logo
WAGOP chair compares Ferguson's rhetoric on immigration stance to Confederate leaders

WAGOP chair compares Ferguson's rhetoric on immigration stance to Confederate leaders

Yahoo3 hours ago
Washington Republican leaders sharply criticized Governor Bob Ferguson's response to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's August 13 letter, which demanded the state end what Bondi called 'sanctuary state' policies that obstruct federal immigration law.
WAGOP Chairman and State Rep. Jim Walsh issued a statement Tuesday saying Ferguson's position risks public safety and undermines federal authority.
'The current governor's response to Attorney General Pam Bondi's letter of August 13 demanding that he end his unlawful 'sanctuary state' policies is disappointing but entirely predictable,' Walsh said. 'Bob Ferguson puts essential functions of state government at risk in order to perpetuate a foolish political fight with the federal government.'
Walsh criticized Ferguson's emphasis on 'values' in defending the Keep Washington Working Act, the 2019 state law limiting local law enforcement's cooperation with federal immigration agencies.
He said Ferguson's rhetoric echoes Confederate leaders who resisted federal authority during the Civil War.
'These justifications didn't end well for Davis and Stephens then; they aren't likely to end well for Ferguson now,' Walsh said.
Republicans argue that the state's restrictions prevent federal immigration officers from targeting dangerous individuals in prisons and jails.
'If Ferguson is really interested in 'keeping Washingtonians safe,' he would cooperate with the Feds and give them access to our jails and prisons—where they can focus on locating and deporting gang members, drug dealers, sex traffickers and other hardened illegal alien criminals,' Walsh said.
The statement also accused Ferguson and other Democratic officials of ignoring the impact of illegal immigration on sex trafficking in the state.
'The dirty secret of Bob Ferguson's 'sanctuary state' policies is that they have enabled the steady growth of sex trafficking in Washington,' Walsh said, alleging that traffickers use Interstate 5 to move children into sex slavery.
Walsh urged Ferguson to 'rise above his petty partisan politics' and work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agencies.
'That cooperation will actually make our communities safer,' he said.
The Republican statement came hours after Ferguson, joined by Democratic lawmakers and immigrant rights groups, rejected Bondi's threat of criminal prosecution.
Ferguson has maintained that Washington will not redirect local law enforcement resources away from community safety to carry out federal immigration enforcement.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on ‘how bad slavery was'
Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on ‘how bad slavery was'

Boston Globe

time7 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on ‘how bad slavery was'

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's the epitome of dumbness to criticize the Smithsonian for dealing with the reality of slavery in America,' said Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian. 'It's what led to our Civil War and is a defining aspect of our national history. And the Smithsonian deals in a robust way with what slavery was, but it also deals with human rights and civil rights in equal abundance.' Advertisement Since taking office, Trump has led an effort to purge diversity, equity and inclusion policies from the federal government and threatened to investigate companies and schools that adopt such policies. He has tried to reframe the country's past involving racism and discrimination by de-emphasizing that history, preferring to instead spotlight a sanitized, rosy depiction of America. Advertisement The administration has worked to scrub or minimize government references to the contributions of Black heroes, from the Tuskegee Airmen, who fought in World War II, to Harriet Tubman, who guided enslaved people along the Underground Railroad. Trump commemorated Juneteenth, the celebration of the end of slavery in the United States that became a federal holiday in 2021, by complaining that there were too many non-working holidays in America. He has called for the return of Confederate insignia and statues honoring those who fought to preserve slavery. And he has previously attacked the exhibits on race at the Smithsonian, which has traditionally operated as an independent institution that regards itself as outside the purview of the executive branch, as 'divisive, race-centered ideology.' Trump's comments also ignore the breadth of the displays in Smithsonian museums. While the National Museum of African American History and Culture, for example, does include exhibits on the Middle Passage and slavery, it also showcases civil rights and cultural icons in Black history. The director of that museum, Kevin Young, stepped down this spring as Trump increasingly targeted the Smithsonian and its museum intended to tell the African American story for all Americans. Trump has often stoked divisions in the United States by tapping into white grievance and framing himself as a protector of white people both in the United States and overseas. Quentin James, a co-founder of the Collective, which aims to elect Black officials in America, said Trump's comments about the museums were an attempt to protect 'white fragility.' Advertisement 'For all of us, it's an assault on our history and an assault on what we know to be true,' James said, while for Trump it is about 'white grievance and him exerting his authority.' The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Trump added in the social media post that he had instructed his lawyers 'to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities.' His administration has pursued an effort to investigate universities that have adopted diversity, equity and inclusion programs, leading to court fights, funding battles and, in many cases, the removal of diversity initiatives. This article originally appeared in .

Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center
Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center

Los Angeles Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Judge dismisses part of lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center

MIAMI — A federal judge in Miami dismissed part of a lawsuit that claimed detainees were denied access to the legal system at the immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' and moved the remaining counts of the case to another court. Claims that the detainees were denied hearings in immigration court were rendered moot when the Trump administration last weekend designated the Krome North Processing Center near Miami as a site for their cases to be heard, U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz said in a 47-page ruling Monday night dismissing a 5th Amendment count. The judge granted the state defendants a change of venue motion to the Middle District of Florida, where the remaining claims of 1st Amendment violations will be addressed. Those include allegations of delays in scheduling meetings between detainees and their attorneys and an inability for the detainees to talk privately with their attorneys by phone or videoconference at the facility whose official name is the South Detention Facility. ACLU lawyer Eunice Cho, the lead attorney for the detainees, said the federal government reversed course only last weekend and allowed the detainees to petition an immigration court because of the lawsuit. 'It should not take a lawsuit to force the government to abide by the law and the Constitution,' Cho said. 'We look forward to continuing the fight.' The judge heard arguments from both sides in a hearing earlier Monday in Miami. Civil rights attorneys were seeking a preliminary injunction to ensure detainees at the facility had access to their lawyers and could get a hearing. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration raced to build the facility on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland two months ago in order to aid President Trump's efforts to deport people who are in the U.S. illegally. The governor has said the location in the rugged and remote Everglades was meant as a deterrent against escape, much like the island prison in California that Republicans named it after. The detention center has an estimated annual cost of $450 million. The state and federal government had argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility is located is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's Southern District was the wrong venue since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's Middle District. Judge Ruiz had hinted during a hearing last week that he had some concerns over which jurisdiction was appropriate. Attorneys for the detainees had argued that Ruiz's court was appropriate since the detainees were under the oversight of federal officials in the Miami regional office. Any transfer to another venue would cause a delay in a court decision. Ruiz noted the facts in the case changed Saturday when the Trump administration designated the Krome facility as the immigration court with jurisdiction over all detainees at the detention center. The judge wrote that the case has 'a tortured procedural history' since it was filed July 16, weeks after the first group of detainees arrived at the facility. 'Nearly every aspect of the Plaintiffs' civil action — their causes of action, their facts in support, their theories of venue, their arguments on the merits and their requests for relief — have changed with each filing,' the judge wrote. The state and federal government defendants made an identical argument last week about jurisdiction for a second lawsuit in which environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe sued to stop further construction and operations at the Everglades detention center until it's in compliance with federal environmental laws. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami on Aug. 7 ordered a 14-day halt to additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. She had yet to rule on the venue question. Detainees at the facility have said worms turn up in the food, toilets don't flush, flooding floors with fecal waste, and mosquitoes and other insects are everywhere. Civil rights attorneys also said officers were going cell to cell to pressure detainees into signing voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys, and some detainees had been deported even though they didn't have final removal orders. Along with the spread of a respiratory infection and rainwater flooding in tents, the circumstances had fueled a feeling of desperation among detainees, the attorneys wrote in a court filing. Fischer, Schneider and Frisaro write for the Associated Press. Frisaro reported from Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Schneider reported from Orlando, Fla.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store