US judge blocks Defense Department from slashing federal research funding
BOSTON (Reuters) -A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked U.S. President Donald Trump's administration from carrying out steep cuts to federal research funding provided to universities by the U.S. Department of Defense.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston issued a temporary restraining order at the behest of 12 schools including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Johns Hopkins University, as well as the Association of American Universities and two other academic trade groups.
Those schools sued on Monday to challenge a policy the Defense Department recently adopted to cap reimbursement for indirect research costs at 15%, an action that mirrored funding cuts announced by the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Energy that judges in Boston have also blocked.
The funding cuts are part of the Trump administration's wide-ranging efforts to slash government spending. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a May 14 memo said the new policy would save his department up to $900 million annually.
Indirect costs are often used to fund facilities, equipment and research staff that provide value across multiple research projects, rather than being tied to a single project.
The universities in their lawsuit argue that the 15% cap on reimbursement rates for those indirect costs flouted the regulatory regime governing them and Congress' express directives.
Murphy, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, scheduled a July 2 hearing to consider issuing a longer-term preliminary injunction. The administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
6th Republican-led state sends National Guard troops to DC
The number of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., increased again on Tuesday as a sixth Republican-led state sent some of its soldiers to the nation's capital as part of the president's activation to fight what he claims is rising crime in the city. Tennessee sent 160 troops to the nation's capital on Tuesday, bringing the total number of troops ordered to the city to 2,021. About 900 members, which include members of the military police, have actually mobilized as of Tuesday afternoon and many of those members are unarmed. Aside from members of the D.C. National Guard, five other states previously sent their military members to serve in Trump's mobilization: Louisiana, Ohio, South Carolina, West Virginia and Mississippi. Guard troops are now helping law enforcement at 10 Metro stations, in addition to keeping a small presence along the National Mall, according to officials in charge of the operation, which they are now calling "D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force." MORE: Sen. Van Hollen says an armed National Guard in DC would be 'troubling' Stations include L'Enfant Plaza, Gallery Place, Metro Center and Union Station. Officials previously said Guard personnel are not arresting people, only helping to detain individuals briefly if necessary before handing them off to law enforcement. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced later in the day there have been a total of 465 arrests since Trump launched federal law enforcement in Washington on Aug. 7. There were 52 arrests Monday night, according to Leavitt. Information about potential charges from those arrests has not been revealed. "Four more homeless encampments were also removed during yesterday's reporting period. To date, a total of 48 homeless encampments have been cleared in Washington, D.C., by multi-agency teams," she added. When asked by a reporter how long residents in the city should expect the National Guard to remain deployed in the district, Levitt said that they don't have a "timeline" to share. ABC News' Anne Flaherty contributed to this report.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unfinished Business: Dickens Outlines His Vision for a Second Term
Tackling income inequality and building another 10,000 affordable housing units are two of Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens' goals for a second term in office. The 51-year-old Dickens outlined his vision for a second term on Tuesday after formally qualifying to put his name on the ballot in November. He told dozens of supporters gathered on the steps outside City Hall that Atlanta has housed hundreds of homeless people, built more than 11,000 affordable housing units, and hired more than 14,000 young people over the course of the past three-plus years, but the city still has a long way to go toward closing the gap between its haves and have-nots. 'We've got big plans to keep moving Atlanta forward,' Dickens told those in attendance on Tuesday. 'We're going to make Atlanta the best place to raise a family through affordable housing, food access, public safety, youth programs, and more.' Tuesday marks the start of the four-day qualifying period for municipal office candidates to be on the ballot in November, according to the office of Atlanta Municipal Clerk Corrine Lindo. Anyone running for mayor or a spot on Atlanta City Council has until Friday to file required paperwork and pay all necessary fees. Read More: Is a Second Andre Dickens Term Inevitable? Mayoral candidates must be at least 18 years of age and pay $6,081.90 to run. They also are required to live in the city for at least a year prior to filing to run for office. Lindo's office on Tuesday declined to confirm who has officially qualified for the city's mayoral race. A staffer said the final list of mayoral candidates won't be available until Friday. Blandtown resident Marcus D. Lamar, 2021 mayoral candidate Walter Reeves, and community advocate Eddie Meredith have declared their intentions to run against Dickens in November, along with consultant Helmut Domagalski. Rumored candidates include Larmetria Trammell and Kalema Jackson, according to the Center for Civic Innovation. Meredith said on Tuesday that he, too, has qualified to be on the ballot. The 39-year-old former pastor and community leader, originally from Oakland, California, has lived in Atlanta since 1993. He told Capital B Atlanta in July that he's running for mayor because, in his view, Dickens hasn't done enough to help the city's working class. Read More: Dickens Champions 'Cop City,' Crime Drop, and Housing Gains 'There's nobody that's out there that is advocating for the people,' Meredith said. 'A lot of residents are extremely vulnerable.' Beunca Gainor disagrees with Meredith's view on Dickens. The 36-year-old Bankhead resident was one of the more than 50 Dickens supporters who attended his Tuesday morning press conference. She said the mayor's affordable housing strikeforce has helped make a difference in the lives of Black Atlanta residents like her. She, her fiancé, and their five children recently moved into an affordable two-bedroom apartment in the city. 'You can't beat $850 in the city in 2025,' Gainor told Capital B Atlanta on Tuesday. 'If I needed to take a week of sick leave from my job, I won't be homeless, because I can actually afford my rent.' The post Unfinished Business: Dickens Outlines His Vision for a Second Term appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michigan House GOP seeks to expand whistleblower protection law, citing state employees concerns
Rep. Jay DeBoyer (R-Clay Township) announces legislation to expand Michigan's whistleblowers' protection act. Aug. 19, 2025 | Photo by Kyle Davidson/Michigan Advance Michigan Republicans on Tuesday announced a bill to expand protections for whistleblowers, telling reporters several state employees had declined to testify before the House Oversight Committee citing a fear of retribution. 'We have developed a common theme in our interaction with department employees, and it's simply this: Tell us about what's going on, share us information. And what we get consistently from those employees is, 'I will be happy to share information with you, but I will not come and testify, and I would prefer you don't use my name, because the retribution that may come back at me in our department could be swift and severe because of what we may be telling you,'' Committee Chair Jay DeBoyer (R-Clay Township) said. After reviewing the state's current whistleblower protection law, DeBoyer found it 'woefully inept' saying it provided 'exactly zero penalties, maybe a $500 fine if it is determined that an employer, a department head, a supervisor, has intimidated or harassed you because you have come forward and spoke the truth.' In response, DeBoyer's bill, which has yet to be introduced and given a bill number, would up the fine to $2,000, with the fine placed in the general fund. While the current law allows for the reinstatement of any employee who was terminated for speaking out against misconduct, DeBoyer's bill would allow them to receive up to three times the amount of back wages as well as full reinstatement of fringe benefits and seniority rights. 'If all you're going to get for coming forward and then being treated poorly is your job back, what's the motivation, right? You've been treated poorly, probably, possibly run through the ringer. Your reputation may have been damaged.…Obviously, getting their job back and the $2,000 fine puts a little more teeth into the bill,' DeBoyer said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
