Stablecoins: the next big financial crisis waiting to happen
Excessive regulation is 'a boot on the neck of business, choking off the enterprise and innovation that is the lifeblood of economic growth', she declared in her recent Mansion House speech. The pendulum has swung too far in favour of stamping out risk.
You could almost see the annoyance on the face of Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, seated beside her.
In remarks last week to MPs, he confirmed that beyond a few tweaks of little significance, he was dead set against tearing up the regulatory reforms that came out of the global financial crisis.
He is right to be concerned. Almost all major financial crises are strongly associated with deregulation and the 'financial innovation' that inevitably follows in its wake.
Take the Depression-era Glass-Steagall restrictions in the US, which enforced separation of investment from retail banking. There was no banking crisis of systemic importance as long as they remained in force. But at the turn of the century, Glass-Steagall was repealed, and within a decade finance had once again blown up the world economy.
It is admittedly debatable whether lifting Glass-Steagall of itself had much to do with it. Nonetheless, it was symbolic of a much wider pattern of financial deregulation that was to fuel such stars of the following credit bubble as the 'collateralised debt obligation'.
These things are cyclical, and though history never repeats itself exactly, the US is once more tearing down the structures that keep finance in check. We might call it 'light touch' regulation 2.0.
Should the UK be following suit? As I say, Bailey is right to be concerned, but the reality is that we do indeed need to replicate at least some of what the Trump administration is doing in the US if the City is to remain a force to be reckoned with as a global financial centre.
Already, the signs of decline are all too visible, with the City failing to find a new raison d'etre after losing its position as Europe's de facto financial centre after Brexit.
As with so much else, the big game changer is technology. The danger is that we get stuck in the same rut as the European Union, with an approach to regulating financial services that looks backwards to a bygone era of eviscerating catastrophe rather than forward to the transformative power of the new technologies. An analogue solution to a digital age is just what we don't need.
As is its wont, the EU was first out of the traps in attempting to regulate the cutting edges of fintech, with its so-called 'Markets in Crypto Assets' directive.
This is essentially just another attempt to predict what risks might materialise before they actually happen, and therefore acts as a significant barrier to innovation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch: Anti-migrant and anti-racism protests held in Bristol
Anti-immigration protesters gathered in Bristol waving Union Jacks and chanting, with signs reading 'Stop immigration, start deportation' among many on display (Saturday, 9 August). Nearby, anti-racism protesters gathered outside the Mercure Brigstow Hotel in Bristol for a 'Defend Refugees, Stand Up To Facism' rally on Saturday in opposition. Avon and Somerset Police pledged a 'robust' response to any disorder, maintaining a significant presence in the area. The events reflect growing friction over immigration in the UK, with police in different cities across England bracing for possible demonstrations this weekend amid the far right's promotion of protests across multiple locations.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Families facing ‘boiler tax' under Miliband's net zero drive
Families have been warned they face a £25 'boiler tax' as heat-pump manufacturers struggle to sell enough to avoid huge government fines. Boiler firms are set to be hit with a £30m bill for failing to meet Ed Miliband's quotas, with the cost of the penalties set to be passed on to consumers. The warning represents a direct challenge to the Energy Secretary, who has insisted the manufacturers will be able to sell enough heat pumps to avoid any penalties. Industry figures have long warned the high cost of installing the systems, plus the fact that they are unsuitable for many homes, means demand is too low. A spokesman for Mr Miliband's department said it 'did not recognise' the estimated fines and that it had set 'realistic sales targets'. It comes after he introduced new quotas that dictate the number of heat pumps that boiler manufacturers must install every year. The Energy Secretary pushed through plans initially drawn up by the Tories before they ditched them in the face of a consumer backlash. Under the net zero scheme, firms will be fined £500 for each unit they miss their target by, with the cost set to be passed on to families. The big-four manufacturers sell around 1.5 million units every year, meaning they would need to add £20 to the cost of each new boiler to recoup £30m in fines. Those companies are also facing several million pounds in administrative costs related to the targets, which will also be passed on to customers. That has led to the policy, formally known as the Clean Heat Market Mechanism, being branded a 'boiler tax' by the industry and political critics. The heat-pump quota for the first year of the scheme, which began in April, has been set at 6 per cent of a company's overall fossil-fuel boiler sales. But figures for the UK's four biggest boiler manufacturers – Worcester Bosch, Vaillant, Ideal and Baxi – suggest the industry is running far behind its target. They only installed 5,000 eligible heat pumps between April and July, well short of the 23,500 they needed to sell to be on course to avoid fines. If those sales levels were to be replicated through the rest of the year the firms would fall about 60,000 short of their quota, resulting in £30m of fines. The Energy and Utilities Alliance, an industry body which conducted the analysis, said that would mean an average price increase of £25 per boiler. Mike Foster, from the Energy and Utilities Alliance, said that low consumer demand for heat pumps, which cost around £13,000 to install, was to blame. 'Supply of heat pumps has never been the issue, you can pick one up from your local merchant tomorrow, it is demand that is missing,' he warned. 'If you can't afford a heat pump but do replace your boiler, you are paying more now to keep warm and have hot water than you need to because of the boiler tax and the flaws in the scheme that have been built in by Whitehall. 'Heat pumps have a role to play in decarbonising homes but the burden should not fall on those who cannot afford or don't want one. 'Making boilers more expensive might appear to make heat pumps more attractive, I know that is the cunning Whitehall plan but it should not be the way we get to net zero.' Ministers are currently consulting on increasing the quota for the next year to between 8 and 10 per cent, which could see fines rise to £50m. That would see the family boiler tax increase to up to £40 based on current sales patterns. Manufacturers' efforts to hit their targets are being hampered by the design of the scheme, which only recognises some heat-pump sales. Only installations that are carried out under a specific certification scheme are counted by officials towards companies' targets. Urged to rewrite rules As a result, the big-four firms have sold 5,000 heat pumps over the past three months, which will not count towards their quotas and avoiding fines. The industry is now urging Mr Miliband to rewrite the rules so that all sales are counted. Heat pumps typically cost £13,000 to install, although families can claim a £7,500 government grant, bringing the price tag down to £5,500. Government officials said that sales under the officially recognised Microgeneration Certification Scheme rose by 63 per cent last year. A spokesman for the net zero department said: 'We do not recognise these figures, which also do not account for any increase in heat-pump sales next year. 'The British people are showing record demand for heat pumps and we are one of the fastest-growing markets in Europe. 'The Clean Heat Market Mechanism is setting realistic sales targets as we work hand in hand with industry to support the transition to clean heating for years to come. 'We are investing £13.2bn to upgrade up to five million homes this Parliament, including making heat pumps more affordable for households by providing £7,500 towards the cost through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme.'
The Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Sun
I asked Virgin Media to cancel my broadband contract when I moved house – it still owes me £574
Q. In March my wife and I moved out of our home in Eastleigh, Hampshire, to a property in Bembridge on the Isle of Wight. We needed to cancel our 18 month broadband contract with Virgin Media as the company doesn't provide a service on the Isle of Wight. 1 We were told that we couldn't pay an early exit penalty to do so. Virgin Media said it would take £545 as a direct debit in March and this would be credited to our account in April. It said it would also refund our account balance of £29.34 at the same time. The direct debit was taken but we never received the refund. We have called Virgin Media several times to chase the money but have had no luck. This is a huge amount of money and it is giving us a lot of worry. We have been loyal Virgin Media customers for the last 25 years and feel very let down. Please will you help us? Chris Hebbes, Isle of Wight. A. I was disappointed to hear about how Virgin Media had treated you, it's a real kick in the teeth as you've been customers for more than 25 years. In general, if you decide to cancel your broadband contract before it ends then you will usually need to pay an exit fee. The exact amount you will be charged depends on your provider. It will usually involve paying off the remaining months of your contract, plus the cost of any equipment you were given, such as your router. But there are a few reasons why you may be able to leave your deal early. These include if your provider has increased your bill, your broadband is slow or you have an issue that your provider has not solved. In your situation, you should have been able to cancel your contract for free as the service is not available in the Isle of Wight. Virgin Media knows the rules, so I was surprised that it had not refunded you. When I contacted the firm, its customer service team got in touch with you immediately to apologise for the delay in sending your refund. As the amount you are owed was more than £500, your case should have been escalated to a team manager before it was issued. In your case the refund was not escalated so your refund was not processed. Virgin Media has now sent you a cheque for £674, which includes a £100 gesture of goodwill. The money should be with you in the next ten working days. I am glad I was able to resolve this issue for you and hope you can now focus on getting settled in your new home.
