&w=3840&q=100)
Yale's $2.5 billion private equity sale tests its vaunted endowment model
By Allison McNeely, Dawn Lim, Preeti Singh and Marion Halftermeyer
(Bloomberg) -- Yale University's $41 billion endowment, led for decades by the late investing giant David Swensen, has been the envy – and the blueprint — for many US universities eager to secure their financial future.
Swensen was the face of higher education's embrace of private equity, illiquid investments held for the long term. His push beyond the traditional stocks and bonds portfolio was a major part of the endowment's size doubling five times over. And where Swensen went, others followed.
Now the Ivy League school is readying its first major sale of private equity stakes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Notre Dame and University of Illinois are each considering similar moves.
After tying up swaths of their money in complicated private investments, US colleges are feeling the costs of emulating the Yale playbook more acutely than ever. President Donald Trump's war on elite schools is exacerbating cash pressures during a fallow period for private equity, and now colleges are planning investment shifts and unwinding some old bets.
Yale's unprecedented shift underscores the eagerness of many schools to secure cash. Washington has aggressively cut government funding to universities and is trying to raise taxes on investment income generated by certain private endowments. Trump also threatened to strip schools of their tax-exempt status, and this week said Columbia University no longer meets accreditation standards.
At the same time, private equity investments have been largely frozen amid a deal slowdown. Endowments are continuing to get less cash back from their private equity investments after almost a decade of meager distributions. That's turning secondhand buyers into winners.
The pressures have raised new questions about the purpose of endowments and how to manage them. Universities typically tap about 5 per cent of their endowments every year to contribute to the schools' operating budgets. That amount could balloon if colleges rely more on their endowments to fund ongoing expenses — pressuring investment chiefs to lean on more-liquid assets like stocks.
'What we're seeing now is fear, which is common when there's uncertainty,' said Sarah Samuels, a partner at consulting firm NEPC and a former investor for Wellesley College. Some investors don't have 'a ton of confidence that they should continue committing to private markets at the same pace.'
Secondary sales
The Yale endowment, run by Swensen protégé Matt Mendelsohn, is nearing a deal — code-named 'Project Gatsby' — to offload about $2.5 billion of private equity stakes, according to people familiar with the matter. Secondhand buyers had considered valuing pieces of the portfolio at a 15 per cent haircut, though the overall discount is expected to be less than 10 per cent, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information.
Yale declined to comment.
Other major universities have been exploring private-asset sales. MIT's endowment, run by former Yale investor Seth Alexander, is researching a potential sale of private assets, as has Notre Dame, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The University of Illinois is considering a secondary sale as part of its portfolio adjustments, some of the people said.
Some schools are also on the lookout for opportunities to be buyers in the secondaries market.
'Because of our strong liquidity position, we are not considering any secondary sales,' Tim Dolezal, vice president and chief financial officer at Notre Dame, said. 'We have tactically used the secondary market on several occasions over the years as a portfolio management tool, both as a seller and buyer. Given the pricing environment for secondaries, our most recent transactions have actually been strategic purchases.'
MIT also pulled back on an allocation to a private equity firm, slashing its check by two-thirds of what it had originally indicated, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Representatives for MIT and University of Illinois declined to comment.
'A lot of larger endowments have been concerned about liquidity and the potential impact of taxes on their portfolios,' said Jon Harris, the chief investment officer of Alternative Investment Management. 'Whether they are pulling the trigger as of yet or not, many endowments are having discussions on portfolio sales.'
There's no shortage of potential buyers in the secondaries market, as alternative asset managers such as Blackstone Inc., Lexington Partners and Paris-based Ardian have been raising billions to snap up existing private equity stakes. This is expected to be a record year for secondary transactions as firms seize on investors' need for liquidity.
For its part, Yale had been weighing a sale for more than a year. It considered trimming positions across dozens of funds as it sought to clean up older holdings and pare back some leveraged buyout funds. Multiple buyers, including Lexington and HarbourVest Partners, assessed the portfolio, according to people familiar with the matter.
Lexington and HarbourVest declined to comment.
Despite the sale, Yale isn't retreating from private markets. The endowment held about $20 billion across private equity and venture capital in mid-2024 and will continue to invest in funds and new managers.
But the secondary transaction would mark a repositioning for the school. More broadly, universities' efforts to offload private equity stakes signal the potential for a pullback from an asset class endowments once piled into.
'The Yale model worked well for decades for many endowments,' said Philip Casey, founder of technology company Institutional LPs, who has advised endowments and foundations. 'But even David Swensen said it would be susceptible to a liquidity crisis during times of economic uncertainty.'
'Dark corners'
A former banker for Salomon Brothers and Lehman Brothers, Swensen was the CIO of Yale's endowment from 1985 until his death in 2021. When he took over, Yale's portfolio stood around $1 billion and was invested in a mix of stocks and bonds like most other major institutions at the time.
Swensen advocated for endowments with long-term horizons to seek out more complex, illiquid assets. Worthwhile investments 'tend to reside in dark corners, not in the glare of floodlights,' he wrote in his book, Pioneering Portfolio Management, widely considered the bible of endowment investing.
He stressed that not every endowment should follow this path, but dozens of schools emulated the strategy and embraced alternative assets such as private equity, venture capital and hedge funds.
Investors who worked for Swensen went on to become some of the highest-paid endowment chiefs in the mid-2010s, running funds at Princeton, Stanford and University of Pennsylvania. By last year, US higher-education endowments held an average of 56 per cent of their assets in alternatives, according to a study from the National Association of College and University Business Officers.
But the Federal Reserve increased borrowing costs in 2022, and for the past three years, investors have grown increasingly frustrated by a lack of cash distributions.
'Costly and wasteful'
A House Republican bill calls for increasing taxes on an endowment's investment income to between 7 per cent and 21 per cent, depending on the size of the student body and amount of assets in the fund. MIT, Harvard, Princeton and Yale all have endowments that would meet the 21 per cent rate, which would be an increase from 1.4 per cent. The steeper levies could make high-risk bets and frequent trading less lucrative, while making rebalancing more costly.
Pomona College, a liberal arts school in California with almost 1,800 students, said its annual tax bill would increase to about $40 million with the legislation, equivalent to about two-thirds of its financial aid budget. The school said it has paid more than $16 million in taxes on its investments since 2017.
'An increase of this magnitude will make it difficult for institutions like Pomona to further their commitment to making a liberal arts education affordable for students from all backgrounds,' Pomona said in a statement.
The prospect of further economic attacks looms: the Trump administration in March identified 60 colleges under investigation for 'antisemitic discrimination and harassment,' the same rationale that the government used to cut billions in funding to Harvard University and to conclude that Columbia no longer meets accreditation standards.
Consulting firm NEPC is advising clients to be more selective with private equity investments and to explore options to make sure they have enough liquidity, such as holding more cash or Treasuries or exploring a credit line or bond sale, according to Samuels.
Yale's decision to shop its private equity stakes after years of sitting on the sidelines shows that there's less stigma around selling. Those moves can shave underperforming investments and adjust portfolios when a new investing chief arrives.
For skeptics of alternative assets, the pullback boosts their argument that investors do just fine in stocks and bonds over the long term. Alternatives are 'costly and wasteful' for big endowments and pensions — with high fees eroding benefits in returns or risk reduction, according to Richard Ennis, a retired investment consultant.
Endowment portfolios invested heavily in alternatives underperformed a stock-bond mix by 2.4 percentage points over 16 years through June 2024, according to a study he conducted. Yale's endowment generated annualized gains of 9.5 per cent for the decade through mid-2024, beating the 6.8 per cent average of US higher education institutions during that period. The S&P 500 returned more than 12 per cent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
BYD Unleashes an EV Industry Reckoning That Alarms Beijing
(Bloomberg) -- The price war engulfing China's electric vehicle industry has sent share prices tumbling and prompted an unusual level of intervention from Beijing. The shakeout may just be getting started. For all the Chinese government's efforts to prevent price cuts by market leader BYD Co. from turning into a vicious spiral, analysts say a combination of weaker demand and extreme overcapacity will slice into profits at the strongest brands and force feebler competitors to fold. Even after the number of EV makers starting shrinking for the first time last year, the industry is still using less than half its production capacity. Chinese authorities are trying to minimize the fallout, chiding the sector for 'rat race competition' and summoning heads of major brands to Beijing last week. Yet previous attempts to intervene have had little success. For the short term at least, investors are betting few automakers will escape unscathed: BYD, arguably the biggest winner from industry consolidation, has lost $21.5 billion in market value since its shares peaked in late May. 'What you're seeing in China is disturbing, because there's a lack of demand and extreme price cutting,' said John Murphy, a senior automotive analyst at Bank of America Corp. Eventually there will be 'massive consolidation' to soak up the excess capacity, Murphy said. For automakers, relentless discounting erodes profit margins, undermines brand value and forces even well-capitalized companies into unsustainable financial positions. Low-priced and low-quality products can seriously damage the international reputation of 'Made-in-China' cars, the People's Daily, an outlet controlled by the Communist Party, said. And that knock would come just as models from BYD to Geely, Zeekr and Xpeng start to collect accolades on the world stage. For consumers, price drops may seem beneficial but they mask deeper risks. Unpredictable pricing discourages long-term trust — already people are complaining on China's social media, wondering why they should buy a car now when it may be cheaper next week — while there's a chance automakers, as they cut costs to stay afloat, may reduce investment in quality, safety and after-sales service. Auto CEOs were told last week they must 'self-regulate' and shouldn't sell cars below cost or offer unreasonable price cuts, according to people familiar with the matter. The issue of zero-mileage cars also came up — where vehicles with no distance on their odometers are sold by dealers into the second-hand market, seen widely as a way for automakers to artificially inflate sales and clear inventory. Chinese automakers have been discounting a lot more aggressively than their foreign counterparts. Murphy said US automakers should just get out. 'Tesla probably needs to be there to compete with those companies and understand what's going on, but there's a lot of risk there for them.' Others leave no room for doubt that BYD, China's No. 1 selling car brand, is the culprit. 'It's obvious to everyone that the biggest player is doing this,' Jochen Siebert, managing director at auto consultancy JSC Automotive, said. 'They want a monopoly where everybody else gives up.' BYD's aggressive tactics are raising concerns over the potential dumping of cars, dealership management issues and 'squeezing out suppliers,' he said. The pricing turmoil is also unfolding against a backdrop of significant overcapacity. The average production utilization rate in China's automotive industry was mere 49.5% in 2024, data compiled by Shanghai-based Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute show. An April report by AlixPartners meanwhile highlights the intense competition that's starting to emerge among new energy vehicle makers, or companies that produce pure battery cars and plug-in hybrids. In 2024, the market saw its first ever consolidation among NEV-dedicated brands, with 16 exiting and 13 launching. 'The Chinese automotive market, despite its substantial scale, is growing at a slower speed. Automakers have to put top priority now on grabbing more market share,' Ron Zheng, a partner at global consultancy Roland Berger GmbH, said. Jiyue Auto shows how quickly things can change. A little over a year after launching its first car, the automaker jointly backed by big names Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and technology giant Baidu Inc., began to scale down production and seek fresh funds. It's a dilemma for all carmakers, but especially smaller ones. 'If you don't follow suit once a leading company makes a price move, you might lose the chance to stay at the table,' AlixPartners consultant Zhang Yichao said. He added that China's low capacity utilization rate, which is 'fundamentally fueling' the competition, is now even under more pressure from export uncertainties. While the push to find an outlet for excess production is thrusting more Chinese brands to export, international markets can only offer some relief. 'The US market is completely closed and Japan and Korea may close very soon if they see an invasion of Chinese carmakers,' Siebert said. 'Russia, which was the biggest export market last year, is now becoming very difficult. I also don't see Southeast Asia as an opportunity anymore.' The pressure of cost cutting has also led analysts to express concern over supply chain finance risks. A price cut demand by BYD to one of its suppliers late last year attracted scrutiny around how the car giant may be using supply chain financing to mask its ballooning debt. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research put BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan ($45 billion), compared with the 27.7 billion yuan officially on its books as of the end of June 2024. The pain is also bleeding into China's dealdership network. Dealership groups in two provinces have gone out of business since April, both of them ones that were selling BYD cars. Beijing's meeting with automakers last week wasn't the first attempt at a ceasefire. Two years ago, in mid 2023, 16 major automakers, including Tesla Inc., BYD and Geely signed a pact, witnessed by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, to avoid 'abnormal pricing.' Within days though, CAAM deleted one of the four commitments, saying that a reference to pricing in the pledge was inappropriate and in breach of a principle enshrined in the nation's antitrust laws. The discounting continued unabated. --With assistance from Yasufumi Saito and Chester Dawson. More stories like this are available on

Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump ‘BLOCKS' Congress Sanctions Against Putin, GOP Senators Too Scared To Protest?
/ Jun 09, 2025, 01:08AM IST A legislation set to be tabled by a Republican senator seeking more sanctions on Russia has been stalled. According to a Bloomberg report, the bill has been stalled due to U.S. President Donald Trump's opposition. The legislation calls for a 500 per cent tariff on countries that buy Russian energy, uranium, and other raw materials. According to the report, Trump had said he had not even looked at the bill, adding he would consider sanctions "at the right time".


Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
(Bloomberg) -- Hedge funds are facing pushback in California as their bets tied to insurance claims stemming from the Los Angeles wildfires are attacked as unethical. The transactions in focus are tied to so-called subrogation claims, which hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers have been buying from insurers over the past few months. Subrogation kicks in if a third party such as a utility is suspected of being responsible for losses covered by insurers. Hedge funds buying these claims from insurers are now under attack from the California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the California Wildfire Fund. It has described such transactions as 'opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,' and says it's planning to take on 'hedge funds and other speculators' that it claims 'are actively seeking to profit from California's devastating wildfire catastrophes.' In practice, that means the authority will try to block the payout of what it says could end up being 'billions of dollars' to the investors that bought the claims, according to materials prepared ahead of a meeting that took place last month with the California Catastrophe Response Council, which oversees the fund. To that end, it plans to engage California's state legislature, according to a transcript of comments made during the meeting and seen by Bloomberg. A spokesperson for the authority declined to comment. Bradley Max, a director at Cherokee Acquisition, a New York-based investment bank that trades and invests in subrogation claims, says the development has 'put a chill on bidding,' which is already visible in pricing. Subrogation rights tied to the Eaton Fire that ripped through Southern California in January were trading as high as 50 cents on the dollar at one point, but have now dropped 'at least a few points lower,' Max said. Still, even though the political development has led to lower prices on the subrogation claims, it hasn't held back transactions, he said. Cherokee said in April it had brokered deals linked to the Los Angeles fires for 'larger, more sophisticated distressed debt hedge funds.' And by April 15, investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. had executed 10 transactions tied to the Eaton and Palisades fires totaling over $1 billion worth of recovery rights, Ronald Ryder, co-head of special assets at Oppenheimer, told the California Earthquake Authority. That includes over $125 million in claims traded in just one day, Ryder wrote. A spokesperson for Oppenheimer declined to comment. Cherokee didn't name the hedge funds for which it brokered deals. In an email to the California Earthquake Authority, Ryder said that as catastrophic weather events become 'more prevalent,' insurers are increasingly resorting to 'recovery subrogation in the secondary market to fortify the balance sheet.' There's a growing consensus that insurers can't cover the rising costs of weather-related catastrophes alone, especially as climate change fuels more extreme events. For that reason, the industry is looking for ways to shift part of its financial risk over to capital markets, with alternative asset managers often the only investor class willing to step in. Efforts to prevent investors from profiting from the subrogation claims they've bought represent 'a politically motivated attempt to not pay legitimate obligations,' Max at Cherokee said. They're 'trying to beat up deep-pocketed hedge funds, despite the ethical and legal implications,' he said. Recovery of subrogation claims is costly and can take years to play out, which is why insurers have started selling them in exchange for an upfront cash payment. The hedge funds buying them are betting that the recovery sum at the end of the process will exceed the amount they paid the insurer to buy the claim. The market for investing in subrogation claims is characterized by over-the-counter deals with little to no transparency. Subrogation deals had a seminal moment more than half a decade ago, when faulty power lines and equipment failures at California utility PG&E Corp. were blamed for wildfires in the state. Back then, hedge fund Baupost Group LLC purchased claims against PG&E worth $6.8 billion. Bloomberg has previously reported that Baupost may have generated an estimated $1 billion of profits. The California Wildfire Fund, which is administered by the state's Earthquake Authority and overseen by the California Catastrophe Response Council, was set up in 2019 to help reimburse claims arising from wildfires caused by utility companies. If hedge funds prevail in their subrogation claims, some of the money could end up coming from the California Wildfire Fund. The fund, which sits on about $13 billion in liquid assets, is partly capitalized by three utilities — San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Edison International's Southern California Edison and PG&E. While the cause of the January fires remains under investigation, it's already clear that the Eaton Fire started inside the service territory of Edison and therefore leaves the fund potentially exposed, the authority said. With current estimates for insured losses as high as $45 billion, the January Southern California wildfires are expected to be the costliest in US history, according to the California Earthquake Authority. The Earthquake Authority and Catastrophe Response Council are now reviewing claims and administration procedures as they take the matter to the state legislature. More stories like this are available on