‘Two Sessions' 2025: how can China get its private sector back on track?
a series , Frank Chen reports on China's first privately owned high-speed railways and how they reflect the wider challenges facing the private sector.
Advertisement
When the first bullet train roared along a new high-speed rail line in eastern China's Zhejiang province in September, the project's investors were ecstatic.
The 350km/h railway would not only slash travel times between two of Zhejiang's biggest cities; it had also broken new ground for private capital in China.
The 218-kilometre line, which links the coastal city of Wenzhou and the provincial capital Hangzhou, is one of the first Chinese high-speed rail projects to be funded, built and controlled by a private consortium, rather than the state.
It is part of a broader push in China to open up more parts of the economy to private investment, as the government seeks to restore confidence in the private sector and tap new funding sources to sustain its infrastructure-building drive.
Advertisement
As an early test case for the new model, the stakes of the project are high. Investors across China have been watching every twist and turn closely, to see if the line can succeed in generating positive returns for the consortium.
So far, it has been a bumpy ride. Six months after going into operation, the line is still firmly in the red and the consortium has found it has limited powers to turn things around.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US soybean farmers urge Trump to make purchase deal with China
American soybean farmers urged US President Donald Trump in a Tuesday letter to reach a trade deal with China that secures significant soybean purchase agreements, warning of dire long-term economic outcomes if the country continues to shun the US crop. China , the world's largest soybean buyer, is turning to Brazilian cargoes amid trade tensions with the US and continuing negotiations. The country has not pre-purchased soybeans from the coming US harvest, an unusual delay that has worried traders and farmers. 'Soybean farmers are under extreme financial stress. Prices continue to drop and at the same time our farmers are paying significantly more for inputs and equipment. 'US soybean farmers cannot survive a prolonged trade dispute with our largest customer,' said the letter sent from the American Soybean Association (ASA) to Trump on Tuesday. China's turn to Brazilian soybeans could cost US farmers billions. China bought 54 per cent of US soybean exports in the 2023-2024 marketing year, worth US$13.2 billion, according to the ASA. The country's soybean imports hit a record July high this year.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Mexican boxer Chavez Jnr deported from US over alleged cartel ties
Mexican boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jnr has entered a prison in the northern Mexico state of Sonora after his arrest in the United States in July, Mexico's national arrest registry showed on Tuesday. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, in her daily press conference, said the 39-year-old had been deported. She previously said there was a warrant for his arrest for charges of arms trafficking and organised crime, and that prosecutors were working on the case. The Mexican attorney general's office declined to comment. The boxer's extradition comes as US President Donald Trump cracks down on immigrants as part of a promise to deport millions of people. Chavez Jnr, the son of a legendary former world champion boxer Julio Cesar Chavez, was detained by US immigration authorities soon after losing in a sold-out match to American influencer-turned-boxer Jake Paul. Mexican prosecutors allege he acted as a henchman for the powerful Sinaloa Cartel, which Washington designated a foreign terrorist organisation earlier this year.
HKFP
3 hours ago
- HKFP
Jimmy Lai's nat. security trial: Judges question whether articles in pro-democracy Apple Daily ‘seditious'
Handpicked judges presiding over jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai's national security trial have questioned whether content in his pro-democracy paper amounted to 'seditious publications,' as stipulated by the prosecution. The court continued hearing closing arguments on Tuesday after proceedings were twice delayed last week, first owing to bad weather and then to health concerns relating to the 77-year-old tycoon's heart. Delivering arguments for the seditious publications charge, lead prosecutor Anthony Chau referenced articles published in Lai's Apple Daily including an editorial calling for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong authorities. He said that those articles did not include 'rational criticism,' and that none of them provided recommendations or ventured 'to suggest any solutions.' But High Court judge Esther Toh, one of the three judges chosen to preside over the security trial, cast doubt on the prosecution's argument that critical articles must propose solutions to be considered not seditious. 'Did they actually have to venture that? You can write a critical article about the water problem, but do you have to venture to offer solutions?' Toh asked, appearing to reference a recent contract fraud case involving the drinking water supply at government offices. Judge Alex Lee pointed to Apple Daily articles calling for the now-shelved extradition bill which sparked widespread protests and unrest in 2019 to be withdrawn, saying: 'They were opposing the very introduction of the extradition bill… was that not a suggested solution?' The 2019 protests escalated into sometimes violent displays of dissent against police behaviour, amid calls for democracy and anger over Beijing's encroachment. Demonstrators demanded an independent probe into police conduct, amnesty for those arrested and a halt to the characterisation of protests as 'riots.' Lee on Tuesday added that an article could not be considered seditious if its purpose was to highlight pitfalls in governance, 'but if it was to defame the government causing the people to lose confidence or to turn hostile against the government, that would be a case of sedition.' Chau also referenced Lai's text messages directing the paper's English news division, which the court had earlier heard was set up to appeal for international support. Lai had told senior management that the paper was not supposed to have a 'balanced view' and only needed a view of the 'yellow' side — the colour associated with the city's pro-democracy movement, Chau added. Calls for sanctions 'in disguise' Besides the charge of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under colonial-era legislation, the tycoon also stands accused of two charges of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. He faces life behind bars if convicted. Based on Lai's prior exchanges with US politicians and diplomats, one could infer that the pro-democracy paper's criticism of the Chinese authorities were an 'indirect' means of calling on foreign governments to interfere, Chau told the court on Tuesday. That was after judge Toh asked whether the prosecution meant that the paper's articles were calls for sanctions 'in disguise.' The prosecution has alleged that Lai used his ties with foreign officials and politicians to impose sanctions against authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest, criminalising subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. Chau also maintained that the media baron had called for what the prosecution labelled 'Sanctions, Blockades, or Hostile activity' (SBHA) against the central Chinese authorities, despite not having made any open or direct requests for such actions after the enactment of Beijing's national security law in Hong Kong. The prosecution submitted that Lai had adopted a 'calculated and strategic approach' for foreign sanctions to be imposed on China and Hong Kong by deliberately and 'falsely' picturing the Chinese Communist Party in a negative light. Prosecutors named retired US army general Jack Keane, ex-US deputy secretary of defence Paul Wolfowitz, ex-US state department advisor Christian Whiton, and Mary Kissel, an advisor to then US secretary of state Mike Pompeo, as Lai's foreign connections, among others. Chau also told the court that Lai had admitted, during his testimony, that he continued international lobbying efforts even after the enactment of the national security law to inform foreign governments of what was happening in Hong Kong and to appeal for condemnation of the Hong Kong and Beijing authorities. However, he denied lobbying overseas governments to influence foreign policy. Chau is expected to conclude oral submissions of the prosecution's closing arguments on Wednesday.
