NATO to strengthen missile defenses in Eastern Europe to counter Russian threats, Bloomberg reports
For the first time, member states of NATO are reportedly considering combining the alliance's ballistic missile shield with other integrated missile defense assets. The talks are taking place behind closed doors and involve sensitive deliberations, Bloomberg reported, citing its sources.
Moscow has long opposed NATO's missile defense infrastructure, particularly the U.S.-built interceptors deployed in Poland and Romania, states neighboring Ukraine. The alliance has previously said those systems are intended to counter potential long-range threats from Iran, not Russia.
The so-called "NATO expansion to the east" is one of the key narratives used by Russian propaganda to justify its large-scale war against Ukraine.
The proposed integration of ballistic missile defense with NATO's broader air and missile defense network would address threats from any direction in the future. This shift suggests the effort would increasingly be focused on deterring Russian capabilities, according to Bloomberg's sources.
The move comes as NATO ramps up its defense posture more than three years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The alliance recently agreed on the most ambitious new weapons targets since the Cold War.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called on alliance members to make a "quantum leap" in defense investment in response to the enduring threat from Russia. Speaking at Chatham House in London, Rutte urged allies to increase air and missile defense by 400%.
Talks on integrating the systems may wrap up ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24–25, but could continue afterward, the sources said. Ukraine is invited to attend the summit. It remains unclear whether the initiative will still officially cite Iran as a threat or move fully toward addressing Russia.
The effort is part of a broader strategy to reinforce NATO's eastern flank, but some officials have raised concerns about how it might affect peace efforts in Ukraine and whether the United States will fully support the integration, Bloomberg reported.
Previously, U.S. President Donald Trump echoed Russian claims that Kyiv provoked the invasion by pursuing its NATO ambitions.
Earlier, Bloomberg reported that NATO is deploying a new satellite surveillance system aimed at monitoring military activity in Ukraine and along the alliance's eastern borders. The system, known as Smart Indication and Warning Broad Area Detection (SINBAD), will use AI-powered analysis to scan large areas and detect potential threats with unprecedented frequency.
Read also: NATO expands satellite surveillance to monitor Ukraine, eastern flank
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
28 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Ukraine's Zelensky to meet Trump in D.C. on Monday after inconclusive summit
KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet Monday in Washington with President Trump, who has shifted to saying that an overall peace agreement — and not a ceasefire — is the next step in ending the 3½-year-old war. Trump's abrupt reversal, aligning himself with a position held by Russian President Vladimir Putin, came in a social media post Saturday, hours after they concluded a summit in Alaska that produced no agreement to halt the fighting. Putin has long said that Moscow is not interested in a temporary truce and instead is seeking a long-term settlement that takes the Kremlin's interests into account. After calls with Zelensky and European leaders, Trump posted that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' In a statement after the Trump call, the European leaders did not address whether a peace deal was preferable to a ceasefire, saying that they 'welcomed President Trump's efforts to stop the killing in Ukraine, end Russia's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace.' Trump and Ukraine's European allies had been calling for a ceasefire ahead of any negotiations. Trump's statement that a peace agreement should be reached before a ceasefire appears to indicate the U.S. president's thinking is 'shifting towards Putin,' an approach that would allow Moscow to keep fighting while negotiating, said Nigel Gould-Davies, a senior fellow at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London. Zelensky, who was not invited to Alaska for the summit, said he had a 'long and substantive' conversation with Trump early Saturday. He said they would 'discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war' on Monday. It will be Zelensky's first visit to the U.S. since Trump berated him publicly as being 'disrespectful' during an extraordinary Oval Office meeting on Feb. 28. Trump, who also held calls with European leaders Saturday, confirmed Monday's White House meeting and said that 'if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin.' Trump rolled out the red carpet Friday for Putin, who was in the U.S. for the first time in a decade and since the start of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But he gave little concrete detail afterward of what was discussed. On Saturday, he posted on social media that it 'went very well.' Trump had warned ahead of the summit of 'very severe consequences' for Russia if Putin didn't agree to end the war. Zelensky reiterated the importance of involving European leaders, who also were not invited to the summit. 'It is important that Europeans are involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America,' he said. 'We also discussed positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine's security.' He didn't elaborate, but Zelensky previously has said that European partners put on hold a proposal to establish a foreign troop presence in Ukraine to deter Russian aggression because it lacked an American backstop. Zelensky said he spoke to Trump one-on-one and then in a call with other European leaders. In total, the conversations lasted more than 90 minutes. Trump said in Alaska that 'there's no deal until there's a deal,' after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' During an interview with Fox News Channel before returning to Washington, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelensky 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. In their statement after speaking to Trump, major European leaders said they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskyy toward 'a trilateral summit with European support.' The statement from French, German, Italian, British, Finnish, Polish and European Union leaders said that 'Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees' and welcomed U.S. readiness to provide them. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory,' they said. 'International borders must not be changed by force.' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that 'the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon,' noting that Moscow launched new attacks on Ukraine even as the delegations met. 'Putin continues to drag out negotiations and hopes he gets away with it. He left Anchorage without making any commitments to end the killing,' she said. Ukrainian and Russian forces are fighting along a 600-mile front line. Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their gains, capturing the most territory since the opening stages of the war. 'Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war,' said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.' Zelensky voiced support for Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting with the U.S. and Russia. He said that 'key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this.' But Putin's foreign affairs advisor, Yuri Ushakov, said on Russian state television Saturday that the idea of a three-way meeting 'has not been touched upon yet' in U.S.-Russia discussions. Zelensky wrote on X that he told Trump that 'sanctions should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war.' In apparent effort to bolster Zelensky's hand before he meets Trump, France, the U.K. and Germany will co-host a video call Sunday afternoon of so-called 'coalition of the willing' nations that could, in one way or another, help monitor and uphold any deal to end fighting, French President Emmanuel Macron's office said. Russian officials and media struck a largely positive tone after Friday's summit, with some describing it as a symbolic end to Putin's isolation in the West. Former President Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Russia's Security Council, praised the summit as a breakthrough in restoring high-level dialogue between Moscow and Washington, describing the talks as 'calm, without ultimatums and threats.' Putin has 'broken out of international isolation' and back on the world stage as one of two global leaders, and 'wasn't in the least challenged' by Trump, who also ignored an arrest warrant issued for Putin by the International Criminal Court, said Laurie Bristow, who was British ambassador to Russia from 2016 to 2020. 'Unless Mr. Putin is absolutely convinced that he cannot win militarily, the fighting is not going to stop,' Bristow told the Associated Press. 'That's the big takeaway from the Anchorage summit.' Kullab and Morton write for the Associated Press and reported from Kyiv and London, respectively. AP writers Geir Moulson in Berlin and Emma Burrows in London contributed to this report.
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
More US tourists visit Canada than Canucks travel to America for first time ever: report
Tourists from the Great White North are giving the US the cold shoulder. In a surprise twist to the ongoing trade war between North American neighbors, July marked the first time ever more Americans road-tripped it to Canada, than vice versa. That month saw 1.8 million US car trips into Canada, compared to 1.7 million Canadian excursions to the Land of the Free, new data from Statistics Canada released Monday found. Cross-border trips between Canada and the US slowed in July, normally the busiest month of the year. Bloomberg via Getty Images Travel in both directions is slumping, however, as trade tensions between the two allies boil over. US visits to its northern neighbor dropped 7.4% from last July — normally the busiest travel month of the year — while Canadian road trips to America nosedived by a staggering 37%. It marked the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year declines in tourism, following President Trump's February announcement that he was implementing tariffs on Canada, while also joking that he planned to make the country the 51st state, which led to Canucks cancelling their US vacations in droves. 1.8 million Americans visited Canada by car in July. AMVShutter – The two countries blew past an Aug. 1 trade-deal deadline and are now locked in a tit-for-tat tariff battle. The US is targeting Canadian goods not covered by the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement with tariffs of up to 50%, and Canada imposing 25% counter-tariffs on billions of US exports.
Time Magazine
29 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's Summit With Putin Need Not Be an Echo of Appeasement
President Donald Trump's unprecedented summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska has failed to deliver the breakthrough on securing a ceasefire in Ukraine that he was hoping for. But Trump proved to be more cautious than many diplomats thought, moving in consultation with European allies and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—and the failure of the Alaska Summit need not be an unvarnished disaster nor an echo of Neville Chamberlain's 1938 appeasement at Munich. [time-brightcove not-tgx='true'] What comes next matters far more than the predictable failure to make a breakthrough, and now Trump needs to make the war more costly to Putin financially and militarily. It's time to call Putin's bluff. As Trump himself declared before the meeting, if Putin did not agree to stop his war on Ukraine, there must be 'severe consequences,' and the time has come for Trump to tighten the screwsby increasing economic pressure on Putin and by buttressing military assistance for Ukraine. As Admiral James Savridis, Former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, complained: 'Putin strung Trump along again with diplomatic rope-a-dope and there should be military consequences for Putin.' It would be a tragic mistake if this turned into merely another instance when Trump threatens Putin with tough talk, only to back down prematurely. Clearly, Putin is counting on Trump backing down and falling victim to his smoke and mirrors. But that bark-and-no-bite approach would destroy U.S. credibility as much as it would erode Trump's own credibility. Trump's initial reaction, declaring on Fox News that it would be up to President Zelenskyy to push the ball forward, is exactly the opposite of what should be done. The truth is that even now, Trump holds all the leverage while Putin has none. Read more: Why Trump's Summit in Alaska Cannot End Putin's War in Ukraine Despite Putin's braggadocio, claiming a win from the legitimacy of visiting U.S. soil for the first-time in a decade, despite having an ICC arrest warrant to his name after the killing of tens of thousands of civilians and the kidnapping of 20,000 children; still, Trump averted the worst-case scenario of falling for Putin's propaganda, stopping hours of planned follow-up meetings that Putin had planned with Russian business and economic development officials. Trump has been correct in recognizing that none of the 1,200 companies whose exit from Russia we helped accelerate have ever expressed interest in returning to Russia. The fact that Putin even thought that the U.S. needs the Russian economy shows how deluded Putin still is. Putin's only commodities are easily interchangeable raw materials that he brings to the world market; no finished goods, industrial products, pharmaceutical ingredients, fashion or financial products come from Russia at scale. Like a mercantile colony, all Putin has is a lot of land, raw materials, and psychopathic propaganda. The reality is that despite Putin's tough guy bluster, Putin is a failure economically and militarily, and Putin's house of cards is far more vulnerable than many realize. In fact, after three years of grueling warfare, Putin's economy is in tatters as Putin stares down bankruptcy. As we revealed previously, for years now, Putin has been obfuscating how weak the Russian economy really is by hiding and fudging the numbers. Putin refuses to disclose major economic indicators as required by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This ranges from foreign trade data, monthly output data on oil and gas, and central bank monetary base data. Due to Putin's obfuscation, few appreciate how close Russia is to running out of cash. The value of Russia's sovereign wealth fund and foreign exchange reserves has dwindled by half since Putin's invasion of Ukraine, as he draws down his windfall oil revenues faster than he can replenish his coffers. That is because Putin is running an unsustainable record budget deficit to fund his war machine in the tens of billions. And with over 1,000 multinational businesses having exited from Russia, the Kremlin is running out of new cookie jars to raid to keep the lights on. Read more: Why The Last Six Trump-Putin Meetings Failed The time has come for Trump to escalate economic sanctions and economic pressure on Russia by cutting off Putin's exports of oil and other natural resources, once and for all. By tightening the screws on Putin's already crumbling economic house of cards, Putin could run out of money very soon—perhaps even by the end of the year. Already, Trump has threatened secondary tariffs on India for buying Russian oil, which aligns with the bipartisan legislation put forward by many of his GOP allies in the Senate, including the 'Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025' legislation co-sponsored by Senator Lindsey Graham and Senator Richard Blumenthal, which would impose secondary tariffs and sanctions on countries which continue to fund Russia's war machine. Simultaneously, Trump has to fortify military assistance for Ukraine, with our European allies being forced to shoulder an increasing share of the burden as previously-appropriated U.S. support dwindles. Already, there is growing momentum in Congress, including from Trump's GOP allies, for another major military aid package to help Ukraine, despite the misguided cries of outnumbered, outgunned isolationists such as JD Vance not to support Ukraine anymore. Already, there is a bipartisan proposal in the Senate for a new $54.6 billion package in new aid to Ukraine, which would make it the largest aid package for Ukraine yet. Providing Ukraine with desperately needed military aid is the best way to show Putin who really holds the leverage. In particular, replenishing Ukraine's stock of F-16s and Patriot missile interceptors would be an incredibly powerful and effective boost. That military aid is sorely needed. As Ambassador Michael McFaul pointed out on MSNBC, 'since President Trump has been in the White House, the war has gotten more aggressive. There's been more attacks on Ukrainian civilians, the number of drone and missile attacks have gone up'. After trying and failing to secure a ceasefire from Putin, the time has come for Trump to impose the 'severe consequences' against Putin that he has previously threatened. If he fails to do so, then Trump's inaction, after Putin's blatant unwillingness to agree to a ceasefire and other measures to end the war on constructive terms, will be deserving of the comparisons to Chamberlain's Munich summit with Hitler—and go down as a far greater blunder than Joe Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.'
