logo
I can take on 'climate change denying' Farage in TV debates, says Lorna Slater

I can take on 'climate change denying' Farage in TV debates, says Lorna Slater

The National3 hours ago
The Lothian region MSP is the only incumbent co-leader taking part in the contest, after Patrick Harvie announced he was stepping back ahead of the looming Holyrood ballot in 2026.
Slater, fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Ross Greer, and Dominic Ashmole are all vying for the two co-leader positions, with the results due to be published on Friday August 29.
Speaking to The National, Slater said it is critical to keep climate change on the political agenda – particularly with the rise of outright "denial" from Reform and the Scottish Conservatives.
READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests'
'With the Tories now having gone from climate sceptic to climate denial under Russell Findlay and Reform in that place as well, it's going to make it much harder to do,' she said.
'It's wild to me that I can go into my place of work and be called a dangerous extremist for repeating what climate scientists say.
'That's where we are, and it's a very upsetting place for Scotland to be.'
Slater said that, in her opinion, one of the reasons the Bute House Agreement collapsed was that while there is a pro-independence majority in Holyrood, there is no consensus on tackling climate change.
Since the Greens left government, Slater accused the SNP of 'dialling back' on climate commitments. From watering down the heat and buildings bill to 'prevaricating' over publishing the long-awaited energy strategy because they are not 'brave enough' to explicitly state there should be no more oil and gas, Slater said the Scottish Government was 'not doing enough' to tackle emissions.
Slater has served as co-leader since 2019 (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) The former Greens minister gained praise for her performance during televised debates at the last election, and said that this was one of the many reasons she wanted to take on the top job again, to make the case for tackling climate change in the face of far-right talking points.
'I've got the confidence to take on Nigel Farage and Russell Findlay and all the others in terms of setting that out, because they are the dangerous extremists for denying that climate change is happening and that we need to make serious, serious changes to how we get about, to how our industries emit, to how we use our land in Scotland in order to preserve the future for young people,' Slater said.
With Reform being an inevitable part of the 2026 Holyrood campaign, Slater said she fears it will pull other parties 'to the right because they'll be afraid of losing voters'.
She added: 'The Scottish Greens are a different cup of tea. We're a values based party. We know what we believe.
'Our goal is to try and persuade people that what we believe can be implemented and will make Scotland a better place. We're not going to shift where we sit on the political spectrum in the hopes of winning votes.'
Despite the collapse of Bute House Agreement in April 2024, Slater describes the power sharing agreement as 'brilliant', particularly due to the number of Green policies the party were able to enact before former first minister Humza Yousaf ended the deal.
​READ MORE: SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK
She firmly believes that while the Greens should have an activist element to their party, they should focus on the political, and that the party should 'build on its successes'.
'The unique thing that we can do, that other parts of the Green movement can't, is make changes to legislation…is negotiate with the party of government…is influence budgets,' she said.
'Therefore we need to focus our time and efforts on those things. So yes, I'm absolutely at the political end of that.
'We are a political party. We win seats in councils and in the Scottish Parliament in order to influence the future of Scotland politically.
'I think the Scottish Greens have done very well at that – things like rolling out free school meals to more children, free bus travel for young people, changing the taxation structure of Scotland to make it more fair, and then using that money to really invest in public services.
'That has changed the nature of Scotland. You can look at the differences between Scotland and England to see some of those effects, and we want to continue that going forward.'
On independence, Slater was firm in her belief that John Swinney's strategy is 'nonsense', as an SNP majority does not guarantee a referendum, particularly as Prime Minister Keir Starmer had not agreed to those terms. Starmer has repeatedly said he would not allow a referendum to go ahead.
She insisted that a pro-independence majority does make the case for allowing Scotland to decide, and that because it is important to so many people in Scotland it still 'needs to be part of the discussion'.
Slater said: 'Over and over again, you'll hear the Unionist parties hoping that we'll forget about it, because they're like, 'We don't let them have a referendum, they'll forget about it and it will go away'.
'It's not going to go away.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike
Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45 per cent of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'

SNP promise to close attainment gap ‘in ruins', say Lib Dems
SNP promise to close attainment gap ‘in ruins', say Lib Dems

Wales Online

time44 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

SNP promise to close attainment gap ‘in ruins', say Lib Dems

SNP promise to close attainment gap 'in ruins', say Lib Dems The party's education spokesperson Willie Rennie said that the SNP has "betrayed a whole generation of young people from poorer backgrounds" The Liberal Democrats have said the SNP's promise to close the attainment gap "lies in ruins" after Scottish exam results showed "minuscule progress". (Image: PA Archive/PA Images) The Liberal Democrats have said the SNP's promise to close the attainment gap "lies in ruins" after Scottish exam results showed "minuscule progress". ‌ The party's education spokesperson Willie Rennie said that the SNP has "betrayed a whole generation of young people from poorer backgrounds" and called for urgent action to drive up performance. ‌ He pointed to comments by then-first minister Nicola Sturgeon in 2016 when she said her government would push to substantially reduce the attainment gap by 2026, writing in that year's programme for government document that elimination of the gap was "a yardstick by which the people of Scotland can measure our success". ‌ Latest exam results published this month show that the poverty-related attainment gap – the difference between the A-C rate for those from the 20% of the most deprived areas of Scotland compared with the most affluent – has shrunk narrowly. The National 5 rate dropped from 17.2% to 16.6% while Highers saw a small dip from 17.2% to 17.1% and Advanced Highers from 15.5% to 12.8% compared with last year. Meanwhile, figures from the Scottish Funding Council show that in 2023-24, 16.7% of Scottish-domiciled full-time first degree entrants to university were from the 20% most deprived areas, up from 16.3% in 2022-23. Article continues below The Scottish Government has a target that by 2030, 20% of full-time, first-degree entrants to higher education should be from Scotland's 20% most deprived backgrounds. Mr Rennie said: "The SNP's promise to close the attainment gap lies in ruins. By Nicola Sturgeon's own yardstick, her party has betrayed a whole generation of young people from poorer backgrounds. "The minuscule progress that they have made is nowhere near good enough. On the SNP's watch, Scotland has tumbled down the international rankings, and parents are hugely worried about what that means for their children's futures. ‌ "In schools, there are lots of issues that need addressed, from behaviour challenges to teachers stuck on supply lists and fundamental problems with the curriculum, but all of them have gotten worse under the SNP. "We urgently need a plan to drive up education performance and improve outcomes for our young people." A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "Substantial progress is being made on widening access to higher education. The latest UCAS data shows the number of Scots accepted to a UK university from deprived areas increasing by 11% since 2023. Article continues below "Ministers remain resolute in meeting the goal of 20% of all entrants being from the 20% most deprived communities by 2030, and will continue to work constructively with the sector to achieve this. "We are determined to drive continued improvement, which is why the curriculum improvement cycle is underway and we are progressing with qualifications reform. "We will continue to engage with our school and local authority partners as part of the annual review of the national improvement framework, to ensure we continue to drive up standards for all our children and young people, and our investment in the Scottish attainment challenge is ongoing to tackle the attainment gap."

Queensland police go to court in bid to stop Story Bridge pro-Palestine protest march
Queensland police go to court in bid to stop Story Bridge pro-Palestine protest march

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Queensland police go to court in bid to stop Story Bridge pro-Palestine protest march

The Queensland police service will take protest organisers to court in an effort to halt a planned pro-Palestine march over Brisbane's Story Bridge this weekend. Justice for Palestine Magan-djin (Brisbane) have advertised plans to march over the bridge at 1pm on Sunday – replicating similar protests that occurred earlier this month in Sydney and Melbourne. Spokesperson for Justice for Palestine Magan-djin Remah Naji said the group is expecting at least 7000 people to attend the rally. The Queensland police oppose the march on public safety grounds. 'Under provisions of the peaceful assembly act, police will lodge documentation with Brisbane magistrates court for a decision to be made with respect to the notice of intention to hold a public assembly,' a spokesperson for the Queensland Police Service said. The matter is yet to be given a date of listing. A cycling group was denied the right to march or ride over the bridge earlier this year at a hearing at the magistrates court on public safety grounds. Naji said the march organisers had already briefed lawyers and were ready for a legal fight. 'We're very much willing to defend our fundamental right to peaceful assembly. If they want to go down this path, we're ready,' she said. Police in New South Wales sought to deny legal protection to a planned protest over the Sydney Harbour Bridge earlier this month – but that bid was overturned by the NSW supreme court at the 11th hour. Police say 90,000 people marched across that iconic structure, organisers put the figure at closer to 300,000 – regardless, the scale of the turnout ranks the protest as historic and the day went ahead without major incidents. In Melbourne on the same day, in contrast, pro-Palestine protesters were met by a wall of police in riot gear behind barricades and backed by a row of mounted officers and riot squad vans when they sought to cross the King Street Bridge. Justice for Palestine Magan-djin conducted mediation with Queensland police on Monday morning. QPS presented two options to the protest group for locations other than the bridge. A spokesperson for the QPS confirmed that mediation had taken place on Monday morning 'however an agreement could not be met'. Naji didn't rule out violating a court injunction if the magistrates court ruled against them, saying it would be a decision for the group collectively. She said the bridge is a central part of the protest because the urgency of the situation in Gaza 'This ongoing livestreamed genocide demands visibility. It is not enough for us to do the usual routes,' Naji said. She said the aim of the march was 'to apply the maximum pressure on our government'. Justice for Palestine Magan-djin has been holding regular protests in Brisbane for the last 22 months since the escalation of the conflict in Gaza after Israel responded to Hamas' attack on 7 October 2023 with a full-scale invasion, bombardment and blockade of aid in the Gaza Strip. More than 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza - mostly women, children and elderly people – since the war began, according to Palestinian health officials. -With additional reporting by Joe Hinchliffe

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store