The right to peaceful protest must be maintained
The proscription of Palestine Action sits among egregious violations of international law. People outraged by atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank are dismayed at the continued prevarications of our government.
This is one motivation for those seated terrorists. However, there is another – the relentless attack on our civil liberties. This did not begin with Keir Starmer's government, but it has doubled down on suppressing freedoms with renewed zeal.
When the Terrorism Act (under which Palestine Action was proscribed) was debated in 1999, it was acknowledged: 'We will have handed the terrorists the victory that they seek if … we descend to their level and undermine the essential freedoms and rule of law that are the bedrock of our democracy.' This was the then home secretary, Jack Straw. He reassured the Commons that the bill was 'not intended to threaten in any way the right to demonstrate peacefully – nor will it do so'. Never would a British government misuse the huge power it was being given. More than 700 arrests for supporting Palestine Action testify to his error.
Not-so-ordinary people are risking jail sentences, travel restrictions, asset confiscation and ruined employment prospects. They are outraged at Gaza, but also outraged to see counter-terror legislation pressed into supporting a morally moribund government. Dr David KillickKendal, Cumbria
Andy Beckett's account of his sortie into the recent London demonstration in support of Palestine, and reports of the rightwing protest groups gathering outside hotels housing asylum seekers, are both indicators that few people now have a sense that Keir Starmer's Britain reflects their views or priorities.
As well as in London, people here in Derbyshire and other towns around the country gathered to express their frustration with our politicians' response to some of their deepest concerns. We have become a country without a shared agreement on what constitutes right or wrong, on what is an acceptable form of dissent, or on what constitutes the real threats to the survival of our democratic freedoms.
This government thrashes about desperately trying to make sense of the events happening all around it and making ill-judged knee-jerk responses that provoke even more hostility. It seems unable to articulate a narrative that will help people feel heard, or which can help foster a sense of social cohesion. The UK has become a country devoid of spiritual, moral and political leadership. The threats from without and within are beginning to fray the very fabric that once held everything together.
The critical task for this government now is how it is going to heal and unite this fractured, divided country before it heads into yet further chaos and conflict and everything begins to fall apart.Peter RiddleWirksworth, Derbyshire
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
I can take on 'climate change denying' Farage in TV debates, says Lorna Slater
The Lothian region MSP is the only incumbent co-leader taking part in the contest, after Patrick Harvie announced he was stepping back ahead of the looming Holyrood ballot in 2026. Slater, fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Ross Greer, and Dominic Ashmole are all vying for the two co-leader positions, with the results due to be published on Friday August 29. Speaking to The National, Slater said it is critical to keep climate change on the political agenda – particularly with the rise of outright "denial" from Reform and the Scottish Conservatives. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' 'With the Tories now having gone from climate sceptic to climate denial under Russell Findlay and Reform in that place as well, it's going to make it much harder to do,' she said. 'It's wild to me that I can go into my place of work and be called a dangerous extremist for repeating what climate scientists say. 'That's where we are, and it's a very upsetting place for Scotland to be.' Slater said that, in her opinion, one of the reasons the Bute House Agreement collapsed was that while there is a pro-independence majority in Holyrood, there is no consensus on tackling climate change. Since the Greens left government, Slater accused the SNP of 'dialling back' on climate commitments. From watering down the heat and buildings bill to 'prevaricating' over publishing the long-awaited energy strategy because they are not 'brave enough' to explicitly state there should be no more oil and gas, Slater said the Scottish Government was 'not doing enough' to tackle emissions. Slater has served as co-leader since 2019 (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) The former Greens minister gained praise for her performance during televised debates at the last election, and said that this was one of the many reasons she wanted to take on the top job again, to make the case for tackling climate change in the face of far-right talking points. 'I've got the confidence to take on Nigel Farage and Russell Findlay and all the others in terms of setting that out, because they are the dangerous extremists for denying that climate change is happening and that we need to make serious, serious changes to how we get about, to how our industries emit, to how we use our land in Scotland in order to preserve the future for young people,' Slater said. With Reform being an inevitable part of the 2026 Holyrood campaign, Slater said she fears it will pull other parties 'to the right because they'll be afraid of losing voters'. She added: 'The Scottish Greens are a different cup of tea. We're a values based party. We know what we believe. 'Our goal is to try and persuade people that what we believe can be implemented and will make Scotland a better place. We're not going to shift where we sit on the political spectrum in the hopes of winning votes.' Despite the collapse of Bute House Agreement in April 2024, Slater describes the power sharing agreement as 'brilliant', particularly due to the number of Green policies the party were able to enact before former first minister Humza Yousaf ended the deal. READ MORE: SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK She firmly believes that while the Greens should have an activist element to their party, they should focus on the political, and that the party should 'build on its successes'. 'The unique thing that we can do, that other parts of the Green movement can't, is make changes to legislation…is negotiate with the party of government…is influence budgets,' she said. 'Therefore we need to focus our time and efforts on those things. So yes, I'm absolutely at the political end of that. 'We are a political party. We win seats in councils and in the Scottish Parliament in order to influence the future of Scotland politically. 'I think the Scottish Greens have done very well at that – things like rolling out free school meals to more children, free bus travel for young people, changing the taxation structure of Scotland to make it more fair, and then using that money to really invest in public services. 'That has changed the nature of Scotland. You can look at the differences between Scotland and England to see some of those effects, and we want to continue that going forward.' On independence, Slater was firm in her belief that John Swinney's strategy is 'nonsense', as an SNP majority does not guarantee a referendum, particularly as Prime Minister Keir Starmer had not agreed to those terms. Starmer has repeatedly said he would not allow a referendum to go ahead. She insisted that a pro-independence majority does make the case for allowing Scotland to decide, and that because it is important to so many people in Scotland it still 'needs to be part of the discussion'. Slater said: 'Over and over again, you'll hear the Unionist parties hoping that we'll forget about it, because they're like, 'We don't let them have a referendum, they'll forget about it and it will go away'. 'It's not going to go away.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
MoD slammed after ministers not told about US troops on Scottish soil
Last year, it emerged that a new base in Lossiemouth, in Moray, would host American Poseidon P8 anti-submarine spy and war planes. When the site opened in May 2024, it became the first time the US military had a presence in Scotland since the end of the Cold War. The Scottish Greens raised concerns that the move signalled the UK Government forging 'closer military relations' with Donald Trump while he is cosying up to Russian president Vladimir Putin. Stop the War said that the decision to allow US troops to be stationed in Scotland without consulting Holyrood should be 'condemned'. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' The National lodged a Freedom of Information (FOI) request with the Scottish Government for any correspondence from the MoD regarding the decision to allow US troops to have a presence in Scotland. 'The Scottish Government does not hold the information you have requested, as matters relating to Defence are reserved to the UK Government,' the response from an official in the Veteran's Unit said. 'As a result, this information is not shared with the Scottish Government. As such, I hereby provide you with formal notice under section 17(1) of FOISA that the Scottish Government does not have the information you have requested.' The MoD previously refuted any suggestion there was a US military base in Scotland, following an investigation by the Ferret. Instead they insisted it was a US 'presence' with a 'US naval detachment' at Lossiemouth. The US navy helped to fund the construction of the new facility where its war planes will be housed, and are set to work alongside UK aircraft. Arianne Burgess, the Scottish Greens MSP who represents the area covering Lossiemouth, said: "A lot of local people will be shocked by these revelations and with the lack of any announcement or basic information. (Image: AP) "The last thing we should be doing is forging even closer military relations with Donald Trump, especially at a time when he is cozying up to Putin and arming genocide against the people of Gaza. "It's time for the Ministry of Defence to level with people and come clean about its arrangements. "With Keir Starmer seemingly joined at the hip with the White House it's more important than ever that Scotland forges its own foreign policy based on human rights, peace and a rejection of the values of Donald Trump." A spokesperson for Stop the War said that there should be 'no US troops or weapons on UK soil'. 'They do not make us any safer from the threats that the warmonger politicians are so enthusiastic about talking up in order to justify increases in defence spending while cutting welfare and hitting the most vulnerable in society the hardest,' they added. READ MORE: SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK 'That the MoD has stationed US troops at RAF Lossiemouth without consultation with Holyrood is of course to be condemned, but comes as no surprise given the Westminster government also allowed US nuclear weapons to be placed at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk without any transparency or debate in Parliament." A spokesperson for the MoD said: "The United States is the UK's closest defence and security partner. As NATO allies, we regularly conduct exercises and operations together to support European and global security. "Defence supports hundreds of thousands of high-skilled jobs across the UK, including over 26,000 in Scotland." US troops had been based in Scotland since the 1960s, including nuclear armed submarines at Holy Loch on the Clyde. After the Cold War ended in 1991, US forces left Holy Loch in 1992. They then left Machranish on the Mull of Kintyre, where nuclear mines were housed, in 1995, and Edzell in Aberdeenshire, a signals intelligence network, in 1997. It comes amid concerns that Trump is in favour of a Russian land grab to end the war in Ukraine, following a meeting with Putin in Alaska. Following the summit, the US President suggested he wants to move straight to a full peace deal, rather than negotiating a ceasefire first. The shift in Trump's position appears to echo the Russians' refusal to agree to a ceasefire before engaging in peace talks. Ukrainian president Vlodymyr Zelenskyy is set to visit the US on Monday, and is set to take UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and top European leaders with him to DC for crunch talks with the US President.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Flags raised by patriotism campaigners removed by London council
A second council has vowed to remove English or British flags that have been attached to lampposts by patriotism campaigners. Tower Hamlets in east London said it would take down the St George's flags 'as soon as possible' after they were put up in recent days as part of the 'Operation Raise the Colours' patriotism campaign that has been gathering momentum online. It come days after Birmingham council ordered the removal of hundreds of Union and St George's flags flying from street lampposts in the city, which were raised in the past fortnight in a 'patriotic outpouring'. The Labour-run authority claimed the flags put the lives of pedestrians and motorists 'at risk' despite being up to 25ft off the ground. But Lee Anderson, the Reform UK MP, was furious, telling The Telegraph: 'This is nothing short of a disgrace and shows utter contempt for the British people.' British or English flags have been raised on streets across England including in Swindon, Bradford, Newcastle and Norwich. Now Tower Hamlets council, which is run by the pro-Gaza Aspire Party, has confirmed it will remove any St George flags from council property including lampposts 'as soon as possible'. A spokesman told The Telegraph: 'We are aware members of the public have been putting up St George's flags on various structures. 'While we recognise people wish to express their views, we have a responsibility to monitor and maintain council infrastructure. 'Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance.' Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets, ordered the removal of Palestine flags from council buildings and lampposts in March 2024 after Jewish families said the 'oppressive and intimidating' symbols made them feel unwelcome in the borough for the first time. Critics accused the council of 'two-tier bias' because the Palestine flags were not taken down for months after popping up in the aftermath of the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, accused Tower Hamlets council of 'absurd national loathing'. He told The Telegraph: 'Tower Hamlets council have allowed Palestinian flags to be publicly displayed on lampposts but not the flag of our country. 'This absurd national self-loathing must end. This is yet more two-tier bias against the British people. We must be one country united under the Union flag.' Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader, asked: 'Why would we leave [Palestinian flags] up and take down flags that represent one of the countries of the UK?' Critics pointed out that Palestinian flags have flown elsewhere on the streets of the city, where 29.9 per cent of residents are Muslim, since the war in Gaza began in 2023. Suella Braverman, a former home secretary, said our national flags 'are a great source of pride and patriotism', adding that 'they should be flown from as many places as possible as often as possible'. Government guidance first published in 2021 states: 'Flags are a very British way of expressing joy and pride.' It goes on to say that: 'The Government wants to see more flags flown, particularly the Union flag.' The guidance warns however that flags must not 'obscure, or hinder the interpretation of official road, rail, waterway or aircraft signs, or otherwise make hazardous the use of these types of transport'.
