logo
Column: The Tribune's film critic Michael Phillips says so long for now

Column: The Tribune's film critic Michael Phillips says so long for now

Chicago Tribune2 days ago
Well. Goodbye for now.
The Tribune has eliminated the position of film critic, as part of a newsroom reorganization. This leaves me with two options: stick around for reassignment or take a buyout. I'm voting buyout. I'm opting in for opting out.
After six newspapers in Minneapolis; Dallas; San Diego; St. Paul, Minneapolis; Los Angeles and Chicago, and 41 fulltime years in this beautiful, vanishing subset of journalism, it feels right. Forty-one years, plus six years of freelancing my way through college. Call it 47. Forty-seven years of writing, editing, gobbling research like the grad student I never was; 47 years of making my peace at the keyboard (or waging another micro-war against cliches) when faced with one more deadline. Nearly a half-century of putting work ahead of everything else, too often at everything else's expense.
So now, for me, it's time for the shock of the new. The new to be named later.
Through fat and lean and thick and thin and, to quote Mel Brooks, through thin, the Tribune has been good to me. They took a chance on me back in 2002 and I'm grateful. The place has brought me so much to love in this city. Plus the paper underwrote 10 trips to the Cannes Film Festival, with my name on the festival badge, once upon a time.
I arrived from the Los Angeles Times as the Tribune's new theater critic. This was the result of a lengthy interview process for the finalists for the post vacated by the irreplaceable Richard Christiansen. Bizarrely, all the other finalists turned the job down, with regrets. Perhaps none of us could get our heads around the workload established so selflessly by Christiansen, and in my case I wanted enough life in my life to be there for my son, then one year old.
And then Tribune editors did something sort of amazing. They agreed to fill the theater critic position with two, not one: me and Chris Jones, the latter now the paper's editorial page editor as well as Tribune and New York Daily News theater critic. In an overwhelmingly white male newsroom, there we were, two more white males.
I think about that a lot.
There's an Arthur Miller quote that gets a lot of reuse here at the Tribune. It's etched into a wall inside our former tower's lobby: 'A good newspaper, I suppose, is a nation talking to itself.' Right now, any newspaper with an interest in staying urgent and relevant and alert is getting an earful of a fractious nation. Making sense of these nerve-wracking times, and everything filmmakers, artists, writers, creators create out of the din, amounts to more than a routine profession. Or a bottom line.
I got paid for my first opinion at 17, which was ridiculous but educational. At my college paper, the Minnesota Daily, I knew I wasn't writing like myself yet. I wrote about movies, plays, performers and artists like a combination of critics I admired. Young actors often do the same; they learn by doing, and by borrowing, and in time by letting the false front fall away.
Every text, email, letter and phone call the Tribune readers have sent my way, be it out of agreement, frustration or just plain kindness — nothing I ever wrote meant as much as what you sent, and I mean it.
The good fortune so many of us fell into back then, editing or generating arts coverage, is a dream now, a dream of a less precarious era of journalism. My first fulltime job was arts editor of the Twin Cities weekly City Pages. What was I doing? I didn't know what I was doing. I just did as much of everything as I could see and hear and watch. In the Twin Cities in the '80s, you could catch Ella Fitzgerald one night and The Replacements the next. You could marvel at some of the riskiest, most experimental regional theater in American history, right there on stage at the Guthrie Theater, under the artistic directorship of Liviu Ciulei and Garland Wright.
You could have your atoms rearranged by Abel Gance's silent epic 'Napoleon' at the Walker Art Center. All in the name of work, and learning, and joy.
My Tribune gigs — four years on theater, 20 on movies — were the best, toughest, most rewarding years of my professional life. Getting to know Roger and Chaz Ebert led to me filling in for Roger, when he took ill, and then co-hosting 'At the Movies' opposite Richard Roeper and then A.O. Scott. (The white man parade never really ended.)
I met Robert Osborne of Turner Classic Movies when he came to town with Jane Powell for a screening of 'Seven Brides for Seven Brothers,' and then a while later, there I was, somehow, introducing a hundred or so films on TCM. I used to say it as a joke, though now it's truer than I realized: TCM may be the one entity in American culture holding this damn country together.
From here, I'll continue to show up on the long-running 'Filmspotting' podcast, broadcast on WBEZ-FM, whenever the hosts Adam Kempenaar and Josh Larsen see fit. Over on Classical WFMT, I'll continue my weekly segments for the film music program 'Soundtrack,' which I adore. Next month I plan to begin my 11th year as advisor and mentor of the University of Illinois College of Media Roger Ebert Fellowship, which is the grad school I never knew but now I know. It has the added benefit of keeping Roger's spirit in my heart and in my work as an editor and a colleague.
If my luck holds out, the unknown unknowns ahead include new colleagues I value as much as I do my fellow Tribune screens chronicler Nina Metz and my editor Doug George. They care, and they're pros, at a time when devaluing expertise is national political policy.
It is of course bittersweet, at least for me, to see the two remaining Chicago daily newspaper film critic positions go away like . Yet Chicago's film exhibition, curation, production and non-daily coverage, of every sort, remains a beacon for much of the rest of the country. And more importantly, for Chicago.
So. Goodbye for now, as the Sondheim song from the film 'Reds' put it. Thank you for reading. Keep seeking out the critical voices that make your own perceptions a little sharper, your interest in something you've seen — and something you may see tomorrow night — a little keener. For now, I'll enjoy this peculiar new feeling, captured best by another song lyric, this one from Irving Berlin's 'No Strings':
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple TV+ is raising its subscription price by 30%
Apple TV+ is raising its subscription price by 30%

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple TV+ is raising its subscription price by 30%

Apple TV+, home of series including "The Studio" and "Ted Lasso," is raising its subscription price by $3 to $12.99 a month, it announced Thursday. The move comes as many streamers have been raising their prices, as the cost of production increases and the businesses are facing more pressure by investors to increase profits. Apple TV+ launched in 2019 at $4.99 a month, positioned as a low-cost perk for people to watch high-quality shows and movies with a free trial if they bought Apple products such as iPhones and iPads. Since then, the streamer has raised its prices, mostly recently in October 2023 from $6.99 to $9.99. Read more: Apple has made splashy bets in Hollywood. Are they paying off? Like other tech giants, Apple has faced scrutiny from the Trump administration on its U.S. manufacturing presence. Earlier this year, when the Trump administration proposed increasing tariffs, some analysts were concerned about the adverse effect that would have on Apple's iPhone business, which makes iPhones in China. Since then, Apple has increased its commitment to manufacturing in the U.S., most recently pledging an additional $100 billion in U.S. manufacturing. If Apple continues to face pressure on major businesses including the iPhone, it could cause the company to look at other aspects of its business that aren't drawing as much revenue, analysts have said. In March, tech and business news site the Information reported that Apple TV+ is losing significant amounts of money. Analysts have long viewed Apple TV+ as part of the company's larger push into services to go along with its hardware. While Apple TV+ is increasing its monthly subscription price, it is not raising its $99.99 annual price or the cost of bundling Apple TV+ with other services through Apple One, the company said in a statement. Apple declined to say how many subscribers Apple TV+ has or the reasons behind the monthly subscription price increase. The streaming service is part of Apple's larger services category, which brought in $27.4 billion in revenue in its fiscal third quarter, up 13% from a year earlier. Read more: Apple commits another $100 billion for U.S. manufacturing amid Trump tariffs Unlike other major streaming platforms, Apple TV+ does not offer an ad-supported version of its service. Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Ralph Barbosa talks about helping families affected by ICE raids
Ralph Barbosa talks about helping families affected by ICE raids

Los Angeles Times

time4 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Ralph Barbosa talks about helping families affected by ICE raids

Comedian Ralph Barbosa sits down with the Los Angeles Times' Nate Jackson to talk about his newest stand-up special, 'Planet Bosa' and how he is using comedy, and his voice, to help the early days of ICE activity in Los Angeles, Barbosa reached out to fans over social media and said he'd help those affected. Here, he talks about why he did that and what it meant to him to help how he could.

Jessie J says breast cancer ‘robbed' her of memories with 2-year-old son
Jessie J says breast cancer ‘robbed' her of memories with 2-year-old son

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Jessie J says breast cancer ‘robbed' her of memories with 2-year-old son

Jessie J is opening up about how her breast cancer diagnosis is affecting her role as a mom. During the Aug. 20 episode of the 'Great Company' podcast with host Jamie Laing, the 37-year-old singer shared that she doesn't feel like she can be the mom she hoped to be because of her diagnosis. 'Yesterday I sobbed, because I miss my boy,' Jessie J said of her 2-year-old rainbow baby. The British singer welcomed her son Sky with boyfriend and pro basketball player Chanan Safir Colman in 2023 after suffering a miscarriage in late 2021, according to the Los Angeles Times. 'I can't be a mom like I want to be a mom and I feel robbed,' she told Laing of her breast cancer. 'The worst part is… I feel like cancer has robbed me of memories with my boy,' she continued. 'And anyone with a toddler knows that they change so much in that space of time. You blink and he's chatting.' Jessie J's breast cancer diagnosis was first revealed to fans in a June 3 Instagram post. In the clip, she shared that she first learned of the diagnosis prior to dropping her 'No Regrets' single in late April. 'Cancer sucks in any form, but I'm holding onto the word 'early,'' Jessie J said on Instagram, adding that she's been 'in and out of tests' for the past few weeks and will be undergoing surgery soon. The singer had previously announced the diagnosis in a May interview with Laing, but that episode wasn't released as Jessie J needed more time to process it, per the video's description. In the now-released episode, Jessie J said she's finally ready to talk about her breast cancer, which she was diagnosed with on March 31. During the interview, Jessie J opened up about how she naturally uses humor to help cope with her breast cancer diagnosis. She later revealed that she was originally told that the lump she found in her breast was likely a cyst and was convinced that it 'wasn't going to be anything' serious. Not long after, doctors told her that the lump contained about 4 to 5 centimeters of cancer. 'I just burst into tears,' she said of the diagnosis. 'They tell you the result and then they're like, 'We'll be in touch.' That's when you're just like, 'Right, what happens next?'' When she revealed the news to Laing in May, she felt a sigh of relief but later realized she hadn't truly experienced the full scope of the diagnosis yet and wanted to wait before talking about it publicly. At that point, she didn't know exactly how serious the diagnosis was. 'When I had spoken about it with you,' she said of the May talk. 'I had cried and had been scared and I was like, 'I'm going to die.'' She reiterated: 'There was moments where I was like, this is going to go left and I'm going to die. And I had those moments.' Jessie J underwent a mastectomy in June and took to her Instagram Stories on July 1 with an update. 'I'm good,' she wrote, according to People. 'Missing being an active Mum/human the most. But it's been nice to slow down and Sky is having a blast with Nanny and Grandad.' While talking to Laing, she described her son as the 'most hilarious, magical boy.' 'It's like watching your heart walk around,' she said of motherhood. 'And it's an opportunity to reflect on your own self.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store