logo
Starmer vows to press on with welfare reform as he takes blame for U-turn

Starmer vows to press on with welfare reform as he takes blame for U-turn

Independent03-07-2025
Sir Keir Starmer has insisted welfare reform is still on the table as he took the blame for Tuesday's U-turn in the face of a major backbench rebellion.
In an interview with the BBC, the Prime Minister acknowledged his Government did not 'get the process right' and failed to 'engage in the way that we should have done' on welfare changes.
But he added his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'.
Despite the setback, which saw changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) stripped out of his welfare legislation, Sir Keir said on Thursday his Government was 'pressing on with welfare reform'.
Answering questions at the launch of Labour's NHS plan, he said: 'It is important we reform the system. Welfare isn't working.'
The Prime Minister went on to praise disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, who is now leading a review of Pip, saying he was 'a thoroughly decent man of huge integrity that we can have faith in to do the review and make the changes that are necessary'.
Sir Keir's U-turn saw planned changes to Pip eligibility put off until after Sir Stephen has completed his review of the benefit next autumn, leaving only changes to universal credit to go forward.
That decision has caused a fiscal headache for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, with the £4.8 billion of savings the reforms were expected to deliver now unlikely to materialise.
Economists have warned that this is likely to mean further tax rises in the autumn, and the Prime Minister did not rule out the possibility on Thursday.
Ms Reeves has previously promised she would not need to repeat the £40 billion tax raid she set out in October 2024.
Asked if he would repeat that commitment, Sir Keir said: 'No prime minister or chancellor is going to write a budget in advance, but we did really tough stuff in that budget last year.'
But he added that last year's budget had already done much of the 'heavy lifting' on repairing the public finances.
The Chancellor also declined to 'speculate' about tax rises ahead of the budget, but told broadcasters there was 'a cost to the welfare changes that Parliament voted through this week and that will be reflected in the budget'.
Ms Reeves herself appeared alongside Sir Keir and Health Secretary Wes Streeting at the launch of the NHS plan on Thursday, a day after she had appeared visibly tearful in the Commons during Prime Minister's Questions.
The Chancellor told broadcasters it had been related to a 'personal issue', while Sir Keir gave her his full backing, adding: 'I think it's just fantastic she's here and, as I say, none of this would be happening if she hadn't taken the decisions that she's taken.'
Questions about the Chancellor's future had sparked a sharp fall in the value of UK government bonds on Wednesday, but the markets rallied on Thursday morning following repeated reassurances she was safe in Number 11.
But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Matt Gaetz has the solution for the Ukraine War: Make Russia part of NATO
Matt Gaetz has the solution for the Ukraine War: Make Russia part of NATO

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Matt Gaetz has the solution for the Ukraine War: Make Russia part of NATO

Matt Gaetz, the former Florida Republican congressman and short-lived attorney general nominee, suggested in his new job as a host on One America News that Russia be offered NATO membership as a way to end the war in Ukraine. 'I've got an idea. Offer NATO membership to Russia,' said Gaetz during Monday's edition of The Matt Gaetz Show. 'Of course, for this carrot, Trump would need to get everything he wants out of [Russian President Vladimir] Putin regarding the end of hostilities, economic cooperation, and territorial disputes.' 'Before you suggest I'm crazy for thinking about NATO and Russia as partners, the idea has been floated by foreign policy thinkers on the right and left for some time,' he added. 'In 1997, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a hearing on NATO expansion. President Clinton's secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, reflected on groundbreaking cooperation between NATO and Russia.' 'That fruit didn't germinate because instead of doubling down on cooperation with Russia, the thinking prevailed that we had to expand NATO and encircle Russia. We learned that an animal backed into a corner can lash out,' Gaetz argued. 'We chose encirclement over cooperation when people were saying cooperation could be part of our forward-looking path with Russia.' The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was created in 1949 in the aftermath of the Second World War to counter the Soviet Union. While NATO worked to establish a partnership with Russia following the end of the Cold War, all cooperation ceased when Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. 'Michael McFaul was President Obama 's ambassador to Russia. In 2006, he wrote an article entitled, 'Why a Democratic Russia Should Join NATO,'' Gaetz went on. 'Again, this reinforces that NATO membership is an earned reward, not an entitlement, but why not give Russia a chance to earn it?' Russia became the first country to join NATO's Partnership for Peace programme in June 1994. Its goals were to expand political and military cooperation in Europe. In late May 1997, NATO leaders and then-Russian President Boris Yeltsin signed the NATO-Russia Founding Act, sharing their wish to 'build together a lasting and inclusive peace in the Euro-Atlantic area on the principles of democracy and cooperative security.' During President Vladimir Putin's time in power, between 2002 and 2008, NATO and Russia participated in the NATO-Russia Council, the formal meetings of which came to an end amid Russia's military action in Georgia in 2008. NATO's website now states that 'The Russian Federation is the most significant and direct threat to Allies' security.' 'NATO membership for Russia isn't coming tomorrow, but to make peace, everyone needs to give up something and get something,' said Gaetz. 'Everyone needs to feel safer in peace than at war. Making war is easy; all you have to do is attack. Making peace is hard, but at least the Trump administration is making progress. We believe that progress could and ultimately should lead to NATO expansion to Russia if everyone behaves.' Gaetz's comments came after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a cadre of European leaders met with President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. An administration official said Sunday that Putin agreed at his Alaska summit with Trump on Friday that the U.S. and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee in the shape of NATO's collective security mandate as part of a possible deal to end the full-scale war started by Russia in February 2022. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff appeared on CNN 's State of the Union on Sunday, saying that it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.' He added that it was 'game-changing.' 'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,' Witkoff added.

Ryanair launches five new flight routes from regional UK airport in huge £300million plans
Ryanair launches five new flight routes from regional UK airport in huge £300million plans

The Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Ryanair launches five new flight routes from regional UK airport in huge £300million plans

A REGIONAL UK airport is getting five new Ryanair flight routes as part of a multi-million pound investment. The budget airline confirmed they would be adding a "gamechanger" third plane to Newcastle Airport. 3 3 This means another 120,000 seats on sale a year, starting from this winter. Not only that, but five new routes will also be launched this winter. This includes Brussels, a popular Christmas Market destination, and will be the first route from Newcastle Airport. The other new routes include Budapest, Gdansk, Malta and Wroclaw. And flights to Alicante, Dublin and Krakow will also increase in frequency. The additions are part of a £300million investment in Newcastle Airport. To celebrate, Ryanair has launched a two-day seat sale with flights on offer from £29.99. Ryanair's CCO Jason McGuinness said: "This Winter Ryanair will operate a record schedule at Newcastle that will deliver more than 1m annual passengers." Newcastle Airport's Chief Operating Officer, Richard Knight, added: "Brussels is a brand new connection for the Airport's departure board and will provide great connectivity for both leisure and business passengers to the capital of Belgium. "The addition of more winter flights to Budapest, Gdańsk, Malta and Wrocław will provide additional flight options for passengers looking to explore these popular destinations from the region.' It's not the only new flights Ryanair is launching. The budget airline is opening a new base at Tirana Airport in Albania. Along with new flights from Birmingham, it will also help Brits travel to Ksamil, dubbed the 'Maldives of Europe'. However, there are three airports in Europe that are seeing all Ryanair flights scrapped. French airports Bergerac, Brive, and Strasbourg will see all Ryanair flights cancelled later this year. It is feared Bergerac Airport could even be forced to close for good. Christophe Fauvel, president of the Dordogne Chamber of Commerce (CCI), said: "If Ryanair decides to follow through on its threat and leaves Bergerac for good the airport may face closure". The Sun's Deputy Travel Editor recently wrote about why she thinks Ryanair is one of the world's best airlines. 3

What security guarantees might Ukraine get in return for a peace deal?
What security guarantees might Ukraine get in return for a peace deal?

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

What security guarantees might Ukraine get in return for a peace deal?

European leaders have been holding a virtual conference call to discuss what security guarantees they could give to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal with Russia. The discussion follows Monday's unprecedented get-together in the White House hosted by Donald Trump. The US president met with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and held talks with Britain's Keir Starmer, as well as the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and Nato. The main topic was how to end the war in Ukraine, the continent's biggest since 1945, and how Europe might stop Russia from attacking again. Zelenskyy has said that the details will be worked out and 'formalised on paper' within a week to 10 days. As many as 30 countries – dubbed the coalition of the willing – are likely to be involved, with some help from the US, although what that might mean is unclear. Speaking after his meeting on Monday with Donald Trump and European leaders in the White House, Zelenskyy said their support could take many forms. One of those could be prysutnist (the Ukrainian word for presence), meaning they would provide troops. And it might include intelligence, as well as providing security in the air and on the Black Sea. They could provide funds instead, he said. The key question is, which European governments are willing to take part in a peacekeeping mission inside Ukraine? The UK and France have indicated they are ready to send soldiers as part of a 'reassurance force'. France's president, Emmanuel Macron, confirmed: 'We have to help Ukraine on the ground.' Germany is more sceptical. Many details have yet to be worked out. Would western troops be stationed along a ceasefire line or provide a more limited training role in big cities such as Kyiv and Lviv? And what rules of engagement would they have if they came under Russian fire? Trump has promised to coordinate a Europe-led peacekeeping operation in Ukraine. 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said on Monday, sitting next to Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. The US president made clear European countries would be expected to carry most of the burden. 'They are a first line of defence because they're there. But we'll help them out,' he said. Ukraine wants to buy $90bn worth of US weapons and says they could form part of the security guarantee. Overall, however, Trump has been vague about how much the US would contribute. He has ruled out Ukraine's membership of Nato, which Kyiv believes would be the best deterrent against a future Russian onslaught. There seems no prospect the US would send its own troops to take part in a peace-keeping mission. One more realistic option would be for the Pentagon to provide logistical support to a proposed 'sky shield'. The plan envisages an air protection zone in the west and the centre of Ukraine, including over the capital Kyiv, enforced by European fighter jets. According to Trump, Vladimir Putin agreed during their summit in Alaska that Ukraine required security guarantees. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff has said that these would be outside the auspices of Nato, but would be the equivalent of article 5, Nato's self-defence pact in which an attack on one is considered an attack on all. Russia's interpretation of guarantees, however, seems different from Witkoff's version. The Kremlin says it is categorically opposed to western troops in Ukraine. It is unlikely to accept a peacekeeping force, as part of any deal. Putin's war goals, meanwhile, are unchanged and framed in terms of Russia's own existential security needs. He is demanding the entirety of Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, including territory Russia has been unable since 2014 to capture. Putin also wants Ukraine's 'demilitarisation and denazification' – meaning severe limits on the size of Kyiv's army, as well as Zelenskyy's removal. The intense diplomacy of the past few days may seem like progress. But Russia's basic position hasn't changed. Putin has shown no sign he respects Ukraine's sovereignty or that he wants to stop the war. While Russia's bombing continues discussion of security guarantees seems moot. We have been here before. In 1994 Kyiv agreed to give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for international security assurances. Under the terms of the Budapest memorandum the US, Russia, the UK, China and France said they would ensure Ukraine's 'territorial integrity' and 'political independence'. And to 'refrain from the use and threat of force'. At the time Ukrainian politicians thought giving up the country's nuclear arsenal left it open to Russian attack. The Clinton administration was insistent. In May 1997 Russia's president Boris Yeltsin signed a friendship treaty with his Ukrainian counterpart, Leonid Kuchma. Russia recognised Ukraine's post-Soviet borders. As part of the deal, Kyiv gave Moscow most of its navy, and leased the Crimean port of Sevastopol to the Russians for 20 years. Neither agreement stopped Russian aggression. In 2014 the Kremlin used its troops stationed in Crimea to seize and annex the peninsula. Putin now says the whole of Ukraine is 'historical Russia'. Ukraine's experience of betrayal – with late 20th-century pledges proving to be worthless – means it will want better guarantees this time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store