US Army finalizing future aircraft design with hopes to field faster
The service has had 'unprecedented access to the design [in] real time' of FLRAA through Bell's rigorous digital engineering, Col. Jeffrey Poquette, the service's project manager for the program, said in a recent interview. The Army chose the Textron subsidiary at the end of 2022 to build a tiltrotor aircraft that is expected to fly twice as fast and twice as far as a Black Hawk.
Bell beat out a Lockheed Martin's Sikorsky and Boeing team following a competitive technology demonstration phase where each built a flying demonstrator. Sikorsky and Boeing's Defiant X featured coaxial rotor blades.
The design process for FLRAA, which will culminate in a critical design review either sometime toward the end of this fiscal year or in the beginning of the next, has allowed the Army to move much faster than in previous aircraft development programs, Poquette said.
'When we had our ... preliminary design review we got to see and have access to that design on a level we've never had, which is going to make for a much better CDR,' he said, and 'we have a compressed test schedule. That's really where the benefits of digital engineering are going to pay off.'
Essentially, the process allows the Army and Bell to build prototypes in the engineering manufacturing and development phase that 'are as close to what we want as possible,' Poquette said.
The Army is planning to compress a test schedule that historically has taken anywhere from four to even 10 years in other vertical lift aviation programs to just a two-year period, according to Poquette.
'We're not going to find big, expensive things. We're not going to find safety things. We're going to find small things that we have to tweak,' he said. 'We found things in PDR, and they fixed it, and now we know that we're going to have the architecture right to meet [the modular open system architecture] and that kind of thing.'
Bell has established a special systems integration lab, or SIL, for FLRAA in Arlington, Texas, to continue to develop and check out aircraft design and behaviors.
'Every mission that the test aircraft will fly will be first flown in the SIL,' Ryan Ehringer, Bell's FLRAA program manager, said in the same interview.
The SIL will be coupled with 200-plus flight hours in Bell's V-280 Valor tiltrotor demonstrator through a competitive Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator (JMR-TD) program built to drive down risk for the future aircraft.
This approach, when joined by a variety of other subsystem testing efforts, 'reduces risk tremendously,' Ehringer said.
The Army also believes it has the buy-in necessary from the current presidential administration to continue to progress with the program, even demonstrating capability for new Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll at a joint capstone experimentation event in California called Project Convergence earlier this year.
'We expect to field the first aircraft in 2030 and that's according to the plan as it stands today,' Poquette said, adding that there 'are opportunities ... the Army is looking at to potentially see if we can go do something different and there's different risks for going faster.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Moon or Doom: Where Does XRP Price Go Next?
The XRP Army has drawn the line: the $3 price mark is now their battlefield. But, at the moment, traders can't seem to decide if XRP is headed to the moon or back down towards doom. After hot inflation data dampened jumbo rate cut hopes earlier this week, XRP dropped 6.4%—right down to that pivotal $3.00 mark that could define the crypto asset's next major move. On Myriad, a prediction market created by Decrypt's parent company Dastan, traders remain slightly bullish despite the correction. Myriad users give XRP a 63.7% chance of reaching $4 or higher (the moon scenario) versus 36.3% odds of crashing back down to $2 or below (doom). So who's right? XRP price: The technical puzzle XRP, the cryptocurrency created by the founders of payments company Ripple, presents a technical puzzle that explains why traders are currently so divided. For reference, even at just $3, XRP commands a market capitalization of $181 billion, good for third-largest behind only Bitcoin and Ethereum. And it's coming off a very recent all-time high of $3.65, which the coin hit less than a month ago. So where is it going next? For starters, the distance from its current price (the white line in the chart below) to the moon (the green line) and its distance towards doom (the red line) is basically the same: 33.33%. So, odds based on the percentage leap required to hit either scenario is not really a factor right now. It's going to require a little further digging. One classic indicator for traders is the Relative Strength Index, or RSI. For XRP, this sits right at 48, just shy of the neutral 50 mark. RSI measures momentum on a scale of 0-100, where readings above 70 signal overbought conditions (time to sell) and below 30 indicate oversold (time to buy). At 48, we're in no-man's land—slightly bearish but not enough to panic. This is what traders call the "decision zone," where markets pick their next direction. Going off RSI, under current conditions, market forces are in equilibrium. However, the overall trend is bullish, so this would signal to traders that prices are more likely to maintain momentum and speed unless something else affects the trend. The Average Directional Index, or ADX, at 28 tells a more decisive story. ADX measures trend strength regardless of direction. Think of it as a speedometer that doesn't care if you're going forwards or backwards. Readings above 25 confirm a strong trend exists, and at 28, XRP is definitely trending. This signals to traders that XRP's upward movement is likely to continue, even if slowly. And, of course, the more the price goes up, the less likely a $2 'doom' scenario becomes. Another key indicator is the exponential moving average, which measures the average price of an asset over a certain amount of time. For XRP, the 50-day EMA sits comfortably above the 200-day EMA, creating what traders call a "bullish stack." This means the average price of XRP in the short-term is trading above the average price over the long-term, and that typically means buyers will keep stepping in at higher prices. It's a vote of confidence in the uptrend. This setup usually favors continuation higher unless something breaks. For XRP to correct down to the 'doom' zone, it would need to switch momentum entirely and, likely, enter a death cross formation. The only indicator that is not bullish for XRP right now seems to be the Squeeze Momentum Indicator, which shows a price consolidation zone as the Ripple-linked token struggles to break past its recent all-time high. Think of it as the market taking a deep breath before the next sprint. Prices can experience a stronger trend either up or down, depending on catalysts. That 'squeeze' zone is considered a price compression because there are a large number of orders fighting to determine the trend. If short-term traders exit those positions in search for other markets, then there could be a fast dip in the same zone as it could trigger many 'stop-loss' zones. On the other hand, if there is a short squeeze, or bulls take control, it could trigger a spike based on buy orders activated too close to each other. But technicals only tell half the story. The 30-day moving average for XRP whale inflows to exchanges jumped to 260 million tokens from 141 million tokens at July's start, with large holders offloading nearly $6 billion worth since mid-July. That's a serious distribution that historically precedes corrections, because the most logical reason to send an asset to an exchange is to sell it. Meanwhile, the SEC and Ripple finally ended their legal battle, removing a major overhang. Add an 88% chance of spot XRP ETF approval by December according to Polymarket and nearly 60% preference over a Litecoin ETF on Myriad Markets, and you've got catalysts that could send XRP either direction—violently. XRP bulls have the edge Weighing all of the data, it's clear the charts today slightly favor the XRP moon scenario. The combination of price respecting an upward channel, maintaining position above both key EMAs, and the Squeeze ready to fire would convince traders of a compelling bullish setup. The ADX confirming trend strength while RSI sits neutral gives XRP room to run without being overextended. Considering indicators show traders in equilibrium during a bullish move (instead of showing such behavior when the coin is trading sideways), the ascending channel and compressed volatility suggest XRP could test $3.30 within days. A clean break above would likely trigger momentum toward $4. But those massive whale sales keep the doom scenario very much alive. If the $2.80 support cracks, all bullish bets are off. This is crypto—and when things break, they break hard. The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Bell Food Group First Half 2025 Earnings: EPS: CHF7.29 (vs CHF7.22 in 1H 2024)
Explore Bell Food Group's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Bell Food Group (VTX:BELL) First Half 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: CHF2.40b (up 3.7% from 1H 2024). Net income: CHF45.7m (flat on 1H 2024). Profit margin: 1.9% (down from 2.0% in 1H 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by higher expenses. EPS: CHF7.29 (up from CHF7.22 in 1H 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Bell Food Group Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 2.5% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 2.7% growth forecast for the Food industry in Switzerland. Performance of the Swiss Food industry. The company's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Bell Food Group. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
How AI's Evolution Is Reshaping Data Systems
Naren Narendran is Aerospike's Chief Science and Engineering Officer. He has previously worked at Bell Labs, Google and Amazon. Enterprise AI has evolved rapidly—from predictive models answering targeted questions to generative models producing content on demand, and now to agentic AI systems that pursue goals autonomously through multi-step reasoning. These shifts have come fast—sometimes within months. But each new wave brings new capabilities and new demands on data infrastructure. To help enterprise leaders navigate this, it's helpful to think in three phases: predictive AI, generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI. Each uses data differently, places different pressure on infrastructure and demands a different approach to scale. Predictive AI: Local, Targeted, Transactional The earliest enterprise AI systems were predictive. These tools were trained to evaluate specific scenarios—flagging fraudulent transactions, identifying potential customer churn or serving a user the most relevant ad. While these systems operated within narrow, predefined scopes, they were designed to make one-off decisions based on structured inputs—a snapshot of data from a single moment or transaction. As a result, the primary infrastructure demands were straightforward: Ensure high availability and low-latency response. Speed and reliability mattered more than flexibility or adaptability. GenAI: Blending Pre-Training With Context Then came GenAI. These models generate text, code, images and summaries. They deliver open-ended outputs rather than simple binary decisions. While GenAI models can generate content based on their pre-training alone—without external context—most enterprise applications combine this knowledge with real-time business context to ensure relevance and accuracy. This led to the rise of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): systems that prompt a model with user input and relevant documents. Enterprises control what data the model sees, enabling curated, context-aware responses. Unlike predictive AI, which typically relies on targeted lookups, RAG-based systems require infrastructure capable of fuzzy semantic search—retrieving information based on meaning, not just keywords—across broad, diverse data sources. Agentic AI: Autonomous, Multi-Step, Demanding Agentic AI is in a different class entirely. Rather than responding to static prompts, these systems are given goals. They decide which steps to take, what data to retrieve, how to organize intermediate results and how to refine their actions based on evolving input. This initiates a continuous, adaptive cycle: retrieving data, reasoning over it, taking actions, storing partial outcomes and adjusting future steps. From a systems perspective, the demands are substantial. Agentic AI stresses the entire data stack. To meet the demands of agentic AI, enterprise systems must perform the following functions efficiently and at scale: • Retrieve and integrate data from multiple sources during a single session. • Cache intermediate results in short-lived, session-specific memory. • Ensure real-time data freshness rather than relying on static documents. • Handle increased per-session load due to iterative, multi-step processes. User prompts may seem simple, but agentic systems often trigger dozens of internal operations—querying APIs, testing hypotheses, caching temporary results and refining actions based on feedback. That memory must be created and accessed rapidly, and retired just as quickly. Multiplied across thousands of users, this creates a "micro database" effect: fast-expiring, high-churn, session-specific datasets. Traditional infrastructure isn't designed for this scale or volatility. What Enterprises Need To Do To support agentic AI, organizations must build data infrastructure that prioritizes flexibility, responsiveness and trust. To do this, enterprise leaders should take the following steps to ensure readiness: • Make data discoverable. Agentic AI can't use what it can't find. Invest in metadata, semantic layers and indexing systems that describe what your data is, how to access it and how it can be used. Think of this as creating a map for autonomous AI to follow. • Expose the right hooks. Discovery alone isn't enough. Systems need accessible APIs or endpoints—structured, unstructured and streaming signals—that agents can query. Adopt emerging standards like Anthropic's Model Context Protocol to enable consistent discovery and interaction. • Support session-scoped caching. Agentic AI systems need working memory. Architect systems to support short-term, per-session data stores—'scratch pads'—that are updated, queried and cleared efficiently as needed. These micro-databases may only last minutes, but must be fast and reliable. • Monitor and manage freshness. Stale memory leads to bad decisions. Build in automated refresh mechanisms and signals to flag outdated data and refresh cache. Your agentic AI needs to be made aware when its working memory is no longer accurate. • Plan for redundancy and reuse. Develop mechanisms for sharing intermediate results across sessions when appropriate. This can reduce load and increase consistency. Anticipate and design for trust failures. Deploy observability tools, audit logs and guardrails to detect and contain trust failures. This isn't an argument against agentic AI. It's a call for architectural maturity. With the right observability, guardrails and real-time infrastructure, we can build powerful and trustworthy systems. Smarter Systems, Not Just Smarter Models The shift from prediction to generation to autonomy isn't just about model capability—it's redefining how enterprise systems must work. Agentic AI introduces higher stakes, more complexity and greater infrastructure dependency than any AI stage before it. Leading organizations will meet this moment not just by deploying models, but by designing data systems that give AI the access, context, memory and control it needs to operate securely and effectively at scale. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
