Shadow minister hits back at claims she was in ‘hiding' when with her baby
Mr Miliband had pointed out the Conservative shadow minister's absence on Monday as he gave a statement to the Commons on climate and nature.
He said: 'The trouble is we're in a situation now where the shadow secretary of state goes into hiding when there's a statement about the climate crisis, because it's just too embarrassing to try and articulate the opposition's position.'
This was followed by energy minister Kerry McCarthy, who also remarked on her prior absence during energy questions on Tuesday.
Ms Coutinho had asked her why the Government is 'offshoring' British industries, and replacing them with dirtier imports with higher emissions.
Ms McCarthy replied: 'Perhaps if (she) had been here yesterday, she'd have been able to engage with the Secretary of State about that then.'
Ms Coutinho later told MPs she had been missing from the Commons as she was looking after her son Rafael.
The MP for East Surrey has recently returned to the Commons from maternity leave.
Maternity leave for ministers and paid opposition figures, normally shadow secretaries of state, was introduced by the Conservative government in 2021. It entitles them to six months of maternity leave.
She upbraided Mr Miliband as she began her questions to him. She said: 'I will just briefly say that yesterday the Secretary of State said I was hiding, when I was in fact with my six-month old baby who I know he's aware of.
'So, on behalf of all young mums who face these kinds of comments from their first few weeks back to work, can I gently suggest that he reflects on his remarks?'
Mr Miliband apologised, telling her: 'I completely respect her decision to be with her young baby, and there was no offence intended. I think it's very, very important that we understand the needs of new parents and indeed parents across the country.'
Ms Coutinho went on to ask the Government why it is now paying £82 per megawatt hour for offshore wind, up from £72 last year.
'That's the price he's paid for offshore wind, and he's set to do the same this year. And that's before the extra cost for grid for wasted wind and backup which are going through the roof thanks to his policies,' she said.
'Yesterday he admitted to radical honesty, will he either admit that he can't add up or that his policies can't bring down bills?'
Mr Miliband said: 'She is gambling on fossil fuels, the same thing she did which led us to the worst cost-of-living crisis in our country's history.
'Family finances wrecked, business finances wrecked and public finances wrecked. The only way to bring down bills for good is cheap, home-grown power that we can control. We have an energy security plan, they have an energy surrender plan.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Sustainable Farming Scheme 'cautiously' welcomed by Coed Cadw
Coed Cadw has described the scheme as a necessary first step in a far longer journey towards a just transition for the people of Wales. The SFS marks a shift in the way land management for public goods is supported in Wales. Coed Cadw has welcomed the collaborative approach taken during its development but feels more work is needed to fully realise the scheme's potential. Kylie Jones Mattock, director at Coed Cadw said: 'We welcome the recognition by the Welsh Government that sustainable land management delivers vital public goods - such as clean air and water, carbon storage, and cultural and community wellbeing. "Framing these outcomes as a 'social benefit' payment is important, as it reflects the interconnected value of land, people, and place." Sent with Mailsuite · Unsubscribe 14/07/25, 16:25:42
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
No, Dale Vince: ‘climate denial' shouldn't be illegal
You can tell the environmentalists are on the back foot. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is issuing doomsday proclamations in parliament, branding Reform and the Tories 'unpatriotic' for refusing to go along with his deranged Net Zero policies. And now Labour donors are also calling for 'climate denial' to be criminalised. Because nothing says 'we're winning the argument' like locking up your opponents. Green tycoon Dale Vince, a man whose woeful politics can be accurately inferred from his appearance, donated £5million to Labour ahead of the last General Election. Ever since, he's been publicly dispensing increasingly crazed – and often totally self-serving – advice to the government he helped put into office. After Miliband announced this week that he was to give the first of what he intends to make an annual climate statement in parliament, Vince took to X to congratulate the energy secretary, and urge him to go further: 'Good move from Ed, it's time to tell it like it is. I'd make climate denial a criminal offence – given the incredible harm it will cause, even by slowing down progress to Net Zero.' This isn't a new idea. Deep greens have been agitating for it for years. Last month, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and climate change, Elisa Morgera, called for 'media and advertising firms' to be held criminally liable for 'amplifying disinformation and misinformation by fossil-fuel companies'. Because, as we all know, the scientific method is all about some bureaucrat deciding what the truth is and then imposing that on the press and civil society. These are not the proposals of a movement that is confident in its arguments. The more that voters bristle against elite greenism, refusing to accept that their lives must become more expensive and less free in order to meet arbitrary climate targets, the more greens start fantasising about the 'deniers' being led away in handcuffs. Ordinary people care about the environment, they're just not buying the eco-austerity the elites are selling. And rightly so. Indeed, for all of Vince's talk of the 'incredible harm' done by 'climate denial', this seems infinitely more true of Net Zero. Cheap and reliable energy is what allows human beings to flourish and prosper. The headlong dash towards so-called renewables, by contrast, has given us nothing but soaring energy prices and deindustrialisation. Miliband warned darkly this week about the supposed 10,000 excess deaths due to heatwaves over the past four years, blithely ignoring the fact that more lives are lost to cold than heat. The brass neck is almost impressive, given Miliband's government has not only worked to make it more expensive for everyone to heat their homes, but also tried to rip away winter fuel payments from freezing pensioners. As for supposed 'misinformation' in the climate debate, the greens haven't got a leg to stand on. Any old cobblers about climate change is now presumed to be legit by the elites, provided it is sufficiently apocalyptic. The BBC's climate editor, Justin Rowlatt, is so cavalier about the facts he was rebuked by the corporation's own complaints unit in 2022 for 'misleading' statements about climate deaths. In a Panorama documentary, Rowlatt suggested that the 'death toll' from extreme weather is 'rising around the world and the forecast is… that worse is to come'. The truth, as the Beeb had to sheepishly concede, is the opposite. The death toll has actually fallen. And not by a little bit. Deaths from climate-related disasters have actually declined by 99 per cent over the past century, thanks to economic growth and new technology fortifying humanity against the brutality of nature. Shall we arrest Justin, too, Dale? From the fossil-fuel workers who backed Donald 'drill, baby, drill' Trump to the gilets jaunes revolt in France against Emmanuel Macron's punishing eco-taxes, ordinary people have had enough of being made worse off to salve the consciences of rich greens posing as saviours of the planet. No wonder Vince is rattled. Now the environmentalists hope to do with censorship what they have failed to do with persuasion. Don't let them get away with it.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why UK and Scottish Governments must 'step up' on devolution
Her response comes after Scottish Secretary Ian Murray urged her to work with Westminster to reverse First Minister John Swinney's policies of 'centralisation'. In a long-running devolution row, the SNP councillor said she was 'disappointed' by the letter, accusing the Scottish Secretary of suggesting the 'UK Government has no role in delivering deals for Scottish cities'. 'This is a misguided regression from what, up until now, had been a shared commitment to successful tripartite collaboration between two governments and the collective democratic leadership of the City Region,' Ms Aitken said. However, she said: 'Glasgow – and Edinburgh, for that matter – needs both of our governments to step up on devolution.' Read more: The back and forth comes after Ms Aitken raised concerns that Scotland's largest city had been sidelined by the Chancellor's spending review in June. The Treasury confirmed a £160 million Investment Zone in the Glasgow Region and £20m for Trailblazer Communities, but Ms Aitken argued it fell short of the funding offered to English counterparts. Ms Aitken said Rachel Reeves took a "retrograde" step for devolution by expanding a scheme that allowed city regions in England to bypass applying for individual grants through competitive bidding processes. The designated areas instead will receive long-term funding to make their own investment decisions. Glasgow, meanwhile, must bid for funding alongside other parts of the UK. Mr Murray had argued that devolution in Scotland was entirely "a matter for the Scottish Government". However, he said the UK Government wanted to work together to "unlock the same levels of growth as your English counterparts in Greater Manchester" and offered to draft a joint letter to Mr Swinney. The Glasgow City Council leader said she was 'happy' to take up the Scottish Secretary's offer to write jointly to the First Minister. However, she said any letter must also be addressed to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the Chancellor, Ms Reeves. Read more: Writing for The Herald, Ms Aitken said: 'The vast majority of the powers to be devolved are, indeed, in the gift of the Scottish Government – and I've made no secret of my view that they need to put more pace behind commitments to empower Scotland's city regions. 'However, the devolution of powers without funding would still leave city regions in all of our devolved nations without the economic tools available to our English counterparts.' Ms Aitken said that equivalent funding outlined for English regions has not resulted in any additional cash for Scotland, adding: 'Therefore, it is clear that the resourcing of any devolution deal remains the responsibility of the UK Government.' In his letter to the council leader, Mr Murray said: 'We are always open to constructive discussions with the Scottish Government to reverse its centralisation policy and devolve powers to our cities and regions.' The announcement from last month's spending review means that almost 40% of England's population will now have local control over the integrated settlement funding. London, the North East, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and Liverpool City region were added to the scheme, joining the original arrangements in Greater Manchester and West Midlands. In her response to Mr Murray, Ms Aitken said that leaders of the UK Core Cities have combined to urge the UK Government to provide 'parity' in funding for Glasgow, Cardiff, Belfast and Edinburgh. 'They agree that we are being disadvantaged and that the recent UK Spending Review was a missed opportunity to begin to address that inequity,' she said. The Scottish Government previously told The Herald it was looking at ways to devolve further powers to cities including Glasgow. But Secretary Shona Robison said the spending review 'short-changed' Scotland. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Councils play a crucial role in our communities which is why we jointly launched the Local Governance Review with COSLA to ensure communities have greater control and influence over decisions that affect them most. 'We are also committed to working with local authorities to deliver greater regional empowerment on decision making and investment and are working with partners to explore ways of devolving further powers to Regional Economic Partnerships, including Glasgow City Region. 'The Scottish Government has delivered a wide range of fiscal powers for local councils including greater powers within planning, parking charges, workplace parking and in Council Tax, being able to charge up to 100% on second and long term empty homes. In addition, the two-year local government pay offer, accepted by trade unions last week, will see all workers getting the pay they deserve over the summer.' A UK Government spokesperson said: "The UK government has delivered record funding for the Scottish government with an additional £9.1 billion in Barnett consequentials over the next four years, this includes an additional £380m as a result of plans for housing, communities and local government in England. "On top of this the UK Government is also investing £1.7 billion in local projects across Scotland. We are pleased Councillor Aitken recognises that the powers that need to be devolved to city regions sit with Holyrood, and the Secretary of State for Scotland is looking forward to working with her to reverse an agenda of centralisation of both power and funding which has unfortunately been a hallmark of recent Scottish Government policy."
