Russia spends nearly $220 million to rig Moldova's election, EU referendum in 2024, Chisinau says
Recean's statement comes after the U.K. imposed sanctions on the pro-Russian NGO "Eurasia," which is allegedly responsible for attempts to rig the referendum in Moldova and destabilize the country's democracy.
According to Moldovan law enforcement agencies, fugitive pro-Russian oligarch Ilan Shor and his associates led the efforts to bribe voters. The U.K. Foreign Ministry said the "Eurasia" network was under Shor's control.
"The Kremlin's agents launched a mass vote-buying campaign, spending about 200 million euros — almost 1% of Moldova's GDP — to destabilize our country," Recean said.
Voters were almost evenly divided on Oct. 21 on a referendum to enshrine the country's path to European Union accession in the Moldovan Constitution. Pro-EU voters won by a razor-thin margin, securing 50.35% of the vote against 49.65%.
In the presidential election, incumbent pro-EU President Maia Sandu won against former prosecutor Alexandr Stoianoglo on Nov. 3 by a margin of about 55.3% to 44.7% despite what she called an "unprecedented" election interference backed by Moscow.
Moldovan authorities, independent observers, and officials from the EU and the U.S. pointed to a malign influence campaign involving criminal networks and political groups tied to Russia. Moldovan lawmakers claimed that Moscow spent millions of dollars backing Stoianoglo.
Sandu has long insisted that the real opponent to her government and Moldova's European path is the Kremlin, which has been waging a hybrid war designed to push Chisinau back into Moscow's orbit in what Sandu described "a fraud of unprecedented proportions."
Read also: Putin issued a decree. Now, millions of Ukrainians face an impossible decision
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Israeli stats show civilian death rate in Gaza war is 83%, report claims — as government denies data
Classified intelligence from the Israeli military suggests that 83% of the total deaths in Gaza have been civilians, according to a new report — which the IDF has slammed as 'incorrect.' An analysis of the IDF's own records revealed that of the nearly 53,000 people killed in Gaza as by May, 19, 2025, some 8,900 represented named fighters from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as dead or 'probably dead,' according to an investigation from The Guardian, the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call. The IDF, however, said that the figures analyzed by the outlets do not accurately reflect the realities of the war and 'reflect a fundamental lack of military understanding.' 5 The Israeli military's own reflects the start reality that civilians make up the majority of the dead in the Gaza Strip, according to The Guardian. REUTERS Advertisement 5 A man runs with a child in his arms following an Israeli airstrike in Deir al-Balah on Thursday. via REUTERS The IDF's database names a total of 47,653 Palestinians considered active in the military wings of Hamas and the PIJ, as per the records Israel has been able to seize in Gaza. While less than 20% of those fighters had been confirmed killed by the IDF after the first 18 months of war, intelligence sources claimed the real number of dead terrorists is much higher — as the database did not include those who were killed but not identified by name. Advertisement It also excludes Palestinians fighters who were not affiliated with the two groups, and Hamas members who were not serving in the military wing when they were killed. The IDF's last public statement on the death toll, released on Wednesday, puts the total number of terror operatives killed at 22,000. 5 The Israeli military has previously acknowledged that its attacks have killed about two civilians per every terror operative slain. REUTERS 5 Experts believe the total civilian death toll has been undercounted, with thousands more believed to be dead beneath the rubble of Gaza. REUTERS Advertisement Meanwhile, the death toll in Gaza has surpassed 62,000, according to the Hamas-run health ministry, which does not differentiate between civilians and terrorists. While the IDF has repeatedly acknowledged that the combatant-to-civilian deaths ratio in Gaza have remained the same throughout the war — with two civilians killed for every dead terrorist — the military refuted the more alarming figures released Thursday. 'The figures presented in the article are incorrect and do not reflect the data available in the IDF's systems,' the military said in a statement. 5 Israel has faced backlash over the civilian death and ongoing humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'Throughout the war, continuous intelligence assessments are conducted regarding the number of terrorists eliminated in the Gaza Strip, based on BDA (bomb damage assessment) methodologies and cross-checking efforts from various sources. One of the sources of information cross-referenced is documents originating from terrorist organizations in the Strip,' the IDF added. 'The IDF is a professional military that operates according to operational methods accepted by many armies worldwide — the claims presented in the article are not only false but also reflect a fundamental lack of military understanding,' the Israeli military concluded. The IDF, however, did not specify what numbers it disputed or directly address questions about the military database. Whether it's The Guardian's 83% or the IDF's 66%, the war in Gaza marks one of the bloodiest conflicts in modern times in terms of the civilian death rate. The growing death toll in Gaza has brought international backlash against Israel over the war, which is approaching its third year as the IDF plans to escalate the fighting by invading Gaza City. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has maintained that the war will continue until Hamas is eradicated and the remaining 50 hostages are freed.
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal
Republican strategist Karl Rove on Thursday underscored the stakes of the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, saying failure to come to a resolution could be the downfall of President Trump's presidency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove outlined the three possible outcomes from Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine: a successful peace deal; a failure to reach a deal, resulting in continued conflict; and a Russian victory over Ukraine. Rove compared the third possibility — which Rove said would result from either no agreement or from an agreement that Russia breaks — to the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, when President Biden's poll numbers tanked and never recovered. 'In addition to being the worst possible outcome morally and geopolitically, this third possibility is the worst scenario for the president and the GOP,' Rove wrote in the op-ed. 'The disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent Taliban takeover broke President Biden's reputation with voters. He never recovered. Mr. Biden was at 50% approval in Gallup in July 2021; he dropped precipitously after Kabul fell the following month. He bottomed out at 36% in July 2024 before he withdrew from the presidential race,' Rove continued. 'The defeat of Ukraine by Russia would be similarly disastrous for Mr. Trump,' he added. Rove noted that Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. Since then, Rove said, Trump has 'put himself at center stage' with his approach to dealmaking and his engagements with foreign leaders. 'The president can't abandon his starring role even if he wants to,' Rove said. 'Public opinion in America and the rest of the civilized world would rightly blame Mr. Putin for the invasion itself—but Mr. Trump for allowing it to succeed.' Rove said that the first outcome—a successful deal—is within reach for the U.S. president, and he touted Trump's steps so far in defense of Ukraine. He also said Trump's pressure on NATO countries to spend more on defense 'is paying off.' Rove urged Trump to become 'as tough on Mr. Putin as he has been on' Zelensky, saying that approach could get the warring countries 'to arrive at a deal that results in a durable peace.' 'Mr. Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Mr. Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator's flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal with Mr. Zelensky. Or else,' Rove said. 'Anything less would be a stain on Mr. Trump and on his party, for which they'd rightly pay a high political price,' he continued.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Will Putin ‘wriggle out' of Zelensky meeting?
'Now, the signals coming from Russia are simply outrageous,' Zelensky wrote on X. 'They are trying to wriggle out of holding a meeting. They don't want to end this war. They continue their massive attacks on Ukraine and their ferocious assaults along the frontline.' The remarks came after Russia on Thursday launched a massive attack on Ukraine that struck an American-owned electronics factory. Officials said the barrage included more than 600 drones and missiles across the country, in what Zelensky called an 'anti-record.' Trump posted a cryptic message later in the day, raising the prospect of Ukrainian attacks into Russia and predicting 'interesting times ahead.' The U.S. president on Monday indicated that Russian President Vladimir Putin was open to a meeting with Zelensky, but Russia has since sought to slow-walk the process. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking to reporters Thursday, said Putin was 'ready' for a meeting with Zelensky, but only if unspecific conditions were met. Lavrov also questioned Zelensky's 'legitimacy' in such talks and railed against NATO discussions about post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. 'All the different [ideas], all the unilateral [moves] are an absolutely hopeless venture,' Lavrov said, according to Reuters. 'As the current discussions between the West and the Ukrainian side are essentially linked to providing guarantees in the form of the foreign military intervention of a certain part of the Ukrainian territory.' Russian officials said earlier this week that any top-level talks between Putin and Zelensky would require layers of lower-level preparations. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed that Putin had agreed to NATO-like protections for Ukraine during previous talks. However, Lavrov and other Russian officials have made no such indication in public remarks this week. Trump dropped his demands for a ceasefire in Ukraine after a meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, insisting the two sides were making progress toward a peace deal and suggesting Putin and Zelensky could meet within days. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday said the president had canceled his August vacation to his Bedminster resort to work on talks to end the war. 'He's a man on a mission. He wants to move. Get things done quickly,' Leavitt said. 'He wants to strike when the iron is hot.'
