Scientists recreate universe's first molecule to crack 13-billion-year-old mystery
The universe was unimaginably hot and dense immediately after it formed about 13.8 billion years ago, and cooled down seconds later to form the first elements, hydrogen and helium, albeit in a completely ionised form.
It then took another 380,000 years for the temperature in the early universe to drop enough for neutral atoms to form by combining with free electrons to pave the way for the first chemical reactions.
The first molecule created this way is thought to be helium hydride ion (HeH+), formed from a neutral helium atom and ionised hydrogen.
Helium hydride's origin also marked the beginning of a chain reaction that led to the formation of molecular hydrogen (H2), which is by far the most common molecule in the universe, scientists say.
Although the infant universe at this point was transparent due to the binding of free electrons, there were still no light-emitting objects, such as stars.
Researchers found that this ancient helium hydride molecule helped cool the universe over a process lasting several hundred million years before the first stars ignited.
Stars are powered by nuclear fusion in which light atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a tremendous amount of energy.
However, for any early contracting gas cloud of a protostar to collapse to the point where nuclear fusion can begin, heat must be dissipated via collisions between atoms and molecules, which then emit this energy in the form of photons.
But below 10,000C, this process becomes ineffective for the dominant hydrogen atoms.
So researchers have long considered helium hydride ions as a potentially important candidate for cooling in the formation of the first stars.
These ancient molecules could facilitate further cooling by emitting additional energy through rotation and vibration, particularly at low temperatures.
The concentration of helium hydride ions in the universe was likely key to the effectiveness of early star formation, the study found.
New research, published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, used a special ultra-cold lab setup to mimic conditions from over 13 billion years ago that led to the formation of these molecules.
The study recreated conditions similar to those in the early universe for the first time at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) instrument at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik – a globally unique lab set up for investigating molecular and atomic reactions under space-like conditions.
In the research, scientists superimposed HeH⁺ ions stored in a 35-metre-diameter storage ring for up to just a minute at a few kelvins (-267C) with a beam of neutral hydrogen atoms.
They studied how the collision rate varied with temperature and found that, contrary to earlier predictions, the rate at which this reaction proceeds does not slow down with decreasing temperature.
'Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,' said study co-author Holger Kreckel from the MPIK.
The findings suggest the reactions of HeH⁺ with hydrogen were far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously thought.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
30 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Deepest-Ever Field Image of Giant Galaxy Cluster Is a Brutal Reminder of Your Cosmic Insignificance
When it comes to deep space observations, our cosmological insignificance seems to grow with the resolution of our telescopes' cameras. In the latest advance, astronomers constructed the deepest-ever images of Abell 3667, a massive galaxy cluster located 700 million light-years from Earth—and most of the tiny dots you see represent entire galaxies. But the latest images of Abell 3667 also offer 'whispering evidence of past galactic interactions,' which astronomers document in detail in a paper published today in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. The team, led by astronomers from Brown University, caught Abell 3677 at a particularly lustrous moment in space-time, during a merger of two of the clusters' brightest galaxies. The stellar union, resembling a starry bridge stretching across the cluster, generated powerful gravitational bursts that yanked away the occasional stray star from other galaxies. Together, these lone stars emit a faint glow known as intracluster light (ICL)—and it's this phenomenon that researchers are investigating to explore Abell 3677's past. Specifically, it appears likely that Abell 3667 also formed from the rapid merger of two galaxy clusters, which previous X-ray and radio observations had predicted. This latest observation, however, represents the first ever optical evidence to support this idea. 'This is the first time a feature of this scale and size has been found in a local galaxy cluster,' Anthony Englert, study lead author, said in a statement. 'We knew that it was possible for a bridge like this to form between two galaxies, but it hadn't been documented anywhere before now. It was a huge surprise that we were able to image such a faint feature.' The team had an unusually long observation period for this project, which partly enabled them to construct such a detailed image. In addition to the intracluster light, the researchers captured faint, wispy puffs of cosmic dust called integrated flux nebulae, seen as bluish ribbons of light streaking across the image. 'It was just a happy coincidence that so many people had imaged Abell 3667 over the years, and we were able to stack all of those observations together,' Englert noted. The researchers have some outstanding questions about Abell 3677 and, more importantly, intracluster light. Fortunately, their timing couldn't have been more impeccable; with the Rubin Telescope officially up and running, astronomers are now better equipped to further probe these questions. 'Rubin is going to be able to image ICL in much the same way as we did here, but it's going to do it for every single local galaxy cluster in the southern sky,' Englert said. 'What we did is just a small sliver of what Rubin is going to be able to do. It's really going to blow the study of the ICL wide open.' Essentially, if this new image doesn't make you feel small, you might want to wait for the soon-to-come Rubin versions of this image. In fact, if Englert is right, we'll be seeing multiple versions of this image, and in higher resolution, too. So, for better or worse, we humans will only get smaller from here.


Geek Wire
an hour ago
- Geek Wire
Seattle-based Avail acquired by Upstack in tech consultancy deal
Interlune will team up with Astrolab to send a camera to the moon for helium-3 survey


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Trump Administration Moves to Destroy Satellite That Monitors Greenhouse Gases
The Trump Administration's budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2026 would take an axe to NASA science. Two satellite missions on the chopping block have provided climate scientists, oil and gas companies, and farmers with critical atmospheric carbon data for years. The Orbiting Carbon Observatories are a pair of instruments that map atmospheric carbon on a global scale. NASA launched the OCO-2 in 2014 and mounted the OCO-3 on the International Space Station in 2019. Trump's budget proposal threatens both missions, but the standalone OCO-2 would be completely destroyed during its fiery descent through Earth's atmosphere. Though the budget has yet to pass, NPR reports that NASA scientists working on the OCO missions are already making 'Phase F' plans—essentially laying out options for termination. David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who designed the satellites and managed the missions until 2022, told NPR that the NASA employees making those plans have reached out to tap his expertise. 'They were asking me very sharp questions,' Crisp said. 'The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan.' Three other academic scientists and two current NASA employees—all of whom requested anonymity—also confirmed to NPR that the agency is planning to terminate the missions. Congress has already funded both satellites through the end of fiscal year 2025, NPR reports. It could still choose to extend their funding through 2026, but it remains to be seen. In July, congressional Democrats did warn acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy not to terminate missions that Congress has funded—a sign that they may attempt to save the OCOs. Decommissioning these satellites would mark a significant scientific loss. The OCO-2 and OCO-3 sniff out atmospheric carbon dioxide using spectrometers to detect wavelengths of light absorbed by CO2 molecules. NASA designed them to improve monitoring of human-driven carbon emissions and variations in the natural carbon cycle, and they've certainly done a good job of this. OCO-2 data have helped scientists quantify how natural carbon sinks such as forests and oceans offset carbon dioxide emissions and how carbon sinks can become carbon emitters through drought, deforestation, or wildfires, according to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. This instrument has also provided valuable insights into urban carbon dioxide emissions and contributed data that supported the Paris Agreement. That's not all. Shortly after launching the satellite, NASA realized it could also measure plant growth, according to JPL. It does this by detecting the 'glow' plants emit during photosynthesis. When plants absorb sunlight to convert carbon dioxide and water into energy, their chlorophyll—a light-absorbing pigment—leaks some unused photons, JPL explains. This produces a faint glow called solar-induced fluorescence, and OCO-2 can spot it. This data helps farmers and agricultural scientists estimate crop productivity, monitor drought, and more. If Trump's budget passes, it will mean the end of the OCO-2, but there is hope for the OCO-3. NASA is seeking partnerships with institutions and companies willing to take over the cost of maintaining this ISS instrument. For now, like many of America's climate and environmental science programs, the future of both Earth-observing satellites hangs in the balance.