Stock markets fall as trade relief fades, eyes on data and earnings
While Donald Trump's agreement with the European Union on Sunday was seen as better than a tariff standoff, observers pointed out that the US president's 15 percent levies -- with none on American goods -- were still much higher than before.
The pact, which followed a similar one with Japan last week, still left many worried about the economic consequences, with auto companies particularly worried.
"The 15 percent blanket levy on EU and Japanese imports may have helped markets sidestep a cliff, but it's no free pass," said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management.
"With the average effective US tariff rate now sitting at 18.2 percent... the barrier to global trade remains significant. The higher tail risk didn't detonate, but its potential impact on the global economy hasn't disappeared either."
And National Australia Bank's Ray Attrill added: "It hasn't taken long for markets to conclude that this relatively good news is still, in absolute terms, bad news as far as the near term (through 2025) implications for eurozone growth are concerned."
Traders are also keeping an eye on US talks with other major economies, including India and South Korea.
After a tepid day on Wall Street -- which still saw the S&P and Nasdaq hit records -- Asia turned negative.
Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Wellington, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta were all in the red.
The euro held its losses from Monday, having taken a hit from worries about the effects of the trade deal on the eurozone.
The first of two days of negotiations between top US and Chinese officials in Stockholm concluded Monday with no details released, though there are hopes they will agree to extend a 90-day truce that ends on August 12.
The two imposed triple-digit tariffs on each other earlier this year in a tit-for-tat escalation, but then walked them back under the temporary agreement reached in May.
Investors are also looking ahead to a busy few days that includes earnings from tech titans Apple, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon, as well as data on US economic growth and jobs creation.
That all comes as the Fed concludes its policy meeting amid increasing pressure from Trump to slash rates, even with inflation staying stubbornly high.
While it is expected to stand pat on borrowing costs, its post-meeting statement and comments from boss Jerome Powell will be pored over for clues about its plans for the second half of the year in light of the tariffs.
Oil prices extended Monday's rally after Trump shortened a deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine to August 7 or 9, following which he vowed to sanction countries buying its crude.
- Key figures at around 0230 GMT -
Tokyo - Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.9 percent at 40,623.32 (break)
Hong Kong - Hang Seng Index: DOWN 1.1 percent at 25,290.03
Shanghai - Composite: DOWN 0.1 percent at 3,595.46
Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1592 from $1.1597 on Monday
Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3354 from $1.3356
Dollar/yen: UP at 148.61 yen from 148.52 yen
Euro/pound: UP at 86.81 pence from 86.80 pence
West Texas Intermediate: FLAT at $66.72 per barrel
Brent North Sea Crude: UP 0.1 percent at $70.11 per barrel
New York - Dow: DOWN 0.1 percent at 44,837.56 (close)
London - FTSE 100: DOWN 0.4 percent at 9,081.44 (close)
dan/lb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PM Carney says trade talks with U.S. may not end by Aug. 1 deadline
WASHINGTON — Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Wednesday that Canada's negotiations with the United States might not conclude by Donald Trump's Aug. 1 deadline as the president added new trade measures that could further hinder some Canadian businesses. Carney said talks have been complex, comprehensive and constructive. He also said they are ongoing and cover "a broad variety of topics." "There are many areas for co-operation between Canada and the United States, including defence spending, security spending, investments, which is one of the reasons why we're having these broader discussions," Carney said at a news conference in Ottawa. Trump sent a letter to Carney threatening to impose 35 per cent tariffs if Canada doesn't make a trade deal by Friday. The White House has said those duties would not apply to goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, better known as CUSMA. The Canadian economy is also being slammed by Trump's Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump on Wednesday signed executive orders for 50 per cent tariffs on semi-finished copper products starting Friday. The president, however, didn't include imports of the refined metal in his order, leaving many in the Canadian copper industry feeling relieved. In a separate order, Trump suspended de minimis exemptions — which had allowed packages worth $800 or less to ship to the United States to avoid tariffs. As part of his reasoning for the change, Trump cited the flow of fentanyl into the United States. Canadian Federation of Independent Business President and CEO Dan Kelly said suspending the de minimis exemption "is bad news for many Canadian small businesses." The federation's data shows about one-third of small Canadian exporters used the exemption to ship to U.S. consumers duty free, Kelly said in a post on social media. Pascal Chan, the vice president of strategic policy and supply chains at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said it adds "another layer of uncertainty for Canadian businesses exporting to the U.S.," particularly small- and medium-sized businesses. "Any increase in compliance costs and delivery delays will only serve to compound the pressure on the cross-border supply chains that have long fuelled our shared economic prosperity," Chan said in a statement. The latest trade changes comes as countries around the world are set to face staggering tariffs when Trump's deadline to make deals passes. Trump announced a deal with South Korea Wednesday which will see the country slapped with a 15 per cent tariff. The president said South Korea "will give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as President. In apost on social media Trump said South Korea will also "purchase $100 Billion Dollars of LNG, or other Energy products." In a separate post the president also said he "concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves" but Trump didn't provide details of a tariff rate. Frameworks of deals have previously been announced for the European Union, Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom — with all nations facing some level of baseline tariff. Not all the details of the deals are clear but Trump has said countries can "buy down" the tariff rate and most agreements have come with announcements of billion-dollar investments. Trump on Wednesday also escalated his threats against Brazil — which will be hit a 50 per cent duty — and India — which will face a 25 per cent tariff, plus an additional import tax because of India purchases Russian oil. Trump has been dismissive of conversations with Canada, saying it is not a priority for his administration. The president said Wednesday that America's northern neighbour is a high-tariff nation, misrepresenting Canadian duties for agriculture imports. "They've been charging our farmers 200 per cent, 300 per cent, 400 per cent for years and nobody did anything about it," Trump told reporters. Carney met virtually with his cabinet earlier Wednesday for a meeting focused largely on the situation in the Middle East. Carney said Canada is seeking the best deal for Canadians and that negotiations will continue until that is achieved. He said Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, will remain in Washington with senior officials "in pursuit of that goal." — With files from Catherine Morrison This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
20 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Here's why women CEOs lead differently
Although there are now 55 female CEOs among the top 500 U.S. companies, female representation is still only 11%. A recent McKinsey & Co. article, The Inner Game of Women CEOs, explores how women who reach the top navigate the mental, emotional, and relational polarities of leadership. How do they maintain confidence and humility while asserting their bold vision and operational grit without self-erasure? Women often lead differently because they have to. Their leadership isn't just a matter of style or preference—it's survival. And that reality doesn't just shape how women show up as CEOs; it reshapes how they communicate, both internally and externally. Female leaders face a double bind Female leaders are consistently caught in what sociologists call the 'double bind.' They are penalized for being too assertive while also dismissed for not being assertive enough. According to McKinsey, women are more than twice as likely as men to be described as 'overly ambitious,' even as they are equally as likely to be described as lacking ambition. Similarly, a Textio report on job feedback shows women receive 22% more feedback on their personality than men and 30% more exaggerated feedback than men. The gap is even greater for BIPOC women. For a female CEO, communication is not just a leadership tool; it's a tightrope to walk. Every sentence, keynote, or town hall must project vision and conviction, but not aggression; authenticity, but not overexposure; strength, but not dominance. Sound familiar? Revisit America Ferrera's epic monologue in the Barbie movie. It's a balancing act few men are forced to consider, much less master. Visibility versus relatability In high-stakes leadership, communication isn't about charisma; it's about trust. Women CEOs often default to a relational, purpose-driven approach in their messaging, using 'we' more than 'I,' contextualizing decisions with values, and inviting dialogue over top-down decree. This isn't weakness. It's often a strategic choice to preempt bias and build credibility. But there's a risk. A too-collaborative tone can undercut authority in the eyes of boards or investors still primed for the Hero Archetype. On the other hand, an assertive female executive can be misinterpreted as cold or arrogant. This paradox means women CEOs must become highly intentional communicators, code-switching not just between audiences, but between their identities. Culture setting through language The best women CEOs use communication not just to lead, but to recalibrate expectations of what leadership looks and feels like. They narrate change. They humanize decisions. They model curiosity as a strength. And often, they do the extra work of 'translating' their leadership moves, explaining not just what decisions they made, but why. This transparency builds alignment and trust but also requires time and emotional labor that their male peers are rarely asked to invest. Internally, this may require women CEOs to spend time: Holding stakeholder briefings that address business outcomes and cultural implications. Articulating a clear vision with space for feedback and co-creation. Saying 'I don't have all the answers,' not as a sign of weakness, but as an indication of leadership maturity. Male CEOs are rarely expected to take these extra steps. Redefining the CEO voice Platforms like LinkedIn, Substack, and executive podcasts create room for women CEOs to tell their own stories on their own terms. This is crucial. While many still face biased gatekeeping in traditional media, digital platforms offer more nuance, depth, and control. We see the most effective women leaders using communications to: Elevate purpose over personal brand. Lean into values without becoming tokenized. Speak candidly about failure, ambiguity, or systemic change. Done right, this kind of external communication doesn't just enhance reputation; it redefines what executive presence looks like in the public arena. The Takeaway The leadership playbook is different for women than men because the expectations and penalties are different. The best women CEOs have developed an 'inner game' of resilience, clarity, and purpose, not because they wanted to, but because they had to. What the McKinsey article illuminates, and what we must continue to say out loud, is this: Women are not thriving despite their different approach, they're thriving because of it. And how they communicate—as translators, narrators, and meaning-makers—is central to their success. As more women take the helm, let's not ask them to conform to outdated norms. Let's rewrite the norms, starting with how we define strong leadership and how we choose to talk about it.
CNBC
21 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump announces trade deal with South Korea, setting tariffs at 15%
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced that Washington had reached a "Full and Complete" trade deal with Seoul, setting blanket tariffs on the country's exports to U.S. at 15%. Trump also said in a post on social media platform Truth Social that South Korea will "will give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as President." South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung said in a Facebook post that his country had concluded the tariff negotiations with the United States after "gathering diverse opinions and refining our strategies," according to a Google translation of his statement in Korean. Lee said the $350 billion fund "will play a role in facilitating the active entry of Korean companies into the US market in industries where we have strengths, such as shipbuilding, semiconductors, secondary batteries, biotechnology, and energy."
