&w=3840&q=100)
Smiling buddha to Operation Shakti
The reverberations of that test, conducted underground in arid Pokhran, and called Pokhran-I (codename Smiling Buddha), were felt around the world. With this detonation, India had become the only country outside the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council – the P5, namely the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China – to have conducted a confirmed nuclear weapons test. China had tested its first just 10 years ago, in 1964, two years after the Indo-China war.
India termed it a 'peaceful nuclear explosion', but it was in effect a decisive and unequivocal declaration that it had nuclear capability. The country's nuclear journey gained pace in the late 1950s under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru through Project Phoenix. It was mainly to promote civilian nuclear energy, but with physicists like Homi Bhabha, the 'father of the Indian nuclear programme', laying the groundwork for weapons development. The Atomic Energy Act of 1962 gave further control to the central government over atomic energy resources. After Nehru died in 1964, the efforts shifted mostly towards peaceful goals under Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri and Gandhian scientist Vikram Sarabhai.
However, with Shastri's successor, Indira Gandhi, the momentum towards weaponisation resumed. A small, secret team of scientists and engineers worked through the 1960s and early 1970s to build the necessary infrastructure and technical capabilities. The 1971 Indo-Pak war, during which the US sent warships to the Bay of Bengal, further galvanised India's resolve, culminating in Gandhi authorising the development of a nuclear test device in 1972. India had already opposed joining the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which it saw as discriminatory. In later years, while it participated in negotiations for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), it did not ratify it for the same reasons.
Pokhran-I invited strong, sharp reactions from the world. India faced immediate sanctions. Major nuclear suppliers shut their doors to it. Less than a year later, led by the US, the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was formed to restrict and regulate the supply of nuclear material and know-how to countries that hadn't ratified the NPT. The US further tightened export controls by passing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act, 1978.
An editorial in The New York Times read: 'Such great talent of resources has been squandered on the vanity of power, while 600 million Indians slip deeper into poverty. The sixth member of the nuclear club may be passing the beggar bowl before the year is out.'
India continued with its programme through the '80s and '90s, aware that neighbouring Pakistan was also acquiring nuclear capability. Meanwhile, the original five nuclear weapons states kept a close eye on India, which had by now opened its economy to the world.
Twenty-four years after Smiling Buddha, the hot, barren Pokhran would once again witness a country's determination to exercise its sovereign right to security, despite the intense scrutiny and the threat of sanctions. It was again in the month of May, when average temperatures in Pokhran hover above 40 degrees Celsius, that India conducted its second test – a series of five nuclear tests, actually; three on May 11 and two on May 13, 1998.
Pokhran-II, codenamed Operation Shakti, with the devices named Shakti-I through Shakti-V, carried out under Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, also invited intense criticism from the global community. Besides the Western world, countries in the
Asia-Pacific region, such as Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia also reacted adversely. While India stood its ground, it made known its 'no-first-use' policy.
India's record since has established it as a nuclear-responsible country. In 2008, it signed a civil nuclear agreement with the US, and the same year, it received a waiver from the NSG. It has since signed civil nuclear cooperation agreements with Japan, Australia, South Korea, France and Vietnam, among other countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's crypto cheer lifts Bitcoin, but core risks still loom
The cryptocurrency faithful are having quite a moment. Donald Trump's return to the White House has brought a veritable cornucopia of pro-crypto promises, from talk of a 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" to declarations about making America the 'crypto capital of the world." Markets have reacted predictably: Bitcoin has surged past previous highs, and believers are treating this as ultimate vindication. Yet beneath the sheen of political legitimacy, nothing fundamental has changed about cryptocurrencies' essential nature. The irony in Trump's embrace of crypto is hard to miss. The proposed 'Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and US Digital Asset Stockpile" will apparently consist entirely of assets seized from criminals. In other words, the US government's official cryptocurrency holdings will be digital assets once used for ransomware, money laundering, drug trafficking, and other illicit activities. It's rather like announcing a strategic reserve of stolen goods as proof of their virtue. This detail neatly captures crypto's central problem. Despite all the technological sophistication and political endorsements, it remains the payment method of choice for criminals worldwide. Every major ransomware attack, dark web marketplace, and cross-border money laundering network gravitates to crypto for the same reasons enthusiasts celebrate it—anonymity, irreversibility, and freedom from traditional oversight. Political enthusiasm can't fix these structural flaws. Governments seeking to legitimise crypto are, in effect, blessing a system designed to bypass governmental authority. The contradiction is glaring: regulators tout an asset class while acknowledging that their strategic reserves will be filled mainly by seizing it from criminals. The ease with which fraud and theft occur in crypto remains staggering. Consider the 'socialised loss" strategy, where a major Indian exchange, after losing customer funds to hackers, decided everyone should share the pain, a perfect example of the Wild West ethos. When exchanges profit, it's capitalism; when they're robbed, suddenly everyone's a socialist. The frequency of such episodes would be comical if they didn't wipe out life savings. These aren't isolated mishaps or growing pains; they're built into a system that operates outside traditional financial protections. When a bank is robbed, deposit insurance protects you. When a crypto exchange is 'hacked", often a euphemism, you're on your own. The very decentralisation crypto champions means there's no safety net when things go wrong. Trump's enthusiasm also underlines another uncomfortable reality: an anti-establishment movement has been fully co-opted by the establishment it once vowed to disrupt. Wall Street, which Bitcoin was meant to circumvent, is now its biggest backer via ETFs and institutional products. The so-called revolutionary currency depends on the same traditional finance for its legitimacy. Political endorsement carries psychological weight. When governments and big institutions adopt a position, it creates an illusion of safety and permanence. Past crypto bubbles fed on tech mystique and get-rich-quick dreams; this cycle adds political validation, which could make it more dangerous for ordinary investors mistaking political backing for sound investment. For Indian investors, the temptation to chase this apparent legitimacy will be strong. Domestic taxation has curbed much local speculation, but political developments in the US could encourage some to seek workarounds. The 'don't miss out" narrative, wrapped in patriotic American rhetoric about financial dominance, could be persuasive. Yet the math hasn't changed. Crypto produces nothing, earns nothing, and represents no underlying asset. It serves no economic purpose that existing systems can't fulfil more efficiently. Its price is driven purely by speculative sentiment, whether fuelled by tech hype, celebrity endorsements, or presidential tweets. The most telling part of crypto's political embrace is how quickly its advocates abandoned anti-government principles in exchange for government approval. Those who once railed against fiat currencies and central banks now cheer politicians promising to hoard their preferred tokens. It's a striking shift from revolutionary idealism to conventional rent-seeking. Short-term price predictions are futile, speculative bubbles can inflate far beyond reason. But knowing what you're buying matters. Political theatre and presidential applause can't turn speculation into investment, gambling into wealth-building, or criminal infrastructure into legitimate finance. However much hot air gets pumped into this bubble, the fundamentals remain unchanged. Dhirendra Kumar is founder and chief executive officer of Value Research, an independent advisory firm. Views expressed are personal.
NDTV
10 minutes ago
- NDTV
Assam Launches 'Gun License' Portal Online For Indigenous People
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Thursday launched an online portal through which indigenous people living in "sensitive areas" can apply for arms licences. According to the Chief Minister, the aim of the initiative is to make people living in vulnerable areas or along the border have a sense of security. Mr Sarma said that the arms licenses would only be granted after proper scrutiny through a multi-layered process. People notified by the district administration or assessed as vulnerable by authorised security agencies will be eligible for acquiring an arms licence, he said. Additionally, only those who do not have any criminal antecedents and are mentally stable can apply for the arms licenses. "This state has several vulnerable areas, particularly border areas. Many times, the citizens of border areas face security issues. Due to prolonged insurgency, we are very restricted in terms of gun licenses, but now there is almost no insurgency left, and the crime situation has improved. So we have decided to have online registration of guns," the Chief Minister said. Calling it a "religious neutral scheme", he added, "One has to be indigenous and an original inhabitant. Anyone whose three generations have stayed in India will be considered for this." Government sources have indicated that Barpeta, Dhing, Dhubri, Jania, Morigaon, Nagaon, Rupahi, and South Salmara-Mankachar as some of the "vulnerable and remote areas". The Opposition, however, has slammed the initiative, calling it "highly condemnable". In May last year, the Assam Cabinet had decided to grant arms licences to "original inhabitants or indigenous Indian citizens" living in border and remote areas - a decision that the opposition parties including congress had criticised heavily claiming that it can lead to more fake encounters and extortion.
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Forgotten witness
I always thought Independence Day belonged to the likes of Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Patel. My father was a young man when India gained Independence. I heard my great-aunt had tasted the police lathi and then become a politician. Our neighbour had been to jail as a freedom-fighter. But I never asked any of them, 'What did you do on August 15?' In retrospect, that seems like such an obvious question. But it ended up being a missed opportunity. That remains a lifelong regret. Some years ago, I asked my mother what she had done on August 15, 1947. But she didn't have clear memories of doing anything special that day. She didn't remember any feasts being cooked at home, or the family huddled around the radio set listening to Nehru's famous speech at midnight. Instead, she remembered drawing the curtains and huddling around the radio to listen to Subhas Chandra Bose's Aami Subhas Bolchi broadcasts from Singapore in years earlier. It puzzled me. Independence was such a seminal moment in the history of the country. I would have thought it would be engraved in her memory. But Kolkata was in a state of violent unrest in those days with Hindu-Muslim killings. It's likely that as a young girl, my mother was not allowed to go anywhere. Independence probably felt very different to her than it did to her brother. I can imagine my uncle and his friends running down the streets on Independence Day. But I never asked him. Our generation took independence for granted. And then one day it was too late to ask those who had witnessed it about it. An incredible spectrum The problem I realise is the way we are taught history. It's about very important men (and a few women) taking very important decisions around round tables. There are Wavell Plans and Cripps Missions and Dandi Marches. But the ordinary people are always the extras. Never at school did someone tell us, 'Go interview your grandparents about living through this period in history'. Their stories somehow never mattered. But what stories they had. Flower Silliman, who passed away last year, was one of the last members of the dwindling Jewish community in Kolkata. She once told me about how she had come upon a mob killing a man in the heart of Kolkata. When she tried to intervene, the mob politely told her this was not her fight. As a memsahib (white woman), she needed to stay out of it. Suddenly she realised that though she thought of herself as an Indian Jew, to many in the new India, she wasn't Indian at all. Jatra artist Chapal Bhaduri remembers peering out of the window of his home in North Kolkata and seeing someone hold another person by the throat and hack his head off with a chopper. In his book The Last Heroes, veteran journalist P. Sainath collects many such stories. The woman who cooked food for revolutionaries hiding in the forests of Purulia in West Bengal. The woman who at 13 was taking on the Razakars of Hyderabad with a slingshot. The student activist who could not give his final exam because he was in jail. 'Freedom was not brought to you by a bunch of Oxbridge Brahmin baniyas,' says Sainath. 'But by an incredible spectrum of diverse peoples — Dalits, Adivasis, women, Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, OBCs, Brahmins, you name it. They participated.' The woman who cooked for Bose's INA thought she was just a cook, not a freedom fighter. Years later, when she was invited to hoist the flag, she was embarrassed. She worked as a domestic help and didn't have a decent sari. These people didn't get roads named after them. There are no statues to them. Memories on postcards It took Aanchal Malhotra finding objects like a peacock-shaped bracelet, a maang tika, a pocket knife, to realise they carried in them stories about her ancestors as they fled across the new border that separated India and Pakistan. That led to her book Remnants of Separation, an alternative history of Partition told through material memory. These stories were not really deemed worth of history books. But history needs to be freed from textbooks. DAG once organised an exhibit called March to Freedom at the Indian Museum in Kolkata. In it were dozens of handwritten postcards with people's memories of Independence. 'My grandmother's father was in the police but he still took part in the Swadeshi movement,' said one. Another said, 'My late grandfather's account of 15th August is rather funny. A bunch of village kids with no money or resources stole gamchas [cotton towels] and hoisted them on a bunch of sticks and ran through the rice fields overjoyed about a free India.' The letter writers (or their grandparents) had never met Gandhi or Nehru. But they too were part of the story of Indian Independence. The people's history of Independence needs to be preserved before it's too late. Sandip Roy, the author of Don't Let Him Know, likes to let everyone know about his opinions, whether asked or not.
