these difficulties. For the research, Pataxó Hãhãhãi interviewed 19 individuals from the 10 villages, selected using the "snowball" method, where community members recommended who should be interviewed based on their reputation as healers. Participants were aged between 50 and 85, with 84% over the age of 62. Although many participants still use medicinal plants, most are now evangelical. Traditional healing rituals have given way to Christian prayers, Bible readings, and psalms. During the research, Pataxó Hãhãhãi collected plant samples recommended by the community's experts and compiled data on them from both traditional knowledge and academic literature. Of the 43 plants assessed for the most common health complaints, 79% had their use supported by scientific studies. He reviewed original articles and systematic reviews published in English over the past two decades, analyzing efficacy and safety data. 'This work was done by us and for us. It recovers knowledge that was being lost and shows that we can do science without abandoning our identity,' Pataxó Hãhãhãi said. In the following conversation with Medscape's Portuguese edition , Pataxó Hãhãhãi discussed the importance of preserving ancestral knowledge, reflected on the difference between external researchers and those embedded within the community and shared more details about his journey. How did a curious village boy become a doctoral student at one of Brazil's most prestigious universities? My parents and teachers always encouraged me to study, and due to my curiosity, my teachers at the village school guided me to study chemistry. I entered university through the national high school examination (Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio), but at first, I felt isolated and got poor grades. After I started spending more time in the library, I began to enjoy the theory more and was able to graduate. At the end of my course, I did scientific initiation with medicinal plants and began to see connections to my origins, but my advisor didn't accept that I study plants from the village. I was upset at the time, but today I understand her concern. Why was that? Research involving Indigenous peoples in Brazil is highly bureaucratic. Even though I lived in the village, it took me nearly a year to get approval from the National Foundation for Indigenous Peoples to conduct the study. I began my doctoral program at the start of the pandemic, attending online classes directly from the village. When I completed the theoretical part, in-person classes resumed, and I started fieldwork. Did the knowledge you brought from village life help in your academic journey? It helped a lot during my undergraduate studies; the inspiration and determination to keep going were crucial. But it took many hours and a lot of coffee to build a solid academic foundation. Every new subject felt like opening a door to new knowledge. I entered through the quota system, and at that time, I was the only Indigenous student at the university. Today, there are more Indigenous students, but the numbers are still small. Is Indigenous knowledge valued at the university, or do you feel that the two worlds — academic and Indigenous — remain disconnected? The two worlds are still somewhat isolated. However, some projects are attempting to bring the university closer to the schools in the villages, though these initiatives are not very strong yet. I know that much Indigenous knowledge is present in the university, but it is rarely recognized as such. Can you give an example of this? A significant portion of modern medicines is based on natural substances discovered through Indigenous practices. Researchers visited these communities, learned about these remedies, and brought the knowledge to universities. However, this knowledge is often explored without acknowledging its Indigenous origins, making it difficult to trace back to the communities that developed it. In the article, I focused on the distinction between external researchers and those embedded within the community. Since the 1970s, there has been an ongoing discussion about the need to properly value the knowledge of local peoples. Unfortunately, this issue still persists today. Do you consider yourself an insider or outsider researcher, or someone who navigates between the village and the university? I started as a chemistry researcher, studying the traceability of coffee types using analytical techniques, but this work wasn't connected to my Indigenous roots. Although my advisor wanted me to continue down that path, I chose to return to my community to apply knowledge locally. When I discovered ethnobotany, I realized it was exactly what I needed, and I began working with professor Eliane Rodrigues from UNIFESP. Do you believe there is an Indigenous science perspective, with its own ways of thinking and specific methodologies? For many academics, Indigenous science is already science in its rawest form. It's about observing nature, creating a hypothesis, testing it, and seeing the results — that's essentially what Indigenous people do. The difference is that these hypotheses often come from dreams, rituals, or memories of the elders. It's a very close relationship with nature. My experience involves a way of living that goes beyond visual and sensory perception, including a spiritual dimension. That's why you can't say both are the same. Do you believe both forms of science can coexist and complement each other? Yes, definitely. In academic science, for example, it's very difficult to go into the forest and test all the plants to discover a remedy because there are so many. But if you already have a clue, things change. You can focus on a specific family or genus, making the search more precise. That clue is intuitive, and for intuition to work, the person must have a deep connection with nature. How do Indigenous medicine and academic medicine coexist in your village? I still feel the integration between the two is weak, despite the health system being present in the village. During my research, the Indigenous Health Department established a medicinal plant garden here, which has been one of the most significant steps towards integrating knowledge. Additionally, we have an Indigenous doctor in the village, which greatly aids this integration. He combines his traditional knowledge with conventional therapies, recommending both when a health issue can be treated with a plant. You had the support of Indigenous leaders to begin this research. What are their main interests: preserving knowledge, deepening traditional knowledge through academia, or both? The goal was more about valuing knowledge. Here in the village, we know the value of plant and cultural knowledge, but because it's part of daily life, many people don't realize its importance. It's like drinking water: You know it's essential, but because it's so routine, we take it for granted. Today, many young people are more connected to the internet and social media, and they drift away from the knowledge passed down by the elders, shared through conversation, and lived experience. Gradually, this knowledge is being lost. But my work promotes an interaction between me, a young person, and the elders. I talk with them and take notes, so that this knowledge, once documented, can transcend time more easily. It's also crucial to encourage other young people to do the same. Another important point from the leaders is that Indigenous people who leave the village to study at universities bring back outside knowledge that can strengthen the community, rather than creating a separation from it. What difficulties did you face in studying medicinal plants? One of the biggest challenges was noticing that many plants, which were once abundant, are now hard to find. Some only grew in specific parts of the forest that have been destroyed. Today, many plants from outside the region have been introduced by Indigenous people who were displaced or by land grabbers. Many of the plants we find now are not native. Studying native plants is crucial because they are rarely studied, while nonnative plants have generally been well researched. The village is large and spans different biomes (Atlantic Forest and Caatinga), each with its own unique vegetation. As a result, people living in different parts of the village are familiar with different plants, and this knowledge doesn't always circulate across the community. How are the studies progressing now? My research is still ongoing. I expect to finish in 6 or 7 months. I decided to prioritize studying plants used to treat hypertension, intestinal worms, and diabetes, as these are the most common health concerns among Indigenous people today. By sharing this knowledge, I hope more community members can benefit. I am now finishing the section on plants used for other health complaints. Since I could identify many plants by their scientific names, I researched how they are used outside of our culture and compared that with our traditional knowledge. For those with related studies, the traditional use was confirmed by the known chemical composition of these plants. I would love to continue studying plants, but I'm still refining some ideas. I'm not sure what I'll do after this phase, but I know I want to pursue a path that strengthens my people. One possibility is to continue in academia, conducting research, and increasing Indigenous presence in higher education. I hope to bring Indigenous perspectives into the university, like painting it with jenipapo and urucum. Do you think the way forward is to study the plants or their chemical components? I don't focus much on isolating substances from plants because many others already do that. I believe that using the plants in their traditional form is a better approach. The elders possess great wisdom in how to use plants, and understanding their chemical properties only strengthens that knowledge. Today, I consider myself more of an ethnobotanist than a chemist. But herbs can't be studied the same way as isolated chemical substances, right? For instance, you couldn't conduct a placebo-controlled study with plants, could you? It's more complicated because studying plants involves far more variables than isolating a single substance. However, there are biological tests that start with plant extracts using simple methods. From there, evidence is gathered to determine if a plant can help with a specific health issue, potentially leading to the development of a medicine. A little-discussed aspect is the issue of contraindications and side effects. How do you address this? Generally, side effects of plants are understood as those that appear in the short term. If someone takes too much of a plant and feels unwell, they know the dose isn't right. The issue arises with prolonged use, which is harder to assess because the effects may not be easily identifiable. This is why laboratories can play a key role in strengthening knowledge about the safety of using these plants. Another important consideration is drug interactions. Using multiple plants or combining them with pharmaceutical medications isn't always advisable due to these interactions. I also observed that different Indigenous people would use the same name for different plants or the same name for different species. This is an important detail that often goes unnoticed but can affect the accuracy of plant identification. The project also includes a booklet with traditional recipes, correct? Yes, the manual will feature images, data, and some recipes shared by the elders. It's crucial to note that the method of preparing a remedy varies depending on experience. For someone experienced, it's one thing; for someone less familiar, it's another. Great care is needed in preparation. When you leave the village, do you usually take herbs with you, or do you prefer to go to a pharmacy if you need treatment? It depends on the issue, but I typically have both options. During my studies, I often returned home with a backpack full of bark, leaves, and roots. My mother would prepare teas for various ailments. If something required more, I'd first look for phytotherapy at the pharmacy. If I couldn't find it, I'd use synthetic medications. Having both options has always been better than relying on just one. Do you think there can be a harmonious integration of both forms of medicine? Based on the conversations I've had, I believe integration will improve. However, it's still a significant political challenge. True integration requires investment, building appropriate spaces, and acquiring equipment. It's not easy. I'm hopeful we'll progress, but for now, it remains a work in progress.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists recreate universe's first molecule to crack 13-billion-year-old mystery
Scientists have recreated the first molecule ever to form and found that it likely played a much bigger role in the birth of early stars than previously thought. The universe was unimaginably hot and dense immediately after it formed about 13.8 billion years ago, and cooled down seconds later to form the first elements, hydrogen and helium, albeit in a completely ionised form. It then took another 380,000 years for the temperature in the early universe to drop enough for neutral atoms to form by combining with free electrons to pave the way for the first chemical reactions. The first molecule created this way is thought to be helium hydride ion (HeH+), formed from a neutral helium atom and ionised hydrogen. Helium hydride's origin also marked the beginning of a chain reaction that led to the formation of molecular hydrogen (H2), which is by far the most common molecule in the universe, scientists say. Although the infant universe at this point was transparent due to the binding of free electrons, there were still no light-emitting objects, such as stars. Researchers found that this ancient helium hydride molecule helped cool the universe over a process lasting several hundred million years before the first stars ignited. Stars are powered by nuclear fusion in which light atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a tremendous amount of energy. However, for any early contracting gas cloud of a protostar to collapse to the point where nuclear fusion can begin, heat must be dissipated via collisions between atoms and molecules, which then emit this energy in the form of photons. But below 10,000C, this process becomes ineffective for the dominant hydrogen atoms. So researchers have long considered helium hydride ions as a potentially important candidate for cooling in the formation of the first stars. These ancient molecules could facilitate further cooling by emitting additional energy through rotation and vibration, particularly at low temperatures. The concentration of helium hydride ions in the universe was likely key to the effectiveness of early star formation, the study found. New research, published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, used a special ultra-cold lab setup to mimic conditions from over 13 billion years ago that led to the formation of these molecules. The study recreated conditions similar to those in the early universe for the first time at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) instrument at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik – a globally unique lab set up for investigating molecular and atomic reactions under space-like conditions. In the research, scientists superimposed HeH⁺ ions stored in a 35-metre-diameter storage ring for up to just a minute at a few kelvins (-267C) with a beam of neutral hydrogen atoms. They studied how the collision rate varied with temperature and found that, contrary to earlier predictions, the rate at which this reaction proceeds does not slow down with decreasing temperature. 'Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,' said study co-author Holger Kreckel from the MPIK. The findings suggest the reactions of HeH⁺ with hydrogen were far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously thought.