Fed kicks off effort to ease bank leverage rules
The Federal Reserve meets on Wednesday to advance a proposal that would ease leverage rules for banks, which would grant the industry a long-sought win they say will help big firms facilitate Treasury market trading.
The central bank's Washington board will consider a plan to revamp the so-called supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), which directs banks to hold capital against assets regardless of their risk level.
Originally designed as a backstop to ensure banks hold some capital on even relatively risk-free assets like U.S. Treasury debt, the industry complains it has become a constraint that actually impedes their ability to facilitate trading in U.S. Treasury markets during times of stress.
The Fed had previously flagged that the SLR may need some tweaks after it exempted some requirements amid market strains during the COVID-19 pandemic, and now Fed officials plan to advance a more lasting solution.
"It would be better if we had a leverage ratio that was a backstop rather than a binding thing, and that's what this proposal is going to do," said Fed Chairman Jerome Powell at a congressional hearing Tuesday.
Powell told lawmakers the Fed is expected to advance a proposal that would tweak the formula calculating the "enhanced" SLR (eSLR), which requires the nation's largest banks to hold an extra layer of capital.
Specifically, the Fed is expected to mirror an effort regulators pitched in 2018 that failed to advance, which would tie leverage requirements to the overall risk each bank is deemed to pose on the financial system.
However, he added the Fed would seek feedback on alternative methods of relief, such as broadly exempting Treasury securities from the requirement altogether.
A Fed spokesperson declined to comment ahead of the board meeting.
"We believe regulators want to provide banks with more space before riskless assets could make the eSLR a binding constraint," Jaret Seiberg, an analyst with TD Cowen, wrote in a note.
The leverage changes are the first of what is expected to be a broad deregulatory agenda from the Fed's new top regulatory official, Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman. President Donald Trump, who nominated Bowman for the post, has made trimming regulations a top priority in a bid to boost economic growth.
On Monday, she said the leverage rewrite is a first step in overhauling "distorted" capital requirements on banks, which were drastically ratcheted up after the 2008 financial crisis. Other future changes could include weakening an additional surcharge imposed on large global banks and tweaking thresholds under which banks face increasingly strict rules as they grow in size.
However, the new plan has its critics, who argue stepping back rules intended to keep banks stable injects unnecessary risk into the system at the behest of the industry.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said in a letter to regulators on Tuesday she had "grave concerns" about the plan.
"If the banking agencies gut this requirement, the big banks will load up on more debt, pay out more money to shareholders and executives, and put the entire economy at risk of another financial crash," she wrote. "There is no valid rationale for your agencies to impose these risks on the American public."
(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; Editing by Sam Holmes)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tahawul Tech
9 minutes ago
- Tahawul Tech
Agentforce 3 Archives
"We are setting a new standard for customer innovation by focusing on both people and technology". Learn more about @Verizon's use of Gemini models in app development below. #Verizon #GeminiAI #tahawultech


Tahawul Tech
9 minutes ago
- Tahawul Tech
Scaling AI Agents Archives
"We are setting a new standard for customer innovation by focusing on both people and technology". Learn more about @Verizon's use of Gemini models in app development below. #Verizon #GeminiAI #tahawultech


Zawya
16 minutes ago
- Zawya
US lawmakers introduce bill to bar Chinese AI in US government agencies
A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday planned to introduce a bill in both houses of Congress that would bar U.S. executive agencies from using artificial intelligence models developed in China, including those from DeepSeek. The introduction of the bill, dubbed the "No Adversarial AI Act," comes after Reuters reported that a senior U.S. official has concluded that DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations and has had access to "large volumes" of Nvidia's chips. DeepSeek shook the technology world in January with claims that it had developed an AI model that rivaled those from U.S. firms such as ChatGPT creator OpenAI at much lower cost. Since then, some U.S. companies and government agencies have banned the use of DeepSeek over data security concerns, and President Donald Trump's administration has mulled banning its use on U.S. government devices. The bill introduced Wednesday into the U.S. House of Representatives by Representative John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, and Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat who is the ranking member on the committee, would create a permanent framework for barring the use of all Chinese AI models from U.S. executive agencies, as well as those from Russia, Iran and North Korea. The bill would require the Federal Acquisition Security Council to create a list of AI models developed in those countries and regularly update it. Federal agencies would not be able to buy or use those AI technologies without an exemption, such as for carrying out research, from the U.S. Congress or the Office of Management and Budget. The law also contains a provision that can be used to get technologies off the list with proof that they are not controlled or influenced by a foreign adversary of the U.S. "The U.S. must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government," Moolenaar said in a statement. "This legislation creates a permanent firewall to keep adversary AI out of our most sensitive networks - where the cost of compromise is simply too high." Also co-sponsoring the bill in the House are Representative Ritchie Torres, a New York Democrat, and Representative Darin LaHood, an Illinois Republication. In the U.S. Senate, the bill will be led by Senators Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, and Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat.