Moment small boat migrants are detained on first day of one-in, one-out deal with France - but critics say they will come straight back
Video clips released by the Home Office showed men boarding an escort van at the department's processing centre in Manston, near Ramsgate, Kent.
Another sequence shows the van arriving at an unnamed immigration removal centre – thought to be Harmondsworth, near Heathrow airport - and the men disembarking.
They are all wearing grey sweatpants and sweatshirts, believed to have been given to them as a change of clothes after their Channel crossing.
Later, up to six men – whose faces are obscured – are seen sitting in a corridor of the removal centre.
The Home Office has refused to disclose how many migrants have been held so far, and it is not known whether the six pictured in the clips are the only detainees.
Other videos released by the Home Office show how Channel arrivals are interviewed and processed at Manston.
Those selected for removal to France are given purple tabards to wear, which differentiate them from other migrants who will be taken on to taxpayer-funded asylum hotels.
The detentions come amid huge concerns that human rights challenges and other legal actions could delay migrants being sent back for months, as well as scepticism over the narrow scope of the scheme.
Migrants selected for removal will be held in Home Office detention facilities rather than being sent to live in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels.
However, Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp blasted Labour's scheme as a 'gimmick that just won't work'.
He said: 'As far as we can see, removals under this scheme will only amount to six per cent of arrivals, meaning 94 per cent will stay.
'It will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.
'We also know that the agreement with France means any migrants claiming to be under 18, or who make a modern slavery or human rights claim, will not get removed.
'So this plan will get bogged down in an endless legal quagmire.
'Just like Keir Starmer's claim to 'smash the gangs' this is another gimmick that just won't work.'
Former Tory Cabinet minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg said the Anglo-French deal was a 'complete waste of time'.
'It's a fake. It's a phony, it's a cheat on the British people,' he said on GB News.
'It's a bogus deal, it's a complete waste of time.
'There's an extraordinary loophole that means almost no one can be deported.'
Despite the narrow scope of the scheme and the fact it is likely to expire in less than 11 months, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer insisted on social media that 'if you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back'.
He added:'No gimmicks, just results.'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil [at Dover port] and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.
'That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.
'No-one should be making this illegal and dangerous journey that undermines our border security and lines the pockets of the criminal gangs.'
Migrants being driven away from the Border Force compound in Dover today
Some of the men gave peace signs as they were taken away in coaches
She added: 'Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make.
'These are the early days for this pilot scheme, and it will develop over time.
'But we are on track to do what no other government has done since this crisis first started - sending small boat arrivals back to France and strengthening our borders through the Plan for Change.'
As part of the treaty Britain will accept migrants from France in exchange for small boat arrivals.
That element of the scheme also began today, allowing migrants to lodge 'expressions of interest' on a specially-created Home Office website.
It comes after a Cabinet minister appeared to contradict the terms of the new treaty with France yesterday.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France.
However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place.
Sir Keir Starmer tweeting about the detentions
The treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim '.
The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full.
It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'.
The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme.
Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed.
Meanwhile, the Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, yesterday published an analysis of the new measures which said: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France.
'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.'
It means the Home Secretary is likely to face a huge legal battle to get the first migrants removed from Britain.
Last month the PM pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement.
But yesterday – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Mr Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Judge orders halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
A judge has ordered the halt of construction of a Florida detention facility Donald Trump had nicknamed 'Alligator Alcatraz' and where he claimed would be held some of the most 'menacing' and 'vicious' people on the planet. The facility, operated by the state and with its costs reimbursed by the federal government, opened two months ago with the intention of housing undocumented migrants rounded up as part of the president's immigration crackdown. It is located in the Florida Everglades, something Mr Trump said made it the ideal place to hold the detainees. Yet, its location near Big Cypress National Preserve was something seized on by environmental activists who filed a lawsuit arguing the site threatens the environmentally sensitive wetlands. They are home to many protected plants and animals. 'We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperilled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,' said Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades. At the hearing in Miami on Thursday, US District Judge Kathleen Williams issued an order halting new construction for the next week but did not suspend operations at the facility. A spokesperson for Republican Governor Ron DeSantis denounced the ruling but said it 'will have no impact on immigration enforcement in Florida'. 'Alligator Alcatraz will remain operational, continuing to serve as a force multiplier to enhance deportation efforts,' said spokesperson Alex Lanfranconi. Mr Trump made a crackdown on immigration a centre part of his campaign for a second term in the Oval Office. Polls show his policies on deportations are largely popular, though not some of his most extreme steps, such as the rounding up of farm workers and day labourers. When Mr Trump visited the site at the beginning of July, he told reporters: 'It's known as Alligator Alcatraz, which is very appropriate because I looked outside and that's not a place I want to go hiking.' He added: 'But very soon, this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.' Mr Trump has also spoken several times of his wish to reopen the original Alcatraz prison, located in the waters off San Francisco and administration officials have toured the facility, which closed as a jail in 1963. In May, he wrote on Truth Social he was ordering all his staff to work towards reopening the prison to house 'America's most ruthless and violent offenders'. He added: 'For too long, America has been plagued by vicious, violent and repeat Criminal Offenders, the dregs of society, who will never contribute anything other than Misery and Suffering.'
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Fourth court blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order nationwide
August 7(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide by a fourth court on Thursday, after a judge issued an injunction in a class action covering children born anywhere in the United States who would be affected by it. U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, sided with immigrant rights advocates who asked her to halt Trump's order, marking the latest decision to show the limits of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that curtailed the ability of judges to block his directive and other policies nationwide. Trump's executive order, which he issued on his first day back in office on January 20, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of U.S.-born children who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a "green card" holder. It was swiftly challenged in court by Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and immigrant rights advocates who argued it violates the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, long been understood to recognize that virtually anyone born in the United States is a citizen. Every court to address the merits of order have agreed, and three judges including Boardman earlier this year halted nationwide the enforcement of the policy, which is part of the Republican president's hardline immigration agenda. The 6-3 conservative majority U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 sided with the administration by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to issue decisions stopping Trump's citizenship order from taking effect nationally. The Supreme Court's ruling notably held out the possibility that a lower court judge could halt a federal policy across the country if it was challenged in a class action on behalf of a nationwide group. Immigrant rights advocates seized on that holding and launched two proposed class actions that same day, including the one before Boardman, who had earlier in the same case concluded in February that Trump's order was likely unconstitutional. Boardman, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, in her February decision said Trump's order interpreted the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment "in a manner that the Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected and no court in the country has ever endorsed." Boardman in a July 16 opinion said she would once again block the policy nationally by granting children class action status at the request of groups including CASA and Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. But she did not immediately do so, saying because her original decision was still on appeal, she would need the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to return the case to her. It did so recently by dismissing the Trump administration's appeal. The case is Casa Inc. et al v. Trump, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 8:25-cv-00201. For the plaintiffs: Joseph Mead of Georgetown University Law Center's Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and Conchita Cruz of Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project. For the United States: Brad Rosenberg of the U.S. Department of Justice Read more: US judge reaffirms nationwide injunction blocking Trump executive order on birthright citizenship US appeals court blocks Trump's order curtailing birthright citizenship Judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order after Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to block presidential policies
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Husband of missing Michele Ann Joy Bourda was LAUGHED AT as he begged for help
Chris Bourda woke to find his wife Michele Ann Joy Bourda had vanished from the sunbed beside him on the beach in Kavala, Greece, on Friday - and he's now very worried The husband of a Brit who vanished in Greece has told of how he was laughed at when he frantically pleaded for help. Chris Bourda, 66, dozed off on a sun lounger and woke to find 59-year-old Michele Ann Joy Bourda had gone. Her belongings had remained on the sun lounger, even her towel, but Michele was nowhere to be found on Friday afternoon. Chris is still desperately searching for his wife in Kavala, Greece, but, when he asked a waiter at a restaurant beside the beach if he had seen Michele, he was mocked. The panicked husband eventually convinced a shopkeeper to help him and call the police. It comes after a Brit who vanished in Paris was discovered safe some two weeks later. Speaking from Kavala last night, Chris, who is a pharmacist, said: "Unfortunately I fell asleep and when I woke up she wasn't there... I went back to the waiter to say my wife was missing, have you seen her and he started laughing." Chris, who lives with Michele in Glasgow, has slammed the Greek police for their lack of urgency in searching for his spouse. He said he did not see a single police officer on the beach they day she went missing - a claim echoed by a fellow hotel guest. "The police didn't do anything on the day. One guest who was there that day said she didn't see any police and I didn't see any police that day either, not one single policeman at the beach. The only thing I saw was a police car driving up and down the road to the beach. Not getting out of the car, just looking in the direction of the sea," Chris, who has a son with Michele, said last night. Recalling the day Michele vanished, Chris told the Daily Mail his partner was "quite happy" and he and his wife had been for a swim in the sea. Michele, who worked at BT before working at a local council, had flown out to Greece with Chris for a two-week holiday last month. But Chris is now despairing at the bleak situation. The dad, who met Michele at university 36 years ago, continued: "I have been searching without sleep or anything. Day and night, especially early in the morning. It was hard to see at night though as it was so dark. "For days and nights I have gone up down the coast, searched bushes, olive groves, empty houses, building sites, later I went to the hills, nothing... The whole night before she had been holding my hand and you would never think anything was wrong or something like this would ever happen." Michele is described as being 5ft 6in, of a slim build with blue eyes and shoulder-length hair. She was last seen wearing a rhinestone-embellished two-piece beaded swimsuit, yellow beach shoes and a pair of red horn-rimmed sunglasses.
