
JPJ nabs express bus driver after positive drug test in special Aidiladha operation
KUALA LUMPUR: An express bus driver tested positive for drugs during the Aidiladha special operation, conducted by the Road Transport Department (JPJ) Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur (WPKL), at the Gombak Toll Plaza, today.
JPJ WPKL director Hamidi Adam said that initial on-site urine screening confirmed that the male driver, in his 30s, tested positive for morphine.
'The driver has been detained under Section 3(1) of the Drug Addicts Act 1983. The National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK) will submit a full report to the Pathology Department of Kuala Lumpur Hospital, for further action,' he said.
He added that the express bus, which was travelling from Lumut to Kemaman, has resumed its journey with a replacement driver.
Hamidi said this in a press conference on the operation, which concluded today, after being implemented since June 4 at the JPJ Gombak Enforcement Weighing Station.
Hamidi said that, as of yesterday, a total of 2,437 notices had been issued for various offences, involving vehicles and drivers who failed to comply with the regulations outlined in the Road Transport Act 1987 (Act 333), and its associated regulations.
'These statistics stem from the inspection of 33,988 vehicles over six days. Of that total, 26 vehicles were impounded, including 23 motorcycles, two cars, and a small lorry,' he said.
He added that, through the JPJ (P) 22 notice issued, 2,559 vehicles and drivers were found to be non-compliant with regulations, including 657 offences related to expired Motor Vehicle Licences (LKM or roadtax) and lack of insurance coverage.
Commenting on today's operation, which took place from 1 pm to 7 pm, he said that a total of 620 vehicles were inspected, with action taken against 60 of them for various offences.
'Today's operation was carried out with the participation of 54 members from JPJ WPKL, 10 members from AADK, five representatives from the Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture Malaysia (MOTAC), and 20 personnel from the Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department (JSPT),' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Why these endless road tragedies?
It has happened again, just as road safety experts had warned. Fifteen lives were lost on Monday in a collision between a tour bus ferrying Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris students and a Perodua Alza multipurpose vehicle on the East-West Highway in Gerik, Perak. Sultan of Perak Sultan Nazrin Muizzuddin Shah has decreed improvements to law enforcement. The authorities must follow the royal decree to the letter to avoid such tragedies. The mangled remains of what was once a tour bus are not just a tragic image of the past; they might be images of many futures if the authorities keep doing the same thing. We are told that the Road Transport Department (JPJ) is conducting a safety inspection, and an audit on the express bus and its operator. Let's be blunt: this is after the fact. For sure, such audits will arm the authorities with evidence to make every individual, from the operator to the driver, accountable should they be found to have broken any laws. But conducting an audit is one thing, and acting on the findings is another. Just like discovering that the tour bus had 21 traffic summonses and the driver 18 and still allowing both to be on the road. From Aug 13, 2007, to Nov 5, 2022, there have been seven major bus crashes that claimed 124 lives. Were audits conducted on these buses and their operators? If so, how many operators have been charged in court or had their businesses suspended? With tragedies like this happening with troubling frequency, the people have the right to know. But JPJ must not stop at the audit of the tour bus and its operator. It is time for JPJ to go on a nationwide inspection and audit of all heavy vehicles and their operators. Transport Minister Anthony Loke has told the media that the tour bus had no seat belts for passengers. To discover this after a tragedy is a tragedy itself. Had an audit been done, the bus operator could have been compelled to install seat belts even though the bus was built before the seat-belt law came into force. There shouldn't be an exception for passenger buses. The minister also told the press that dashboard cameras and speed limiters are in the process of being made mandatory. The "in the process" is troubling, to say the least. We have heard this before from a former transport minister. Nothing happened. But what happened were tragedies after tragedies. Operators will resist, because more trips mean more profits. If the aim is to save lives, then the authorities must throw the statute book at them. The fear appears to be that such devices can easily be disabled by the operators as the owners of lorries are already doing it to speed limiters and Global Positioning System. But that should not be a reason for not installing the devices. The law is there; just haul the operators to court. Operators who allow their heavy vehicles to turn into killer machines must be put out of business. Period.


The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
PJ police unleash drones to crack down on motorcycle lane violations
PETALING JAYA: Errant motorcycle riders beware, as PJ police are using drones for the first time, looking out for riders who did not use the designated motorcycle lanes along the Federal Highway. Petaling Jaya OCPD Asst Comm Shahrulnizam Ja'afar said the operation, which was conducted along KM28.4 of the highway on Wednesday (June 11), focused on reducing the number of accidents involving motorcyclists, especially fatal ones along the Federal Highway. "We are cooperating with the Police Air Unit (PGU) for the operation by using drones. "Once the offender is spotted on the drone, they will be issued summonses on the spot. "For the few exceptions that might have escaped, we would have already recorded their registration numbers, and summonses will be sent directly to their homes," he told reporters during the operation on Wednesday. He urged motorcycle riders to use the designated lanes to lessen the risks of being involved in accidents and other hazards. "I understand riders do not prefer to use the lanes as they are less than desirable, as some parts of the motorcycle lanes could be dark at night, while if it rains, such areas might also be flooded. "Our operation is conducted during peak hours during the day, especially in the morning," he said. A total of 47 summonses were issued for various offences, he said. "Some 16 offences were detected using drones," he said. Within 30 minutes, 32 summonses were issued during the operation, he said. "Most of the summonses were issued to riders not using the designated motorcycle lanes under Section 79(2) of the Road Transport Act 1987," he said, adding that some 16km of the highway was under the jurisdiction of PJ police. He stated that the operation aimed to enforce laws and raise awareness among road users, particularly motorcyclists, about the importance of complying with traffic regulations. "We are focusing on motorcycle riders, as 70% of fatal accidents in the district involved them. "We will continue to conduct such operations using drones from time to time," he said.


Borneo Post
19 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Academician calls for compulsory dashcams in all Malaysian vehicles
Muzaffar has called for dashcams to be made mandatory in all vehicles in Malaysia to enhance road safety and support legal proceedings. – Photo by Kevin Embol KUCHING (June 11): Dashcams should be mandatory in all vehicles in Malaysia to enhance road safety and support legal proceedings, said Dr Muzaffar Syah Mallow. In this regard, the Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia's Faculty of Syariah and Law associate professor urged the government to review existing laws, particularly the Road Transport Act 1987 (Act 333), to introduce new provisions making dashcams mandatory. 'The government can consider requesting vehicle owners in the country to instal dashcam inside their vehicle by themselves or requesting car manufacturers in the country to add a dashcam component to every vehicle which they produce. 'Whatever approach we take, we should never undermine the importance of a dashcam. With so many issues which occur on the road, dashcam footage can serve as vital evidence when needed,' he said in a statement today. He explained that modern dashcams, now compact and easy to mount, allow drivers to record visuals of any road incidents they encounter. 'Drivers may opt to instal dashcams in their vehicles for liability protection. I f a driver is involved in an accident or is accused of a crime, the lawyer may be able to use the footage from a dashcam as evidence to assist the driver with their legal battle in court,' he said. Highlighting the risks drivers face—such as accidents, snatch theft, road bullying, and harassment—Muzaffar said recorded visual evidence can assist them in filing police reports, insurance claims, and even in legal cases. Legally, Dr Muzaffar said dashcam footage qualifies as admissible documentary evidence in court, provided it is relevant, strong, and credible. He cited Section 3 of the Evidence Act 1950 (Act 56), which states that evidence includes both oral and documentary forms, such as visual recordings. 'This view is based on the case of Chin Seow Noi v PP (1994) 1 SLR 135, where the court said that 'The use of the single word 'includes' in our Section 3 is clearly intended to make the definition of evidence in our Evidence Act an extensive one.' 'The use of the word 'includes' in Section 3 of the Evidence Act 1950 [Act 56] was intended to make the definition of evidence in the section extensive. Meaning, we can use a dashcam footage as evidence. 'As long as the evidence tendered is relevant, strong and credible to our case, it can be accepted by the court,' Muzaffar explained. dashcam Dr Muzaffar Syah Mallow lead