LHV Bank launches current account
LHV Bank, a fully licensed UK bank, today launches its new fee-free current account with market leading 3.25% AER on all balances up to £1 million, tracking the Bank of England Base Rate minus 1%.
0
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
Today's launch provides a new alternative for the UK public and takes aim at the £252bn of deposits* held in non-interest-bearing bank accounts in the UK. By contrast, LHV Bank customers' money is always at work, earning a market leading rate of interest from the moment it goes into their current account.
New research from LHV Bank and Opinium – surveying 2,000 UK adults – reveals the scale of Britain's 0% interest current account challenge. Less than a third (30%) of Britons report collecting interest on their most used current account, whilst two in three (64%) believe banks should be responsible for warning them if their current account is not earning interest. Two fifths of respondents (41%) would support Government legislation to ban 0% interest rate current accounts altogether.**
LHV Bank aims to be the best place to save money and, alongside the new current account, offers a range of competitive fixed rate savings bonds with further savings products planned. It secured its full UK banking licence in 2023 and is now doubling down on its commitment to the UK market, where it sees significant opportunities for innovation and disruption.
The launch of LHV Bank's current account offer is accompanied by an advertising campaign aimed at 'Reckless Savers'. The campaign goal is to encourage UK consumers to switch banks to earn interest on their current account balance, in turn pushing the banking industry to better by its customers and offer current account interest as standard. Reckless Savers can sign up today to LHV and make their money work harder for them.
Erki Kilu, CEO of LHV Bank, said: 'The majority of UK banks are focused on helping customers to spend money, but at LHV we take a savings first approach. We believe that every penny deposited with your bank should earn interest, making it easy to be a 'reckless saver' and make the most of your money. LHV is a bank for savers, not for spenders.'
Alongside leading interest rates, from today LHV customers can make use of:
A fresh, new banking experience: the LHV Bank app has been designed from scratch to offer customers a seamless self-service user experience
Advanced fraud prevention: cutting-edge real-time risk decisioning technology protects customers from fraud and scams
Fee free interest: access to fee free market leading interest rates on current account balances as standard
Debit Cards: stylish, minimalist Debit Cards in a range of colours to match any style with no current account or overseas debit card transaction fees
Google Pay: enabled from launch, with Apple Pay coming soon
Kris Brewster, Director of Retail Banking at LHV Bank, said: 'Millions of people across the UK are being short-changed by banks offering 0% on their current accounts. At LHV, we're giving customers the tools to take control – combining meaningful interest rates, modern app-based technology, and complete transparency to help them make smarter money decisions every day.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour faces backlash after taking credit for Bank of England's interest rate cuts
The Government came under fire last night after seeking to take credit for interest rate cuts in the UK. Rachel Reeves used her spending review to claim her policies have 'helped support four cuts in interest rates ' by the Bank of England since the election. It echoed similar comments from Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions just minutes earlier. But they faced a backlash from economists. Simon French, chief economist at City broker Panmure Liberum, said that Labour's spending may have led to higher interest rates. Describing himself as 'uncomfortable with this line from the Chancellor that fiscal policy has supported cutting UK interest rates four times', he said: 'Basic economics would have it that looser fiscal policy necessitates tighter monetary policy, all else being equal.' The former Bank of England rate-setter Andrew Sentance said French's analysis was 'absolutely right' and suggested that the Bank 'has been over-hasty in cutting rates'. And Julian Jessop, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, noted that while Starmer 'is still trying to claim credit for four interest rate cuts', the European Central Bank 'has cut interest rates eight times in the past year'. The Bank's monetary policy committee is independent and Government ministers have no say in its interest rate decisions.
Metro
7 hours ago
- Metro
Millions could be paying off debt well into retirement amid 'pension postcode lo
A 'postcode lottery' means people face carrying hefty mortgage debt well into retirement, an analysis has found. Years of putting off home buying amid rising property prices and extended mortgage terms mean some Britons will be paying off loans for decades. According to the study released today, 48% of over 50s are in some form of debt, with 14% having yet to pay off their mortgages. But regional inequality is rife in the UK, with at least 20% of over 50s in Northern Ireland being set to pay off home loans well into their golden years, the highest number in the UK. They have an average of £50,409.09 in outstanding debt. The highest percentage of debt-raddled over 50s in England is in the North West, at 19%, with an average mortgage debt of £48,839.55. But 30% of the age group in the region have no private pensions, with the average income being less than £25,000. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video London faces what the survey-maker called a 'perfect storm' of low homeownership, mountainous debt, financial anxiety and pay cheques that barely cover the bills. Just 55% of older Londoners own their home, while many take only £31,164 each year, far lower than in other regions. Over 50s cough up around £1,230 each month for their homes in the capital, far above the average payment elsewhere in the UK at £887. While fewer over 50s in East Anglia have mortgages to repay, the region has the most eye-watering average mortgage debt at £96,471.43. The South East is not far behind with an average debt of £95,905.77. In Scotland, more than half (53%) of the surveyed age group are in debt. Mark Screeton, CEO of SunLife, the life insurance group behind the survey, said: 'Our research shows a clear 'postcode lottery' when it comes to retirement, where people's ability to enjoy later life appears to be impacted by where they live. 'Whether it is mortgage repayments dragging into retirement or higher levels of consumer debt, older people in some areas are facing greater financial concerns than others.' More Trending The retirement age in the UK is 66 for men and women, which is when people receive their state pension. SunLife said that of the 2,000 people aged over 50 polled, the cost of living remains a top concern in certain regions. Worries over spiralling costs were highest in: Northern Ireland (74%) Scotland (71%) East Midlands (68%) London (56%) View More » Screeton added: 'For homeowners over 55 – even those with an outstanding mortgage – equity release could offer a way to clear debts, stop monthly repayments, and unlock the value in their home without having to move. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Map reveals the 5 cheapest London postcodes where properties cost less than £300,000 MORE: I loaned my parents a few hundred quid — then they stole thousands MORE: Here's how you can find out if you're owed money from your state pension Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
New Statesman
7 hours ago
- New Statesman
The shame of Labour's austerity doctrine
Photo byThe first thing the Chancellor Rachel Reeves wants you to know is that her spending review is not 'austerity'. That was how she opened her statement, it's how her team has been briefing the plans, and it's also how almost every chancellor I remember in recent years have framed their budgets. During the first pandemic summer in 2020, Boris Johnson promised: 'We are absolutely not going back to the austerity of ten years ago.' In fact, austerity – the spending cuts inflicted since the coalition government was elected in 2010 – ended in 2018, when the then prime minister Theresa May and her chancellor Philip Hammond declared that it was over ahead of the autumn Budget that year. Can't you tell? The truth is, Britain is trapped in Forever Austerity. You can pledge £39bn to build more affordable homes – but council planning departments are in shreds so they won't be held to decent standards. You can raise NHS spending by 3 per cent a year – but the elderly will still be stuck in hospital beds and hospitals full because social care is so stretched. You can cap bus fares at £3 – but potholed roads, hollowed-out high streets and low-wage jobs that rely on ever-diminishing welfare top-ups rather dampen the experience. Just look at the 100-hectare Thamesmead Waterfront site, ready and waiting for thousands of new homes, shops and local amenities – a prime stretch of brownfield to show off the government's housebuilding promises. It needs an extension of the Dockland Light Railway to unlock that building: an infrastructure project overlooked by the spending review. And so it continues. At the time of writing, we don't yet have the figures for how squeezed departmental budgets will be, but that increase in NHS spending means 'virtually nothing on average for current spending elsewhere', warned Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. From 2026-27 onwards, day-to-day spending is not rising for anything but the NHS. That means policing, councils, things people notice in their everyday lives. And people have noticed. A quarter of Britons think we are returning to austerity, and a further 27 per cent think that Britain never left austerity, according to polling by More in Common. When Labour took power, the Chancellor was left a bombsite of an economy, littered with clever little landmines like just £8.9bn in fiscal headroom (much lower than the £26.1bn average since 2010), and 3.3 per cent yearly cuts to unprotected spending with no plan for where they would fall. Whether or not blaming the last government for leaving a £22bn black hole is rhetoric or reality, the public finances Labour inherited seemed to guarantee further cuts. Reeves's predecessor, Jeremy Hunt, admitted this to me when I spoke to him ahead of the spring statement last week: 'She's made a big thing of saying 'we shouldn't have austerity', and what are we going to see next week? We're going to see cuts in unprotected departments. She's doing exactly the same thing that she criticised me about in opposition.' When I asked why he had left so little headroom, and baked in such drastic cuts, he didn't 'want to particularly go over all those arguments'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe But it's not just the Tories, and it goes beyond cuts. Labour has been warned for years that the same old tinkering with the budget – essentially, making sure the numbers on the NHS and schools go up, shuffling bits and bobs around for everything else, and tired regions-first rhetoric without investment to match – won't bring about the 'renewal' it craves. Even the party's own former adviser on levelling up, the former Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane, has been dismayed by the lack of creativity, writing in the New Statesman's Spotlight supplement that the Chancellor's 'major announcements have been reheated leftovers from the Treasury's freezer'. The UK is set to be poorer per person than Poland by 2030, and than both Hungary and Romania by 2040. The north of England (including the Midlands) is already poorer than east Germany. It's a comparison that captures the scale of ambition successive British governments have failed even to imagine. The German government spent €2trn 'levelling up' east Germany following reunification. For all the talk of rebalancing the north-south divide, nothing comparable has ever been attempted by the modern-day UK Treasury. 'In 1992, east Germany had a productivity which was 20 per cent of west Germany. Now, 30 years on, it's 85 per cent of west Germany,' wrote the development economist Paul Collier. 'East Germans see that, and they're angry. If you think that's a failure, come and look at Britain.' [See also: Revealed: Labour's welfare cuts will take people out of work] Related
