Beijing's growing influence, suppression of academic freedom in UK Universities: Report
Advt
A recent report published by UK-China Transparency (UKCT), which investigates transparency matters between the UK and China, has revealed systematic efforts by Beijing to inhibit academic freedom and influence the narrative concerning China within British universities, according to a report from Phayul.The publication, titled "Cold Crises: Academic Freedom and Interference in China Studies in the UK", claims that the Chinese government is employing students, scholars, and financial leverage to intimidate academics and limit discussions on sensitive subjects, thereby creating a culture of fear across UK campuses.Drawing on feedback from 50 scholars specialising in China studies throughout UK institutions, the findings depict a troubling scenario of surveillance, harassment, and self-censorship in academia. UKCT reports that Chinese students and academics are sometimes pressured through threats against family members back home to monitor their peers and report on politically sensitive conversations to Chinese authorities."We're observing you," one academic recounted being told by a visiting scholar from China, while others shared experiences of online harassment and intimidation, including notifications from Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials, as mentioned in the Phayul report.The report suggests that Chinese Students and Scholars Associations (CSSAs), present in most UK universities and connected to the CCP, act as "vectors for surveillance and repression", fostering a climate of fear, especially for students of Chinese descent.Beyond direct intimidation, the CCP is alleged to exploit financial dependencies to apply pressure on university administrations. Two-thirds of respondents indicated that the reliance on tuition from Chinese students affected how university leadership managed relations with Beijing. Certain institutions faced accusations of withholding funding for research considered politically sensitive, while others reportedly stifled critical scholarship to maintain financial connections or placate Chinese officials.Professor Gregory Lee, professor emeritus at the University of St Andrews, described the report as "the most significant" ever released on censorship and coercion in UK-based China studies. "By failing to act on these matters, we in the UK are complicit in the Chinese authorities' attempts to impose their idyllic depiction of China on the minds of students and non-students alike," Lee stated, as reported by Phayul.The publication of this report follows closely behind the introduction of new UK legislation that mandates universities to actively protect academic freedom and freedom of speech. This law also addresses foreign partnerships, such as those with Confucius Institutes, which may jeopardise ideological neutrality or impose constraints on teaching and research.The findings in the UKCT report resonate with broader apprehensions reflected in other nations, including Australia, Canada, Germany, and the United States, where previous documentation has indicated Chinese influence within academic institutions using similar tactics involving surveillance, visa control, and pressure on diaspora communities, as noted by Phayul.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
22 minutes ago
- India.com
China's Envoy Hits Out At Trump's Tariffs On India, Says ‘Give The Bully An Inch…'
New Delhi: Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong has criticised U.S. President Donald Trump's escalating tariff policies, including the recent imposition of 50% duties on Indian exports. His reaction came through a post on X, where he referenced an old proverb in pointed context. 'Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile,' Xu wrote, attaching a quote from recent discussions between China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Celso Amorim, chief advisor to Brazil's President Lula da Silva. The quote read, 'Using tariffs as a weapon to suppress other countries violates the UN Charter, undermines WTO rules and is both unpopular and unsustainable.' Give the bully an inch, he will take a mile. — Xu Feihong (@China_Amb_India) August 7, 2025 India had initially been in line to finalise a trade agreement with Trump's administration. Negotiators from both sides held five rounds of discussions. However, the process stalled due to disagreements. India was unwilling to open up its large farm and dairy markets. Talks also broke down over New Delhi's decision to continue importing oil from Russia. The Chinese ambassador's criticism comes at a moment when the U.S. president is considering further economic penalties. Trump warned that countries buying Russian oil may face additional tariffs. He made this remark during a recent press conference at the White House. 'It may happen, I don't know, I can't tell you yet. We did it with India and we are doing it probably with a couple of others. One of them could be China,' Trump said in response to a question about new trade restrictions. At present, India, China and Turkey remain the top three buyers of Russian crude. Trump has said new 'secondary tariffs' may be applied if the war in Ukraine does not end by Friday. Earlier this year, tensions rose between Washington and Beijing over trade measures. The United States had increased tariffs on several Chinese goods, reaching as high as 145 per cent. In response, China raised its tariffs but stopped at 125 per cent. Officials in Beijing explained that any further increase would lack economic sense. 'Even if the U.S. further raises tariffs to even higher levels, it would be economically meaningless and would ultimately become a laughingstock in the history of global economics,' a Chinese trade spokesperson had said at the time. Despite the current standoff, Trump has announced intentions to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year. According to the White House, the meeting aims to build the foundation for a new trade agreement between the world's two largest economies.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Says US Will Reap Billions From Tariff Blitz. But Who Pays The Bill?
US President Donald Trump says the United States will reap billions of dollars from his tariff blitz, but who pays the bill? Higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners kicked in Thursday, ranging between 15 per cent and 41 per cent. Here is a look at the effects of Trump's tariff onslaught: Higher prices for US consumers? The tariffs are paid by US-based companies to US customs when they import goods from abroad. US consumers could see a range of products become more expensive if companies choose to raise prices to offset the higher costs of importing goods. For instance, Japanese cars face a 15-per-cent tariff while made-in-Vietnam T-shirts now have a 20-per-cent duty. But companies have other options: they can absorb the higher cost, which would hit their bottom line, or they can try to negotiate lower prices with exporters. US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell estimated at the end of July that higher tariffs were beginning to be felt on certain goods. For example, the US toy company Hasbro, maker of the Monopoly board game and the owlish electronic toy Furby and which imports half of its products from China, began raising prices in May and June. Procter & Gamble, the maker of Tide laundry detergent and Pampers diapers, has projected a $1 billion hit from US tariffs over the next year and said it would institute limited price hikes in the United States. The tariffs are even more problematic for US economic sectors which don't have an option to switch to local suppliers, said Philippe Chalmin, emeritus professor at Paris-Dauphine University. The United States imports lots of copper, a key metal in electrical machinery and wiring, which Trump announced would face a 50 per cent tariff on August 1. "Half of what the United States needs is imported from Chile, and following the announcement, the price of copper on the US market rose 25 per cent compared with the global reference price," said Chalmin. In the end, however, the Trump administration backpedalled and applied the tariff only to semi-finished copper products such as pipes and wires. Loss of competitiveness The bill could also weigh on companies which depend heavily on exports, with the rising prices of their products in the United States leading to a loss of competitiveness. This is the concern for the European wine and spirits sector, which has yet to obtain an exception from US tariffs. Higher prices on Champagne or Chianti could easily push US consumers to grab a bottle of Californian wine. The impact "will be all the harsher" since, in addition to the tariffs, the value of the dollar has fallen, which further increases the price of the bottles on shelves in US shops, warned Gabriel Picard, president of the French Federation of Wine and Spirits Exporters. He estimated that this combined effect could result in a one-billion-euro loss for French producers. "There will be sectoral differences and even within the same sector, it will depend on the negotiating power" between the producer, the wholesaler, and the retailer, said Bruno de Moura Fernandes, head of macroeconomic research at Coface, a firm which provides insurance and financial services for exporters. However, he said that the effect will be especially significant for industries already facing difficulties remaining competitive against their American counterparts, notably in the chemicals and steel sectors. Thinning margins Some companies have already announced that they will cut into their profit margins to offset the effects of US tariffs. Automakers, among the first affected by US tariffs, have already seen sales and profits hit. German auto giant Volkswagen said last month that US tariffs had cost it 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) in the first half of the year as it reported falling profit. It now forecasts a profit margin for the year of between four and five per cent, down from 5.5 to 6.5 per cent previously, amounting to billions of euros for the group. US tariffs prompted Japanese auto giant Toyota -- the world's largest carmaker by sales-- to cut its annual net profit forecast by 14 per cent.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Fansi ghar' row: Panel to summon Kejriwal, Sisodia, former speaker
New Delhi: Stressing there was no 'fansi ghar' (gallows chamber) on Delhi assembly premises, speaker Vijender Gupta Thursday said the matter will be referred to the privileges committee for inquiry. "The committee will summon former CM Arvind Kejriwal , his deputy Manish Sisodia, the then assembly speaker Ram Niwas Goel and former deputy speaker Rakhi Birla," he said. Gupta had earlier told the House the structure, which was renovated and inaugurated in 2022 by then CM Kejriwal as a 'fansi ghar', was actually a 'tiffin ghar' as per records. On Wednesday, displaying a 1912 map of the assembly complex, he said there was no documentation or evidence indicating the space was used for executions. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi While giving directions on the matter on Thursday, Gupta reiterated his allegation that "falsehood" was spread in the name of 'fansi ghar' and history was "distorted". The speaker said he gave AAP time to present "concrete facts and documents" in support of their claims of the existence of the execution room, but they failed to do so. "The plaque bearing the names of Kejriwal and Sisodia outside fansi ghar will be removed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Female Athletes Right Now Undo The 1912 map depicting it as a tiffin room will also be displayed," he told the House. Gupta said when the previous Kejriwal govt announced there was an execution room, they revered it as a site of martyrdom. "After three days of discussion, and in the absence of any concrete evidence, documents provided by the National Archives, Indian Council of Historical Research, and IGNCA confirmed that no fansi ghar was ever constructed at the site," he said. "When we were in the opposition, we were led to believe there was an execution room here. We were also emotionally connected to the site," Gupta said. However, after becoming the speaker, he conducted thorough research and discovered that the structure in question was actually a tiffin ghar, which was "deeply upsetting", he added. "History was distorted and they (AAP) played with the feelings of people. This is all deceit. People won't forgive them for this," he said. Delhi environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said it was "highly condemnable" that a place where people would have consumed non-vegetarian food was called 'fansi ghar', where freedom fighters attained martyrdom. AAP had earlier accused BJP of trying to shield the British by saying that there was no execution room. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and s ilver prices in your area.
