Trial date set for Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla over July unrest
Image: Doctor Ngcobo/Independent Media
Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) member of Parliament, Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla is no longer intending to petition the National Director of Public Prosecution (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, to withdraw charges against her but said she is ready for trial.
This was revealed by her attorney Advocate Dali Mpofu SC after the pre-trial hearing at the Durban High Court on Thursday. Both the State and the defence said they were ready for the trial and the court date was set from 10 to 21 November.
Sambudla-Zuma was arrested and charged in January. The state alleges that she was instrumental in fomenting deadly violence that left many people dead and paralysed the economy, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal in July 2021.
She faces three counts emanating from her social media posts during the civil unrest. Count one is incitement to commit the offence of terrorism, with the state alleging that between 29 June and July 2021, in various places within the country, the accused unlawfully and intentionally incited others to commit terrorism by engaging in terrorist activities.
On count two, which is an incitement to commit violence, the state alleges the accused incited, instigated, commanded or procured other persons unlawfully assembling with common intent to forcibly disturb the public peace or tranquility or to invade the rights of other persons. On count three, the state also accuses her of violating Section 17 of the Riotous Assemblies Act, 17 of 1956 which deals with the illegal assembling of persons with the intention to cause a riot.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Wearing a black T-shirt with the words 'Modern Day Terrorism Charges', Zuma-Sambudla looked relaxed and smiled. Speaking after the postponement inside the court, Zuma-Sambudla said she still maintained that the charges against her were politically motivated, however, she was ready for trial.
"I still maintain that this case is politically motivated. I am in high spirit and ready for the trial. My party comrades and I are in and out of court because the system wants to punish us for supporting ubaba (Jacob Zuma), said Sambudla-Zuma.
At her last appearance in March she had indicated that she would fight for the dropping of charges.
During the pre-trial hearing, Mpofu read her admission that between June and July she had tweeted using her X account, which has more than 100,000 followers, during her father's arrest.
However, she denies having incited anyone to cause violence. Her argument is that people who may have caused violence and looted did so out of their own anger over her father's arrest in July 2021, not because they were incited by her tweets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Striking a Balance Between Upholding Human Rights and the Rule of Law
Residents of Atteridgeville, grouped under Concern Tshwane Residents, protesting outside Kalafong Provincial Tertiary Hospital, calling for undocumented foreigners to be barred from receiving healthcare services due to the alleged strain on public resources. Image: Independent Media Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu The issue of undocumented migrants in South Africa has caused a stir across various sectors. While some call for their immediate deportation because they deplete the country's resources at the expense of the nationals, others – including some NGOs – plead on their behalf. They even invoke certain clauses of the Freedom Charter and sections of the country's constitution to strengthen their argument on why these undocumented migrants should be allowed to stay in this country. The main question that begs for attention is: where does one draw the line between addressing the challenge of undocumented migrants and upholding human rights? Another question becomes: should the rights of these undocumented migrants supersede those of South African citizens? These are very critical questions. To answer them properly, one must cogently interpret both the Freedom Charter and the Constitution. Clause five of the Freedom Charter states that 'all shall be equal before the law.' Clause 6 states that 'all shall enjoy equal human rights.' The reality is that when the Freedom Charter was adopted in Kliptown, Soweto, on June 26, 1955, it did not envision a South Africa that people from outside the country would populate. In that sense, the 'all' in both clauses did not refer to foreign nationals. Therefore, if these undocumented migrants were to be allowed to live in South Africa, it would be for other reasons, not because of the Freedom Charter. Some cite different sections of the Constitution to make a case for these undocumented migrants, especially Chapter 2 on the Bill of Rights. Sec 25 states that 'everyone has the right to have access to adequate housing.' Section 27 states that everyone has the right to basic education. While these sections are relevant to the debate, it is Section 27 that has triggered a serious debate. Sub-section 1(a) states that 'everyone has the right to have access to health care services, including reproductive healthcare.' Some South Africans complain that they are unable to access health care services because they compete with undocumented migrants. It was for this reason that members of Operation Dudula were arrested for checking patients' identity documents to ascertain if they were South Africans. Others criticise these undocumented migrants for taking their jobs. Whether this is true or not varies from one case to another. This debate leads us to a broader discussion that we must focus on. In this regard, there are five questions to ruminate about. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Firstly, what role has our government played in creating this situation? For example, had they protected the country's borders like other countries do, would this problem have arisen? Secondly, to what extent are the home governments of these undocumented migrants to blame for many of the challenges South Africa is wrestling with? In other words, had these governments ensured political and economic stability in their countries, would these undocumented migrants have come to South Africa? Thirdly, what role do NGOs play in sustaining this challenge? Do they assist the government on how to address the challenge, or do they use the desperation of these undocumented migrants to make themselves relevant and score cheap points? Fourthly, how does the international community contribute to the sustenance of this challenge about undocumented migrants? Do they share their experiences with the South African government, or do they use these migrants for political expediency? Fifthly, what is the way out of this dilemma? In other words, should South Africa simply learn to live with this challenge, or should a solution be found? If the latter is the case, how should the process unfold, and who should be the role-players? On the first question, our government is to blame for the current situation. The country's borders are porous. Corruption has become 'normal'. Some argue that they were in exile in the countries where the undocumented migrants come from. While this statement is factually correct, it is analytically flawed. They lived in camps, were known to the authorities, respected the laws of those countries, and many of them did not compete for jobs with the citizens of their host countries. On the second question, the home governments of these undocumented migrants are to blame. They created economic and political conditions not conducive to their citizens. As such, some had to find their way out to look for greener pastures in South Africa. Regarding the third question, NGOs are not a homogeneous group. Some are doing a good job in filling the gaps where the government has failed. Others advance the interests of foreign governments that want to see South Africa fail. They do so under the guise of helping the needy. They take the side of undocumented migrants to paint the country in a bad light. The fourth question is related to the third one. Some foreign governments are vocal whenever South Africa acts against undocumented migrants. Ironically, they are very tough in their own countries. In that sense, the fate of these undocumented migrants is used to tarnish South Africa's global image while scoring cheap political points. The fifth question is the most important. The South African government should demonstrate leadership. This includes teaching South Africans the correct interpretation of the Freedom Charter and the Constitution. Where the constitution has loopholes, these should be filled through constitutional amendments.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue steering committee aims for broader representation in two weeks
President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing delegates at the national convention, marking the opening of the National Dialogue. The constitution of the steering committee has been delayed by another two weeks. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media The establishment of the broad-based steering committee to oversee and guide the National Dialogue is expected to be finalised in the next two weeks. The National Dialogue's first national convention at the University of SA's main campus in Pretoria on Saturday could not finalise constituting the steering committee. Mandisa Khanyile, a member of the convention organising committee, said some formations or sectors are not yet ready to make a decision regarding who they are going to have as their steering committee nominees 'What we have decided to do is that we are going to allow a period of two weeks post this convening for those sectors to make that decision,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Khanyile added that sectors should provide two or three nominees for the steering committee or one of its subcommittees. She said organisations and sectors will meet over the next two weeks and include not just people present during the national convention. 'There was a complaint that there were people who are not in this room, that we haven't had access to, this is the time to bring them into the conversation,' Khanyile explained. She said the organising committee wanted the process to be made public. 'If you are going to, for example, have a meeting, that meeting must be available for people online who want to join so that they can see the transparency within the process,' Khanyile added. She clarified that this is a 100% voluntary engagement. 'No one is going to get remunerated for their time. You will not be paid to do this work. 'It is going to be up to you and your organisation and your personal pocket how you fund your participation in this process,' said Khanyile, adding that involvement will be based on ability to participate without necessarily needing compensation. The Rastafari Nation Council representing 26 organisations of Rastafarians and seven orders of the Church of His Majesty or the churches of Rastafari opposed capping the number of steering committee members at 50. A representative of the council from Limpopo said half of the social or civil society movements present at the national convention are already speaking on behalf of the process and there is overrepresentation on their side. 'We have a National Assembly of 400 people, so it shouldn't be a problem having a steering committee as widely representative as possible than to be limiting it to a particular number,' the Rastafari council representative stated. He explained that as long as there is broad representation and inclusivity, they will be happy with that. The Rastafaris claim to be a significant minority of about three million in South Africa. 'We would like to humbly request that we be defined as Rastafari, not grouped with faith-based communities, not grouped with any other groupings because faith plays a smaller role within that. We are also one of the communities which are very much historically marginalised,' the representative added.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Civic groups challenge government control in National Dialogue discussions
President Cyril Ramaphosa addressing delegates at the sitting of the National Convention, which marked the opening of the National Dialogue. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Media Abahlali Basemjondolo has vowed to utilise the National Dialogue to disrupt the country's status quo, which suppresses the voices of the people on the ground. The group's general secretary, Thapelo Mohapi, said the group would ensure that the government does not have an upper hand in conducting the dialogue across the country. The civic society, which lobbies for the better lives of informal settlement dwellers, participated in the two-day National Convention at the University of South Africa (Unisa) on Friday and Saturday. The convention was to draft a roadmap for the discussions to find a way of dealing with the country's challenges. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The last day of the convention on Saturday at Unisa's ZK Matthews Hall was expected to give direction on how the dialogues would be convened in all spheres of society. Like many groups of society, Abahlali was concerned that under the government's control, the dialogue would become another talk-shop. 'We are here to disrupt the status quo because we want this dialogue to be for the people by the people,' said Mahapi, who participated in a plenary session that dealt with crime and corruption. Mohapi was concerned that if the dialogue was controlled by the government, it would end up being like various commissions of inquiries whose recommendations ended up gathering dust without implementation. He said the people who are poor and marginalised used various platforms to express their views, but the government never recognised them. 'This dialogue must be rooted in the ground, it must be people-led,' he said. Abahlali would take the agenda crafted by the plenary sessions to its constituents for scrutiny. He said he wanted the dialogue that is going to deal with the informal settlement dwellers who are constantly victims of shack fires and floods. 'We are saying these are the issues of the people,' said Mohapi. Independent political analyst Dr Imraan Buccus was concerned that the dialogue was constructed as an elite project 'that takes into account organisations and individuals that don't necessarily speak on behalf of the masses of the people'. He agreed with the growing consensus that serious questions need to be asked about whether we need a dialogue at all. 'There's ample research and other participatory processes that tell us what we already need to know,' Buccus said. He was also concerned about the money spent on conducting the dialogue. 'The R700m being used for the dialogue would be better utilised to address the deficit we already know about,' he said. Sinesipho Soxujwa, who represented the Unemployed People's Movement at the opening of the dialogue, said on Saturday that people on the street were expecting the dialogue to come up with a resolution to promote local businesses to create job opportunities. 'We must oblige the private sector to invest in the communities instead of extracting from them and not giving back. We must ensure a living wage to uplift people trapped in poverty,' said Soxujwa. Soxujwa briefly stole the limelight when she called for the dialogue not to be a polite conversation that would avoid the truth. 'We want this dialogue to tackle the issues that we deal with daily. We want it to go on a route of the unemployment issues, and we have talked and talked and came to the conclusion that the dialogue should reject neoliberalism and build an economy that is going to serve the people first. 'And also defend water, electricity, transport, and houses as rights and not commodities,' she said. University of KwaZulu-Natal-based political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said the dialogue should consider changing the electoral system to one that enables voters to hold public representatives, such as members of Parliament and councillors, accountable. 'Our electoral system is the biggest problem because public representatives are accountable to political parties, who deploy them and not the voters.' Although questioning the necessity of the dialogue, Ndlovu hoped that the issue of the electoral system would be discussed because it is a fundamental issue. 'We voted for the people to do the job, which they don't do. As a result, we now have the National Dialogue. 'How do you justify the cost of R700 million? This thing is like the commissions that do not help because if you look at the Zondo Commission, over R1 billion was spent, but no one has been prosecuted,' said Ndlovu.
