
Rural Scots 'face major energy bills hike after RTS meter switch off'
But just 11 days before that deadline, the UK Government paused the planned blanket switch-off in favour of a phased approach, citing the fact that 314,000 households across the UK – including 105,000 in Scotland – were still using the meters.
READ MORE: Dr Ron Mould: RTS switch-off will put vulnerable Scots at risk
The Scottish Government had raised concerns that the shutdown could disrupt heating and hot water systems for those still relying on RTS meters, while potentially triggering steep hikes in energy costs.
However, Shetland resident John Inkster said he is already feeling the impact after being moved off the RTS system by provider EDF Energy. He described the resulting rise in bills as 'unjust' and said it flies in the face of assurances given by Ofgem, the energy regulator.
Ofgem has stated that consumers should be left 'no worse off' as a result of switching away from RTS meters. But Inkster said that for islanders like him – living in areas without access to mains gas – the reality is starkly different.
'I think we spend about £4000 a year heating our house at the moment, before the RTS meter changeover,' he said. 'I imagine that might go to £6000.
'You don't need to be a rocket scientist to work out that people are going to be completely fleeced here.'
READ MORE: John Swinney: Labour are ruling out all options to reduce energy bills
Before the switch, Inkster had two meters: one charging 27p per unit of electricity for standard use (lights, appliances, sockets), and another offering a reduced 15p tariff for heating and hot water.
Since EDF replaced his system, most of his heating, except for storage heaters and a portion of water heating, is charged at the higher rate.
Based on his calculations, the change equates to a 74% increase in costs on around half of his heating and hot water use. That could see his annual bill rise from £4000 to around £5500.
'There are a lot of people who don't understand this who have it in their house, to be honest with you,' he said. 'It is a bit complicated.
'But it doesn't take any kind of a genius at all to work out that customers will be much, much worse off.'
He went on: 'It's said people are dying in Scotland in the cold because they can't afford to heat their homes. You hear that, don't you?
'Well, how is this going to affect those statistics? Improve them or make them worse?'
Inkster said he was aware of other Shetlanders who had already 'torn panel heaters out of their houses' in response to the soaring cost of using them under the new tariffs. He warned that many affected households might only realise the full extent of the change when their winter energy bills arrive.
The Shetlander has enlisted the help of his local MP, LibDem Alistair Carmichael, who has written to EDF chief executive Simone Rossi with his concerns.
The LibDem MP for Orkney and Shetland, Alistair Carmichael (Image: UK Parliament/PA Wire) 'Ofgem has stated that energy companies should give equivalent tariffs to RTS customers so that no one is left worse off as a result of switching,' the MP said.
'At best, what EDF is doing goes against the spirit of that commitment – at worst, it looks like an active attempt to evade the new rules. Ofgem and the Government must come down hard on this sly behaviour.'
EDF did not respond to the Sunday National's request for comment.
A spokesperson for Ofgem said: 'We have made clear to suppliers that we expect them to treat customers fairly – not only in terms of shielding households from unnecessary costs but also offering the same or similar tariffs after their RTS meter has been upgraded.
'It is crucial that customers are protected at every stage of the phased shutdown, and we are spelling out to suppliers key requirements that must be met before an area loses its RTS signal.
'While this carefully managed phaseout process should reassure customers, it remains crucial that these meters are replaced urgently so it's vital to engage with your supplier when offered an appointment.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Rural Scots are right - it is time to halt onshore windfarms
Of course, the President's antipathy towards wind turbines is well known, which may or may not stem entirely from an offshore windfarm near to his Aberdeenshire golf course. But does he actually have a point – has Scotland become saturated with wind farms and is it time to pause? Certainly, many across rural Scotland would agree with the President. Now an unprecedented movement of 53 community councils are demanding a summit with energy ministers in a fight to pause infrastructure projects in some of Scotland's most picturesque areas. They claim there is a 'barrage' of major renewable energy proposals with more than 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone, ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. They add that they are being 'overwhelmed by multiple, complex major applications, from well-funded overseas developers'. According to the group, it has become 'David and Goliath' experience, with concerns raised that local democracy has been 'overridden'. The convention now wants the Scottish Government to undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments on the communities and landscape fearing projects 'may hasten depopulation in some areas'. In June, 300 gathered in Beauly, near Inverness, in a public meeting to discuss concerns over feeling 'disregarded' over the wave of projects. There were delegates from over 50 community councils, collectively representing 72,000 people. Among the most controversial are plans for a so-called 'super-pylon' plan which was to run for over 100 miles across some of Highlands and Aberdeenshire's most picturesque areas to enable 'significant' growth of renewable energy and support transition away from fossil fuels. Nothing about the A9 dualling project suggests momentum Ms Hyslop I have walked amongst Scotland's largest seagulls - and they are a menace Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission (SSEN), which owns, operates and develops the high voltage electricity transmission system unveiled the strategy three years ago which it says was a 'critical project of national significance' as it has been identified as 'essential' to deliver government targets for offshore wind. The project at that point was to involve building a new 400kV overhead line connection between Beauly and Peterhead to enable the transmission of renewable power into the network for onward transmission to 'areas of demand further south'. They would transmit the electricity on wires carried on a system of mainly metal towers and large substations. SSEN was asked how big the pylons would be after a previous plan involving 165ft 'super pylons' was mothballed five years ago in the wake of environmental concerns. The new pylons at that point were expected to be on average even taller – at 180ft. Now the convention is now planning a summit for [[Inverness]] and wants Scottish energy secretary Gillian Martin and UK energy minister Michael Shanks as well as deputy first minister Kate Forbes to attend. Highland councillor Helen Crawford, who was a key convention organiser, said communities felt 'powerless' over the projects. She said: 'This is a significant representation of thousands of people across the Highlands and it is fair to expect our leaders to advocate for them at [[Scottish Government]] and UK Government level.' In response, Morag Watson, director of onshore at the industry body Scottish Renewables, said: 'Scotland's renewable energy industry is committed to delivering a lasting legacy for local communities and we will work with all stakeholders to achieve the right outcomes for the country as we build a fairer, cleaner and more secure energy system.' Of course there is a degree of Nimbyism at play here as many people love the idea of renewable energy schemes until they pop up and spoil the view out of their kitchen window. However, you just have to look at the UNESCO world heritage site of the Flow Country in Sutherland and Caithness to see the damage that can be done by onshore windfarms. Many small projects have been approved on the peatlands which will cause incalculable damage to the environment as a whole. Onshore wind farms are not as environmentally friendly as some will lead us to believe, they are made of plastic after all. They are also normally sited in peatlands which will release goodness know how many tonnes of carbon dioxide when they are disturbed to drill holds for the cement to keep the turbines in place. Wind farms have their place in the energy mix and are undoubtedly here to stay – they are also far better than coal and gas fired power stations. However, with the number of offshore arrays currently operational with many more planned, maybe it is time to pause new onshore ones. It is arguable now to see how vital they would be for the UK's electricity supply. Some large wind farms, such as Whitelee in East Renfrewshire, are now hugely popular places for recreation such as walking and cycling, whereas before there was just bleak moorland. Thousands of local communities have also benefitted hugely from wind farm proceeds, but that shouldn't be used as a sweetener to get locals onside in future. Wind farms can already provide more than 100% of electricity supply on certain days, so it is hard to argue that we need any more. Offshore wind will provide even more in the future along with the other more conventional sources such as nuclear and hydro. There have been great strides made in recent decades away from fossil fuel to renewables and that should be warmly welcomed by everyone. Sadly, this has come at a cost to some, though the overall benefits far outweigh the downsides. But maybe it is time to halt onshore wind farms before the downsides outweigh the benefits.
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26crop%3D3%3A2%2Csmart%26trim%3D&w=3840&q=100)

Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Realising the benefits of investing to achieve long-term goals
Tom Ham | Supplied Tom Ham, Group CEO at Calton, on moves to incentivise Cash ISA savers to go into investment Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Well, the UK Government is rushing to get everything off its desk in a mad scramble to get out the door for the summer holiday. The long-awaited draft legislation on Inheritance Tax changes for pensions and agricultural and business property has been released. Spoiler – neither are going away, so more on the technicalities of these soon. More exciting, however, is the new stuff being lobbed over the transom. There's the Pensions Commission, and a raft of reforms designed to funnel money out of cash savings and into investments. Here's some context to help separate the signal from the noise. The government is looking for growth and to inject capital into the UK markets. Fund flows into London-listed mandates have been declining for months, and new listings in the UK's IPO space have dropped to their lowest level for a half-year since records began in 1995. No-one wants to use the word bleak at midsummer, but this does not signal health or confidence. At the same time, global trends in personal finance show that people are holding a significant proportion of their wealth in cash. Vanguard reports this month that an estimated £1.7 trillion is sitting in cash savings across the OECD; the same report suggested that in the UK there is potentially £242 billion that could be turned towards both the government's and individual citizens' long-term financial goals. Do the markets have a right to people's money? Of course not. But we should ask why and how we might nudge this cash into investment and consider who might benefit. The savings cash-pile has accumulated because of policy, regulation and broad economic patterns on one hand, and financial education and behaviour on the other. Cynics might say the government has just identified a new reservoir of money to tap. Banks and building societies have pointed out that this money isn't inactive, it circulates through their lending activities too. That said, the Treasury has two motives for seeking to turn savers' money towards the market. First, the government – and surely everyone else – wants to reinvigorate the economy, to foster growth and instil confidence, though the jury is out on how much this will move the dial. Second, individuals holding money in cash accounts are not getting the same long-term return they might realise if they invested instead. This is a problem as personal savings, and taking responsibility for maximising them, become increasingly important as public finances deteriorate and defined contribution pensions are now the norm. To be clear, holding assets in cash isn't intrinsically bad – we frequently advise clients to do so. Your emergency fund of three to six months of living expenses needs to be in an easy-access account. As clients approach retirement, we increase the amount they hold in cash – often within pension or other investment wrappers – to protect from market events as they approach drawdown or the purchase of an annuity. At this stage we suggest having 12-18 months of living expenses available – not a small amount of money. But the Cash ISA is a subject of speculation. They are vastly popular because they are useful for short-term saving goals – easy to set up, easy to withdraw from, and a low-risk tax-wrapper shielding profits from Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax. If changes come, they will be to the annual tax-free allowance. Since ISAs arrived in 1999 the allowance for adult account holders has risen from £4,000 per annum to a grand £20,000. This can be shared amongst all members of the ISA family – the Stocks and Shares ISA, the Lifetime ISA and the Finance ISA, each with different rules, risks and rates of return. The most straightforward change to divert savings towards investment would be to reallocate the allowance across other types of ISA, stipulating a certain portion must go to an Investment ISA. However, this is when you slam into the two major barriers to investment – risk and cost. For example, opening a Stocks and Shares ISA involves declaring your awareness of the risk, being comfortable with it, and paying a percentage fee to your ISA provider. While you can make withdrawals from a Stocks and Shares ISA instantly, exposure to market falls means you are more likely to realise expected returns over a longer period – most experts advise a minimum five-year investment, but this is the kind of decision you might wish to seek more reassurance and advice on. So far, the Cash ISA remains untouched; it's now incumbent upon government and the advice profession to make the case for investment to help people with their long-term goals, and to show the benefits rather than be accused of making another cash grab.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Glen Lednock windfarm opponents submit 41-page objection
The Save Glen Lednock document includes concerns on access, traffic and transport, ecology, cultural heritage, noise and vibration. Campaigners opposed to a controversial windfarm in a scenic Perthshire glen have lodged a 41-page objection to the scheme. The Comrie-based Save Glen Lednock group - who have described the proposed scheme as a 'destructive industrial project' – submitted their objection to the Scottish Government's Energy Consents Unit (ECU) just hours before Monday's deadline (July 21). Renewable energy company Low Carbon, is aiming to build 19 turbines with blade tips extending as high as 200m, on land within Invergeldie Estate. It is expected to generate approximately 342,600 MWh of electricity per year or the equivalent of the annual electricity requirement of more than 100,000 households. Save Glen Lednock campaigners say those living near the windfarm – as well as businesses and residents in Comrie and Crieff, and rare birds including golden eagles - will all suffer as a result of the scheme. The Save Glen Lednock submission lodged this week includes objections on access, traffic and transport, ecology, cultural heritage, noise and vibration and national planning policy. Objector Alastair Forsyth said: 'This development has the potential to have very negative impacts on many people's lives, not just those who live in Glen Lednock, but also well beyond – with hundreds of additional vehicles for the construction phase, including many lorries, travelling daily along the A85 through Comrie and Crieff to the A9 at Perth.' The campaigners also highlighted that they only had six weeks to digest 293 documents detailing the plans. Mr Forsyth added: 'The developer has had years to put together this mass of documentation, yet concerned citizens of Strathearn, and visitors who value the tranquillity and beauty of Glen Lednock, have had just weeks to make sense of the 3,000 pages of documentation that were submitted by Low Carbon in support of their application.' A Low Carbon spokesperson said this week: 'The final design for the Glen Lednock Wind Farm has been shaped by extensive pre-application consultation with the local community and we are grateful for the input from residents, community councils and other organisations that took time to attend our public exhibitions and other events over the past two years and shared their views with us. Low Carbon has also undertaken a programme of survey and assessment over several years to inform our Glen Lednock Wind Farm application, which is in line with good practice guidance from the Scottish Government. This includes an assessment of the project's alignment with National Planning Framework 4 policy tests. 'Furthermore, the application sets out how Low Carbon will provide the equivalent of £5,000 per MW of installed generating capacity annually into a community benefit fund every year. 'This equates to £589,000 per annum or £23.6million (2025 prices) for local communities around Glen Lednock over the proposed 40-year operational life of the project.' Windfarm backers Low Carbon and opponents Save Glen Lednock have clashed over a number of issues. Developers Low Carbon last week disputed the campaigners' assertion of 400 lorry movements per day during construction of the windfarm. However, campaigners pointed to Low Carbon's own Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) to support their assertion. These figures itemise a seven-month peak daily traffic figure of 392 accounting for 251 large good vehicles (LGV) and 140 heavy goods vehicles (HGV) and one HGV articulated lorry. Heavy goods vehicles and large goods vehicles both have a gross weight exceeding 3500kg. Low Carbon also took issue with campaigners' mention of a new eight mile access road. However, the EIRC states: 'The Access Route Area to the Turbine Development Area would be approximately 12,687m (eight miles) in length, via the existing A85 bellmouth to the east of Comrie and along a series of access tracks, both existing and newly constructed comprising 'a number of localised upgrades to approximately 8,528m (5.29 miles) of existing tracks; and approximately 4,158m (2.58 miles) of new track. Another issue of contention is the impact the turbines would have on wild birds including golden eagles. Low Carbon point out research contained in their EIRC comprises a 'comprehensive assessment of disturbance and displacement of bird species, including golden eagle, [and] concludes that there will be no significant displacement' [by wind turbines]. However, Save Glen Lednock point to a collison risk estimate table in the Low Carbon report. Campaigner Alastair Forsyth said: 'What is shocking is the predicted mortality of birds of prey caused by collisions with wind turbines over the 40 year operational predicted life of the turbines. 'To be clear a collision equals a dead bird. 'For golden eagle Low Carbon estimate that this would equal approximately 12 birds in 40 years.'