Offshore betting and real estate top ad violations in ASCI's 2024-25 report
Offshore betting and real estate emerged as the most non-compliant sectors in advertising during 2024-25, according to the
Advertising Standards Council of India
's (ASCI) Annual Complaints Report.
The self-regulatory body reviewed 9,599 complaints and examined 7,199 advertisements over the course of the year. Offshore betting accounted for 43.5% of all the violative ads last fiscal, followed by real estate at 24.9%. Together, these sectors made up more than two-thirds (68%) of total violations, the report said.
They were joined by personal care (5.7%), healthcare (5.23%), and food and beverages (4.69%) as the top five violating sectors.
ASCI monitors advertising violations across brands, platforms, and influencers, working closely with the Department of Consumer Affairs to promote truthful and lawful advertising.
"This year has been one of meaningful collaboration," said Manisha Kapoor, CEO and secretary general of ASCI. "We expanded our efforts to address key areas such as offshore betting and real estate, which involve high-impact violations."
Betting is illegal in India, and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) has directed all publishers to avoid carrying advertisements from offshore betting platforms.
Industry-wide compliance with ASCI guidelines stood at 83%, with television and print media showing a higher adherence rate of 98%.
Digital media accounted for 94.4% of the ads flagged for violations, while traditional media contributed a relatively small share. Influencer-related violations made up 14% of the total ads reviewed. The report noted that 79% of digital ad violations occurred on Meta platforms, followed by other websites, Google, property portals, and LinkedIn.
ASCI reported a significant improvement in complaint resolution efficiency during 2024-25, with the average turnaround time reduced to 16 days-a 46% improvement over the previous year. This was largely driven by the higher proportion of uncontested claims and enhanced processing systems.
Of the scrutinised ads, 98% required some form of modification.
Notably, 59% of the investigated ads were uncontested and were either withdrawn or modified by advertisers.
Most violations stemmed from misleading claims due to lack of honest representation and promotion of harmful products or depictions of dangerous situations, the report said.
A total of 3,347 ads fell under categories that are legally prohibited from advertising, including offshore betting, alcohol branding, and unauthorised forex trading apps, which are banned by the Reserve Bank of India.
Additionally, 233 ads potentially violated the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. ASCI reviewed 1,015 influencer ads during the year, with 98% requiring modifications.
On LinkedIn alone, 121 violations were identified, largely due to professionals failing to disclose paid partnerships.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Thomas Fugate: A novice who replaced an army veteran to lead US terror prevention centre
Thomas Fugate, the 22-year-old college graduate, with no previous government leadership or security experience, has been picked up by US President Donald Trump to head the Centre for Prevention Programs and Partnerships, as first reported by ProPublica. Thomas Fugate has been appointed to a leadership role in the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships, known as CP3, which works to combat terrorism, school shootings and other hate-driven violence. This includes an $18 million grant program intended to help communities battle violent extremism, reports The Independent. Here are key things you need to know about Thomas Fugate: -Thomas Fugate, a former gardener and grocery store worker who graduated from college last year, was hired by DHS in February, The Daily Mail reported, citing his LinkedIn profile. -The University of Texas at San Antonio graduate landed a position on Donald Trump's campaign in 2024 and then he was subsequently hired by DHS. -A former Heritage Foundation intern and self-described "Trumplican", Fugate's LinkedIn profile does not show experience in counterterrorism or any related security-related fields. He also does not have an impressive internship history. -On Thomas Fugate's professional page are stints running a gardening and landscaping business as well as experience working as a grocery store associate. In 2020, he was working as a self-employed 'Landscape Business Owner.' Live Events ALSO READ: Meet Thomas Fugate: 22-year-old ex-gardener and grocery store assistant to lead $18 million terror prevention team -Prior to his work as a gardener—while studying for a degree in politics and law—Fugate worked at an H-E-B supermarket in Austin, Texas, as a 'Cross Functional Team Member', according to The Daily Beast. -According to his LinkedIn, he would 'perform various activities around every department of the store, fulfilling key duties contributing to store operations.' He has served as an 'advance team member' on President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, according to his LinkedIn page. -Fugate was reportedly hired as a 'special assistant' in an immigration office at the DHS in February, according to ProPublica. He then took over CP3 after its previous director quit. -"Tom Fugate has performed well in his current role as a Confidential Assistant in our Immigration & Border Security suboffice," a DHS official told Daily Mail, adding this is a credit to his work ethic and success on the job. ALSO READ: Amid Trump-Musk spat, Tesla CEO's immigration status under scanner. Can President deport him? -The recent appointment of a University of San Antonio graduate has raised concerns among counterterrorism experts and insiders. 'It sounds like putting the intern in charge,' a counterterrorism researcher who has experience working with CP3 told ProPublica. 'We're entering very dangerous territory,' another longtime counterterrorism official said. -Fulgate took over from Army veteran Bill Braniff, who resigned in March after the Trump administration cut 20 percent of his staff, accoridng to The Independent. Braniff has more than 20 years' experience in national security. -Replacing Braniff with Fulgate is 'an insult,' a source told ProPublica. Braniff helped with the move 'toward evidence-based approaches to terrorism prevention' in a field still dealing with post-9/11 work that was predisposed to stigmatizing Muslims, the source added. 'They really started to shift the conversation and shift the public thinking. It was starting to get to the root of the problem,' they said. 'Now that's all gone."
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Meet Ashok Elluswamy engineer, brain behind Elon Musk's Tesla's AI success, not from IIT, IIM; earned Bachelor's degree from..
Meet Ashok Elluswamy engineer, brain behind Elon Musk's Tesla's AI success, not from IIT, IIM; earned Bachelor's degree from.. Tesla head Elon Musk needs no introduction. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index 2025, Elon Musk is the richest person in the world. His total net worth is $335 B. An old post by Elon Musk about Ashok Elluswamy, the head of Tesla AI, has recently gone viral. On June 2, 2025, Musk went back to that time by re-posting his 2015 tweet with the message, 'Ramping up the Autopilot software team at Tesla to achieve generalized full autonomy. If interested, contact autopilot@ In the post, Musk shared that Elluswamy was the very first person he interviewed when hiring for Tesla. Talking about the Indian-origin engineer Ashok Elluswamy, who was the first recruit of Tesla's Autopilot team, Musk said, 'This tweet 9 years ago was how I started the Autopilot, now AI, team at Tesla. Ashok, who now leads the team, was the first person I interviewed. Milan, who leads Optimus, also joined very early. Many of the key people in Tesla AI have been there from the beginning.' Ashok Elluswamy is a San Francisco resident who serves as Vice President of AI at Tesla and directs the company's Autopilot software. Originally, he came to Tesla in 2014 and became the first engineer of the Autopilot/AI team. He has been leading AI software since 2019, guiding Tesla's initiatives in autonomous driving, neural networks, and real-time decision-making systems. This tweet 9 years ago was how I started the Autopilot, now AI, team at Tesla. Ashok, who now leads the team, was the first person I interviewed. Milan, who leads Optimus, also joined very early. Many of the key people in Tesla AI have been there from the beginning. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 2, 2025 'Robotics engineer with broad experience from computer vision and perception through planning and control. Inspired to solve meaningful and challenging real-world problems using state-of-the-art technology! Eager to work hard and learn continuously,' reads his LinkedIn profile. According to his LinkedIn profile, Ashok pursued Bachelor of Engineering, Electronics and Communication from the College of Engineering Guindy, Chennai between 2005 to 2009. Later, he pursued Master of Science-MS, Robotic Systems Development from Carnegie Mellon University. Before Tesla, he worked as a Software Engineer at WABCO Vehicle Control Systems. He worked as a research intern at Volkswagen Electronic Research.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Ghosted after payday? Mumbai startup founder's viral post sparks storm over work culture and employee ethics
Kiran Shah , the founder of Mumbai-based startup Market Fit@Go Zero , found himself at the center of a heated LinkedIn storm after posting a candid message about employees who allegedly 'ghosted' the company right after payday. His frustration? That some team members waited to receive their salaries on the 1st of the month, only to resign without a word the very next day. This shift to early-month salary payments, implemented in December 2023 to ease employees' financial burdens, unexpectedly created a trend that Shah described as not just disruptive—but indicative of deeper professional ethics. In his post, Shah didn't mince his words: 'Don't ghost your employer once you get the salary… Do it in a professional way that doesn't burn bridges.' From Empathy to Outrage: A Founder's Candid Take Shah emphasized that his intent in advancing salary credit dates was rooted in empathy. He recalled his startup's earlier policy of paying salaries on the 10th or 15th, a common practice in bootstrapped firms. But when employees shared that the delay caused financial strain, he changed it to the 1st of the month. Ironically, it's after this shift that a few employees—exactly three, by his count—exited silently the very day salaries hit accounts. 'Of course it hampers operations,' Shah wrote, 'but I won't revert to the old system just because of a few such dumb folks. That would go against the culture I'm trying to build.' While some praised him for raising concerns around professional decency, others were far less forgiving. In a candid LinkedIn post, Shah described how four employees quit the very day they received their salaries — without notice, without explanation. (Screenshot: LinkedIn/Kiran Shah) Critics Clap Back: Is Timely Pay a Privilege or a Right? Shah's post—initially meant to reflect on the values of communication and professionalism—was quickly interpreted by many as an attempt to guilt employees for exercising their right to resign. One user shot back, 'Receiving salaries on time is not a favour, it's a right.' Others questioned the startup's HR practices and suggested that the real issue was not the mode of exit but the reasons prompting such exits in the first place. You Might Also Like: Can posting regularly on LinkedIn boost your job prospects? A career coach thinks so, but netizens beg to differ 'Worry less about how they're leaving and more about why,' another commenter offered, calling attention to what could be deeper organizational issues that make employees disengage silently. A Second Post, a Clarification, and a Cultural Reflection Faced with criticism and misinterpretation, Shah followed up with another post to set the record straight. He clarified that only three people had resigned unprofessionally, while others—such as a core team member—had left on good terms, even amid crucial business periods. He addressed accusations of toxic work culture by pointing to Go Zero's zero-layoff history, lean team size, and a culture of respect. 'I've fired people when needed, but always communicated expectations clearly,' he said. He also lamented how media and social media alike often choose sensation over substance. But beyond HR policies and exit etiquette, Shah's reflection turned philosophical. 'Culture,' he said, 'is misunderstood in India. Most workers care more about stability, dignity, and meaningful work than offsites and perks. That's the culture I strive to nurture.' You Might Also Like: Marketing professor's hilarious LinkedIn comment on alma mater IIM Ahmedabad will leave you in splits. Netizens call him 'legend' Beyond Go Zero: A Mirror to Modern Workplaces While Kiran Shah's post may have sparked criticism, support, and trolling in equal measure, it struck a nerve that many employers and employees today grapple with: what defines a professional exit ? Is giving notice a duty or a courtesy? And when founders publicly air grievances, does it reflect transparency—or managerial fragility? In an age where hustle culture, quiet quitting, and evolving workplace dynamics collide, Shah's experience offers a revealing look into the growing pains of startups—and the fragile trust that binds teams together. Whether you're the boss or the beginner, one thing is clear: how you enter and exit a workplace says as much about the organization as it does about you.
