India braces for hit to $64 billion US exports amid rising tensions with Washington
India estimates about 80% of its goods exported to U.S. take a hit
*
Says India to lose competitive edge to likes of China
*
Key exports to U.S. to become 10% costlier
*
India's NSA visit to Russia to discuss oil, weapon issues
By Nikunj Ohri, Sarita Chaganti Singh and Shivam Patel
NEW DELHI, - India expects to lose a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods exported to the U.S. due to President Donald Trump's 25% tariff and an assumed 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, four sources told Reuters citing an internal assessment report by the government.
India faces its most serious diplomatic crisis with the United States in years after Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, even before any penalty.
A relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is seen limiting the direct impact on growth to 40 basis points. The Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5% and held rates steady on Wednesday despite the uncertainty created by tariff hikes.
The trade impact estimates were prepared by the Indian government after Trump announced the unexpectedly high tariff for Indian goods, along with the unspecified penalty. The Indian government in its assessment report has assumed a 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, taking the tariff to 35%, the four Indian government sources told Reuters.
They declined to be identified because they were not authorised to speak to media.
India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump said on Wednesday his administration will decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil post the outcome of U.S. efforts to seek a last minute breakthrough in the Ukraine war. U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline set by Trump for Russia to agree to peace or face new sanctions.
The impact of the tariff and possible penalty will be on nearly $64 billion worth of India's exports to U.S that account for about 80% of total exports to the country, and it will lead to 'potential export losses' due to price disadvantages, the four sources said.
The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariff by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said.
India exported goods estimated at around $81 billion in 2024 to the U.S., including garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery, and petrochemicals, according to government data. The South Asian nation's goods exports to U.S. constituted 2% of GDP in 2024.
Its total goods exports globally were at $443 billion in 2024.
The proposed tariffs on India's high-value exports face "erosion of price competitiveness encountering intensified rivalry from countries subject to lower duties," two sources said citing the internal assessment.
RUSSIA IN FOCUS
India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to a government source.
His visit will be followed by Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come, amid India's attempts to placate Washington's concerns while balancing historical ties with Moscow.
Doval is expected to discuss India's defence collaboration with Russia, including getting faster access to the pending units of S400 air defence system and President Vladimir Putin's visit to India.
India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Acer Inaugurates New Laptop Manufacturing Unit in Puducherry
Acer, the Taiwanese electronics major on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) increased Acer laptop manufacturing with the partnership with Plumage Solutions for manufacturing of IT hardware at a newly set up facility in Puducherry. The computer monitors, All in One (AIO) desktops, servers, workstations and power adapters are all going to be produced at the new plant. Acer's localisation move is intended to increase local production, reduce import dependence, and to meet the growing demand from urban and emerging markets the company further said. 'Facility in Puducherry will help increase supply chain efficiencies and enable faster deliveries, with competitive price points,' Plans are afoot to invest ₹50 crore in the next three to four years to augment Acer's manufacturing capabilities and widen the production portfolio in India, said a statement by The Plumage Group. Harish Kohli, President and Managing Director, Acer India, 'Teaming up with Plumage is a critical step towards bringing in international best practices, superior technology, and world-class manufacturing standards to local manufacturing. This partnership will allow us to create a robust and flexible supply chain, to serve the Indian market faster, and more efficiently.' ' We're pleased to mate with Acer in this new phase of India's manufacturing trip. This cooperation is further than a marketable arrangement it's a combined commitment to erecting a sustainable and encyclopedically competitive manufacturing ecosystem. By combining Acer's product moxie with our engineering & manufacturing capabilities, we aim to set new marks for quality, effectiveness, and invention in the assiduity, ' said Mukesh Gupta, Managing Director, Plumage Group. Opining on the collaboration Mukesh Gupta, Managing Director, The Plumage Group said, ' We're thrilled to join hands with Acer at this significant point in India's manufacturing trip. This cooperation is n't just a business adventure, it's a testament to our participated commitment towards erecting a sustainable, world- class manufacturing ecosystem. By combining Acer's product perceptivity with our engineering and product moxie, we aim to set new marks in quality, effectiveness and invention. '
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
RBI allows transition to continuous clearing of cheques
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has decided on the transition of the Cheque Truncation System (CTS) from the current approach of batch processing to continuous clearing with settlement on realisation in two phases. Phase 1 will be implemented on October 4, 2025 and Phase 2 on January 3, 2026, the banking sector regulator said. All banks have been advised to make their customers adequately aware of the changes in the cheque clearing process. Banks have also been advised to be in readiness to participate in continuous clearing in CTS on the above dates. There will be a single presentation session from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM and cheques received by the branches will be scanned and sent to the clearing house by the banks immediately and continuously during the presentation session. The clearing house will in turn release the cheque images to drawee banks on a continuous basis. The confirmation session will start at 10:00 AM and close at 7:00 PM and for every cheque presented, the drawee bank will generate either positive confirmation (for honoured cheques) or negative confirmation (for dishonoured cheques).
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
When US bought Alaska for $7.2 million and why Trump and Putin's meeting revives the story
When Donald Trump said on Monday that he would meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin 'in Russia' this Friday, it sounded like another of the US President's verbal slips. But 158 years ago, he would have been right. Alaska, with its onion-domed churches, fur trade legacy and once Russian-named capital Novo-Arkhangelsk, was part of the Tsar's empire until 1867, when it was sold to the United States for just $7.2 million. The deal was mocked by Washington and mourned in St Petersburg, only to become one of history's most spectacular bargains. As Putin prepares to land in Alaska this week, traces of Russia's past are still visible. From the wild, rugged shores of Baranof Island to Anchorage's Orthodox churches, the legacy endures. In Sitka, the green dome of St Michael's Cathedral rises against a backdrop of glaciers, still standing on the same spot where it was built more than 150 years ago. Russia's presence in Alaska began with fur traders, not armies. In the mid-18th century, merchants and adventurers pushed east across Siberia in search of lucrative sea otter pelts. By the 1780s, Catherine the Great had authorised the creation of the Russian-American Company, granting it a monopoly over trade and governance in the territory. Alexander Baranov, a merchant, tightened Russia's grip in the late 18th century, expanding settlements and crushing native resistance, most famously from the Tlingit, who called him 'No Heart.' Russian Orthodox priests soon followed, building missions and churches. By the mid-19th century, the Russian empire saw Alaska as more liability than prize. The Crimean war had weakened the empire financially, and the growing reach of Britain's navy in the Pacific heightened fears that Alaska could be seized in a future conflict. As per a report by The Guardian, in July 1867, Eduard de Stoeckl, Russia's envoy in Washington and chief negotiator of the sale, confided to a friend: 'My treaty has met with strong opposition … but this stems from the fact that no one at home has any idea of the true condition of our colonies. It was simply a matter of selling them, or watching them being taken from.' The sale was intended as a diplomatic win for both sides. Russia gained much-needed cash and a potential ally across the Atlantic while avoiding a clash with Britain. The US acquired new territory that would push back European influence and extend its reach into the Pacific. At the time, neither country celebrated the deal as a triumph. In St Petersburg, many believed the price was insultingly low. As per a report by The Guardian, the liberal newspaper Golos condemned it as 'deeply angering all true Russians' and asked, 'Is the nation's sense of pride truly so unworthy of attention that it can be sacrificed for a mere six or seven million dollar[s]?' In the US, Secretary of State William H Seward, who negotiated the treaty, was ridiculed for spending what critics considered a fortune on an icy wilderness. The New-York Daily Tribune as per The Guardian, dismissed Alaska as 'the nominal possession of impassable deserts of snow' and wrote, 'We may make a treaty with Russia … but we cannot make a treaty with the North Wind or the Snow King.' Some suspected Russia had sold land of little value. 'Russia has sold us a sucked orange. Whatever may be the value of that territory and its outlying islands to us, it has ceased to be of any to Russia,' the New York World wrote on 1 April 1867. Within decades, those doubts vanished. Gold rushes in the late 19th century and the discovery of vast oilfields in the 20th century turned Alaska into one of America's most resource-rich territories. What critics once called Seward's folly became a symbol of strategic foresight. Yet the sale price remained a sore point in Russian memory. In 1974, during American protests over the low price the USSR paid for wheat, Soviet trade official Vladimir Alkimov drily noted that Alaska had been sold for only $7 million. In 1867, the deal briefly opened a period of warmth between Russia and the United States. The New York Herald wrote that 'the cession of Russian Alaska becomes a matter of great importance. It indicates the extent to which Russia is ready to carry out her entente cordiale with the United States.' That goodwill reached its peak in 1871 when Grand Duke Alexei Alexandrovich visited New York with a naval squadron, receiving parades, receptions and civic honours. When Trump and Putin meet in Alaska this week, the historical parallels will be hard to ignore. For Ukraine, the hope is that any renewed warmth between Washington and Moscow will not come at the expense of another nation's territory, and that the days of trading land like currency in great power deals remain firmly in the past. (With inputs from The Guardian)
