Sunni political alliances shift as Iraq prepares for November elections
With internal competition, fading alliances, and the re-emergence of veteran figures, the Sunni front is mobilizing to secure its place in Baghdad and regain ground lost since the upheaval of 2014.
Shafaq News has learned that four main forces are set to dominate the race in Sunni-majority provinces: Taqaddum (Progress) led by former Parliament Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi, Al-Siyada (Sovereignty) under Khamis al-Khanjar, Azm (Determination) headed by Muthanna al-Samarrai, and the newly established New Baghdad Alliance, a coalition formed around Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani and several prominent Sunni figures.
While some movements are already engaging in campaign activity, others appear hesitant, uncertain whether the political calendar will hold in the face of Iraq's broader institutional volatility.
Legacy of Fragmentation
Sunni representation in Iraq's post-2003 political system has been shaped by successive cycles of marginalization, reconfiguration, and resurgence. After the ISIS territorial takeover in 2014 devastated Sunni heartlands, Sunni factions saw their influence diminish.
In the 2018 parliamentary elections, Sunni MPs secured just 73 of 329 seats—a steep decline from the 90 seats held in the prior cycle. That number rebounded in 2021 to approximately 94, but the gains were short-lived.
Internal discord has continued to fragment Sunni representation. In January 2022, two major camps—al-Halbousi's Taqaddum and al-Khanjar's Azm—joined forces under the Al-Siyada Alliance, commanding a combined bloc of 71 seats. But unity proved fleeting. Al-Halbousi eventually withdrew, citing differences in strategy and leadership, effectively dissolving the coalition's momentum.
In January 2025, a new attempt at consolidation emerged with the formation of the Sunni Leadership Alliance, announced in Baghdad. However, the alliance was notably launched without al-Halbousi's participation, a signal of enduring rivalry within the Sunni sphere. Despite its high-profile launch, the grouping has yet to translate its formation into a coherent electoral strategy or policy action.
Sources close to recent negotiations confirmed that in March, Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani hosted a private meeting among leading Sunni figures, including al-Halbousi. The participants reportedly agreed on the need to maintain communal cohesion and refrain from escalating personal rivalries, which many see as a key obstacle to unified Sunni leverage in national politics.
Major Blocs And Early Mobilization
While formal coalition-building remains limited, campaign activity has already begun in several key provinces. Taqaddum and Azm have taken the lead, investing in candidate selection, media outreach, and constituency visits.
Political operatives linked to Taqaddum are supporting several provincial lists, including the Iraq Hawks Movement led by Yazan Mishaan in Saladin, Minister of Planning Mohammed Tamim in Kirkuk, and Industry Minister Khalid Battal in Al-Anbar. Influential tribal leader Ahmed Abu Risha is also reportedly preparing an electoral push aligned with Taqaddum-backed platforms.
Azm, under the leadership of Muthanna al-Samarrai, is now regarded as the most extensive Sunni alliance. It includes several prominent political veterans such as former Parliament Speaker Osama al-Nujaifi, former Deputy Prime Minister Rafi al-Issawi, and ideological affiliates like the Justice and Benevolence Movement (Harakat al-Adl wal-Ihsan). The coalition aims to present itself as a centrist bloc capable of bridging the Sunni political divide and reasserting influence in the national legislature.
Despite Al-Siyada's continued presence under al-Khanjar, the coalition has yet to mount a clear electoral strategy for November. A political source close to the group suggested that al-Khanjar remains skeptical that elections will proceed as planned, citing the risk of a broader political transition that could sideline the current electoral timeline altogether.
Nonetheless, insiders revealed signs of quiet coordination between Taqaddum and Al-Siyada, raising the possibility of a post-election alliance should mutual interests align. While no formal agreement has been reached, observers note that electoral pragmatism could override past tensions in pursuit of a stronger Sunni parliamentary bloc.
Baghdad And Beyond: Key Battlegrounds
Sunni parties are expected to compete fiercely in several strategic provinces, most notably Al-Anbar, Saladin, Nineveh, Diyala, and parts of Baghdad. The capital's mixed constituencies will be a crucial testing ground for the New Baghdad Alliance, which seeks to mobilize moderate urban Sunni voters disillusioned with established factions.
Mahmoud al-Mashhadani is betting on his stature to draw in support for a platform grounded in technocratic governance and Sunni-Shiite dialogue. His coalition includes former civil servants and professionals aiming to offer an alternative to the dominant tribal- and personality-based politics in Sunni areas.
Meanwhile, efforts are being made to incorporate younger voices and grassroots movements into campaign lists. While these initiatives remain limited in scope, they reflect a broader generational shift underway across Iraq's political spectrum.
Opportunity Amid Uncertainty
With less than seven months remaining before the scheduled vote, Iraq's Sunni political scene remains in flux. While Taqaddum and Azm appear most organized, the absence of a unified electoral front could weaken Sunni influence in a post-election government formation process. The legacy of mistrust, divergent leadership ambitions, and regional competition continues to challenge collective action.
Yet the potential for realignment remains. Observers suggest that electoral outcomes in Sunni areas will depend not only on intra-bloc rivalries but also on national political developments, including potential electoral law changes, federal court rulings, and the fate of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government.
In this fluid environment, Iraq's Sunni leaders face a familiar dilemma: to compete or to coalesce. The answer, and its timing, may well determine the bloc's future relevance in a country still struggling to balance representation, stability, and reform.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
an hour ago
- Shafaq News
Hamas ties talks to end Gaza famine
Shafaq News – Gaza On Thursday, Hamas expressed its 'immediate readiness' to resume ceasefire negotiations, on the condition that humanitarian aid reaches its intended recipients and the famine in Gaza is brought to an end. In a statement, the Palestinian group warned that continuing talks amid what it described as a starvation policy strips the negotiations of meaning. Hamas accused Israel of withdrawing from the talks without justification while 'continuing to deprive more than two million Palestinians of food,' resulting in what the group called an unprecedented humanitarian disaster. Hamas called on the international community and relevant stakeholders to take urgent action to stop the 'massacre committed by the Israeli military against Gaza's population.' It demanded the immediate, unconditional delivery of food aid with guarantees to protect it from obstruction or targeting. The group stressed that any future negotiations must be built on ending the current crisis and ensuring basic human rights.
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's Speaker: Anfal massacre against Barzanis is unforgivable crime
Shafaq News – Baghdad Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani condemned the mass killing of Barzanis during the Anfal campaign, describing it as one of the most horrific atrocities in Iraq's modern history. In an official statement marking the anniversary of the campaign, al-Mashhadani extended condolences to the Barzani family, Kurdish leadership, and the broader Kurdish population, calling the massacre a 'moral outrage' and 'unforgivable crime.' 'We recall with deep sorrow and pain the unjust aggression committed against innocent Barzanis during the Anfal operations,' al-Mashhadani stated, emphasizing that the campaign—which involved mass killings, forced displacement, and attempts to erase the identity of the Kurdish Barzanis—occurred at a time when human conscience was absent or silenced. He reiterated that the Iraqi parliament stands firmly committed to justice and human rights and bears a continued responsibility to support all victims and prevent such tragedies from recurring. 'The blood of the innocent will not be in vain, and history will not forgive those who stood idle in the face of such crimes. Equating victim and executioner is a betrayal of human values.'
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Public opinion is absent from the Anfal crimes anniversary
Shafaq News Although the memory of Iraqis is burdened with disasters and bloody tragedies, they rarely express them with collective awareness or in public. Bitter experiences have taught them that reviving such memories could be exploited politically by certain parties. Every year, the anniversary of the Anfal campaigns launched by Saddam Hussein's regime against the Kurds passes without genuine engagement from Iraqi public opinion. The reason lies not in a weak collective memory but in official policies that have deliberately employed these occasions while ignoring their national and humanitarian dimensions. Successive governments, along with their media apparatuses, have adopted a political discourse stripped of moral content, causing confusion and apathy among the people. This performance has weakened trust and deepened divisions to the point that mourning for an Anfal child has become rare, and some have even gone as far as justifying the crime or praising the perpetrator. Had media policies over the past two decades been more professional and just, Iraqis of all backgrounds would today be at the forefront of those crying out against the Anfal crimes and other massacres. But the selective narrative and political exploitation have obscured the story, disappointed the public, and embarrassed state institutions. More than four decades have passed since the massacres committed by the Ba'ath regime against Kurdish villages and towns under the banner of "Anfal." Yet official stances remain lackluster, and society lacks a true moral compass. Although the Supreme Criminal Court recognized the Anfal as a crime of genocide, that recognition failed to build a firm societal awareness or prevent similar future catastrophes. Even the global public only came to grasp the gravity of what occurred much later—because we failed to tell the truth in its proper time. Sociologists understand that neglecting such memories or approaching them coldly weakens the collective conscience and causes dangerous moral dysfunction in society. True commemoration of these events does not come through official statements but through reviving awareness and involving generations in understanding what happened and why it happened. What is lost today is not merely a historical event, but a precious moral and human capital. The moral exhaustion has reached a point where society can no longer bear to look at images of the victims or comprehend the horror of the crime. This poses a serious threat to the identity and social fabric of the country. Perhaps the deliberate neglect of the anniversary of the Barzani Anfal this year is a glaring example of this absence. There are no sufficient justifications for erasing this tragedy from public awareness, because the collective memory only thrives when citizens feel that it concerns them—that it lies at the heart of their cause. Commemorating this anniversary does not mean inflating the number of victims, but pausing to understand how the Kurds reached that moment in history, and what must change to ensure it does not happen again. The loss of social trust capital has worsened today, and officials must recognize the value of these occasions as gateways to restoring national unity. The Anfal is not merely a Kurdish tragedy—it is an Iraqi catastrophe par excellence. It deserves to be embraced by all components of the Iraqi people, not as a sad memory, but as a cry of conscience against tyranny, whose echo should be heard in Basra, Al-Anbar, Nineveh, and every corner of this land—a roadmap toward a future where justice is never forgotten.
