logo
How the far right is politicising the return of the wolf – and again threatening its presence in Europe

How the far right is politicising the return of the wolf – and again threatening its presence in Europe

Independent2 days ago
In Lower Saxony, in 2022, a wolf attacked and killed Dolly, Ursula von der Leyen's favourite pony. Strategically, this was a terribly poor move on the wolf's part. The president of the European Commission is a passionate equestrian. Citing 'numerous reports of wolf attacks on animals' and an unsubstantiated 'increased risk to local people', von der Leyen requested an in-depth analysis into the wolf's status in Europe. On the basis of that analysis, the European Commission voted last year to downgrade the wolf's level of protection, and on Monday that directive formally entered into force. With it began a whole new chapter in our relationship with the wolf.
Wolves have been undergoing a remarkable resurgence. By the mid-20th century they had been pushed almost to extinction in Europe, but a combination of EU conservation measures and the abandonment of agricultural land means that today there are more than 23,000 across the continent, a species of least concern. In a biodiversity crisis, it is heartening to see nature's capacity to heal if we let it.
For my book Lone Wolf I followed one of the pioneers. Slavc was a wolf born in the south of Slovenia in 2010, but at 18 months old he left his pack behind and set off on a 1,000-mile journey across the Alps. He crossed Slovenia and Austria, and four months later came to Italy, to the foothills north of Verona, where he bumped into a female wolf on a walkabout of her own. Astonishingly, perhaps the only two wild wolves for several thousand square miles had somehow found each other. When they bred, they became the first wolf pack back in these mountains for more than a century. Today, there are at least 17 packs in the region.
Before setting out, Slavc had been fitted with a GPS collar. It gave researchers a unique chance to observe the path of a large carnivore through the heart of Europe; and it gave me an idea. More than a decade later I embarked, on foot, on the same path Slavc had travelled. I wanted to see how those living alongside the wolf once more were coping with its presence. I found shepherds and farmers working with dogs and electric fences, showing coexistence with carnivores is possible. But I also found that wherever the wolf has returned, the fear and hatred has come back, too.
Alpine farmers live hard lives in hard places. Climate change; the rocketing costs of energy and feed; young people leaving for the cities: now they are being asked to tolerate the wolf. I could understand their anger. The wolf has become a convenient scapegoat for a range of complex problems, and one that can be addressed with a shotgun. Wolves kill at least 65,500 livestock annually in the EU (by comparison, dogs off the leash in the UK kill an estimated 15,000 sheep a year). Yet those herders taking measures to protect their flocks are often treated as traitors by their neighbours.
Far-right, anti-EU parties, such as Austria's FPŐ, have been enflaming tensions in the countryside, refusing to countenance any solution except shooting them. The framing is that wolves are supported by an urban elite with no idea of how the land works. It has been a successful strategy. A 2022 German study found that wolf attacks led to far-right gains of between one and two percentage points in subsequent municipal elections. Only 2 per cent of European voters work in farming, but their voice is loud and they symbolise a much wider discontent about the green transition. It is a discontent the far-right are all too happy to encourage.
Two years ago, when I walked Slavc's path, a change in law still seemed fanciful. That it has happened so quickly is indicative of how politics is shifting, and how politicised the wolf remains. Countries including Spain, Germany and France have already indicated or enacted changes in law, and other countries will follow suit. 'If we could count on logic and rationality and scientific rigour, this decision is not dangerous,' said Luigi Boitani, Italy's pre-eminent wolf expert. But as I saw in a long walk across Europe, that is rarely how we reason.
Despite their numbers, wolves remain in 'unfavourable or inadequate conservation status' in all but one of Europe's biogeographical regions. A Swedish decision to reduce the country's wolf population from 300 to 170 risks pushing them into an 'extinction vortex'. A coalition of environmental groups are taking the European Commission to court over the decision, in a move backed by hundreds of conservationists. In the meantime, this summer is set to be the bloodiest for wolves for half a century. Whether it harms their numbers, and whether it assuages the anger in the countryside, remains to be seen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime
Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Labour says Reform UK ‘trying to divide communities' ahead of Farage speech on crime

Update: Date: 2025-07-21T08:19:51.000Z Title: Farage's plans to reform criminal justice system criticised ahead of speech Content: Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics. Nigel Farage is to lay out plans that he claims would end all early release schemes for sex offenders and serious violent offenders if he were to become prime minister. In a speech in London later today, the Reform UK leader will also reportedly promise to build 30,000 new prison places to tackle the overcrowding crisis, appoint 30,000 more police officers within five years and deport 10,400 foreign offenders currently in British jails. He has not said how these policies will be funded and will likely face questions on how he would negotiate return agreements for foreign offenders. Some of his promises – like sending some of the most serious criminals to overseas jails, including in El Salavdor – will also likely face serious legal obstacles if they were ever realised. Farage, whose Reform party is leading many polls, was quoted by the Daily Telegraph as having said: Reform UK will be the toughest party on law and order this country has ever seen. We will cut crime in half. We will take back control of our streets, we will take back control of our courts and prisons. We are expecting more details on Reform's plans at around 11am. Reform's attempt to woo voters with a tough on crime message stands in contrast to the proposals recently suggested by Sir Brian Leveson, a former senior judge who was asked by the Lord Chancellor to come up with ways to reduce the backlog of cases in the criminal courts. Recommendations in the report included increased use of out-of-court resolutions, greater use of rehabilitation programmes and health intervention programmes and increasing the maximum reduction for entering a guilty plea at the first opportunity from 33% to 40%. Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said that Reform is not serious about implementing real changes to the criminal justice system as the party 'voted to try to block measures to crack down on knife crime, antisocial behaviour, shop theft and child sexual abuse'. 'They should focus more on practical solutions to support our police, combat crime, deliver justice for victims of crime, rather than chasing headlines, spouting slogans and trying to divide communities,' she added. Here is the agenda for the day. 09.45am: Sir Jon Cunliffe, Independent Water Commission chair, to give speech. 11am: Nigel Farage to make a speech in London on the criminal justice system. 13:00pm: Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign press conference in Sheffield. 14.30pm: Keir Starmer to appear at the Liaison Committee.

Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with
Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Taking the knee has not ‘lost its power' – it never had any to begin with

The shock value of the Lionesses' decision against taking the knee was that they still laboured, five years on, under a misapprehension it was some vital instrument in the fight against racism. Watching them stage this ritual before their games in Switzerland has brought echoes of that overwrought summer of 2020, when the Black Lives Matter movement unleashed such chaos that genuine action took a back seat to superficial slogans and designer hashtags. Kneeling felt tokenistic even then, a tick-box exercise for football to show how much it cared, an easy PR win while avoiding any commitment to deeper change. In 2025, it has become so perfunctory that the England women's team are forced to admit it serves no useful purpose. 'Is the message as strong as it used to be?' asked Lucy Bronze. 'Is the message really hitting hard?' To those questions, Alex Greenwood provided some form of answer. 'There's maybe a feeling,' she said, 'that it has lost its power.' The reality that these players dared not acknowledge was that it had never had any power in the first place. This was not some 21st-century equivalent of the Black Power salute, when Tommie Smith and John Carlos stood atop a podium at the Mexico City Olympics and raised black-gloved fists to the sky at grave personal cost to themselves. This was an empty, performative piece of gesture politics. The wonder, truly, is that it has gone on so long. Even when Gareth Southgate's England included it in their pre-match repertoire in 2021, many fans loudly booed in protest, rejecting both the symbolism of a fad that had originated in the United States and the blurring of political agitation with the escapism of sport. The pro-knee brigade's argument, of course, was that this crusade had less to do with politics than an assertion of universal human rights. But this seemed naive at best when you examined the other principles of BLM leaders who portrayed themselves as 'trained Marxists': defunding the police, for example, or dismantling the nuclear family. Perhaps the most compelling case against kneeling was made by black players who hated it. Wilfried Zaha described it as 'degrading', explaining that his parents had taught him to be proud to be black, that they had urged him to stand tall. 'I think the meaning behind the whole thing is becoming something that we just do now,' he said. 'That's not enough. I'm not going to take the knee.' It was four-and-a-half years ago that he delivered this impassioned statement, so it seems peculiar that the Lionesses are only now reaching the same conclusion. The original rationale was that taking the knee would assume unstoppable force purely through repetition. And yet the reverse has taken place, with the spectacle so denuded of impact that the Premier League has long since chosen to reserve it only for a few carefully-chosen fixtures. For an institution so wedded to the idea that it compelled players in 2020 to replace the names on their shirts with the words 'Black Lives Matter', it is a means of saving face. Now we find ourselves at the logical end point, where the practice is phased out altogether. You might expect this to happen if its stated objectives had been fulfilled, but the bitter truth is that it has done nothing to eradicate the scourge of racism. Just as Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka and Jadon Sancho received unspeakable bigotry after missing penalties in England's European Championship final defeat to Italy, so Jess Carter has spoken of 'vile' and 'abhorrent' comments directed towards her online during the latest tournament. For all that she deserves sympathy over her ordeal, it is revealing that she and her team-mates are abandoning their anti-racism campaign on the pitch at the precise moment that they confront evidence of racism off it. There could scarcely be a more damning illustration of the gesture's hollowness. In sport as in society, we are past the point of being impressed by those who drape themselves in the cloak of righteousness. In 2020, amid the collision of pandemic and culture wars, conspicuous projection of virtue was all the rage, with Jake Humphrey adorning his fleece in the TV studio with one pin badge for the NHS and another for BLM. But in 2025, it is a turn-off, with the sight of footballers dropping to their knees for a couple of seconds inducing nothing more than ennui, a sense that they are acting out of obligation rather than any sincere concern for the cause of anti-racism itself. So, never mind Greenwood's notion that it has 'lost its power' now. Ultimately, you cannot lose what you never had.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store