Book Review: 'April 1861' captures drama that occurred before Civil War's first shots
In '1861: The Lost Peace,' Winik covers the lead-up to the first shots being fired at Fort Sumter. The political intrigue leading up to 1861 rivals the battlefield action readers come to expect from many Civil War histories.
The overarching story is a familiar but important one for students of history: how a lowly Illinois congressman rose to power to lead a nation through its great divide over slavery and saved the American Experiment.
Winik chronicles Abraham Lincoln's evolution as a politician and as someone who 'was careful never to step too far ahead of prevailing opinion.'
But '1861' is one of the few Civil War histories where Lincoln isn't the most compelling figure. That title goes to a cast of characters, familiar ones such as abolitionist John Brown and lesser known figures such as Kentucky Sen. John J. Crittenden.
The book also portrays the waiting game that Major Robert Anderson faced as he commanded Fort Sumter and faced uncertainty as Lincoln took office.
Winik has a taut yet dramatic writing style that makes the book a compelling read even for those well-versed on the history leading up to the Civil War's outbreak.
Winik writes that the 'ultimate fate of nations is often measured and swayed not by large events, but by tiny ones,' and '1861' illustrates that point throughout its pages.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on ‘how bad slavery was'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's the epitome of dumbness to criticize the Smithsonian for dealing with the reality of slavery in America,' said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian. 'It's what led to our Civil War and is a defining aspect of our national history. And the Smithsonian deals in a robust way with what slavery was, but it also deals with human rights and civil rights in equal abundance.' Advertisement Since taking office, Trump has led an effort to purge diversity, equity and inclusion policies from the federal government and threatened to investigate companies and schools that adopt such policies. He has tried to reframe the country's past involving racism and discrimination by de-emphasizing that history, preferring to instead spotlight a sanitized, rosy depiction of America. Advertisement The administration has worked to scrub or minimize government references to the contributions of Black heroes, from the Tuskegee Airmen, who fought in World War II, to Harriet Tubman, who guided enslaved people along the Underground Railroad. Trump commemorated Juneteenth, the celebration of the end of slavery in the United States that became a federal holiday in 2021, by complaining that there were too many non-working holidays in America. He has called for the return of Confederate insignia and statues honoring those who fought to preserve slavery. And he has previously attacked the exhibits on race at the Smithsonian, which has traditionally operated as an independent institution that regards itself as outside the purview of the executive branch, as 'divisive, race-centered ideology.' Trump's comments also ignore the breadth of the displays in Smithsonian museums. While the National Museum of African American History and Culture, for example, does include exhibits on the Middle Passage and slavery, it also showcases civil rights and cultural icons in Black history. The director of that museum, Kevin Young, stepped down this spring as Trump increasingly targeted the Smithsonian and its museum intended to tell the African American story for all Americans. Trump has often stoked divisions in the United States by tapping into white grievance and framing himself as a protector of white people both in the United States and overseas. Quentin James, a co-founder of the Collective, which aims to elect Black officials in America, said Trump's comments about the museums were an attempt to protect 'white fragility.' Advertisement 'For all of us, it's an assault on our history and an assault on what we know to be true,' James said, while for Trump it is about 'white grievance and him exerting his authority.' The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Trump added in the social media post that he had instructed his lawyers 'to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities.' His administration has pursued an effort to investigate universities that have adopted diversity, equity and inclusion programs, leading to court fights, funding battles and, in many cases, the removal of diversity initiatives. This article originally appeared in .
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
WAGOP chair compares Ferguson's rhetoric on immigration stance to Confederate leaders
Washington Republican leaders sharply criticized Governor Bob Ferguson's response to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's August 13 letter, which demanded the state end what Bondi called 'sanctuary state' policies that obstruct federal immigration law. WAGOP Chairman and State Rep. Jim Walsh issued a statement Tuesday saying Ferguson's position risks public safety and undermines federal authority. 'The current governor's response to Attorney General Pam Bondi's letter of August 13 demanding that he end his unlawful 'sanctuary state' policies is disappointing but entirely predictable,' Walsh said. 'Bob Ferguson puts essential functions of state government at risk in order to perpetuate a foolish political fight with the federal government.' Walsh criticized Ferguson's emphasis on 'values' in defending the Keep Washington Working Act, the 2019 state law limiting local law enforcement's cooperation with federal immigration agencies. He said Ferguson's rhetoric echoes Confederate leaders who resisted federal authority during the Civil War. 'These justifications didn't end well for Davis and Stephens then; they aren't likely to end well for Ferguson now,' Walsh said. Republicans argue that the state's restrictions prevent federal immigration officers from targeting dangerous individuals in prisons and jails. 'If Ferguson is really interested in 'keeping Washingtonians safe,' he would cooperate with the Feds and give them access to our jails and prisons—where they can focus on locating and deporting gang members, drug dealers, sex traffickers and other hardened illegal alien criminals,' Walsh said. The statement also accused Ferguson and other Democratic officials of ignoring the impact of illegal immigration on sex trafficking in the state. 'The dirty secret of Bob Ferguson's 'sanctuary state' policies is that they have enabled the steady growth of sex trafficking in Washington,' Walsh said, alleging that traffickers use Interstate 5 to move children into sex slavery. Walsh urged Ferguson to 'rise above his petty partisan politics' and work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies. 'That cooperation will actually make our communities safer,' he said. The Republican statement came hours after Ferguson, joined by Democratic lawmakers and immigrant rights groups, rejected Bondi's threat of criminal prosecution. Ferguson has maintained that Washington will not redirect local law enforcement resources away from community safety to carry out federal immigration enforcement. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mail-in voting is nothing new, just ask Civil War soldiers
'We cannot have free government without elections,' President Abraham Lincoln reflected outside the White House on Nov. 10, 1864. 'And if the rebellion could force us to forego or postpone a national election it might fairly claim to have already conquered and ruined us.' By the fall of 1864, the United States had been engulfed in a civil war for nearly 44 months, with 'the bones of thousands of Northern boys [lying] in Southern graves or decayed unburied in the thickets and swamps of Dixie,' writes historian Gerald Swick. For Lincoln — and for the Union — the outcome of the 1864 presidential election hung in the balance. If voters rejected Lincoln, the war to save the Union would almost certainly be lost. According to Swick, Peace Democrats, Lincoln's chief political opposition, wanted an end to hostilities immediately, under almost any circumstances. With so many men out on the field of battle, the incumbent president feared that many Union soldiers would not be able to cast their vote — and in his favor. For Lincoln, the election was to be won by bullets and ballots, with a string of Union victories that fall — David Farragut damning the torpedoes at Mobile Bay and William T. Sherman conquering the Southern city of Atlanta — helping to quell the Democrats' calls for an early peace By November 1864, as men physically lined up in the North to vote for Lincoln or the former Union general, George B. McClellan, a novel way to accommodate a soldier's right to vote was sweeping the battlefield. There was some precedent for absentee voting. During the War of 1812, Pennsylvania and then New Jersey changed their legislation to allow for mail-in voting for their soldiers at war. On Oct. 1, 1864, Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton published General Orders No. 265 outlining the procedures for Army voting. The order's purpose was to 'secure a fair distribution' of election material and prevent fraud and intimidation at the front and further invited 'civilian inspectors of each political party' to visit the various brigade headquarters throughout the Army 'to see that the elections are fairly conducted.' During the war, 19 Union states changed their laws to allow their soldiers to vote absentee. Other states permitted soldiers to vote by proxy, while others created polling sites in camps and hospitals under on-site inspection by appointed clerks or state officials. (In many states, however, the laws only referred to organizations within the Army: companies, regiments and brigades. Thus, many new voting laws did not apply to members of the Navy, according to the National Park Service.) Each state devised its own methods for absentee voting procedures, with Connecticut, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia mailing proxy votes, ballots or tally sheets. Pennsylvania officials prepared mailing materials for conveying the votes gathered at the front, while Ohio produced envelopes for both the state and national elections, according to the National Postal Museum. Ohioan qualified military absentee voters cast 12% of all the military ballots, with a majority voting for the reelection of Lincoln. By the end of Election Day on Nov. 8, 1864, of the 40,247 Union soldiers who voted, 30,503 voted for Lincoln, approximately 75.8% of the Union citizen-soldiers, according to the American Battlefield Trust. Lincoln carried all but three states (Kentucky, Delaware and New Jersey) with a 90% margin in the Electoral College, 212–21. Since then, states have offered, to varying degrees, the option of absentee voting. During the Second World War, the Soldier Voting Act of 1942 permitted 3.2 million absentee ballots to be cast during the conflict. The act was amended in 1944 and expired at war's end. Presently, the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act allows for roughly three-quarters of the 1.3 million active-duty troops to be eligible to vote absentee, according to the Federal Voting Assistance Program.
