
Commentary: Espionage and tariffs can't tarnish TSMC's crown
Still, heavy is the head of TSMC, whose technology everybody wants a piece of. Less than a day after news broke that TSMC fired several employees for a suspected attempt to obtain critical information on its cutting-edge manufacturing, US President Donald Trump threatened new chip tariffs 'of approximately 100 per cent'.
On Thursday, Taiwan confirmed that TSMC is exempt from the latest levies due to its investments in the US. But Trump still sowed a lot of confusion after stating in an interview earlier this week that Taiwan was 'coming over and spending US$300 billion in Arizona, building the biggest plant in the world'. TSMC had previously only committed US$165 billion, suggesting negotiations might not be over.
Trump likely realized that new, sky-high tariffs on TSMC would be a blow to US tech ambitions. Domestic titans at the heart of maintaining America's lead over China, such as Nvidia and Apple, are TSMC's biggest customers. And fresh levies would be an own-goal for the Stargate artificial intelligence infrastructure plans Trump announced earlier this year, which rely on hundreds of thousands of advanced chips.
The news of a tariff reprieve helped drive TSMC's shares to a record on Thursday.
TSMC's multi-billion-dollar expansion efforts in the US haven't always gone over well at home. Some patriotic Taiwanese want the chipmaker to keep core technologies within the self-ruled island as a safeguard from potential Beijing aggression.
But expanding manufacturing to the US will only strengthen Taiwan's alliance with Washington and give its footprint room to grow. It's also worth recognising that TSMC and Silicon Valley are on the same side when it comes to countering China.
MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS OVER LEAK
Still, tariffs may not be the company's biggest headache. The potential corporate espionage is far more than a run-of-the-mill commercial intellectual property theft. It's being investigated under Taiwan's national security law and has the potential to spiral into a broader geopolitical spat.
At this stage, there are more questions than answers. The scope of the leak, the perpetrator and the motive haven't been disclosed. Still, TSMC has said it was able to identify the issue 'early'.
On Thursday, Tokyo Electron confirmed that a former employee was involved in the case, though said an internal probe hadn't found evidence of the confidential information being shared with a third party.
Local prosecutors have made half a dozen arrests, and the people involved were reportedly targeting information on the company's 2-nanometer production – the most advanced chip manufacturing technology in the world.
Besides TSMC, there are only three other companies that are actively trying to mass produce the cutting-edge chips: Samsung, Intel and Japan's long-shot startup Rapidus. Many of them rely on the same suppliers, such as Tokyo Electron.
Acquiring the critical know-how for smaller chip node production can cost tens of billions of dollars in research and development. There are other reasons so few firms are capable of attempting this. Even with the R&D knowledge, it still requires massive investments in fabrication plants and tooling equipment, as well as access to a very limited supply of trained engineers to compete at scale.
Taiwan and TSMC have spent decades building this foundation, and there aren't clear shortcuts to leapfrog the company's dominance – even unethical ones. Countries and companies have poured billions trying to eclipse TSMC's virtual monopoly on advanced chipmaking, but these hard-won gains can't be spread (or stolen) overnight.
The firm is also no stranger to talent poaching and other attempts at IP theft; it's a systemic issue in an industry where the strategic importance is so high. The most recent case is spurring international whodunnit intrigue, but more importantly it shows that the company has beefed up internal security protocols to rapidly respond.
CRUCIAL FOR TSMC TO MAINTAIN ITS EDGE
It can't be overstated how important it is for TSMC to maintain its technology edge. Some 24 per cent of the most-recent quarterly revenue came from its 3-nanometer tech. Demand is already high for the company's next-generation nodes, set to go into mass production later this year. TSMC's dominance gives it the power to set prices at a time when the foreign exchange rate is unfavourable and trade uncertainty looms.
This tech advantage has not just proven crucial for TSMC's business. It is giving Taiwan's government leverage via so-called semiconductor diplomacy. The potential leak gives new fuel to critics of President Lai Ching-te, who has had a rough few weeks.
As the first chips-related case involving the National Security Act, it's imperative that authorities investigate and respond to the fullest extent of the law. Taipei must set a precedent with this case to deter any future attempts.
As my colleague Howard Chua-Eoan has written, history shows us that technological secrets and monopolies have a hard time staying that way in the long run. For now, TSMC is selling the shovels during a global AI gold rush. Even tariff threats and espionage attempts can't tarnish its crown just yet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


International Business Times
an hour ago
- International Business Times
Putin to Fly to the US for High-Stakes Meeting with Trump in Alaska for Ukraine Talks
President Donald Trump revealed on Friday that he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska next week. The president announced on his Truth Social account that the meeting is set for Friday, August 15. "The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska," Trump wrote. "Further details to follow. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Earlier on Friday, the president told reporters that his efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war would begin with a meeting with Putin in the coming days. High-Stakes Meeting Next Week Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin X The president acknowledged that ending the three-and-a-half-year war would require negotiations over certain territories in Ukraine. "It's complicated, nothing easy," he previewed. "It's very complicated but we're going to get some back and we're going to get some switched." Trump said that his priority is bringing the war to an end and "saving lives." "I think if we didn't come, Ukraine and Russia would have ended up being a World War, and I stopped that," he said. Vladimir Putin X The summit will be the first in-person meeting between a U.S. and Russian leader since former President Joe Biden sat down with Putin in 2021. Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in 2022 following that meeting, and Biden has since declined to meet with Putin. It will also mark the first visit by Putin — or any Russian head of state — to the United States since September 28, 2015, when he met with then-President Barack Obama during the UN General Assembly in New York City. The unexpected announcement comes just a day after Trump's latest deadline for Russia to commit to peace talks expired. Trump X Trump's statement also follows reports from multiple U.S. outlets quoting a White House official who said any meeting with the Russian leader would depend on his willingness to meet directly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. However, when questioned by reporters, Trump clarified that a meeting between Putin and Zelensky would not be required for the planned U.S.-Russia talks to proceed. Complicated Issue but Ukraine Not Involved The U.S. president continues to push for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if Putin refuses to engage with Zelensky. Had the US missed the peace talk deadline, the nation would have been prepared to impose secondary tariffs targeting Russia's major allies, India and China. Volodymyr Zelensky X In anticipation of these measures, India announced last night that it was halting its purchases of Russian oil. The action would strip the Kremlin of billions in oil revenue used to fund its occupation and attacks on Ukraine. When questioned about the deadline, Trump said the decision was "up to" Putin. "It's going to be up to him [Putin]. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed."


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Iran will not allow Trump-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to exclave: Khamenei aide
TEHRAN: Iran will not allow the creation under a US-brokered peace deal of a corridor near the Iranian border linking Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Saturday (Aug 9). The planned corridor, dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity", is a key part of a peace deal signed at the White House on Friday between Azerbaijan and its longtime foe Armenia. However, the proposed route, in which the United States will have development rights, passes near the Iranian border and Khamenei's international affairs adviser Ali Akbar Velayati said Iran would not accept it. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Velayati told the Tasnim news agency, He said the planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries". Iran has long opposed the planned transit route, also known as the Zangezur corridor - fearing it would cut the country off from Armenia and the rest of the Caucasus, and bring a foreign presence to its border. "We have the right to defend our interests in a completely powerful manner," Velayati said, adding that Iran had held multiple military exercises in the area to show its "readiness". Iran's foreign ministry welcomed "the finalisation of the text of the peace agreement" between Armenia and Azerbaijan but expressed "concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders". It added that such a move would "disrupt the security and lasting stability of the region". Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have feuded for decades over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. They went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Asked what Armenia stood to gain from Friday's deal, a White House official said it was "an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world: the United States of America".

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran will not allow Trump-backed corridor linking Azerbaijan to exclave, says Khamenei aide
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox (From left) Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev, US President Donald Trump and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signing a peace deal at the White House on Aug 8. TEHRAN - Iran will not allow the creation under a US-brokered peace deal of a corridor near the Iranian border linking Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, an adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Aug 9. The planned corridor - dubbed the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity' - is a key part of a peace deal signed at the White House on Aug 8 between Azerbaijan and its longtime foe Armenia. However, the proposed route, in which the United States will have development rights, passes near the Iranian border and Ayatollah Khamenei's international affairs adviser, Mr Ali Akbar Velayati, said Iran would not accept it. 'With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered,' Mr Velayati told the Tasnim news agency, He said the planned corridor was 'an impossible notion and will not happen', while the area would become 'a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries'. Iran has long opposed the planned transit route, also known as the Zangezur corridor – fearing it would cut the country off from Armenia and the rest of the Caucasus, and bring a foreign presence to its border. 'We have the right to defend our interests in a completely powerful manner,' Mr Velayati said, adding that Iran had held multiple military exercises in the area to show its 'readiness'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 4 men arrested after police search operation in forested area near Rail Corridor Singapore SAF regular serviceman dies after being found unconscious at Hendon Camp swimming pool: Mindef Singapore E-bike rider arrested for rash act causing hurt after accident with pedestrian in Toa Payoh Singapore Man arrested for allegedly stealing from business class passenger on flight to Singapore Singapore Driver taken to hospital after car hits lamp post in Orchard Road Singapore Urban farming, robots, AI exhibitions: Public invited to share ideas for new Science Centre World Three wounded in shooting in New York's Times Square Asia 2 Malaysian tourists critically injured after being set on fire in Bangkok Iran's foreign ministry welcomed 'the finalisation of the text of the peace agreement' between Armenia and Azerbaijan but expressed 'concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders'. It added that such a move would 'disrupt the security and lasting stability of the region.' Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have feuded for decades over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. They went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Asked what Armenia stood to gain from the Aug 8 deal, a White House official said it was 'an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world: the United States of America'. 'The losers here are China, Russia and Iran,' he said, speaking on condition of anonymity. AFP