CCP raids premises of 2 leading fan manufacturers, their association in Gujrat
The enforcement action was carried out as part of an ongoing investigation into potential violations of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010, which strictly prohibits agreements or practices that have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or reducing competition.
Acting under Section 34 of the Act, three CCP teams comprising duly authorized officers entered and searched the business premises of the undertakings. The teams secured documents, pricing records, and digital evidence relevant to the enquiry.
The Enquiry Committee examined three years of pricing data and obtained circulars issued by the industry association to its member undertakings. These circulars contained coordinated announcements of price increases for different fan variants. Moreover, price lists collected from various brands revealed strikingly similar pricing patterns, including: Multiple manufacturers revising prices on identical dates.
Price differences between standard ceiling fan models being as low as 0.05%.
In several cases, competing brands charging and revising exactly the same prices for certain variants.
These consistent and uniform pricing practices raise strong concerns of collusion and a prima facie violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act.
The fan industry holds significant importance in Pakistan's economy, and CCP remains vigilant in monitoring the sector to ensure that consumers are protected from artificially inflated prices and anti-competitive conduct.
The CCP is mandated under the Competition Act, 2010 to promote free competition across all sectors of the economy, enhance efficiency, and safeguard consumer interests against practices such as price fixing, collusion, and abuse of market power.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
21 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Lucky Core Industries announces financial results
KARACHI: Lucky Core Industries Limited (the 'Company') in the meeting of the Board of Directors announced its financial results for the year ended June 30, 2025. Financial Highlights: • On a consolidated basis (including the result of the Company's subsidiary Lucky Core PowerGen Limited), the Company reported a Net Turnover of PKR 119,941 million for the year under review, representing a one percent decline compared to the same period last year (SPLY). • The consolidated Operating Result stood at PKR 18,031 million, which is higher by five percent in comparison to the SPLY. • On a consolidated basis, the Profit After Tax (PAT) for the year under review at PKR 11,757 million and Earning Per Share (EPS) attributable to the owners of the holding company at PKR 25.46* are both five percent higher than the SPLY. • On a standalone basis, the PAT and EPS for the year under review at PKR 11,638 million and PKR 25.20* per share respectively, both are four percent higher than the SPLY. EPS has been restated to reflect the subdivision of the face value of the ordinary shares of the Company from PKR 10/- per share to PKR 02/- per share. The regulatory formalities to give effect to the stock split were completed after the close of the financial year, on July 19, 2025. The Board of Directors has recommended a Final Cash Dividend in respect of the financial year ended June 30, 2025, at a rate of 310% (i.e. PKR 6.20/- per share of PKR 2/- each). This is in addition to the 340% Interim Cash Dividend (i.e. PKR 34/- per share of PKR 10/-) already paid (prior to the stock split). Following the announcements of results, LCI's Chief Executive Mr. AsifJooma said, 'In a year marked by economic transition and evolving industry dynamics, macro indicators showed early signs of stability. However, the operating environment remained challenging with subdued demand weighing on key sectors, particularly in the second half of the year. Against this backdrop, Lucky Core Industries delivered a resilient performance with steady growth in profitability, reflecting the strength of its diversified portfolio, cost discipline, and operational excellence. As we look ahead, we remain guided by our shared purpose to enrich lives, anchored in collaboration, resilience, and the strength of working together.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
21 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Closure of industrial, commercial establishments: Sindh govt, not labour court, has jurisdiction to decide cases: SC
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court declared that under the Sindh Terms of Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 2015, the jurisdiction to decide cases of closure of industrial or commercial establishment is vested in the Government of Sindh, rather than the Labour Court. A three-judge bench, headed by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, heard appeals against the Sindh High Court (SHC) verdict. The transitory facts of the case are that the petitioner (M/s Trio Industries (Pvt) Limited) was engaged in the business of printing of ceramic tiles on finished products manufactured by other ceramic tiles production companies. Due to the advancement of technology, the process of printing tiles has become an integral part of the manufacturing process, hence the petitioner's enterprise was no more a viable venture. The petitioner on 02.03.2017 applied to the Labour Department, instead of the Sindh Government, under Standing Order 15 of the Sindh Terms of Employment (Standing Orders) Act 2015 for permission to close down the factory. During the closure process, the respondents (employees of the factory) filed their Grievance Petition before the Labour Court and alleged that due to trade union activities, the petitioner has decided to remove them from service. They asserted that no proper application was moved to the Government of Sindh for seeking their approval in the closure of the establishment, which was the wrong method. SC determines right meaning of FMCG products The Sindh Labour Court, Karachi, dismissed the grievance petitions. The respondents then filed appeals under Section 48 (3) of the Sindh Industrial Relations Act, 2013 (SIRA). The Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi directed the petitioner to deposit the stipulated amount of compensation within one month. The petitioner filed a constitution petition before the Sindh High Court, which was also dismissed. The petitioner's stance was that the Joint Director, Labour, represents the government and the application for closing down the establishment was rightly submitted to him, as he was the proper authority for submission of such application, and hence, intimation or notice to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, was not required. The judgment noted that under Standing Order 15 of the 2015 Act, an application for closing down the establishment was to be moved to the Government of Sindh, rather the Labour Department. If, under Standing Order 15, the application for permission to close down was not decided within 15 days of its submission, the said application could be deemed to have been granted/allowed, it added. It said there must be some well structured procedure and mechanism to deal with and decide the applications submitted to the Government of Sindh for closing down the establishment in terms of Standing Order 15 of the 2015 Act. 'No doubt, the powers are given to the government, but there is no procedure to decide such application except providing the outer limit of 15 days; that, too, is in favour of the employer, to presume that his application is allowed if it was not decided or responded to within 15 days. Therefore, a clean slate is accorded to the employer to immediately shut down the whole business/establishment without checking whether the action is bona fide or mala fide or, while doing so, if the full and final accrued dues of employees have been settled or not. 'On the contrary, while assuming jurisdiction to accord permission, it is the responsibility of the Government to ensure that the close down is bona fide and permission is granted after ensuring the payment of dues to the employees.' The judgment said there is a need to enact a fool-proof procedure to deal with, examine, and decide such applications after hearing the employer and employees/their representative/Trade Union/CBA, and then render a speaking order so that an aggrieved person may file an appeal in the Labour Court in terms of Standing Order 15 of the 2015 Act. The court recommended that some necessary amendments in the 2015 Act or some rules or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are required to be enacted in the best interest of workers, to save them from unlawful removal from service in case of mala fide attempts/schemes, and also from deprivation of their lawful dues in case bona fide of employer is proved. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
21 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Iran, Pakistan reaffirm commitment to boost ties
ISLAMABAD: Deputy Prime Minister/ Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar met with Iranian Foreign Minister, Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, here on Saturday. FM Araghchi is part of Iranian President Dr Masoud Pezeshkian's delegation for his state visit to Pakistan. The two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening Pakistan-Iran ties, with a focus on expanding cooperation in regional stability, trade, and economic collaboration. They also discussed enhancing bilateral engagement across key areas of mutual interest. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
