Unique 1.5m year-old ice to be melted to unlock mystery
The glassy cylinder is the planet's oldest ice and was drilled from deep inside the Antarctic ice sheet.
Frozen inside is thousands of years of new information that scientists say could "revolutionise" what we know about climate change.
BBC News went inside the -23C freezer room at the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge to see the precious boxes of ice.
"This is a completely unknown period of our Earth's history," says Dr Liz Thomas, head of ice core research at the British Antarctic Survey.
Red warning lights flash above the door, and inside there is an emergency escape hatch into a tunnel in case something went wrong.
The rules say we could only go inside for 15 minutes at a time, wearing padded overalls, boots, hats and gloves.
Our camera's electronic shutter froze shut and our hair started to crackle as it turned icy.
On a worktop next to stacked boxes of ice, Dr Thomas points out the oldest cores that could be 1.5 million years old. They shine and are so clear we can see our hands through them.
For seven weeks, the team will slowly melt the hard-won ice, releasing ancient dust, volcanic ash, and even tiny marine algae called diatoms that were locked inside when water turned to ice.
These materials can tell scientists about wind patterns, temperature, and sea levels more than a million years ago.
Tubes will feed the liquid into machines in a lab next door that is one of the only places in the world that can do this science.
It was a huge multinational effort to extract the ice cores in Antarctica, at a cost of millions. The ice was chopped into 1m blocks and transported by boat and then in a cold van to Cambridge.
Engineer James Veal helped to extract the ice close to the Concordia base in eastern Antarctica.
"To hold that in my carefully gloved hands and be very careful not to drop the sections - it was an amazing feeling," he says.
Two institutions in Germany and Switzerland also have received cross-sections of the 2.8km core.
The teams could find evidence of a period of time more than 800,000 years ago when carbon dioxide concentrations may have been naturally as high or even higher than they are now, according to Dr Thomas.
This could help them understand what will happen in our future as our planet responds to warming gases trapped in our atmosphere.
"Our climate system has been through so many different changes that we really need to be able to go back in time to understand these different processes and different tipping points," she says.
The difference between today and previous eras with high greenhouse gases is that now humans have caused the rapid rise in warming gases in the last 150 years.
That is taking us into unchartered territory, but the scientists hope that the record of our planet's environmental history locked in the ice could give us some guidance.
The team will identify chemical isotopes in the liquid that could tell us the wind patterns, temperatures, and rainfall for a period of time between 800,000 and up to 1.5 million years ago or possibly more.
They will use an instrument called an inductively couple plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS) to measure over 20 elements and trace metals.
That includes rare earth elements, sea salts and marine elements, as well as indicators of past volcanic eruptions.
The work will help scientists understand a mysterious change called the Mid-Pleistocene Transition 800,000 to 1.2 million years ago when the planet's glacial cycles suddenly changed.
The transition from warmer eras to cold glacial eras, when ice covered a lot more of Earth, had been every 41,000 years but it suddenly switched to 100,000 years.
The cause of this shift is one of the "most exciting unsolved questions" in climate science, according to Dr Thomas.
The cores may have evidence of a time when sea levels were much higher than they are now and when the vast Antarctic ice sheets were smaller.
The presence of dust in the ice will help them understand how the ice sheets shrunk and contributed to sea level rise - something that is a major concern this century.
Million year-old bubbles could solve ice age mystery
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Unveil Wild New Way to Explore the Edge of Space
Scientists often refer to the mesosphere as the 'ignorosphere'—a region that's too high for planes or weather balloons to explore, yet too low for satellites to probe. Despite our technological advances, we've yet to find a decent way to monitor this large stretch of air, which lies about 37 miles (60 kilometers) above the surface. But engineers are inching towards a solution—one inspired by a toy-like invention from the 19th century. A Nature paper published today presents a proof-of-concept for an extremely lightweight, disc-like structure that levitates thanks to sunlight, no fuel required. Crafted from ceramic aluminum with a chromium base, the device floats on photophoresis, which literally means 'light-driven motion.' When sunlight strikes the device, the differences in heat and pressure around the disc create an upward airflow, keeping the disc airborne. The pressure difference produces photophoretic lift—enough to keep these little guys aloft. Although this particular device was tailored for mesospheric exploration, the physics driving its flight could easily be applied to future missions beyond Earth—including the achingly thin Martian atmosphere, as long as there's sufficient sunlight, the researchers say. 'Photophoresis requires no fuel, batteries, or photovoltaics, so it is an inherently sustainable flight mechanism,' Ben Schafer, study lead author and an associate researcher at Harvard University, told Gizmodo in an email. 'We could use these devices to collect groundbreaking atmospheric data to benefit meteorology, perform telecommunications, and predict space weather.' The initial idea dates back to 1873, when physicist William Crookes invented a radiometer that fed off sunlight. Subsequent projects attempted to build on Crookes's invention, but with limited success, as Igor Bargatin, a mechanical engineer at the University of Pennsylvania, explained in an accompanying News & Views article. (Although Bargatin did not participate in the new study, Schafer cited his work as one of the main inspirations for the device.) Schafer and his colleagues, however, capitalized on previous work and recent advances in nanofabrication technology for their blueprint, constructing samples of 'shiny, thin squares with very tiny holes,' as Schafer described them. Researchers from multiple countries teamed up on the project, combining theoretical and experimental steps. Normally, the photophoretic force is weak relative to an object's size and weight, making it nearly impossible to notice, Schafer explained. But the new device is so thin and tiny—about half the size of a penny—that the photophoretic force actually exceeds its weight, causing it to levitate. To validate its calculations, the team built a low-pressure chamber in the lab to simulate the atmospheric and sunlight conditions of the mesosphere. To their delight, the tiny discs remained aloft. Schafer, now CEO of Rarefied Technologies, is moving quickly to bring these devices to commercial use. His team wants to tinker with the fabrication element so the discs can carry communications technology that can collect and send back weather data, Schafer said. 'We plan to use passive devices that can be tracked remotely with lidar or radar to collect weather data in the upper atmosphere; this could reach the pilot phase in a couple years,' he explained. 'If the full potential of this technology can be realized, swarms or arrays of such photophoretic flyers could be collecting high-resolution data on the temperature, pressure, chemical composition, and wind dynamics of the mesosphere,' Bargatin added. 'What began as a Victorian curiosity might soon become a key tool for probing the most elusive region of the atmosphere.'
The Verge
3 hours ago
- The Verge
Some doctors got worse at detecting cancer after relying on AI
We've heard about upskilling and re-skilling due to AI — but how about de-skilling? A new study published this week found that doctors who frequently use AI to detect cancer in one medical procedure got significantly worse at doing so. The researchers set out to discover whether continuous exposure to AI impacted doctors' behavior when conducting colonoscopy, so they decided to assess 'how endoscopists who regularly used AI performed colonoscopy when AI was not in use.' The answer: Not so hot. The rate was about six percentage points lower. The study was published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology journal by medical professionals and researchers in countries including Poland, Norway, Sweden, the U.K., and Japan. It followed doctors at four endoscopy centers in Poland, which were part of a trial program focusing on AI's use in colonoscopy for potential cancer prevention. It raises questions about the use of AI in healthcare, when it helps and when it could hurt. Last week, The Verge reported on a Google healthcare AI model's instance of potentially hallucinating a body part and where medical professionals think the industry will go from from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Hayden Field Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Health Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Antarctica's Ghost Hunters: Inside the World's Biggest Neutrino Detector
Neutrinos are strange little things. This tiny, enigmatic particle with no charge exists in virtually every corner of the universe, but without powerfully sensitive, sophisticated instruments, physicists would have no way of knowing they exist. In fact, trillions are passing through you every second. Physicists devise all sorts of ways to coax neutrinos into the detection range. But IceCube—which celebrates its 20th anniversary this year—stands out in particular for its unique setup: 5,160 digital sensors latched onto a gigantic Antarctic glacier. Recently, the IceCube Collaboration set the most stringent upper limits on a key statistic for ultra-high-energy neutrinos, often found inside cosmic rays. It's also slated to receive some major technological updates later this year, which will make the detector—already one of the largest neutrino experiments on Earth—even larger and stronger than ever. Gizmodo reached out to Carlos Argüelles-Delgado, an astrophysicist at Harvard University and a neutrino expert who's been with IceCube since 2011, when the experiment began its physical operations in Antarctica. We spoke to Argüelles-Delgado about why IceCube is, well, in Antarctica, some highlights from the experiment's 20-year run, and what we can expect from the forthcoming IceCube-Gen2. The following conversation has been lightly edited for grammar and clarity. Gayoung Lee, Gizmodo: Let's begin with the elephant in the room. Why did physicists decide Antarctica was a good place to find neutrinos? Argüelles-Delgado: Yeah. You have a combination of two very difficult problems. You're looking for something that's very rare that produces very small signals, relatively speaking. You want an environment that is very controlled and can produce a large signal at a small background. The IceCube project—kind of a crazy project if you think about it—the idea is we're going to take a glacier about 2.5 kilometers [1.5 miles] tall, which is one of the most transparent mediums that exists on the planet. We're going to deploy these very sensitive light sensors [called digital optical modules] that can detect single light particles known as photons. And so, you have this array of light detectors covering 1 cubic kilometer [0.24 cubic miles] of essentially pitch-dark space. When a neutrino comes from outer space, it can eventually interact with something in the ice and make light, and that's what we see. Gizmodo: It's really difficult to understand what neutrinos actually are. They sound like something churned by particle physicists, but at other times they're discussed in the context of experiments like IceCube, which searches for neutrinos from space. What exactly are neutrinos? Why does it feel like they appear in every niche of physics? Argüelles-Delgado: That's a good question. One reason that neutrinos appear in very different contexts—from particle physics to cosmology or astrophysics—is because neutrinos are fundamental particles. They are particles that cannot be split into smaller pieces, like the electrons. Like we use electrons in laboratories, we also use electrons in detecting physical phenomena. Neutrinos are special because we have open questions about their behaviors and properties [and] about the universe in the highest energy regime, where we observe cosmic rays. So, observing neutrinos in a new setting on a new energy scale is always very exciting. When you try to understand something with a mystery, you look at it from every angle. When there's a new angle, you then ask, 'Is that what we expected to see? Is that not what we expected to see?' Gizmodo: In the spirit of attempting new angles to solve mysteries, what sets IceCube apart from other neutrino detectors? Argüelles-Delgado: It's huge! IceCube is a million times larger than the next neutrino experiment that we have built in the laboratory. It's just huge. Since the interaction rate depends on how many things you're surveying, the larger the volume, the more likely you are to see something. For ultra-high-energy neutrinos [which originate in space], you're always thinking about natural environments—mountains, glaciers, lakes—landscapes converted into experiments. Gizmodo: Antarctica isn't exactly somewhere you can just fly to with a plane ticket. What challenges come from the unique conditions at this remote location? Argüelles-Delgado: You're right. The logistics are very complicated. You have to ship all of these components, and you have to be sure that when you put something in the ice, it will work. It's like when you put something on a satellite on a spaceship. Once it's there, you cannot fix it. It is just there. So the quality requirements are very high, and there are multiple challenges. One of them is drilling the actual holes, through two steps. A mechanical drill makes the first guiding hole. Then we use a custom-made, high-pressure hot water drill that then pumps water to [carve the glacier]. The other part is the cable. The cables in IceCubes are quite special, [holding] the instruments that digitalize the modules, which allows you to have better quality of signal processing. Gizmodo: What are the upcoming upgrades to IceCube, and why are they needed? Argüelles-Delgado: The upgrade has two functions. One of them is that we need to better understand the glacier where IceCube is embedded. Obviously, we didn't make that glacier. We just put things on the glacier. And the better we understand the glacier and its optical properties—how light travels in that glacier—the better we can actually do neutrino physics. So we're going to install a bunch of cameras and light sources to try to sort of survey the glacier better. We're also installing a bunch of new sensors [for] a larger version of IceCube, called IceCube-Gen2. When you do science, you want to test new things but also measure things. We are not going to be able to extend the detector volume, but instead we're going to put [sensors] in the innermost part of the detector to allow us to better measure lower-energy neutrinos in IceCube. Low-energy neutrinos are important because at low energies, the neutrinos experience something known as flavor oscillation, which means that the neutrinos, as they travel from one side of the planet to the other, change in type. That is actually a quantum mechanical phenomenon of microscopic scales. IceCube shows one of the best measurements of that physics. Gizmodo: You've been a part of IceCube's journey since the beginning. In your view, what are some of the main highlights the experiment has accomplished? Argüelles-Delgado: First, we discovered that there are ultra-high-energy neutrinos in the universe. These are difficult to detect but not that rare in terms of the universe's energy density, or how much energy per unit volume exists in the universe between protons, neutrinos, and light—they're actually very similar—and IceCube established [this relationship]. A few years ago we saw the first photo of our galaxy in neutrinos. Something very close to my heart is flavor conversion in quantum mechanics. We think neutrinos are produced primarily as electron- and muon-type neutrinos. Now as they travel through space, because of these quantum mechanical effects, they can transform into tau neutrinos, which are not initially there at production. In IceCube, we have found significant evidence of various tau neutrinos at high energy levels. What's amazing about this is that those neutrinos can only be produced and can get to us if quantum mechanics is operating at these extremely long distances. Gizmodo: Given these highlights, what are some things that you are most looking forward to next? Argüelles-Delgado: There are two things that I find very exciting in neutrino astrophysics. One is the neutrinos' quantum behavior, and we do not understand how they acquire their masses. Most particles, when they have mass, have two states that interact with the Higgs boson to produce their masses. Neutrinos, for some reason, we only see one of these states. What I'm excited about is looking for new flavor transformations of very high-energy neutrinos. In some of these scenarios, we could actually have some idea about neutrino mass mechanisms. The second thing is, we have seen neutrinos that are 1,000 times more energetic than the product of the LHC [particle beam]. So are there more at the higher end of neutrinos? Is this where the story ends? What's interesting is that an experiment called KM3NeT in the Mediterranean has reported observations of a neutrino that's [100,000] times more energetic than the LHC beams. I think that is weird. You know, when you see weird things happening, it often means you don't understand something. And so we need to understand that puzzle. Gizmodo: On a scale of 1 to 10, how likely is it that we'll solve these mysteries? Argüelles-Delgado: If we discover the nature of neutrino masses is due to this quantum oscillation phenomenon of the high energies, this will be like a Nobel Prize discovery. Because it's such a big thing, I'll give you at best 1%. Gizmodo: I'd say that's actually pretty good. Argüelles-Delgado: I'd say that's pretty good, yeah. Let's say 1%. I think we'll solve the puzzle of the ultra-high-energy regime; that's a matter of time. That's going to take us easily another 15 years, but it's going to be, again, completely new land. We will see what awaits us. When IceCube started seeing the first neutrinos, we were so confused because we were not expecting to see them [like] this, right? And if all the confusion keeps happening, we'll find more interesting results
