FAM hits back at 'baseless' claims over naturalised players
FAM president Datuk Joehari Ayub insisted the governing body had followed all proper procedures and dismissed the swirling accusations as baseless.
"FIFA have checked. We followed the rules and regulations," he told Timesport on Thursday.
The controversy was sparked by Indonesian outlet Disway ID, which alleged that Harimau Malaya's victory on June 10 could be overturned — with Vietnam awarded a 3-0 win instead.
The report also claimed that FAM could be fined US$2 million (RM9.4 million) and face further sanctions if FIFA finds evidence of document manipulation involving players heritage.
Five newly naturalised players — Facundo Garces, Imanol Machuca, Joao Figueiredo, Rodrigo Hidalgo and Jon Irazabal — made their debuts in that match, prompting critics in Indonesia and Vietnam to question the legitimacy of their Malaysian ancestry.
FAM has already stated that the players' naturalisation processes were fully vetted and approved by FIFA.
However, Indonesian media claimed that an internal probe by the world body had uncovered inconsistencies in the documentation.
As of now, neither FIFA nor the AFC have issued any official statement, and no formal complaints have been made public.
Despite the lack of concrete evidence or action, the issue has gained traction among Southeast Asian football fans, especially on social media, with many demanding a formal investigation.
Peter Cklamovski's side currently top Group F with six points, followed by Vietnam and Laos (three points each) and Nepal (zero). Malaysia opened their qualifying campaign with a 2-0 win over Nepal in March before their dominant victory over Vietnam.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
23 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Bangladeshi militant group: Malaysia shows effective counterterrorism capabilities, says analyst
KUALA LUMPUR: The recent discovery and crippling of a Bangladeshi-based Islamic State (IS) cell operating in Malaysia has reinforced the nation's strategic position in regional migration networks and the effectiveness of its counterterrorism efforts, a security analyst said. Chasseur Group security analyst Munira Mustaffa believes the detection demonstrates Malaysia's continued appeal as an operational environment for foreign extremist networks, but this reflects strategic calculations by threat-actors rather than unique Malaysian vulnerabilities. "The case reinforces Malaysia's position as a country where legitimate migration channels intersect with security challenges. "However, the successful disruption by Malaysian authorities also demonstrates robust counterterrorism capabilities," she told the New Straits Times. Chasseur Group is a specialised research and analytical consulting firm based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, focused on complex security challenges. "All countries face terrorism risks, but Bangladesh's recent regime change creates particular vulnerabilities. "Post-revolution periods typically involve internal power struggles, disagreements over governance direction, and social fractures," she said adding that these instabilities create opportunities that extremist groups can exploit. Munira said it is a common pattern seen after sudden political transitions. She said the regional implications are limited, as this appears to be a homeland-focused network rather than one seeking regional expansion or local recruitment. "While public concern is understandable, the successful identification and disruption of this network actually demonstrates effective counterterrorism capabilities rather than enforcement failures. "Malaysia faces similar challenges to other countries with significant migrant populations and established diaspora communities. "The network's exclusive focus on Bangladeshi nationals and homeland objectives suggests selective targeting rather than broad-based local recruitment," she said adding that modern counterterrorism operates on intelligence-led approaches focusing on tangible threats rather than abstract possibilities, which appears to be functioning effectively in this case. Munira believes that sustained intelligence-led operations remain the most effective approach, as evidenced by this successful disruption. "Key priorities include maintaining robust intelligence-sharing mechanisms with international partners, particularly given the transnational nature of these networks. "Enhanced community engagement within diaspora communities can provide early warning indicators whilst avoiding broad-based surveillance approaches," she said adding that the focus should remain on understanding threat-actor operational requirements rather than implementing blanket restrictions that may prove counterproductive. She said Malaysia's existing legal framework, including the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act, appears adequate for addressing these threats, as demonstrated by the varied legal dispositions in this case. "Further legislative restrictions risk creating authoritarian overreach whilst potentially alienating communities whose cooperation is essential for effective counterterrorism. "The emphasis should be on improving implementation and community-based prevention approaches rather than expanding legal powers," she said adding that evidence-based community engagement programmes may prove more effective than additional legislative measures. Munira said Malaysia could benefit from adopting more systematic approaches to threat assessment and community engagement programmes developed in other democracies. "This includes enhanced analytical frameworks for understanding threat-actor operational requirements, improved inter-agency coordination mechanisms, and evidence-based community resilience programmes. "However, any adaptations must account for Malaysia's specific demographic, political, and constitutional context rather than wholesale adoption of foreign models. The priority should be strengthening analytical capabilities and community partnerships rather than expanding enforcement powers," he said.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Influencers urged to steer clear of hot topics during US immigration crackdown
Avoid politics. That's the advice lawyers are increasingly giving US-based content creators who aren't citizens as an immigration crackdown spreads across the country. "Every chance I get to tell them to scrub their socials even for likes and reposts of innocuous content – like JD Vance or anti-war memes – I do,' said Genie Doi, an immigration lawyer who works with influencers. In the combative, anything-goes world of digital media, Internet personalities tend to gravitate toward hot-button, controversial subjects, not shy away from them. But in the current political climate, lawyers are telling their clients that weighing in on topics like Palestine or the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles, can come with serious risks, including unwanted scrutiny from authorities or unfriendly competitors. Last month, Khaby Lame, a Senegalese-Italian influencer with millions of followers on TikTok, was detained by immigration agents in Las Vegas after overstaying the terms of his visa, according to a Department of Homeland Security senior official. Lame, who has partnered with many mainstream brands, including Pepsi and Hugo Boss, has since voluntarily left the country. Afterward, Bo Loudon, a conservative influencer who is friends with US President Donald Trump's son Barron, took credit for tipping off DHS. Even though Lame typically doesn't speak in his TikTok videos, which come across as entirely apolitical, Loudon has since described him as a "far-left influencer'. Lame didn't respond to a request for comment. "No one is above the law!' Loudon wrote on X. For many social-media personalities around the world, the US is a desirable place to work due to the big marketing budgets of US brands, as well as the proximity to dealmakers and casting directors in Hollywood. But for anyone with a large following on social media, coming into the US these days isn't without potential hazards. In May, Hasan Piker, a popular, far-left political commentator and US citizen, was stopped and questioned by US border agents at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport about his views on Palestine, which he regularly shares on Inc's livestreaming site Twitch. In an interview with Bloomberg News, Piker said he believes DHS interrogated him to send a message to others in his position. "The goal was to threaten people who might also want to speak out and go to protests regardless of their citizenship status,' he said. "It's a threatening environment they want to cultivate to stop people from exercising their First Amendment rights.' "Our officers are following the law, not agendas,' DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin responded via email. "Upon entering the country, this individual (Hasan Piker) was referred for further inspection – a routine, lawful process that occurs daily, and can apply for any traveler. Once his inspection was complete, he was promptly released.' Earlier this year, US Customs and Border Protection revoked Piker's Global Entry privileges – a programme in which approved individuals get expedited clearance on their return to the US. Doi, the immigration lawyer, is now advising clients who aren't US citizens to avoid international travel altogether. At ports of entry, CBP has broad authority to search and seize electronic devices of incoming travelers though the agency says that fewer than .01% of all international travelers were subject to such searches last year. "Every entry at the border is an opportunity for CBP to inspect your electronics without a warrant,' Doi said. One in five Americans get their news from influencers, according to a 2024 Pew Research survey, with 27% of news influencers identifying as conservative or pro-Trump, versus 21% as left-leaning. So far in his second term, Trump has directed most of his attacks on the media at mainstream outlets, ranging from CNN and CBS News to the New York Times – all of which have full-time legal departments poised to respond to such threats. By contrast, even the most popular online creators tend to have much slimmer operations, potentially leaving them more vulnerable to aggressive legal tactics. David Rugendorf, an immigration attorney, said he now advises content creators, regardless of their citizenship status, that anything they have ever posted online could be used against them. As a result, he said, some are opting to delete old posts. "This government,' Rugendorf said, "is particularly attuned to the power of social media' and "wants to counter' certain positions. In early June, Derek Guy, a fashion critic whose popularity has soared on social media for mocking the sartorial choices of conservative politicians, revealed his own status as a longtime, undocumented resident of the US. "The lack of legal immigration has totally shaped my life,' he wrote on X, where he has more than 1 million followers. "It has taken an emotional toll, as this legal issue hangs over your head like a black cloud.' Afterward, some conservatives suggested online that the Trump administration should kick Guy out of the country. Before long, Vice President Vance weighed in on X, posting a meme of the actor Jack Nicholson nodding his head up and down menacingly. Guy didn't respond to requests for comment for this story. In mid-June, Mario Guevara, an independent, Spanish-speaking journalist with a sizable online following, was arrested while livestreaming anti-Trump protests outside of Atlanta. He was subsequently handed over to ICE. Guevara, who moved to the US from El Salvador in 2004 according to the New Yorker, is currently facing deportation hearings. The Committee to Protect Journalists has said that Guevara "has authorization to work' in the US. DHS said that he entered the country illegally. Guevara's lawyer didn't respond to a request for comment. "Following his arrest by local authorities, ICE placed a detainer on him,' DHS's McLaughlin said. "Following his release, he was turned over to ICE custody and has been placed in removal proceedings.' Scrutiny from immigration authorities isn't the only potential risk for politically outspoken influencers. In recent years, a growing number of large advertisers have been shying away from politically active creators, said Crystal Duncan, an executive vice president of brand engagement at Tinuiti, a marketing firm. In recent months, many brand managers have grown even more wary. "In general, brands have been less vocal about political and social issues since the change in administration, given shifts in the political climate and heightened polarization,' said Jasmine Enberg, principal analyst at eMarketer. David Melik Telfer, a lawyer in Los Angeles, said that most international influencers come to the US on O1-B visas, under the same category as traditional entertainers. Lately, he said, the US State Department has been scrutinizing applications more closely and challenging them more often. "They are examining everybody's social media,' he said. "If your number one priority is not being detained and remaining in the US, I would certainly not attend any protest.' – Bloomberg
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Jail for Malaysian who recruited two Japanese women for prostitution in Singapore's Marina Bay Sands
Goh Boon Hong pleaded guilty to five charges on June 30, including harbouring women for the purpose of prostitution and living on prostitution earnings. - Singapore Police Force via ST/ANN SINGAPORE: A man who ran an online vice syndicate to recruit Japanese women for prostitution in Singapore was sentenced to a year's jail and fined S$4,000 (US$3140). Goh Boon Hong, 25, pleaded guilty to five charges on June 30, including harbouring women for the purpose of prostitution and living on prostitution earnings. In August 2024, Goh, who is Malaysian, was hired by a man named Wong Chi San to be a member of the syndicate. Initially, Goh received a ten per cent commission from the prostitution earnings. This was later increased to 20 per cent. In January 2025, Goh took over the syndicate's operations after Wong was arrested. Details of Wong's case were not mentioned in court documents. That month, a 26-year-old Japanese woman, identified in court documents as A1, accepted Goh's invite to prostitute herself in Singapore from February to March. A1 extended the invitation to her 27-year-old Japanese friend A2, who also accepted. On July 4, Seng Guan Heng, 57, was also charged with two counts of using criminal force on another person. Over nine days at the Marina Bay Sands hotel, A1 provided sexual services to 44 customers. She earned S$14,800 from them, and was paid 1.24 million yen (S$10,900) by Goh. A2 served 37 customers, earning S$11,100. Goh paid her 830,000 yen. Goh worked with an accomplice, Chinese national Zhang Kai, who booked the hotel rooms. On top of the hotel room charges, Goh paid Zhang S$50 per room per day for procuring the hotel rooms. Zhang would also help Goh to set up inflatable beds and massage gels in the toilets of the hotel rooms. Initially, Goh paid Zhang S$500 for each toilet set-up. This was subsequently increased to S$600 after Zhang complained of the risk involved in carrying out these prostitution operations. Goh also paid Zhang S$2,100 for his services over the nine-day period and kept the rest of the prostitution earnings. The offences came to light on March 7 when the police conducted an anti-vice operation at Marina Bay Sands and Goh was arrested. Zhang's case is still before the courts, with his pre-trial conference set for July 17. Those convicted of harbouring a woman for the purpose of prostitution can be jailed for up to seven years and fined up to S$100,000. - The Straits Times/ANN
