
Surrogates at greater risk of new mental illness than women carrying own babies, study finds
In addition, regardless of how they conceived, women with a previous record of mental illness were found to have a higher risk of being diagnosed with such conditions during and after pregnancy than those without.
While laws around surrogates, or 'gestational carriers', vary around the world, the practice is booming. According to Global Market Insights, the market is expected to grow from $27.9bn (£20.8bn) in 2025 to $201.8bn (£150.2bn) in 2034.
'Our findings underscore the importance of adequate screening and counselling of potential gestational carriers before pregnancy about the possibility of a new-onset mental illness, or exacerbation of a prior mental illness during or after pregnancy,' said Dr Maria Velez, the first author of the research, from McGill University in Canada. 'As well, the provision of support during and after pregnancy may be particularly important for gestational carriers.'
Writing in the journal Jama Network Open, Velez and colleagues report how they analysed data from 767,406 births in Ontario that occurred between 1 April 2012 and 31 March 2021.
Of these, 748,732 involved unassisted conceptions, 758 involved surrogacy, and the others involved IVF in mothers who carried their own babies. Velez said the vast majority of surrogacy cases in Canada involved the surrogate being unrelated to the child, meaning the surrogate's eggs were not used in conception.
Among those excluded from this initial analysis were women with a record of mental illness prior to the estimated date of conception.
The team analysed the number of women in each group who received a diagnosis of a new-onset mental illness since the estimated date of conception, such as anxiety disorder, mood disorder, self-harm or psychosis.
These diagnoses occurred in 236 surrogates, 195,022 women who had an unassisted conception and 4,704 women who had received IVF.
After accounting for factors such as age, income, smoking and number of children, this corresponded to a 43% and 29% higher incidence rate of new mental illness per 100 people per year of follow-up in surrogates compared with women who had an unassisted conception or IVF, respectively.
For all three groups, mood or anxiety disorder was the most common diagnosis, while median time from conception to diagnosis was similar, at about two and a half years.
The researchers found the risk of new mental illness remained elevated in surrogates, but to a lesser degree, when compared with women who had an unassisted conception but no longer lived with their child a year after the birth.
'The finding might suggest that some gestational carriers may experience grief from relinquishing their newborn, like that described after adoption or removal of the child into foster care – something that needs further studies,' said Velez.
The team then carried out further analyses that included women with a previous record of mental illness and found all groups in this category had a higher rate of new-onset mental illness than those with no previous record. Despite Canada requiring would-be surrogates to undergo psychological assessments, the results revealed 19% of surrogates in the study had a documented diagnosis of mental illness before pregnancy.
The study follows previous research by the team that found surrogates were more likely to experience complications including severe postpartum haemorrhage and severe pre-eclampsia.
Dr Zaina Mahmoud, an expert on the socio-legal aspects of surrogacy at the University of Liverpool, in England, who was not involved in the work, said further research was needed to explore whether the greater risk of new mental illness in surrogates was down to the pregnancy itself, and the mechanisms at play.
'[The researchers are] not addressing why or how surrogates have these emotional trajectories,' she said, adding that the team had used very broad definitions of mental illness. 'They hypothesise that grief from relinquishing the infant may contribute, but they don't actually measure that grief.'
But Mahmoud backed the call for greater screening and support for potential surrogates, saying the work suggested support should last for more than two years after the birth. The studies 'really highlight the need for robust information and consent procedures', she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Staff fearful of reprisals if they speak up amid hospital investigation, report finds
Staff at a hospital trust where police are investigating at least 90 deaths say they face reprisals and ridicule from bosses if they raise concerns, according to a damning report. Asked to review University Hospitals Sussex, the report's authors said they 'repeatedly heard concerning examples of staff, often at a senior level, being ignored, dismissed and sometimes ridiculed when speaking up.' The report by Niche Health and Social Care Consulting said this fear of reprisals from whistleblowing could be harming patient safety. It also highlighted complaints of misogyny and failures to deal with 'unwanted romantic advances'. The review team noted a number of challenges facing the trust, including an investigation by Sussex police into possible corporate and individual manslaughter charges over allegations of medical negligence and cover-up in the general surgery and neurosurgery departments. Operation Bramber is focused on the deaths of more than 90 patients, and serious harm suffered by more than 100 others. It was sparked by the concerns of two consultant whislteblowers who lost their jobs at the trust after speaking up, first revealed in the Guardian in June 2023. The report found staff feared their careers could be hindered if they raised concerns. One said they had been told not to share data that made the trust look bad. Another said when they did raise concerns they were 'gaslit' and targeted by management. The report identified 'significant issues with psychological safety at every [staff] level' and noted that the fear of speaking up had worsened in the last year. It said staff identified as having the potential to disagree with management said they were deliberately ignored in meetings. A staff survey conducted for the review received 376 responses of which more than 300 were negative or very negative on the issue of speaking up. The responses often cited a 'fear of reprisals'. One said: 'There could be comeback which will affect your career in [a] negative manner.' Another said: 'I raised concerns. It put a target on my back. Management lied, gaslit me, would circumvent the issue, would dismiss my concerns.' A third said: 'I feel no one listens.' Staff complained that the executive team discouraged bad news and different opinions. The review identified a 'predominance of direct and authoritative leadership styles'. It added: 'We heard repeatedly that 'there is a parent-child dynamic in this organisation'.' It also found that 'incivility and poor behaviours appear to be pervasive' and there was a strong view that these were tolerated by leaders. The report did not give details of these behaviours. Last year the Guardian revealed that a consultant surgeon was promoted after allegedly assaulting resident doctors during surgery. Six senior women at the trust complained to the reviewers of misogyny, which was felt to be prevalent among consultants. Female staff said they faced eye rolling and other signs of dismissiveness from male colleagues when they spoke at meetings. They also faced pejorative references to sexuality when they took the lead. One woman claimed she 'experienced unwanted romantic advances and inappropriate comments, with no actions taken months after reporting this to various senior leaders.' Earlier this month the trust chief executive, George Findlay, announced his departure. Andy Heeps, the acting chief executive, said the trust accepted all the report's recommendations for improvement and its 'valuable insight into what we do well, where we are improving, and where there is clearly more to do'. He said: 'The authors recognise the scale of the task in completing such a huge trust merger during the Covid pandemic, and highlight a number of key improvements such as our big reductions in waiting lists and key service quality improvements. 'But they also draw attention to some fundamental issues which we've not yet succeeded in tackling – and all of these things need to change, and change quickly.'


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Take this test to find out if your HEART is ageing faster than the rest of your body
Most adults' hearts are ageing quicker than the rest of their body, a concerning new study has suggested. But, US researchers have developed a new free online test that they claim could help predict biological age and turn back the clock. Routine health data—including blood pressure, cholesterol levels, chronic illness, and lifestyle risk factors such as smoking—has long been considered a good marker of healthy ageing. But until now, heart disease risk has been calculated as a percentage, leaving many patients uncertain of how likely they are to develop potentially deadly heart disease. Traditionally, a doctor may tell a patient: 'Eight out of ten people with your profile may suffer a heart event in the next 10 years.' But the new tool, based on data provided by American Heart Association, reframes the risk as an age—making it easier to understand just how much stress your heart is under. The tool asks you to enter your sex, age, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, whether or not you have diabetes, and if you take medication for blood pressure or statins. It also requires you to input your eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) which is used to measure how well your kidneys are functioning. In the current study, researchers tested the age calculator on more than 14,000 US adults aged 30 to 79 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, between 2011 and 2020. Using this data, it then generates your 'heart age'—and it might be older, or younger, than you. Dr Sadiya Khan, a cardiology professor at Northwestern University and lead author of the study, said: 'Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk of heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not. 'We hope this new age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people.' None of the participants had history of cardiovascular disease. On average, they found that women had a biological heart age four years older than their actual age. For men, the results were more severe. Despite having an average chronological age of just under 50-years-old, the test suggested their hearts resembled that of a 56-year-old. And among men who did not complete college or sixth form the prognosis was even bleaker, with nearly a third of this group having a heart age more than ten years older than their actual age. This pattern—where there was a significant discordance between biological and chronological age—was most prevalent in Black and Hispanic adults. Writing in the journal JAMA cardiology, the researchers concluded: 'The important thing is that we have very good options available in our tool box to help slow that aging down if we can identify it. Dr Khan added: 'This may be even more important in younger people who don't often think about their risk for heart disease.' The researchers now plan to study whether presenting risk in terms of age to patients improves outcomes and helps people better understand the need for preventative treatment. Alarming data last year revealed that premature deaths from cardiovascular problems generally, such as heart attacks and strokes, had hit their highest level in more than a decade. MailOnline has previously highlighted how the number of young people, under 40, in England being treated for heart attacks by the NHS is on the rise. Cases of heart attacks, heart failure and strokes among the under-75s had tumbled since the 1960s thanks to plummeting smoking rates, advanced surgical techniques and breakthroughs such as stents and statins. But now, other factors such as slow ambulance response times for category 2 calls in England — which includes suspected heart attacks and strokes — as well as long waits for tests and treatment have also been blamed.


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
When cold sores can kill or cause brain damage: Doctor warns what you should NEVER do if you have one
Two weeks after a straightforward birth by planned caesarean, baby Violet Stevens became ill. 'One day she vomited a lot, the next she looked like she had conjunctivitis brewing and felt a bit warm,' says her mother Holly, who lives in south London with her son Freddy, six, and Violet, now aged five months.