Protect Your Property With the Low Maintenance Eufy SoloCam S220 for Just $65
According to a recent CNET survey, one in six US adults has been a victim of package theft at least once -- and that's just one of many growing threats. This is exactly why having a reliable outdoor security camera isn't just a nice-to-have: It's essential for added protection and a little peace of mind. Plus, if you've been thinking about getting one, now's the perfect time to make it happen.
Eufy, one of our go-to home security brands, is offering a huge 50% off its solar-powered S220 security camera, bringing the price down to just $65. There are no monthly fees or hidden costs so it's a one-and-done purchase. The only catch? This promotion is part of a limited-time deal, so you might want to act fast.
This tiny but mighty camera comes in a wire-free design and takes approximately five minutes to set up. It features an IP67 rating, so whether it's rain, shine or snow, it's built to handle whatever the weather throws at it.
Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.
You'll get a clear 2K video that shows exactly what's happening outside your home. The f/1.6 night vision gives you a sharp view even in the dark, and the built-in AI can tell the difference between people and random objects -- you won't be bombarded with false alarms that just stress you out. You can even set custom security zones to get alerts only when there's motion where it actually matters.
The Eufy S220 also works with voice assistants like Alexa and Google, so you can control it completely hands-free. And with two-way audio, you can easily communicate with whoever's at your door without having to get up. Finally, you don't have to worry about recharging the camera at all. Just 3 hours of sunlight a day keeps the solar battery up and running.
Why this deal matters
Taking effective measures to protect your property is no longer optional. This solar-powered security camera is not just easy to maintain but also offers a bunch of advanced features, now for just $65. This is one of the best prices we have seen on the S220, but the discount might not last long, so take advantage of it while you can.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Cuban Corrects Elizabeth Warren As She Slams JNJ, PFE For Higher Prices And Zero Taxes On Big Pharma: 'PBMs Corrupt Healthcare'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A heated debate over the U.S. healthcare system erupted on X, pitting billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban against Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) over the root causes of soaring drug prices. What Happened: The clash, unfolding as of Friday, has reignited discussions on Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and Big Pharma's tax practices, with the Senate poised to address reform amid rising public scrutiny. Enter Cuban, the Dallas Mavericks owner and founder of Cost Plus Drugs, who fired back with a pointed correction. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — In a post quoting Warren, Cuban argued that PBMs—not Big Pharma—are the true culprits behind inflated drug prices. 'PBMs corrupt healthcare,' he wrote, explaining that these intermediaries control formularies and manipulate prices to maximize rebate revenue, with three major PBMs negotiating over 90% of rebates for commercial insurance plans. Warren, in her post, had blamed pharmaceutical giants like Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) for charging Americans the 'highest drug prices in the world' while paying 'zero dollars in federal taxes.' Citing data from her Senate Finance Committee role, Warren highlighted how these companies, alongside AbbVie Inc. (NYSE:ABBV), Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN), and Merck & Co Inc. (NYSE:MRK), have exploited tax loopholes from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to shield billions in profits. 'Republicans want to make it worse. I'm fighting back,' she declared, sharing a CNBC headline and urging action against what she calls a 'rigged tax system.' Why It Matters: Cuban has been a critic of the healthcare system, saying that it should be simple. According to him, it's become overly complicated by big insurance companies and PBMs. These groups, he says, act as middlemen, controlling not just the costs but also the accessibility of care. He blames PBMs for lack of transparency, inflated specialty drug prices, rebate distortion, formulary restrictions, and 'Sh–ing on' on independent pharmacies. Some significant firms engaged in the PBM business listed in the U.S. include;Stocks YTD Performance One Year Performance CVS Health Corp. (NYSE:CVS) 51.15% 9.57% Cigna Group. (NYSE:CI) 14.54% -6.95% UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE:UNH) -39.11% -36.60% Meanwhile, here is how some pharmaceutical sector ETFs have performed;Pharma ETFs YTD Performance One Year Performance VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (NASDAQ:PPH) 1.69% -4.48% iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF (NYSE:IHE) -0.49% -1.85% Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF (NYSE:PJP) -3.23% -1.64% SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (NYSE:XPH) -4.06% 2.61% KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (NYSE:KURE) 20.55% 22.94% First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (NASDAQ:FTXH) -5.44% -6.27% Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical (NYSE:PILL) -23.49% -14.63% The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (NASDAQ:QQQ), which track the S&P 500 index and Nasdaq 100 index, respectively, were mixed in premarket on Friday. The SPY was down 0.30% at $595.67, while the QQQ was 0.015% higher at $529.07, according to Benzinga Pro data. Read Next: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo courtesy: Shutterstock This article Mark Cuban Corrects Elizabeth Warren As She Slams JNJ, PFE For Higher Prices And Zero Taxes On Big Pharma: 'PBMs Corrupt Healthcare' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why is AI halllucinating more frequently, and how can we stop it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The more advanced artificial intelligence (AI) gets, the more it "hallucinates" and provides incorrect and inaccurate information. Research conducted by OpenAI found that its latest and most powerful reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinated 33% and 48% of the time, respectively, when tested by OpenAI's PersonQA benchmark. That's more than double the rate of the older o1 model. While o3 delivers more accurate information than its predecessor, it appears to come at the cost of more inaccurate hallucinations. This raises a concern over the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) such as AI chatbots, said Eleanor Watson, an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) member and AI ethics engineer at Singularity University. "When a system outputs fabricated information — such as invented facts, citations or events — with the same fluency and coherence it uses for accurate content, it risks misleading users in subtle and consequential ways," Watson told Live Science. Related: Cutting-edge AI models from OpenAI and DeepSeek undergo 'complete collapse' when problems get too difficult, study reveals The issue of hallucination highlights the need to carefully assess and supervise the information AI systems produce when using LLMs and reasoning models, experts say. The crux of a reasoning model is that it can handle complex tasks by essentially breaking them down into individual components and coming up with solutions to tackle them. Rather than seeking to kick out answers based on statistical probability, reasoning models come up with strategies to solve a problem, much like how humans think. In order to develop creative, and potentially novel, solutions to problems, AI needs to hallucinate —otherwise it's limited by rigid data its LLM ingests. "It's important to note that hallucination is a feature, not a bug, of AI," Sohrob Kazerounian, an AI researcher at Vectra AI, told Live Science. "To paraphrase a colleague of mine, 'Everything an LLM outputs is a hallucination. It's just that some of those hallucinations are true.' If an AI only generated verbatim outputs that it had seen during training, all of AI would reduce to a massive search problem." "You would only be able to generate computer code that had been written before, find proteins and molecules whose properties had already been studied and described, and answer homework questions that had already previously been asked before. You would not, however, be able to ask the LLM to write the lyrics for a concept album focused on the AI singularity, blending the lyrical stylings of Snoop Dogg and Bob Dylan." In effect, LLMs and the AI systems they power need to hallucinate in order to create, rather than simply serve up existing information. It is similar, conceptually, to the way that humans dream or imagine scenarios when conjuring new ideas. However, AI hallucinations present a problem when it comes to delivering accurate and correct information, especially if users take the information at face value without any checks or oversight. "This is especially problematic in domains where decisions depend on factual precision, like medicine, law or finance," Watson said. "While more advanced models may reduce the frequency of obvious factual mistakes, the issue persists in more subtle forms. Over time, confabulation erodes the perception of AI systems as trustworthy instruments and can produce material harms when unverified content is acted upon." And this problem looks to be exacerbated as AI advances. "As model capabilities improve, errors often become less overt but more difficult to detect," Watson noted. "Fabricated content is increasingly embedded within plausible narratives and coherent reasoning chains. This introduces a particular risk: users may be unaware that errors are present and may treat outputs as definitive when they are not. The problem shifts from filtering out crude errors to identifying subtle distortions that may only reveal themselves under close scrutiny." Kazerounian backed this viewpoint up. "Despite the general belief that the problem of AI hallucination can and will get better over time, it appears that the most recent generation of advanced reasoning models may have actually begun to hallucinate more than their simpler counterparts — and there are no agreed-upon explanations for why this is," he said. The situation is further complicated because it can be very difficult to ascertain how LLMs come up with their answers; a parallel could be drawn here with how we still don't really know, comprehensively, how a human brain works. In a recent essay, Dario Amodei, the CEO of AI company Anthropic, highlighted a lack of understanding in how AIs come up with answers and information. "When a generative AI system does something, like summarize a financial document, we have no idea, at a specific or precise level, why it makes the choices it does — why it chooses certain words over others, or why it occasionally makes a mistake despite usually being accurate," he wrote. The problems caused by AI hallucinating inaccurate information are already very real, Kazerounian noted. "There is no universal, verifiable, way to get an LLM to correctly answer questions being asked about some corpus of data it has access to," he said. "The examples of non-existent hallucinated references, customer-facing chatbots making up company policy, and so on, are now all too common." Both Kazerounian and Watson told Live Science that, ultimately, AI hallucinations may be difficult to eliminate. But there could be ways to mitigate the issue. Watson suggested that "retrieval-augmented generation," which grounds a model's outputs in curated external knowledge sources, could help ensure that AI-produced information is anchored by verifiable data. "Another approach involves introducing structure into the model's reasoning. By prompting it to check its own outputs, compare different perspectives, or follow logical steps, scaffolded reasoning frameworks reduce the risk of unconstrained speculation and improve consistency," Watson, noting this could be aided by training to shape a model to prioritize accuracy, and reinforcement training from human or AI evaluators to encourage an LLM to deliver more disciplined, grounded responses. RELATED STORIES —AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims —AI can handle tasks twice as complex every few months. What does this exponential growth mean for how we use it? —What is the Turing test? How the rise of generative AI may have broken the famous imitation game "Finally, systems can be designed to recognise their own uncertainty. Rather than defaulting to confident answers, models can be taught to flag when they're unsure or to defer to human judgement when appropriate," Watson added. "While these strategies don't eliminate the risk of confabulation entirely, they offer a practical path forward to make AI outputs more reliable." Given that AI hallucination may be nearly impossible to eliminate, especially in advanced models, Kazerounian concluded that ultimately the information that LLMs produce will need to be treated with the "same skepticism we reserve for human counterparts."
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Secrets of the Truly Wealthy, According to Dave Ramsey
One of Dave Ramsey's most consistent pieces of financial advice is that wealth-building isn't necessarily tied to how much money you make, but rather how you manage what you have. Many people assume that earning a higher income automatically leads to wealth, but Ramsey points out that a disciplined approach to spending and saving is far more important. Find Out: Read Next: Truly wealthy people live below their means and when they do spend money, they don't advertise it. Essentially, saving consistently is more important than the size of your paycheck or what you splurge on. Known for his no-nonsense approach to personal finance, Ramsey has helped millions of people get out of debt and take control of their financial futures. But what separates those who simply earn a good living from the truly wealthy? According to Ramsey, 'When you quit worrying about what people think and you're actually living life for you and your family — that causes you to make completely different purchases and live a completely different lifestyle.' Here are key principles that truly wealthy people understand and practice consistently. The wealthy don't leave their financial futures to chance. They create a plan, stick to it and regularly review it, which doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room for extravagant purchases like designer clothing. Think about some of the billionaires you see in the news — many aren't dressing like a million bucks even though they have more than a billion bucks. Ramsey would recommend taking baby steps toward building an emergency fund, paying off debt or investing for retirement well before you spend thousands of dollars on pants or shoes. The truly wealthy know where their money is going each month and it's not hanging in their closet. For You: Ramsey is a strong advocate for long-term investing and wealth-building strategies. However, once someone has grown their wealth to be in a place where they are considered rich, they tend not to advertise how much they have or are spending. Some of the most lavish and luxurious expenses can include trips the wealthy take, but the truly wealthy don't let you know about those. Ramsey said, 'They enjoy nice vacations but they seldom post them for you to see on Instagram because they didn't take you on vacation. They wanted to go on vacation.' Generosity is a hallmark of the truly wealthy, and giving often brings even more fulfillment than financial success. However, that doesn't mean they spend everything they can afford to during the holiday season. Ramsey noted, ' The Christmas presents around the tree are very reasonable,' when referring to what the truly wealthy spend on presents. Showing people you care or being generous doesn't necessarily come with an expensive price tag. When it comes to giving to your children, generational wealth may be more the goal than how many presents are under the tree. True wealth comes from a long-term perspective and avoiding debt, which means big expenses such as luxury cars should be avoided when possible. 'The car that they drive is understated and the valet is seldom impressed until he gets the tip. It's usually a used Camry, a nice used Honda or a nice old pickup truck of some kind,' Ramsey said. This long-term perspective includes avoiding debt as much as possible, because, as Ramsey has said, 'Debt is a thief.' The wealthy understand that having a reliable car they don't have to make payments on goes much further down the financial road than other flashier options. The bottom line is that the truly wealthy aren't simply people with high incomes or luxurious lifestyles. They are individuals who consistently practice discipline, intentionality and long-term thinking in their financial lives. They understand that true wealth comes from wise decisions, which means anyone can build lasting wealth and live a financially peaceful life if they put their mind to it. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on 4 Secrets of the Truly Wealthy, According to Dave Ramsey Sign in to access your portfolio
