Israel's ambassador to UK accuses LSE of fuelling extremism with book on Hamas
Israel's ambassador to Britain has accused a leading university of 'providing a platform for Hamas propaganda' by hosting a book launch.
Tzipi Hotovely has called for the London School of Economics (LSE) to cancel a talk about the book Understanding Hamas: And Why It Matters, on Monday, warning it would 'grow support' for the terrorist group among students.
Its synopsis describes the Palestinian terrorist group as 'a widely misunderstood movement whose involvement in a just resolution of the Israel/Palestine conflict will be critical'.
In a letter to Larry Kramer, the president of the LSE, Ms Hotovely wrote: 'I am deeply concerned that the event is providing a platform for Hamas propaganda – a terror organisation proscribed under United Kingdom law.
'I worry that by promoting such a book, which sympathises with and justifies the survival and existence of Hamas, will only serve to grow support for a brutal terror organisation among your students and beyond.'
She expressed 'sincere hope that you will reconsider allowing the event to go ahead'.
The Home Office has already pre-warned the event's speakers that they will face the 'full force of the law' if they praise Hamas at the book launch.
In her letter Ms Hotovely drew attention to one passage in the book which appeared to deny the Oct 7 attacks.
It reads: 'Israeli claims about what happened on Oct 7 have since been proven to be false. They have been proven even to be deliberate lies designed in order to justify what the Israelis were going to do as a revenge attack on Gaza, which we were seeing happening for the past eight months nearly.'
Another passage in the book argues that 'demonisation efforts' against Hamas 'impede diplomacy and keep the [Palestinian] populations suffering colonial rule or military occupation trapped for decades in devastating conflict at the hands of their far more violent and heavily armed oppressors.'
The book claims 'the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has been subjected to intense vilification'.
'Branding it as 'terrorist' or worse, this demonisation intensified after the events in southern Israel on Oct 7, 2023.'
Ms Hotovely said going ahead with the talk will put Jewish students at risk as she called for it to be cancelled.
She told Mr Kramer: 'Your Jewish and Israeli students will be feeling anxious and fearful for their own safety at this moment in time.
'The past 17 months have been deeply traumatic to Jewish people in the UK and around the world. Indeed, cases of reported anti-Semitic incidents rose by 148% last year – with university campuses specifically seeing a rise in anti-Jewish and anti-Israel hatred.'
Ms Hotovely, who has served as Israel's ambassador in London since 2020, told the LSE's president: 'The university should not be endorsing this event, let alone organising it through its Middle East Centre. Nor should the university allow this event to go ahead on its premises. Therefore, I encourage you to cancel the event.'
Hamas has been a proscribed organisation in Britain since 2021.
Expressing support for a proscribed terrorist organisation is illegal under Section 12 of the Terorrism Act 2000.
An LSE spokesman said: 'Free speech and freedom of expression underpins everything we do at LSE. Students, staff and visitors are strongly encouraged to discuss and debate the most pressing issues around the world.
'We host an enormous number of events each year, covering a wide range of viewpoints and positions.
'We have clear policies in place to ensure the facilitation of debates in these events and enable all members of our community to refute ideas lawfully and to protect individuals' rights to freedom of expression within the law. This is formalised in our Code of Practice on Free Speech and in our Ethics Code.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Penny Wong slammed by US Secretary of State after introducing sanctions on Israeli officials
Australia has come under fire from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for backing sanctions against two senior Israeli officials, accusing it of turning a blind eye to the 'real enemy'. Foreign Minister Penny Wong announced on Wednesday the targeted sanctions in a joint statement alongside her counterparts from Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. The measures - which include travel bans and financial sanctions - are against National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who have been accused of inciting 'extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. Mr Ben-Gvir, from the Jewish Power party, and Mr Smotrich, of the Religious Zionism Party, are members of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's coalition government. Mr Rubio on Wednesday said that he conemns the move, 'These sanctions do not advance U.S.-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war,' he said. 'We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organization that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. 'We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is. Asked about Mr Rubio's condemnation of the sanctions, the foreign minister said that despite their differences Australia and the US remained aligned on strategic interests. 'We will continue to be part of the international call for aid to enter (Gaza) unhindered, unimpeded,' Senator Wong said. 'That is Israel's obligation. 'These two ministers have been the most extremist and hard line of an extremist settler enterprise, which is both unlawful and violent. 'Australia can't shift the dial on the Middle East by ourselves. 'What we can do is act with others, and that's what we've done.' 'We will continue to advocate for a ceasefire and the return of hostages, and we will continue to condemn Hamas and its terrorist ideology.' Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the sanctions 'outrageous' and said his government would hold a meeting early next week to decide how to respond to the 'unacceptable decision' made by the five countries. Although the sanctions focus on the West Bank, the foreign ministers said 'this cannot be seen in isolation from the catastrophe in Gaza'. The Australian Jewish Association said it was appalled by the federal government's actions and accused it of anti-Semitism. 'This action represents a hostile and unjustified attack on a democratic ally and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms,' CEO Robert Gregory said. 'This government's willingness to engage with authoritarian regimes... while targeting the world's only Jewish state, exposes a disturbing double standard. 'There is no other explanation for this disparity than blatant antisemitism.' 'This government's willingness to engage with authoritarian regimes, including Holocaust deniers like Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, while targeting the world's only Jewish state, exposes a disturbing double standard. 'There is no other explanation for this disparity than blatant anti-semitism.' The Australian Centre for International Justice said the decision was a significant step and would send a clear message. 'These measures directly respond to the compelling evidence implicating Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in inciting extremist violence and serious human rights violations against Palestinians,' acting executive director Lara Khider said.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia sanctions two Israeli ministers over 'violent' West Bank settlements
Australia's foreign affairs minister Penny Wong announces that Australia will join key allies in sanctioning two Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for inciting violence against Palestinians. 'They are the most extreme proponents of the unlawful and violent settlement enterprise,' Wong tells reporters at a press conference on Wednesday morning
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump administration ends DHS program designed to thwart terror attacks
The Trump administration is planning to eliminate a Department of Homeland Security terrorism prevention program that former government officials and experts say has helped thwart attacks in the United States. The DHS budget submitted to Congress last month cancels the $18 million terrorism prevention grant program, saying it 'does not align with DHS priorities.' 'That line should be quoted after every future mass casualty event in this country,' said a current senior DHS official who declined to be named, citing fear of being fired. Former DHS officials say they believe the modest program, which costs about 4% of the military's marching band budget, has stopped violent attacks. It is designed to prevent a type of terrorism that has become increasingly common: lone-wolf attacks by individuals who are not members of an organized group. Examples include the recent firebomb attack in Boulder, Colorado, on demonstrators marching in support of Israeli hostages; the murder of a young couple outside the Capitol Jewish Museum; the killing of 14 people in a New Year's attack in New Orleans; and the shooting of a United Health Care executive in Manhattan. 'When people say, 'You can't prove prevention doesn't work,' I ask them, 'Do you go to the doctor? Do you have a smoke detector in your home?' Then you believe in prevention,' said Bill Braniff, a Biden administration appointee who oversaw the program as the director of DHS's Center for Prevention Partnerships and Programs. John Cohen, a former senior DHS counterterrorism official in the Obama and Biden administrations, said the threat is growing. 'Why was DHS created? To help the nation be better prepared to stop terrorist attacks following Sept. 11,' he said. 'We have had since January a number of school shootings and four terrorist incidents — all by people who fit those behavioral profiles.' The White House and DHS did not respond to requests for comment. The program, formally known as the Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention Grant Program, recently drew scrutiny when ProPublica published an article about Braniff's successor, a 22-year-old former Trump campaign worker with no relevant experience. But the larger issue, experts say, is that the program is being zeroed out. They call that a short-sighted decision in an era when alienated loners are attempting mass violence attacks at a greater frequency than ever. 'Do I know for certain that we helped to avert school shootings and mass casualty attacks? I am 99% sure that we helped to avert a number of them,' said Braniff, who now heads the Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab at American University. Interest in and demand for the program is high and spans the country. In 2024, DHS reported receiving 178 eligible applications from 47 U.S. states and territories requesting $98.9 million for $18 million in available grants. The money funds state and local programs designed to help identify people who are radicalizing and potentially violent. They included school-based threat assessment teams, mental health teams and programs designed to inoculate children against extremist messages on social media. Specific examples are difficult to cite, in part because many cases are confidential, and in part because it's difficult to draw a straight line between a government program and a thwarted attack. But DHS documents cite a 2022 case as an example of how they believe the program helped stop a school shooting. After an outreach campaign at Palm Beach State College in Florida urging students to be vigilant about online threats of violence, a student anonymously reported to authorities about online posts threatening a mass shooting. Among the posts, according to court records, were threats to commit a 'massacre,' and an inquiry, 'who's selling an AR-15?' Authorities arrested and charged a young man, who ultimately was sentenced to probation and also was the subject of a risk protection order, records show. 'This is not the time to be ending that office,' said Cohen, the former senior DHS counterterrorism official. 'This is the time to be expanding activities that are designed to detect emerging threats."
