Jannik Sinner: Quiet man of tennis basks in the limelight
The Italian beat his fierce rival Carlos Alcaraz 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 in the latest instalment of their captivating rivalry to claim his fourth Grand Slam at the age of 23.
The pair are the new dominant forces in men's tennis, sharing the past seven Grand Slams between them as the memory of the "Big Three" era fades.
While Alcaraz is the flashy showman of the game, adored by the fans for his high-risk, high-reward tennis, Sinner stays ice-cold on the court and mild-mannered off it.
His game is based on relentless power and accuracy from the baseline, resembling that of 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.
The Italian is getting used to life at the top, reaching his fourth successive major final at Wimbledon this year -- a run that started with the US Open last season.
Sinner defended his Australian Open title in Melbourne in January but his career was put on hold after that as he served a three-month ban for twice testing positive for banned anabolic steroid clostebol last year.
Sinner has always maintained the product entered his system unintentionally through a massage from his physiotherapist, who had used a spray containing it to treat a cut.
The World Anti-Doping Agency said "Sinner did not intend to cheat" but that he would serve his suspension as he is responsible for the actions of his entourage.
- Alcaraz rivalry -
Sinner returned to the court in May, reaching the final of the Italian Open, where he was beaten by Alcaraz.
Next on his schedule was the French Open and again he reached the title match, this time suffering heartbreak as Alcaraz came back from two sets down, saving three match points to defend his title.
That gave the Spaniard an 8-4 lead in the rivalry between the pair and was his fifth straight win.
But the tables were turned on Sunday as Sinner showed impressive mental strength to come back after losing the first set.
Sinner was born in German-speaking San Candido, in northern Italy, near the border with Austria.
A career in professional tennis was not a given.
He was a champion skier as a youngster and still enjoys the sport in the off-season. He was also a keen footballer.
The right-hander, who stands six feet 3 inches (191 centimetres) tall, won his first title indoors in Sofia in 2020.
The 2024 season was his breakthrough year as he collected his first Grand Slam, the Australian Open, and followed up with seven other titles including the US Open.
He became world number one -- and the first Italian to reach top spot -- in June last year.
Sinner's super-power is his extraordinary ability to stay calm on court.
"I know he's just 23 years of age, but sometimes it feels like he's much older and wiser than what we are," said his coach Darren Cahill. "He's an incredible young man."
Sinner makes no secret of the fact that he loves the job he has chosen.
"I'm very lucky because tennis started off a hobby when I was young, and now it becomes my job," he said.
"In my mind it's still a hobby. I love to go on court and just play. There is no better place to do it than in big stadiums with packed crowd."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Alcaraz doffs his hat to Sinner and hails great 'rivalry'
Carlos Alcaraz said he could hold his head high despite being unseated from his Wimbledon throne by Jannik Sinner on Sunday and the Spaniard praised their hot rivalry for being several notches higher than the others on the men's tour. Alcaraz's bid for a third straight title at the All England Club ended with a 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 loss on Centre Court, leaving him to digest his first Grand Slam final defeat. "It's always a bad feeling losing matches. It's a little bit worse when you lose in a final," said Alcaraz, who narrowly beat Sinner in a five-set humdinger at the French Open last month. "I'm just proud about everything I've done in the last four weeks on grass at London. I leave Wimbledon, the court, with my head held really high because I did everything that I could. "I played against someone who played an unbelievable game. So I'm just a little bit sad about losing, but with my head held really high." Alcaraz said his rivalry with Sinner was great for the pair and also for tennis, which has had to endure the retirements of Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal and Andy Murray in recent years with fellow great Novak Djokovic in the twilight of a glorious career. The young duo have now shared eight of the last nine Grand Slam titles, with each winning four. "Every time we play each other, I think our level is really high. We don't see a level like this ... I don't see any player playing against each other, having the level that we're playing when we face each other," Alcaraz added. "This rivalry, it's becoming better and better ... we're playing in the finals of Grand Slams, finals of Masters and the best tournaments in the world. It's going to get better. "I'm just really grateful for that because it gives me the opportunity to just give my 100% every practice, every day, just to be better. The level that I have to maintain and I have to raise if I want to beat Jannik is really high." Sinner's coach Darren Cahill admitted that while the Italian did not take any of his rivals for granted, he does pay extra attention to Alcaraz. "Jannik watches more Carlos matches than he does anybody else because he's fascinated with the improvements that are coming in his game, and he's pushing us as coaches to make sure that he's improving as a tennis player," Cahill said. Sinner, who ended Alcaraz's 24-match winning run across all events and 20-match streak at Wimbledon, was most pleased with ending his own run of five successive defeats against the Spaniard. "When you lose several times against someone, it's not easy," said Sinner, who narrowed his win-loss record against Alcaraz to 5-8. "At the same time in the past, I felt I was close ... I never pushed myself down. I keep looking up to Carlos because even today I felt like he was doing a couple of things better than I did. So that's something we'll work on and prepare ourselves because he's going to come for us again. "There's not only Carlos, but everyone. We have a big target on us so we have to be prepared. Then we'll see what's happening in the future." Alcaraz said he had no doubt that Sinner would learn from his near 5-1/2-hour loss at Roland Garros, where the Italian squandered three championship points, and hit back. "I know he's a really nice player and a huge champion. Champions learn from their losses," Alcaraz said. "I knew from the beginning he was going to learn from that final and not make the same mistakes. The way he played today, it was really high. "I wasn't surprised at all."
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Jannik Sinner eyes golden era after Wimbledon glory
Jannik Sinner has warned Carlos Alcaraz that he will get even stronger after beating his arch-rival to win his first Wimbledon title on Sunday. Sinner avenged an agonising French Open final loss against Alcaraz as he battered the Spaniard into submission with a dynamic display of power hitting on Centre Court. The Italian's 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 victory ended Alcaraz's two-year reign as Wimbledon champion and gave Sinner his fourth Grand Slam crown. Sinner has reached the last four Grand Slam finals, winning three of them, and the world number one has no intention of resting on his laurels. "I don't think I'm at my best because at 23 I don't think you can be in your best shape ever. So hopefully I can keep improving," he said. "I keep looking up to Carlos because even today I felt like he was doing couple of things better than I did. "That's something we will work on and prepare ourselves because he's going to come for us again. "We have a big target on us, so we have to be prepared." It was a cathartic triumph for Sinner after he squandered a two-set lead and blew three championship points against Alcaraz at Roland Garros in June. Alcaraz had won five successive encounters against the 23-year-old, including finals in Paris, Rome and Beijing, prior to their showdown at the All England Club. Sinner admitted it was vital to finally beat the world number two for the first time since 2023. "It is important, for sure, because you know, when you lose several times against someone, it's not easy. But in the same time in the past I felt that I was very close," he said. "I never pushed myself down. I felt like I did something great because it has been not easy. Coming here and winning Wimbledon, it has been amazing." 'The rivalry is real' While Sinner had spent the last five weeks publicly insisting he would not let his French Open collapse affect him, he revealed he had to work hard to move on from the loss before launching his Wimbledon challenge. "This is the part where I'm the proudest because it really has not been easy. I always tried to be honest with myself and had the self-talk. You know, what if, what if? I tried to accept it, in a way," said Sinner, who returned from a three-month doping ban in May. "Even if I don't cry, it feels emotional because only me and the people who are close to me know exactly what we have been through on and off the court, and it has been everything except easy. "We've tried to push, you know, every practice session, even I was struggling at times mentally. "That's why I also said after Roland Garros that it's not the time to put me down, no, because another Grand Slam is coming up, and I did great here." Sinner and Alcaraz have won the past seven majors between them, establishing themselves in a class of their own. Sinner's coach Darren Cahill expects the pair to battle for supremacy for years to come, but he stopped short of comparing it to the dynastic era of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. "It's difficult to compare this rivalry to what we've just had. It's been a golden age in tennis with Novak and Roger and Rafa. They dominated for 20 years," Cahill said. "To win a Grand Slam back in those days, you had to beat one of them in the quarters, the other one in the semis, and another one in the final. "These guys still have a ways to go, but they've started incredibly well. Carlos is a big focus, and both of those guys are pushing each other. "The rivalry is real. Hopefully it's going to be there for the next 10 or 12 years."
Gulf Today
9 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Francesca Albanese will make a difference
Francesca Albanese, the Italian human rights lawyer and the UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur for Palestine, is the woman of the hour, someone people all over the world can look to for hope and courage. She has laid out a legal framework to show that not just the government of Israel is guilty of acts of genocide and human rights violations in occupied Palestinian territories (oPt), but also all other entities including corporations, non-profit and for-profit organizations are culpable and liable. And she has outlined the evolution of international law in the matter. She has shown passion, courage and lawyerly meticulousness in arguing her point. She writes in her report, entitled 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide'. She states her general theoretical thesis, her basic argument: 'The role of corporate entities in sustaining Israel's illegal occupation and ongoing genocidal campaign in Gaza is the subject of this investigation, which focuses on how corporate interests underpin Israeli settler-colonial the twofold logic of displacement and replacement aimed at dispossessing and erasing Palestinians from their land.' The reason that the United States and Israel are exploding with anger at Albanese is due to the fact that she hits at the most vulnerable point of Israel, and its arch-ally, the United States: the corporate world. The economic power and the military superiority of Israel and the US is hugely dependent on the support, especially material and financial, that the corporates lend to their governments. That is why, the US has issued sanctions against Albanese. Israel and US would have been livid with anger with Albanese even if she had confined her criticism to the governments of Israel and the US. But she has targeted the Achilles heel of the two countries: the economic and commercial heft of their corporations, without which Israel would not be able to carry its expansionist policy in the West Bank, and its relentless violence against the civilians in Gaza since October 2023. The initial justification of Israel for unleashing violence against Gaza is due to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Albanese is making a broader point. It goes beyond the government, and it points an accusing finger at the big corporations. She reminds the corporates that they cannot escape liability if they support a government and its policies which are gross violations of international law, which involve practice of apartheid, genocide. She reminds the corporates that they cannot pretend that they did not know what was happening. If their business activities help in any way a government in violating human rights. She cites the precedents: 'The post-Holocaust Industrialists' Trial laid the complex groundwork for recognizing the international criminal responsibility of corporate executives for participation in international crimes. By addressing corporate complicity in apartheid, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission helped shape corporate responsibility for human rights violations. Increasing domestic and international litigation signal a growing trend toward corporate accountability.' These are strong precedents in international law. The world has been helplessly witnessing the killing of civilians in Gaza in their thousands over the last two years. The substantial protests came first from South Africa which had moved the International Criminal Court (ICC) against Israel's military action in Gaza resulting in death of civilians. Albanese has expanded the scope of the liability of violence against unarmed people from governments to corporations and other entities. This is a politically and economically sensitive issue though it does not directly concern political actors. Albanese displays the passion of an activist against human rights violations, but as a lawyer she is careful to chart the narrow path of how corporations are culpable in political conflict.
