logo
The Macrons have shown the world what can happen behind closed doors when couples argue

The Macrons have shown the world what can happen behind closed doors when couples argue

Yahoo26-05-2025
Credit: Reuters
It was supposed to be a routine presidential visit. Emmanuel Macron's plane had touched down in Vietnam, the doors were about to open and out he would step to wave to the world. Instead, we got a rare glimpse inside a power couple's extraordinary dynamic.
As the doors opened, the French president was seemingly shoved in the face by the red-jacketed arms of his wife Brigitte, stunning the waiting media and leaving the French leader to awkwardly wave as he composed himself.
It was an excruciating start to their official Southeast Asia tour, forcing Macron to insist it was a case of 'simply joking with my wife as we often do' and rubbishing claims of a 'domestic incident'.
'It's a tricky one because the key element is we really don't know the full story,' says Peter Saddington, a relationship therapist with more than 30 years experience of counselling couples.
'If we imagine the scenario, for instance, in which one person tells the other person they've had an affair, there might well be a knee-jerk physical lashing out – perhaps a push or or slap – that won't have been thought through, and would be out of character,' he adds.
'In those circumstances you might understand, and forgive, how it might have happened.'
It's likely the 16-hour flight may have frayed tempers (even though they were hardly travelling in the cramped conditions of commercial economy class).
You can't help but wonder how any of us might feel if our own private altercations were played out in public.
One writer, who wishes to remain anonymous, admits: 'I once waved a kitchen knife at my husband when he was driving me mad (much to his horror) and afterwards, in my shame, I wondered what on earth would have happened if a neighbour had looked through our window.'
It could well have been a playful move, as Macron maintains. 'Perhaps he said something in jest, or tried to kiss her when she was trying to get ready for the cameras, and she was simply shoving him in a 'not now you don't' way,' says Saddington.
We must all know some couples who seem to actively enjoy shared fiery outbursts.
Saddington agrees he's worked with people who describe rows as 'passionate' and who admit to the odd push and, yes, shove. If this is genuinely mutual, then it may be unwise to pass judgment.
'But what I would be very concerned about is when one party is being physical, or coercive or controlling, and the other is forced to defend physically themselves,' warns Saddington. 'That would be very wrong.'
'What I think is the most telling thing is that Macron didn't seem particularly perturbed by what happened – he didn't look shocked or hurt. It didn't seem to put him off his stride. It's clear it's something he wasn't exactly anticipating at that moment, but his reaction wasn't to panic. What marriage doesn't suffer – and survive – the odd sniping comment?'
But Saddington is clear that as a rule he believes any physical touch like this is never a good idea to manage or resolve relationship issues.
He suggests instead of thinking about it inside a marriage, consider it on a more basic level: 'if you were out shopping and somebody hit, slapped or pushed you in some way, you'd rightfully claim it was an assault. That would be illegal. So equally it's not right in a relationship. Communication really is best achieved by talking issues through.'
Some Telegraph readers who have seen the footage have rightly pointed out that if this situation had been reversed there would be a huge outcry. 'It's quite true there are different implications because men are stronger, and thus able to do more harm physically,' says Saddington.
'But I also work with men who are on the receiving end of physical assault from their partners. It's more unusual but perhaps it's reported less frequently because it comes with the added stigma of 'being weak'. It's taboo and men are less likely to seek help.'
Whether it's a muttered row on the doorstep of a dinner party or a blazing row just before the world's cameras are trained on you, no one really knows what goes on behind the closed doors of any marriage.
World leaders in particular face the pressure to always show a united front; why would the spouse accompany a president or prime minister unless it serves a purpose?
Cherie Blair and Samantha Cameron paused their own careers to be the dutiful wife, while there's a reason why Angela Merkel and Theresa May usually appeared at events solo (male spouses don't have the same air of 'power couple').
Meanwhile Jill Biden loyally stood by her man – and came under flak – while some clearly can't face it.
Melania Trump's way of swerving most of the togetherness image altogether also attracts criticism. Is it possible for the spouses to ever really win?
The Macrons, especially, must know that the world has always had plenty to say about their relationship, so the scrutiny they are under means they must be even more careful than anyone else. When everything from height and weight to age and body language is pored over, it pays to have any disagreements firmly off the world stage.
However Peter Saddington believes this is a couple who have long proven their own strength in the face of adversity.
'With the Macrons, I think what's notable is the fact that when they're out in public they do seem a couple who are [generally] comfortable and at ease with one another.
'Their relationship has always raised eyebrows – and they've always weathered the storm together,' he says. 'Having a relationship that looks different to most other people's has never really been a problem for them, which will make it easier to shrug this incident off in public.'
His advice for any couple – famous or otherwise – who are disagreeing is to talk, apologise and listen. 'If any couple are both committed to wanting to sort it out, they will.'
Diplomacy, you might call it.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump caught on hot mic saying Putin wants to ‘make a deal for me'
Trump caught on hot mic saying Putin wants to ‘make a deal for me'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump caught on hot mic saying Putin wants to ‘make a deal for me'

President Trump was captured on a hot mic Monday telling French President Emmanuel Macron that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to ' make a deal for me.' 'I think he wants to make a deal,' Trump said in the East Room of the White House ahead of the multilateral meeting between several of Europe's most powerful leaders. 'I think he wants to make a deal for me,' he continued. 'Do you understand that? As crazy as it sounds.' Trump was also heard telling Macron, 'I'll set up a trilat,' referring to a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Putin and himself. He has expressed this position publicly as well. The president embraced Zelensky at the White House on Monday and largely used their joint Oval Office appearance to increase pressure on Putin to join the peace talks. The dynamic marked a stark shift from the Ukrainian leader's last visit to the White House in February, when the conversation devolved into an explosive shouting match on live television. An extraordinary delegation of seven European leaders, during their own White House meeting, also sought to bolster Ukraine's negotiating position. Later Monday, Trump said he spoke to Putin about arranging a time for a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky. Trump said a trilateral meeting, which he would join, would follow sometime after. 'After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years.'

Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelensky and Europeans: Praise, security talks, more meetings
Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelensky and Europeans: Praise, security talks, more meetings

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Takeaways from Trump's meeting with Zelensky and Europeans: Praise, security talks, more meetings

Following the talks, Trump called and spoke at length to Russian President Vladimir Putin who got the red carpet treatment at a summit with Trump last Friday in Alaska, to discuss the extraordinary gathering of allies. Trump said he would now work to arrange a meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin. Advertisement Here are key takeaways: Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump says the US could back security guarantees for Ukraine A central question for peace talks is how to prevent further Russian aggression in the future. Trump has ruled out allowing Ukraine to join NATO, which would extend the military alliance's protection to the besieged country. He did, however, express support for security guarantees for Ukraine — though details remain vague. European countries 'want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with that,' Trump said. That pleased Zelenskyy, who said the US was offering 'such (a) strong signal.' With Europeans looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement in Ukraine, Trump suggested that Putin would be open to accepting security guarantees. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said Sunday that Moscow was open to accepting NATO-style protections for Ukraine. Advertisement European leaders applauded that notion, and the larger meaning it would carry. 'When we speak about security guarantees, we speak about the whole security of the European continent,' French President Emmanuel Macron said. Macron said talks to determine what the U.S. is willing to provide will start as soon as Tuesday. European leaders praise Trump but say tough work is still ahead The Europeans came to show a united front on Ukraine, and many used public comments to heap praise on Trump. That was striking given tensions over Trump's threats to impose steep tariffs and other issues. Ahead of their meeting, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called Trump 'dear Donald' and said of fighting in Ukraine: 'If we play this well, we could end it.' In an interview later with Fox News Channel, Rutte called Trump 'amazing' and said potential swaps of Ukrainian territory weren't discussed. 'First, we need full clarity on security guidelines,' Rutte said. Though Ukraine might not have NATO membership, he noted, there would be discussions for security guarantees similar to those extended to members of the alliance. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said after the meeting that there was 'real progress' and a 'real sense of unity.' Before the leaders spoke privately at the White House, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said all the parties were working together on 'a just and lasting peace.' Offering a more measured tone was German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who said 'the path is open now' to halting the fighting but next steps are 'more complicated.' 'Let's try to put pressure on Russia,' Merz said, adding that he would like to see a ceasefire come together. Advertisement Trump was noncommittal, saying, 'If we can do the ceasefire, great,' but suggested it was far from a dealbreaker. He dropped his push for a ceasefire after Friday's summit, aligning with Putin's position that negotiations should focus on a long-term peace settlement instead. The good feelings extended to Zelenskyy and Trump. After Ukraine's leader praised the 'very good conversation' with Trump, the U.S. president responded, 'Great remarks. I appreciated it.' Speaking to reporters Monday night, Merz said the Russian demand that Ukraine give up unconquered parts of its eastern Donbas region to end the fighting would be equivalent to the U.S. giving up Florida. More formal attire — and a far different reception — for Zelensky The meeting with Trump in the Oval Office on Monday was dramatically different than six months ago, when Trump and Vance harangued Zelenskyy for not being thankful enough for US military support. Trump even seemed to relish a reporter from a conservative outlet asking then why Zelenskyy wasn't wearing a suit at the White House. Ukraine's leader came prepared this time, wearing a black shirt and blazer. The same reporter told Zelenskyy, 'You look fabulous,' and Trump responded, 'I said the same thing.' Then Trump said to Zelenskyy: 'That's the one that attacked you last time.' The Ukrainian president said he remembered, then playfully needled his questioner. 'You are in the same suit,' Zelenskyy said as laughter rippled through the room. 'I changed. You did not.' Ukraine's president usually appears in a trademark hoodie or T-shirt — a show of solidarity with Ukrainian forces on the front lines. Zelensky also expressed gratitude to the US and European allies for supporting his country, and repeatedly thanked first lady Melania Trump for sending a letter to Putin about stopping the killing of children during the war. Advertisement In the Oval Office, Vance gave no public comments. Next steps in the negotiations turn back to Putin Trump, who bragged on numerous occasions during the campaign that he could settle Russia's war in Ukraine in a day, said repeatedly Monday that it was far more complicated than he ever thought it would be. But he also suggested — likely implausibly — that the fighting that has raged for years could wind down quickly. 'A week or two weeks, we'll know whether we're going to solve this, or if this horrible fighting is going to continue,' said Trump, even suggesting the issues yet to be hammered out weren't 'overly complex.' Still, much remains unresolved, including red lines that are incompatible — like whether Ukraine will cede any land to Russia, the future of Ukraine's army and whether the country will ultimately have lasting and meaningful security guarantees. Trump said he had begun arrangements for a face-to-face meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy. But Russian foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said only that Putin and Trump had a 40-minute phone call and 'spoke in favor' of continuing direct talks between the sides, Russian state news agency Tass reported. Outside the White House, Zelenskyy said no date had been set for such a meeting but that the US suggested it be as soon as possible. 'But for that, agreement of all sides is needed,' he said. He added that the question of territory 'is a matter that we will leave between me and Putin.' Though many European leaders oppose forgoing a possible ceasefire on the road to seeking lasting peace, they have supported a meeting by Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin in the meantime. Macron suggested that another summit could feature the three presidents and also top European leaders. Advertisement 'The idea of trilateral meeting is very important, because this is the only way to fix it,' the French president said.

Florida man who fatally stabbed friend over Trump convicted of second-degree murder
Florida man who fatally stabbed friend over Trump convicted of second-degree murder

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Florida man who fatally stabbed friend over Trump convicted of second-degree murder

A Florida man who fatally stabbed a friend during an argument in 2022 over Donald Trump's businesses having gone bankrupt, is facing possibly spending the rest of his life in prison after being convicted of murder. Donald Jamesbrown Henry, 38, awaits a sentencing hearing tentatively scheduled for October after jurors found him guilty Friday of second-degree murder in the killing of Shawn Popp, whose death came to be regarded by some as an example of the havoc that politics can wreak on interpersonal relationships in the US. Henry's conviction, under Florida law, requires him to serve at least 16 years and nine months in prison without the possibility of parole. The state's maximum punishment for second-degree murder is life imprisonment. According to authorities, Popp was smoking marijuana at a friend's house in the community of Arcadia on 22 October 2022 when he and Henry – another visitor – became locked into an argument about Trump, who at the time was a fellow Florida resident in between his two presidencies. Related: 'We're anti-federal chaos': Democratic cities prepare for worst after Trump's tirades against DC and LA Popp made a statement about 'Trump going bankrupt', investigators wrote in a sworn statement that was later filed in court and reported on by Reuters. Henry, meanwhile, 'strongly believed that Donald Trump did not go bankrupt but instead … chose the wrong individuals to do business with, which caused it to fail', investigators wrote. A number of businesses that Trump ran before winning the 2016 and 2020 presidential races sought federal bankruptcy protection, and it was not clear whether the argument between Popp and Henry focused on any particular one of those cases. Regardless, the two ended up fighting, with Henry convinced Popp 'was talking to him like he was stupid', authorities alleged. Investigators said Henry then plunged the blade of a kitchen knife that he was sharpening into Popp's chest. Popp subsequently walked outside, crossed the street and collapsed dead after being overheard remarking, 'You stabbed me, you son of a bitch,' the news website Law & Crime reported. Once the local sheriff's office was called out to investigate, Henry claimed he had acted in self-defense and therefore had justifiably killed Popp. Henry maintained that fists were 'deadly weapons' and he had first been struck in the face by Popp, prompting him to use the knife and 'stop the threat', deputies wrote in their sworn statement. Deputies also accused Henry of explaining that his family members were high-ranking military members – and of saying that prior 'training' he had received in survival and weapons 'kicked in' during the fracas. Though Henry had 'superficial marks' on his forehead, investigators said they determined he did not have any injuries demonstrating that he needed to defend himself with deadly force. They jailed Henry – and on Friday, after brief jury deliberations at the conclusion of his trial, jurors returned a verdict finding him guilty of murder as well as trying to intimidate a witness out of cooperating with authorities, a statement from the DeSoto county sheriff's office said. 'This verdict is a testament to the dedication and hard work of [law enforcement] who never stopped pursuing justice,' the sheriff's office statement added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store