Cabinet Secretary backs Glasgow hub's child poverty support
This visit follows her £2.2 million investment in the Whole Family Relational Mentoring service designed to help eradicate child poverty.
The scheme provides intensive, personalised support to families facing multiple challenges including housing, mental health and unemployment.
It aims to integrate with public services to deliver better, joined-up outcomes.
During her visit, Somerville awarded the Relational Mentoring Changemaker Award, acknowledging dedication to helping families achieve sustainable change.
She said: 'It was good to meet mentors and those supported through the programme, which is providing life-changing support in areas such as employability and skills, improving household finances, and mental health and wellbeing.
'Eradicating child poverty is the Scottish Government's top priority and we are committed to doing all we can to support families with the cost of living including offering free school meals to more than 270,000 pupils, free bus travel for 2.3 million people and early learning and childcare worth more than £6000 per eligible child every year – demonstrating our determination to invest in our communities when they need it most.'
Read more: New programme launched to help people in Glasgow get back into work
Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice and Wise Group mentors (Image: Supplied)
Read more: 'Wonderful' housing and care campus praised as Cabinet Secretary visits site
The Wise Group's data shows that 98% of people supported have needs across at least three areas.
Progress in one area, like housing, often leads to improvements in others, such as health or employability.
The Whole Family model is now informing wider conversations around public service reform and child poverty prevention.
Sean Duffy, chief executive of the Wise Group, said: 'The Cabinet Secretary's investment in this service is making a real and measurable difference.
'Our mentors walk alongside families – not just signposting, but staying the course.
'The integration we've seen with local authorities, health and employment services is key to the outcomes we're achieving.
'Today's visit affirms what we know to be true: that ending poverty means transforming how support is delivered, not just what is delivered.
'We are proud to be part of that mission.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Festival seeks tourist tax help as it faces hike in costs
Although the city council has predicted it will generate an additional £50m a year by 2028, the city's festivals do not know if they will see any direct investment. Read more: In a wide-ranging interview with The Herald, EIF chief executive Francesca Hegyi, said the rising costs faced by the city's major cultural events were no longer viable under current levels of funding support and financial pressures. The EIF, which currently gets around £1.9m a year from the city council, has been on standstill funding from the city council since 2019 when it was hit with a nine per cent funding cut. The Edinburgh International Festival got underway last week. Picture: Andrew Milligan/PA Ms Hegyi called for a 'mindshift' in how the festivals are treated by the city council and the Scottish Government, and for greater collaboration between the cities major cultural events. She suggested they could work together to explore broadcast partnerships and a shared box office system, which could help the festivals attract new commercial sponsorship. Francesca Hegyi, chief executive of the Edinburgh International Festival, wants the event to get some form of rebate for the accommodation it books in future. (Image: Gordon Terris/Herald & Times) Under the city council's plans for the introduction of the visitor levy, it will affect bookings for stays of up to five days from July 24 next year – just days before Edinburgh's 2026 summer festivals seasons will get underway. The Herald told earlier this month how Edinburgh's festivals, venues and performers were being urged to book accommodation a year in advance to avoid the tourist tax. Event organisers, venues and artists are being urged to take advantage of a "window" before the start of October, when the five per cent levy will start to be added to accommodation bills for the 2026 summer festivals season. The EIF meets the accommodation costs of artists and crew working at the event, but is not expected to finalise its programme until the end of the year. Ms Hegyi told The Herald: 'I actually think there is a massive opportunity around visitor Levy, actually, and I'm generally quite positive about it. 'Anything that increases the pot available to the city, for infrastructure, for communities, for festivals, and arts and culture in general, has absolutely got to be a good thing. 'I think the significance of the visitor levy shouldn't be understated because, to my knowledge, the first major source of new revenue that's come along for many years. 'The devil is in the detail about how it will work. The one hesitation I have about it is that, as it currently stands, this festival will between £50,000 and £60,000 worse off because we will be charged the levy when we book accommodation for our visiting artists and crew. The only certainty I have right now is that the festival is going to be worse off." Edinburgh's festivals are represented on an independent advisory group which will produce recommendations on how income raised through the visitor levy should be spent. Under current proposals – which will affect hotels, self-catering properties and short-term lets – 35 per cent of the funds raised will be distributed across 'culture, heritage and events.' Ms Hegyi added: 'I would hate for us to be out of pocket as a result of the visitor levy. What I would like the council to consider is some sort of rebate mechanism for those cultural institutions and attractions which are the reason why visitors come to the city. 'I understand exemptions are difficult, but it would be really helpful if a rebate could be considered. It would just be perverse if a scheme that's meant to benefit cultural organisations ended up costing them money.' The EIF was forced to scale back this year's programme due to uncertainty over its future Scottish Government funding. A long-awaited decision was put back from October to January after the government refused to sign off a budget for its arts agency, Creative Scotland, before setting out its own spending plans last December. The EIF's core government funding, which had been pegged at around £2.3m for more than a decade, was increased to £3.25m for the current financial year and £4.25m annually for the following two years. The city council's funding for the EIF is expected to remain just over £1.9m until at least 2027-28 under a three-year programme to support festivals, events and cultural venues in the city. However the council has instigated a new 'Festivals City Leadership Group,' which also involves the Scottish Government, to help tackle the biggest challenges faced by the city's major cultural events. Ms Hegyi said: 'One of the topics this group is look at is the whole question of accommodation and what we can do collectively to ensure that the festivals can be affordable in future. 'I think there is acceptance from everyone around the table that the status quo just isn't viable anymore. 'The idea that the festivals are sustainable in the long run under the current support mechanisms and what is being asked of festivals has gone. 'I think there's an acknowledgment that we've got to move on. 'For public funding agencies, that's about considering how they value the festivals in the round. 'What I'd like to see is a mindshift in the way that festivals are considered and treated, That's not necessarily about money. "One of the challenges we all need to get grips with is the inherent fragmentation of the festivals. We're all different, separate and independent. We'll always be that way. "But I think we probably could and should do more to coordinate to make it easier for residents and visitors who want to engage with the festivals in some way, and have a single front door to buy tickets. "There is an appetite among some of the festivals to think in that way so we can be more coordinated. Our chances of attracting new forms of income - whether through broadcast partnerships or commercial partnerships - on a scale that isn't possible with an individual festival. "One of the good things that has happened in the last year is that with the Creative Scotland settlements we've finally been able to move out of crisis mode, start to look a bit further ahead and start to dream a little bit." The Herald has teamed up with to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier. To buy tickets, click here
Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
Report for 'doomed to fail' minimum income guarantee cost £1.3m as SNP exercise branded 'waste of time'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers spent £1.3 million on a report into introducing a new welfare system despite knowing the scheme was 'doomed to fail'. The Scottish Government commissioned an expert panel to look at how it might implement a policy of bringing in a minimum income for all Scots. Findings from the Minimum Income Guarantee Expert Group included giving single parents in Scotland up to £28,000 in benefits without working. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the Scottish Parliament building in Edinburgh | PA However, sources close to the project insist there is little appetite to introduce the scheme, branded an 'absurd' policy by opposition parties. Now figures, released under Freedom of Information rules, show the costs for the expert group's final report were £280,000. The group was supported by a government secretariat of five civil servants, making their salary costs over the time of generating the report around £260,000 a year. It took from August 2021 to May 2025 - three years and ten months - to develop the findings. This is despite the fact the Holyrood Government does not have devolved all the reserved powers necessary to introduce a minimum income guarantee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A recommendation of the report is the Scottish and UK governments should set up a "co-operation commission" to work out what powers would be needed. An SNP insider said the report was a 'waste of time' and 'doomed to fail'. The source said: 'This report is going to be used as a springboard for charities to lobby government for a minimum income guarantee - despite the fact it is impossible to see how we could afford to pay for it. 'We've paid a significant sum for a report we don't agree with and that was doomed to fail, are now likely to distance ourselves from and now are going to be lobbied to implement it. It's not just a waste of time and money, but also a disappointment for the charities involved.' On publication of the minimum income guarantee report, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the Government would consider the findings after the Holyrood recess. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP Minister Shirley-Anne Somerville hoped to sort housing emergency (Picture: Jeff) Shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy said the report was a 'shocking waste of taxpayers' money'. He said: 'Especially when it was to explore a half-baked policy that everyone knew would be unaffordable and damaging. It's typical that the SNP's reaction is now to try to bury the issue and dodge responsibility. 'They should immediately rule out a minimum income guarantee – an absurd and eye-wateringly expensive policy that they have no powers to introduce. But they also owe Scots an explanation for why they ever devoted public money and civil servants' time to this idea, and a detailed account of how so much taxpayers' cash was wasted on this ridiculous report.' The Scottish Government initially declined The Scotsman's FOI request but, on appeal, gave a partial response. Using the pay bands of each civil servant in the secretariat, the salary costs per year would amount to around £260,000 annually. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A plan to bring in a minimum income for all Scots has been under consideration for several years. Supporters claim it would make for a fairer society with a reduced level of poverty if every Scot had a definite basic income, with the suggestion it would 'would effectively end poverty for those in receipt'. Opponents, however, claim it is too expensive a policy to implement and raise concerns that people would not work if they did not have to earn additional income. The report from the independent expert group, which included representatives from 16 groups such as social mobility organisations, universities and charities, recommended the base income be £11,500 for a single adult. A couple would receive £20,000 while a couple with one child or a lone adult with two children would receive £28,000. As their earnings rose to exceed the minimum income threshold, the payments would taper off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The group laid out a series of plans to be rolled out over the next decade that would pave the way for Scotland to introduce a minimum income guarantee from 2036. At the launch of the report in June, Satwat Rehman, one of the members of the group and chief executive of One Parent Families Scotland, said: 'A minimum income guarantee would provide a lifeline, ensuring no single-parent household falls below a dignified minimum income – whether in or out of work, studying or training – and ensure families and children thrive and not just survive.'
Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why loss of Kate Forbes will be bigger blow than SNP may realise
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As we reveal today, the Scottish Government spent £1.3 million of taxpayers' money on a report into the idea of a minimum income guarantee, despite not having the authority to introduce it and seemingly knowing it was 'doomed to fail'. The question is, therefore, why would they do this. The answer, as ever with the SNP, is simple: the pursuit of independence, the guiding light behind too many decisions in government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wanting to appear progressive and to the left of Labour, they clearly felt the need to seem sympathetic to the idea of a minimum income. Commissioning a report was a way to signal this. Of course, the SNP may argue that it is a policy which could be considered in an independent Scotland and that the money was as well spent as that used to produce the Scottish Government's near-forgotten 'independence papers'. On the latter point, we would not disagree. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes has announced she is standing down at the next Holyrood election (Picture: Paul Campbell) | Getty Images Dreamers vs pragmatists However, any such justification would only highlight what should be considered as a fundamental dividing line within the party – between the dreamers who think selling a vision of a promised land is the best way to achieve independence and the pragmatists who recognise it is important to run Scotland well in the here and now. The decision of Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, a pragmatist with at least a degree of understanding of the needs of business, to stand down at the next election will therefore be a blow not just to the SNP government but to Scotland as a whole. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The simple truth is that there is no prospect of another referendum, let alone independence itself, while support remains at its current level. Selling dubious visions of the future is an easy, glib and ultimately empty way of trying to increase it.
