Austria set to deport Syrian, marking first for EU since Assad's fall
Rights groups are concerned that Austria's plan could set a precedent, encouraging other EU member states to follow suit amid rising anti-migration sentiment across the 27-nation bloc.
The 32-year-old man, who was granted asylum in Austria in 2014, lost his refugee status in February 2019 because of his criminal record, his legal adviser Ruxandra Staicu said. She refused to specify the nature of his conviction.
Deportation to Syria was not possible during the country's civil war as it was considered unsafe.
The Austrian government argues that Assad's fall means the situation has changed and it has begun proceedings to strip some refugees of their status.
Austrian and Syrian authorities agreed for the man to be deported last week, but the closure of airspace due to the Iran-Israel conflict delayed the process, Staicu and a Western diplomat said.
The diplomat added that the deportation would now go ahead once the airspace reopened.
Since 2015, European countries have received around 1.68 million asylum applications from Syrian nationals. Some governments, most notably Germany, initially welcomed them warmly as civil war ravaged their homeland.
But rising public concern over the scale of immigration has fueled support for far-right, anti-migrant parties.
With the fall of Assad last December, many EU governments were quick to suspend the processing of Syrian asylum applications, and some have called for the security situation in Syria to be reassessed to enable deportations to resume.
In Austria, former Chancellor Karl Nehammer, from the ruling Austrian People's Party, is among those calling for such a reassessment, amid pressure from the far-right Freedom Party.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
8 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Judge Blocks Order Barring Asylum Access at Border and Gives Administration Two Weeks to Appeal
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that President Donald Trump's order suspending asylum access at the southern border was unlawful, jeopardizing a cornerstone of the president's plan to curb migration. However, the ruling was put on hold for two weeks to allow the government time to appeal. In a January 20 order, Trump declared the situation at the southern border an 'invasion' of America and suspended migrants' physical entry and ability to seek asylum indefinitely. US District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington stated that his order blocking Trump's policy will take effect July 16, giving the Trump administration time to appeal. Moss wrote that neither the Constitution nor immigration law permits the president an 'extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime' for repatriating or removing individuals from the US without an opportunity to apply for asylum or other humanitarian protections. The Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to a request for comment, but an appeal is likely. The president and his aides have frequently criticized court rulings that undermine his policies as judicial overreach. The ruling follows a sharp drop in illegal border crossings. The White House stated on Wednesday that Border Patrol made 6,070 arrests in June, down 30 percent from May and on pace for the lowest annual figure since 1966. On June 28, Border Patrol made only 137 arrests, a stark contrast to late 2023 when arrests exceeded 10,000 on the busiest days. Arrests declined dramatically when Mexican officials increased enforcement within their own borders in December 2023 and again when then-President Joe Biden introduced stricter asylum restrictions in June 2024. They fell further after Trump became president in January, deploying thousands of troops to the border under a national emergency declaration. Trump and his allies contend that the asylum system is being abused. They argue that it attracts people who know it will take years to process their claims in the country's backlogged immigration courts, during which time they can work and live in America. But supporters maintain that the right to seek asylum is guaranteed by US law and international commitments–even for those who cross the border illegally. They say that asylum offers vital protection for people fleeing persecution–a protection guaranteed by Congress that even the president lacks the authority to disregard. People seeking asylum must demonstrate a credible fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, or membership in a particular social or political group. In the executive order, Trump argued that the Immigration and Nationality Act empowers presidents to suspend the entry of any group they deem detrimental to US interests. Groups working with immigrants–the Arizona-based Florence Project, the El Paso, Texas-based Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, and the Texas-based RAICES–filed the lawsuit against the government, arguing that the president was wrong to equate migrants arriving at the southern border with an 'invasion.' They also argued that Trump's proclamation amounted to the president unilaterally overriding 'the immigration laws Congress enacted for the protection of people who face persecution or torture if removed from the United States.' However, the government argued that because both foreign policy and immigration enforcement fall under the executive branch, the declaration of an 'invasion' was entirely within the president's authority. 'The determination that the United States is facing an invasion is an unreviewable political question,' the government wrote in one argument.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Austria set to deport Syrian, marking first for EU since Assad's fall
BRUSSELS/PARIS: Austria is preparing to deport a Syrian man whose asylum status was revoked due to a criminal conviction, in what an EU official and rights groups say will be Europe's first forced deportation to Syria since the fall of President Bashar Assad. Rights groups are concerned that Austria's plan could set a precedent, encouraging other EU member states to follow suit amid rising anti-migration sentiment across the 27-nation bloc. The 32-year-old man, who was granted asylum in Austria in 2014, lost his refugee status in February 2019 because of his criminal record, his legal adviser Ruxandra Staicu said. She refused to specify the nature of his conviction. Deportation to Syria was not possible during the country's civil war as it was considered unsafe. The Austrian government argues that Assad's fall means the situation has changed and it has begun proceedings to strip some refugees of their status. Austrian and Syrian authorities agreed for the man to be deported last week, but the closure of airspace due to the Iran-Israel conflict delayed the process, Staicu and a Western diplomat said. The diplomat added that the deportation would now go ahead once the airspace reopened. Since 2015, European countries have received around 1.68 million asylum applications from Syrian nationals. Some governments, most notably Germany, initially welcomed them warmly as civil war ravaged their homeland. But rising public concern over the scale of immigration has fueled support for far-right, anti-migrant parties. With the fall of Assad last December, many EU governments were quick to suspend the processing of Syrian asylum applications, and some have called for the security situation in Syria to be reassessed to enable deportations to resume. In Austria, former Chancellor Karl Nehammer, from the ruling Austrian People's Party, is among those calling for such a reassessment, amid pressure from the far-right Freedom Party.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
EU's von der Leyen to face no confidence vote
BRUSSELS: European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen will face a no-confidence vote put forward by far-right MEPs on July 10 — although it is likely to fail. The motion delivered to the European Parliament's plenary session Wednesday reached the minimum requirement of 72 signatures to set a date for the vote. MEPs will debate the motion on Monday in Strasbourg ahead of the vote the following Thursday. Initiating the move, far-right Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea criticized a lack of transparency from von der Leyen related to text message exchanges with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla during the Covid pandemic, when the bloc was negotiating the purchase of vaccines. Their exchange has spurred complaints from numerous anti-vaccine groups, as well as the New York Times, which sought access to the messages in question. Piperea meanwhile also accused the European Commission of 'interference' in Romania's presidential election that saw nationalist George Simion lose to pro-European Nicusor Dan. Chances of von der Leyen losing the no confidence vote are slim. Piperea's own political group ECR has already distanced itself from the motion. 'It's not an initiative of our group,' an ECR spokesperson said. For the motion to succeed, it would require an absolute majority — at least 361 of the 720 votes.
