Trump has long bedazzled his life – now he's refashioning the Oval and our democracy
Once upon a time,
George Washington
and
Thomas Jefferson
held a competition for the design of the house of our presidents. Well-established architects submitted proposals, but the winner was a young Irishman, James Hoban. He also supervised construction of part of the Capitol.
My dad, another Irishman, worked at the Capitol. And sometimes my mom and I would drive down and gaze at the White House and Capitol, so proud that an up-and-coming Irishman could have beaten out all the other architects to play such a central role in conjuring the seats of our new Republic.
I would think about that when I grew up to be a White House reporter, interviewing president
George HW Bush
in the Oval Office. The room where it happens was a place of wonder, baked in history – good and bad. A famous old ivy, which had lasted through so many administrations and eavesdropped on so many remarkable conversations, was the main item on the mantel, flanked by porcelain vases. (Now there are nine gold decorative objects and counting.)
READ MORE
Back then, the room was understated and overwhelming. As Michael Douglas's CEO said in The American President, showing off the Oval Office, 'The White House is the single greatest home court advantage in the modern world.'
Real power doesn't need to shout. In fact, it can whisper.
But
Donald Trump
was shouting down to reporters on Tuesday as he surveyed his desecration from the White House roof. He looked at his brutalist Rose Garden renovation, a stone slab with Florida-esque patio furniture and the site of the proposed $200 million ballroom, encroaching on the East Wing and encompassing 90,000sq ft, nearly twice the size of the White House residence.
President Donald Trump shouts answers to questions from reporters as he tours the roof of the West Wing of the White House. Photograph:Trump vowed to pay for the ballroom with private funds – which means, of course, that someone else will curry favour and pay.
Trump has long been a human wrecking ball, but now his chaos has splattered on to the usually serene White House. He's obsessively terraforming the place to be an extension of his attention-crazed id.
Ever since he escaped what he considered a drab existence in Queens, Trump has bedazzled his life; everything from tweezers to seat belts to TV remotes were gilt. Even as president, he's selling gold sneakers, gold watches and gold phones.
Now he has tarted up the Oval; it's the modern version of worshipping the golden calf and just as profane.
Trump's tacky rococo gold adornments are growing exponentially. He's piling on more and more garish features – from cherubs to mantelpiece swirls – and sycophants add to the gold rush by bringing offerings to truckle to King Midas.
[
CBS and other media outlets caving to Trump is sickening. At least South Park will still hold people accountable
Opens in new window
]
A grovelling Tim Cook came to the Oval on Wednesday with a gift for the president: a glass plaque with a 24-karat gold base.
Trump is trying to turn the people's house into a Saudi palace – 'dictator chic'. It is symbolic of this president: he's refashioning our democracy as an autocracy.
'In one year, we'll celebrate 250 years of independence from a mad king,' said political consultant David Axelrod. 'Would you not give anything to invite Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln back to comment on what they're seeing? It's blasphemous.'
Trump is making the justice department a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump Inc, turning the FBI into his personal, political police force, pursuing his foes with a Javert-like fever. Justice is investigating Letitia James and Adam Schiff, and another agency is investigating Jack Smith. After Democratic legislators left Texas to block Trump's gerrymandering power grab there, and after Trump said the FBI 'may have to' get involved, a Republican senator from Texas said the bureau agreed to help locate the lawmakers.
Trump sent his former lawyer, now deputy attorney general, to interview
Ghislaine Maxwell
, who was then summarily transferred to Club Fed amid whispers of a possible pardon. Brian Driscoll, who briefly served as acting head of the FBI, was dismissed because he tried to protect agents from Trump's purge of anyone involved in investigating the January 6th insurrection.
[
Maga fans turn on Trump as he turns murky over Epstein files
Opens in new window
]
This, even as Jared Wise, a rioter who egged on the mob that day to 'kill' the police, has been named an adviser to the justice department task force seeking vengeance against Trump's perceived political foes. Trump slapped Brazil with a 50 per cent tariff because the government is prosecuting his far-right buddy Jair Bolsonaro, known as 'the Trump of the tropics', for trying to overturn the election he lost.
The president's unbridled gilt reflects his unbridled greed.
King Midas of legend paid for his vanity. He was horrified that he could not control the golden touch. He turned his daughter, his food and his drink into gold. Aristotle said his 'vain prayer' led to starvation.
It is a lesson Trump will never learn: the flashiest is never the truest.
– This article originally appeared in
The New York Times
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
National guard deployed on streets of Washington after Trump takes control of city's police
The Washington , DC national guard began deploying on the city's streets overnight, a day after Donald Trump ordered their arrival and took control of the city's police force, calling Washington a 'lawless' city, despite official crime statistics saying otherwise. Defence officials said a small number of the roughly 800 national guard members planned for the mission had been mobilised, with more expected to arrive in the coming days. About 850 officers and agents took part in a 'massive law enforcement surge' across Washington on Monday night and made nearly two dozen arrests, the White House has said. The violent crime rate in the city is at a 30-year low. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday: 'As part of the president's massive law enforcement surge, last night approximately 850 officers and agents were surged across the city. They made a total of 23 arrests, including multiple other contacts.' READ MORE The arrests consisted of homicide, firearms offences, possession with intent to distribute narcotics, fare evasion, lewd acts and stalking, Leavitt added. 'A total of six illegal handguns were seized off of District of Columbia's streets as part of last night's effort.' [ Trump sends troops into Washington DC: distraction tactic or part of wider policy? Opens in new window ] Leavitt added: 'This is only the beginning. Over the course of the next month, the Trump administration will relentlessly pursue and arrest every violent criminal in the district who breaks the law, undermines public safety and endangers law-abiding Americans.' Earlier, Muriel Bowser, the mayor of Washington, DC, said she expected members of the national guard to be deployed on federal property in the US capital, including parks, monuments, federal buildings. Leavitt also told reporters that homeless people have the option be taken to a homeless shelter and offered addiction and/or mental health services. 'If they refuse, they will be susceptible to fines or to jail time. These are pre-existing laws that are already on the books. They have not been enforced,' she said. US president Donald Trump announces that he is assuming control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department and deploying the national guard in the city at the White House on Monday. Photograph: Doug Mills/The New York Times Trump's intervention has been widely condemned as an authoritarian power grab that undermines the autonomy of Washington's DC local government and seeks to distract attention from political problems such as the Jeffrey Epstein files. Bowser had earlier pledged to work 'side by side' with the federal government as national guard troops arrived at their headquarters in Washington. Speaking after a meeting with the attorney general, Pam Bondi, at the justice department, Bowser told reporters: 'I won't go into the details of our operational plan at this point but you will see the Metropolitan police department (MPD) working side by side with our federal partners in order to enforce the effort that we need around the city.' Bowser has cultivated a delicate working relationship with Trump since his return to power in January, avoiding direct confrontations when possible. On Tuesday, she struck a conciliatory note and said she would try to make the most of the extra resources to fight crime. 'What I'm focused on is the federal surge and how to make the most of the additional officer support that we have,' she said. 'We have the best in the business at MPD and chief Pamela Smith to lead that effort and to make sure that the men and women who are coming from federal law enforcement are being well used and that, if there is national guard here, that they're being well used and all in an effort to drive down crime. 'So, how we got here or what we think about the circumstances right now, we have more police and we want to make sure we're using them.' However, other Democratic mayors across the US have adopted a different tone, warning Trump against expanding his law-and-order power grab in other big cities. [ Trump has long bedazzled his life – now he's refashioning the Oval and our democracy Opens in new window ] Trump told reporters on Monday: 'We have other cities also that are bad,' citing the Democratic strongholds of Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. 'And then, of course, you have Baltimore and Oakland. You don't even mention them any more, they're so far gone.' Stephen Miller, an influential White House deputy chief of staff, stepped up the rhetoric on Tuesday, tweeting without evidence: 'Crime stats in big blue cities are fake. The real rates of crime, chaos & dysfunction are orders of magnitude higher. Everyone who lives in these areas knows this. They program their entire lives around it. Democrats are trying to unravel civilization. Pres Trump will save it.' Crime stats in big blue cities are fake. The real rates of crime, chaos & dysfunction are orders of magnitude higher. Everyone who lives in these areas knows this. They program their entire lives around it. Democrats are trying to unravel civilization. Pres Trump will save it. — Stephen Miller (@StephenM) All five cities named by Trump are run by black mayors. Most were outspoken in denouncing the president's move. Brandon Johnson, Chicago's mayor, said in a statement: 'Sending in the national guard would only serve to destabilise our city and undermine our public safety efforts.' Brandon Scott, the mayor of Baltimore, said: 'When it comes to public safety in Baltimore, he should turn off the rightwing propaganda and look at the facts. Baltimore is the safest it's been in over 50 years.' Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, where troops were sent earlier this month in a crackdown on protests, posted: 'Another experiment by the administration, another power grab from local government. This is performative. This is a stunt. It always has been and always will be.' Trump took command of the Washington, DC police department and deployed the national guard under laws and constitutional powers that give the federal government more sway over the capital than other cities. But Democrats raised concerns that Washington could be a blueprint for similar strong-arm tactics elsewhere. Christina Henderson, a Washington, DC council member, told CNN on Tuesday: 'I was listening to the president's press conference yesterday, and I think it should be concerning to all Americans that he talked about other cities. 'The District of Columbia, for decades, without statehood, has always been used as a Petri dish, where Congress or the federal government is trying out ideas here. So, I would hope that folks don't lose sight of what's happening in the district. And even if they don't live here, they fight hard with us.' California's governor, Gavin Newsom, warned that Trump 'will gaslight his way into militarising any city he wants in United States'. JB Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, said the president 'has absolutely no right and no legal ability to send troops into the city of Chicago, and so I reject that notion'. He added: 'You've seen that he doesn't follow the law. I have talked about the fact that the Nazis in Germany in the 30s tore down a constitutional republic in just 53 days. It does not take much, frankly, and we have a president who seems hell-bent on doing just that.' – Guardian
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
The Most Powerful Court in the World by Stuart Banner: More than US legal analysis, it's an excellent history
The Most Powerful Court in the World - A History of the Supreme Court of the United States Author : Stuart Banner ISBN-13 : 9780197780350 Publisher : OUP USA Guideline Price : £30.99 While the title of this book indicates a legal history of the United States supreme court , the book is far more than a jurisprudential analysis of the highest court in the United States. Banner, a law professor at the University of California, sets out to avoid the traditional legal history of the court and instead writes a trilateral history, a consideration of the court's decisions, the lives of its justices and an analysis of the relevant contemporaneous political and societal influences. Banner argues that it is not possible to consider the court in isolation and during periods of its history, the court was the driving force which directed the course of the United States. An example of this impactful influence can be seen in the 1803 decision of Marbury v Madison which has become legendary in the canon of constitutional jurisprudence in which the court recognised the judiciary's power of judicial review. READ MORE Dred Scott Banner notes that the decision of Chief Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott v Sandford (1857) is often cited as one of the most shameful opinions in the history of the court. In Dred Scott, the court ruled that people of African descent, whether enslaved or free, were not and could never be citizens of the United States and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court. Dred Scott would go on to play a significant role in hastening the onset of the American Civil War in 1861. During the Chief Justiceship of Earl Warren (1953-1969), the court ushered in the most liberal period of its history. During this period, the court determined seminal cases such as Brown v Board of Education (1954) which banned the segregation of public schools, Miranda v Arizona (1966) which ruled that the police must warn a person of their constitutional rights, before conducting an interrogation and New York Times Co. v Sullivan (1964) which ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the constitution limited the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. The author notes that the US supreme court is not apolitical. The court is exposed to politics in a number of different ways, including through the appointment of its justices. When a vacancy arises, the president nominates a candidate for appointment and the Senate confirms their appointment. Traditionally, Republican presidents have appointed conservative justices while Democratic presidents have appointed more liberally minded members of the bench. Roe v Wade Arguably the most controversial decision of the court in the past century concerned abortion rights. In Roe v Wade (1973) the court found that the US constitution protected the right to have an abortion before the point of foetal viability. Given the polarisation of views on social issues, there was an immediate call for the overturn of Roe. The US constitution, similar to other modern constitutions, can evolve over time and the court can revisit its earlier decisions if the make-up of its bench shifts and social norms evolve. Following a number of Republican appointed justices, the court now leans towards a conservative interpretation of the constitution. In 2022, the court was prepared to reconsider Roe in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization. In Dobbs, the court ruled that the constitution does not confer a right to abortion, thereby overruling the controversial decision in Roe. The decision in Dodds has caused a legal and social cataclysm in the United States. Arguably the most controversial decision of the court in the past century concerned abortion rights. Photograph: Getty Images Several States moved quickly to ban abortion, and the Roe/ Dodds line of case law is likely to reverberate in the United States for many years to come. The author brings the history of the court up to the present and considers a number of appeals to the court, brought by President Donald Trump, on various issues including the 2020 United States presidential election. Banner notes that Trump has a very poor success rate before the court. While this is certainly an enlightening history of the court, there are aspects of the court's history which are considered in a summary manner only. For example, the book concentrates on the liberal period of the Warren Court but pays little attention to the Watergate scandal and its political and legal fallout. That said, Banner, has authored an excellent, comprehensive and engaging one-volume history of, as the title enunciates, possibly the most powerful court in the world. Dr James Meighan is a practising lawyer and holds a PhD in constitutional history from the University of Limerick.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Trump extends China tariff truce for 90 days
US president Donald Trump has extended a pause of sky-high tariffs on Chinese goods for another 90 days, stabilising trade ties between the world's two largest economies. Mr Trump signed an order extending the truce to November 10th, deferring a tariff hike set for Tuesday. The de-escalation first took effect when the US and China agreed to reduce tit-for-tat tariff hikes and ease export restrictions on rare earth magnets and certain technologies. 'All other elements of the Agreement will remain the same,' Mr Trump said in a Truth Social post, suggesting no planned changes to US trade policy or to the terms of the arrangement. A fact sheet, posted by the White House, did not detail any modifications beyond the date extension. In a similar statement, China said it too would extend its own suspension for a further 90 days. READ MORE Negotiators from both sides reached a preliminary agreement to keep the deal last month in Sweden. Had the truce not been extended, US tariffs on Chinese goods would have jumped to at least 54 per cent starting after midnight in New York. The extension will ease worries of a renewed tariff war that threatens to choke off trade between the US and China. An escalation between Washington and Beijing earlier this year shook global financial markets. It will also give the countries more time to discuss other unresolved issues such as duties tied to fentanyl trafficking that Mr Trump has levied on Beijing, American concerns about Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil and disagreements around US business operations in China. The signing may clear the path for Mr Trump to visit China to meet with president Xi Jinping in late October, around the time of an international meeting in South Korea that the US leader is likely to attend. Speaking to reporters earlier on Monday, Mr Trump said 'we've been dealing very nicely with China'. Mr Trump earlier this year ratcheted up tariffs on Chinese goods, and Beijing responded in kind. US tariffs on Chinese imports ultimately reached 145 per cent, and China curbed access to magnets critical to US manufacturers. The two sides reached a 90-day truce in May, under which the US lowered its China duties to 30 per cent while Beijing reduced levies on US goods to 10 per cent and agreed to resume rare earth exports. Mr Trump's willingness to parlay with China has prompted concerns from national security hawks that he is unwilling to crack down on the US's biggest geopolitical rival. Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc reached deals with the Trump administration to secure export licenses by agreeing to pay 15 per cent of their revenues from certain Chinese artificial intelligence chip sales to the US government. Mr Trump earlier on Monday also signaled openness to separately allowing Nvidia to sell a scaled-back version of its most advanced AI chip to China, saying 'it's possible I'd make a deal'. —Bloomberg
