logo
July 4th cookout costs sizzle with tariff pressures

July 4th cookout costs sizzle with tariff pressures

Axios6 hours ago
Tariffs and trade tensions are pushing up the cost of summer cookouts, including Independence Day barbecues, Democratic lawmakers warn.
Why it matters: Cookout costs increased 12.7% since President Trump announced the "Liberation Day" tariffs, analysis by the Joint Economic Committee's minority arm found.
By the numbers: Ground beef and ice cream hit their highest prices on record since the 1980s, the analysis found citing Consumer Price Index data.
Miller Lite and Coors Light six-packs are up more than 13% at Walmart since Liberation Day and through June 26, per the report.
Imported beer prices also rose with Peroni increasing 10.5% and Modelo Especial 9.5%.
Cookout essentials like aluminum foil, grill tools, and sunscreen saw hikes between 6% and 18%.
Yes, but: Different analysis yield different results, while also looking at varying items.
The Rabobank Barbecue Index found the 10-person barbecue cost 4.21% more than last year.
The America Farm Bureau's annual survey found cookout staples for a 10-person meal declined less than 1% from last year's record high but are 19% higher than five years ago.
Wells Fargo Fourth of July report estimates a 2.2% increase over last year for the holiday cookout.
The intrigue: 32% of Americans are swapping barbecue for pizza this Fourth of July, according to Empower's survey of 2,200 people.
68% of those surveyed said barbecues are noticeably more expensive to host this year with 55% noting tariffs are making holiday celebrations more expensive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial
Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota lawmaker shootings suspect tells judge he's ‘looking forward' to facts coming out at trial

Vance Boelter, the suspected shooter of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses, told the judge during a court hearing Thursday he's 'looking forward' to the facts coming out at trial. Boelter, 57, is facing both state and federal charges related to the deadly shootings of Democratic State House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, and her husband Mark, on June 14. He's also been charged over the shootings of Democratic State Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who both survived the attack. Boelter is yet to enter a plea. During the federal court hearing, Boelter waived his right to a detention hearing, where prosecutors provide evidence supporting the suspect's charges, and told the judge he was 'looking forward to court,' where the truth would come out, The New York Times reported. Boelter said this included events related to 'what happened before the 14th,' seemingly referring to the date of the shootings. During the hearing, the judge ordered Boelter to remain in jail while awaiting trial. At his last hearing in late June, a sleep-deprived Boelter complained to a judge over the treatment he had received at the Sherberne County Jail. Boelter's lawyer, Manvir Atwal, said her client had been placed on suicide watch and was living in a cell with only a mat and a pillow. She also claimed the lights were kept on all day and night and another inmate in Boelter's unit had been spreading feces on the wall. Boelter told the judge he hadn't slept for 12 or 14 days and he'd 'appreciate' delaying proceedings, 'So I can get some sleep.' The judge agreed and postponed the hearing until Thursday. The suspect said in court Thursday the lights were still being kept on 24/7, and it has made it difficult to 'know if it's day or night,' the NYT reported. Sherburne County Sheriff Joel Brott called Boelter's complaints 'absurd' in a statement made after the suspect's June 27 hearing. "He is not in a hotel. He's in jail, where a person belongs when they commit the heinous crimes he is accused of committing,' the sheriff said. 'Lights are on 24-7, and need to be so correctional officers doing welfare checks can see that the inmates are okay.' Federal prosecutors say Boelter disguised himself as a police officer to carry out the attacks, which occurred at the lawmakers' Minneapolis-area homes in the early morning hours. Boelter was arrested near his rural Minnesota home after a two-day manhunt. Authorities called the shootings 'politically-motivated.' Prosecutors say handwritten notes were found in Boelter's car with the names of dozens of Minnesota state and federal elected officials which included some of their home addresses. Boelter's wife, Jenny, said in a statement through her lawyer late last month she and her family are 'appalled and horrified' by the shootings. "We are absolutely shocked, heartbroken and completely blindsided,' she said. 'This violence does not at all align with our beliefs as a family. It is a betrayal of everything we hold true as tenets of our Christian faith.'

Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit
Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit

Slate Auto, the electric vehicle startup backed by Jeff Bezos, has stopped promoting that its upcoming pickup truck will start 'under $20,000' following passage of President Trump's tax cut bill. The bill, which is expected to be signed into law by Trump on July 4, will cause the federal EV tax credit to end in September — a $7,500 incentive that Slate had counted on to help its all-electric pickup clear that mark. When Slate came out of stealth mode in April, the startup heavily promoted that its all-electric pickup would start at 'under $20,000' with the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. That language was still on Slate's website as recently as yesterday according to the Web Archive. The change is a potential blow to the young company's attempt to make a radically affordable electric vehicle. Slate didn't provide a precise price for the EV at its launch event; and it has yet to say what the actual starting price of its vehicle will be, sans-credit. A Slate spokesperson declined to comment on the change. The company won't start building the truck until the end of 2026 at the earliest. Slate's business is also built around making this vehicle highly customizable, which means it's possible that few people will buy the base model to begin with. The sub-$20,000 price had been a big attraction point for the brand new company's product, and it was a major focus following its April launch event. The auto industry has 'driven prices to a place that most Americans simply can't afford,' chief commercial officer Jeremy Snyder said during the event. 'But we're here to change that.' 'We are building the affordable vehicle that has long been promised but never been delivered,' CEO Chris Barman added at the time. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) and President Donald Trump, speak to members of the media as they depart a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images The passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on Thursday was a moment when President Donald Trump's hold on the Republican Party was tested — and he won. GOP holdouts objected to the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt and the cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs. But in the end, Trump was able to browbeat Republicans into supporting his costly plans to fund long-term tax cuts for the wealthy, more deportations of immigrants and boosting defense spending. Trump's victory further strengthens his power in Washington and clears the way for him to take even more aggressive actions on immigration, trade policy and depart from American tradition to hammer the chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates, a move that could give the U.S. economy a sugar high of cheap cash. Read more: The Budget Bill's Big Consequences Trump's control over the GOP 'is as close to total as any President has ever had over his own political party,' says Whit Ayres, a long-time Republican pollster. 'It gives him the support of his own legislative caucus for almost anything he wants to do.' Trump plans to sign the bill into law on Friday at 5 p.m. as B-2 bombers jet over the White House during a Fourth of July celebration for military families. 'We'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads,' Trump told reporters traveling with him on Air Force One on Thursday evening. In order to get the bill passed, some Republicans broke their promises not to cut Medicaid, other Republicans reneged on pledges to keep down the national debt. In the House, only two Republicans—Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania—ended up voting against Trump's bill. The bill narrowly passed the House 218-214 with all Democrats voting against it. Massie wrote on X that he voted 'no' because 'it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates.' The bill barely made it out of the Senate earlier in the week. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against Trump's bill forcing Vice President J.D. Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. Tillis said the Medicaid cuts would be devastating to his state, and, after bucking Trump, said he wouldn't run for reelection. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had argued against the cuts to Medicaid but ended up voting 'yes,' and Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a Republican, had criticized the bill for not cutting enough to offset adding trillions to the debt, but ended up voting for the bill. Read more: The GOP Budget Will Balloon the National Debt. Here's What Trump Could do to Fix it Now Trump is faced with the daunting task of selling the unpopular bill to the public. Only 29% of voters said they support the bill, according to a Quinnipiac University poll published on June 26, while 55% percent of voters said that they oppose the bill and 16% were unsure. The cuts to social safety net programs and the increase in the deficit could lead to political blowback that helps Democrats take back control of the House in the 2026 mid-term elections. The bill could be a political risk for Trump, says Ayres, if 'a whole lot of Trump supporters lose their health care and get angry about it.' Contact us at letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store