Breaking down the Budget with Max Rashbrooke
There have been savings made through reforms to the pay equity legislation and KiwiSaver.
But boosts for businesses with a tax incentive, learning support in schools and roading.
Max Rashbrooke is a senior research fellow in the School of Government at Victoria University, he has written extensively on inequality and talks to Susie.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
29 minutes ago
- Scoop
72% Of Kiwi Consumers Say Brands Don't Keep Their Promises
Press Release – Accenture The Brand Experience Gap study, produced by tech-powered creative group Accenture Song, measures the gap between what brands promise to deliver versus what customers actually experience. The study, now in its second year, examined 65 brands across … Nearly three-quarters (72%) of Kiwi consumers say companies are failing to live up to the promises they make, a new report has found. The Brand Experience Gap study, produced by tech-powered creative group Accenture Song, measures the 'gap' between what brands promise to deliver versus what customers actually experience. The study, now in its second year, examined 65 brands across six sectors in New Zealand. This year's result showed a slight increase from 2024 (71%). Like last year, financial services providers performed the best, with an experience gap of 63%. This means that 63% of financial services customers don't believe their main provider delivers on their promises. A third (33%) of financial services customers said having reasonable fees and interest rates is one of the biggest areas for improvement. Media and entertainment companies (such as content streaming services) fared the worst, with an overall experience gap of 79%. The main areas for improvement included users being able to manage and customise content (81%) and content being regularly refreshed so it doesn't get boring (78%). Across all sectors, the areas where consumers found the biggest gaps were feeling valued and recognised by brands (79%), the brands positively contributing to society (78%), and having the latest technology to make dealing with them easier (77%). Other sectors analysed in the study, and their brand experience gaps, include general insurance (71%), telcos (72%), utilities (68%), and travel and tourism (76%). Storm Day, NZ Lead at Accenture Song, says: 'Customers are demanding more from the brands they deal with, and rightly so. In an increasingly complex business environment, companies simply can't afford to promise what they can't deliver. 'Again in 2025, we're seeing a stubbornly high experience gap among brands in New Zealand. But this gap comes with an opportunity, as closing it is one of the best ways to build long-term customer trust. 'The key is to treat customer experience as a purpose-led growth driver, not just a budget line item. Sectors like financial services are holding steady because they've invested in owning the customer experience, along with the systems and strategies to support it. 'It's also important to remember that your brand doesn't exist in a vacuum. You might be closing gaps, but if your competitors are closing them faster, people notice that. Customers' experiences are framed by all the organisations they deal with, not just those in your sector. 'That's crucial, because customers don't always complain – they simply don't come back. They disappear silently, often to your competitors. 'By harnessing smart technologies like generative AI to deliver genuine organisational purpose, we're on a mission to turn intent into action – and close the gap.' About the Brand Experience Gap research: The Brand Experience Gap study measures the 'gap' between what brands promise they deliver to their customers, versus what their customers actually experience. Respondents were asked nine statements representing universal brand values (e.g. 'They are simple & easy to deal with' and 'I feel valued and recognised by them'), as well as sector-specific attributes (e.g. 'They actively protect me against fraud' for financial services brands). The gap between what companies promised in their communications and what their customers experienced was measured for each sector as a whole, as well as the individual brand values within each sector. A total of 1,527 respondents were surveyed in New Zealand in 2025.
Scoop
29 minutes ago
- Scoop
There's No Doubt The RBNZ Should Cut. And They Will. But There Is Doubt That They Will Do Enough.
Press Release – Kiwi Economics The economic data and developments since the last MPS have strengthened the case for a more go for growth focussed RBNZ. The RBNZ will have removed the restrictiveness of monetary policy but that is not enough. The RBNZ's policy decision is approaching. Will they cut? Yes. Will they signal another cut to come? Yes. Will it be enough? Not quite. There's no doubt that the Kiwi economy needs support. There's no doubt the RBNZ needs to stimulate. But there is doubt that they will deliver? They should. The weakness in the economy demands stimulus. With all the risks offshore, and the pain still felt onshore, there's a good argument to be made for taking policy into stimulatory territory asap. An argument that is growing in support. Our COTW looks at the latest REINZ housing data, which much like the current season, feels stuck in an endless winter. House prices have dipped for a second month in a row. And activity remains subdued. Here's our take on current events From the RBNZ's perspective, this week's decision, with updated forecasts, sets the scene for the next 3 months (see our full preview here). And it will help set the trading ranges for financial markets. The economic data and developments since the last MPS have strengthened the case for a more 'go for growth' focussed RBNZ. The RBNZ will have removed the restrictiveness of monetary policy… but that is not enough. Wednesday's decision by the RBNZ should set a policy path that is right for the recovery. We need a stimulatory monetary policy setting. So, what do we mean? Estimates of a 'neutral' setting – when policy is not hurting but certainly not helping – range from 2.5-3.5%, with 3% being roughly right. So, a cash rate of 3% isn't stimulatory, and it isn't encouraging excessive behaviour or inflation. But we need a stimulatory rate if we're going to encourage businesses to take on risk – by either investing or hiring. And we need a stimulatory rate if we're going to see embattled households boost discretionary spend. 2.5% is closer to what we need. And the risks are towards a 2% cash rate, not 3%, in our opinion. That said, the RBNZ has proven to be reluctant, all the way down. A more decisive RBNZ would be viewed positively across the road (Terrace), given the difficulty the Government has in balancing the books. And a more decisive RBNZ would be viewed positively by Kiwi business owners, property investors, and most households with debt. Unfortunately, it is never straight forward. And there are three likely scenarios that could play out on Wednesday: The first scenario is the one the RBNZ may find the easiest to deliver. The RBNZ delivers a 25bp cut and leaves the OCR track at 2.85% or thereabouts. This would not go down well. Wholesale market traders would push interest rates higher, again frustrated by the RBNZ's reluctance in getting the job done. The OCR endpoint priced into the OIS strip would lift from ~2.71% towards 2.85-2.9%. Unhelpful. The pivotal 2-year swap (interest) rate would rise from around 3.06% now to 3.15% (about 15bps). Mortgage rates would barely move… although they had been lowered a little in response to the recent fall in wholesale rates. But the risk then turns towards a slight lift in mortgage rates. Very unhelpful. The Kiwi currency would pop higher, towards 60.50c and possibly 61c in time. Not what exporters want to see with an intrusive 15% tariff from the US. The second scenario is what we think they will do, with least regret and least resistance. A 25bp cut accompanied by a lower OCR track to 2.7% (or close to). Currently, most economists sit between a low of 2.5% (Kiwibank) and a high of 3%. This scenario will push most economist forecasts to a lower 2.25-2.75% range. Such a move would support current market pricing of a 2.71% terminal rate. The 2-year swap rate should ease back to 3%, supporting current mortgage rates. The short dated mortgage rates may ease a little more, whereas the 3-5 year rates may not move much at all. The Kiwi currency would probably stay around 60c. It's a move that supports markets, but does not stimulate. The third scenario is 'go for growth' and generate greenshoots. A Doveish Hawkesby should put a 2.5% cash rate firmly on the table. The shock without Orr would see wholesale rates continue their downward spiral. The 2-year swap rate would ease towards 2.8%. All mortgage rates would likely be lowered, as needed. And the Kiwi currency would fall towards 58c, giving a bit of relief to exporters, and helping to offset the US tariffs.
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
RNZ an easy target for flailing Goldsmith
Comment: Melissa Lee was dumped as Minister for Media and Communications for being, in her own words, 'a little slow'. Lee had done nothing in her six-month tenure and resembled an opossum in the headlights when Newshub closed and TVNZ slashed staff numbers. If the same rules applied, Lee's replacement, Paul Goldsmith, should also be handing the portfolio over to the next hopeful. In his 12-month reign, Goldsmith has failed to strengthen the media presence in New Zealand – the job given to him by his boss, Christopher Luxon. He hailed Sky's $1 takeover of Three as a welcome investment in local media. It was, of course, the American owners admitting defeat and bailing out. This might be harsh, but Goldsmith's one achievement seems to have been getting walked over by Google and Facebook. Since Goldsmith gave up on plans to force these global giants into paying for news, Google has voluntarily started renewing content deals that were in place before the last election. These deals pump millions into the media sector including RNZ and TVNZ. Under pressure to be seen to be doing something, anything, Goldsmith has turned his sights on an easier target – RNZ. Easier in multiple ways. No one in the coalition Government is going to stand up for RNZ. Act doesn't think there is any need for the public broadcaster and NZ First leader, Winston Peters, seems bent on revenge for a perceived lack of reporting on his party's successes. The Prime Minister struggles with his own performances in the media and is unlikely to deter Goldsmith from selecting RNZ as a whipping boy. RNZ's falling radio ratings are a soft target for Goldsmith to zero in on. The connection between a falling audience and management failure is an easy concept to push and a hard one to defend. Further slides in the ratings following Goldsmith's pronouncements left RNZ's CEO Paul Thompson in a very tough spot. As well as indirect pressure from Goldsmith, Thompson would have felt the heat from a new (Goldsmith appointed) board member, Brent Impey. Impey is a veteran of commercial radio, where ratings are everything. The current chair, Jim Mather, would also see the need for action. Appointed chair during Labour's time in office, Mather is an ex-military man who understands the chain of command and always does things by the book. He would have felt the need to respond to Goldsmith's concerns even if he didn't agree with them. Thompson decided on a bold move. He contracted RNZ's former news boss, Richard Sutherland, to produce a report looking at the reasons behind the ratings slide and possible solutions. Thompson would have known that Sutherland, who left RNZ in August 2023 after five years as head of news, was unlikely to take prisoners. It was hardly a secret in media circles that Sutherland had become frustrated with parts of the organisation's structure including the archaic separation of news and digital (RNZ's web content). He was furious at what he saw as a lack of accountability from those overseeing online during the Russian propaganda fiasco in mid 2023. Thompson would also have known that Sutherland's report would end up in the public arena. RNZ is subject to the Official Information Act and competing media, particularly NZME, delight in opportunities to cast the state broadcaster in a negative light. What Thompson possibly didn't anticipate was how big a swing Sutherland would take at his old employer. In a report most media have described as 'highly critical' or 'scathing' Sutherland criticised the quality of on-air work, the amount of time staffers are allowed to work from home and a Wellington bias in its news selection. But perhaps the most interesting revelation in the report is that interviews conducted by Sutherland revealed most of the staff see radio as a sunset industry. It is not hard to imagine Goldsmith and Impey (who will probably chair RNZ after Mather retires from the board) saying 'gotcha' as they read that part of the report. There is no doubt RNZ has undergone a culture change in the past few years. After Sutherland left, he was replaced as news boss by Mark Stevens from Stuff. Sutherland grew up in commercial radio and TV – he is a broadcaster through and through. Stevens has no radio experience but is well regarded for his digital know how. In many ways Stevens has been a good hire for RNZ. With Megan Whelan (Head of Content) they have dramatically broadened the range and scope of RNZ's online offering. This has led to rapid growth in RNZ's online audience, helped by Newshub's closure and spikes in readership of one-off lifestyle or fast-twitch content. If RNZ was private media company, its executive would have been praised for the successful investment in online media. But the inability to slow the rate decline of radio audiences is now creating huge pressure on Thompson and his team. Whelan has resigned and RNZ has advertised for a 'Chief Audio Officer.' Turning around the ratings will be hard, partly because the staff view that radio is a 'sunset industry' is not exactly wrong. Like audiences of most legacy media with linear offerings, it will keep declining but the end of the medium is someway off yet. Sutherland suggested a 'high profile' hire would be an important step on the road to redemption, but who? NZME will desperately hold on to its stars and on-air talent from the failed Today FM have mainly drifted out of the industry. Ex-TV3 journalists like Paddy Gower, Duncan Garner, Rebecca Wright and Melissa Chan-Green are names being mentioned and no doubt considered, but the search for outside talent also highlights RNZ's failure to develop more of its own presenters into top performers. Who is the next Kim Hill? Katherine Ryan is probably the closest to a Hill-type RNZ has, but is in the later stages of her career. The Sutherland report also presents Thompson, now the country's longest serving media CEO, with another problem. It paints a picture of failure; failure to address problems that have built up over years. Radio stations take time to turn around and it usually requires myriad small changes as well as major ones. The RNZ board will be acutely aware the underperforming media minister Paul Goldsmith won't want to hear that. He will want a quick result to improve his own scoreboard.
